Factor VIII and Factor IX Activity Measurements for Hemophilia Diagnosis and Related Treatments.

Accurate measurement of clotting factors VIII (FVIII) or IX (FIX) is vital for comprehensive diagnosis and management of patients with hemophilia A or B. The one-stage activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)-based clotting assay is the most commonly used method worldwide for testing FVIII or FIX activities. Alternatively, FVIII and FIX chromogenic substrate assays, which assess the activation of factor X, are available in some specialized laboratories. The choice of reagent or methodology can strongly influence the resulting activity. Variation between one-stage FVIII or FIX activities has been reported in the measurement of some standard and extended half-life factor replacement therapies and gene therapy for hemophilia B using different aPTT reagents. Discrepancy between one-stage and chromogenic reagents has been demonstrated in some patients with mild hemophilia A or B, the measurement of some standard and extended half-life factor replacement therapies, and the transgene expression of hemophilia A and B patients who have received gene therapy. Finally, the measurement of bispecific antibody therapy in patients with hemophilia A has highlighted differences between chromogenic assays. It is imperative that hemostasis laboratories evaluate how suitable their routine assays are for the accurate measurement of the various hemophilia treatment therapies.

Laboratory issues in gene therapy and emicizumab.

The treatment options for the haemostatic disorders, haemophilia A and haemophilia B, have progressed rapidly over the last decade. The introduction of extended half-life recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) concentrates to replace these missing clotting factors highlighted discordance between one-stage activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)-based clotting factor assays and chromogenic factor assays with some products. This raised awareness of the importance of investigation of potential reagent or assay differences by pharmaceutical companies. In 2017, the FVIII mimetic, emicizumab, was approved as a prophylactic treatment for haemophilia A patients with anti-FVIII inhibitors. The mechanism of action of emicizumab causes interference with some commonly used haemostasis tests including the APTT and its associated one-stage APTT-based clotting assays. Chromogenic assays may also be affected but this is dependent on the particular constituents of the reagents. Chromogenic assays containing human factor IXa (FIXa) and factor X (FX) are sensitive to the presence of emicizumab but those containing bovine FIXa and FX are unaffected. Many haemostasis laboratories have been required to evaluate new assays to enable accurate monitoring of emicizumab in patient plasma. A number of gene therapy approaches have been trialled in both haemophilia A and haemophilia B but there are scant data published on the measurement of FVIII and FIX in these patients and whether there are discrepancies between reagents or assay methodologies.

Agreement between one stage and chromogenic assays in samples from patients receiving recombinant porcine FVIII (Obizur, Susoctocog-alfa).

INTRODUCTION: Recombinant porcine FVIII (rpFVIII) (Obizur, Susoctcog-alfa, Takeda, Japan) is licensed for the treatment of bleeding in acquired Haemophilia A (AHA). The summary of product characteristics state that monitoring should be by one stage assay (OSA) rather than chromogenic assay (CSA). CSA have been shown to underestimate activity when rpFVIII is added to plasma in vitro. METHODS: Samples from three AHA patients (n = 21) (pre- and post rpFVIII) were assessed using FVIII:C assays; OSA methods: Actin, Actin FS, Actin FSL and Pathromtin SL performed on CS5100i (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan); APTT-SP, SynthASil and SynthAFax performed on ACL TOP (Werfen, Barcelona, Spain). CSA methods on CS5100i: Siemens Chromogenic Assay, Biophen FVIII:C, Technochrom FVIII:C; on ACL TOP: Rox Factor VIII, Coamatic Factor VIII and CRYOcheck Factor VIII. RESULTS: OSA and CSA varied according to reagent used median OSA 61 IU/dL (range 41.5-81 IU/dL (ANOVA p < 0.0001)) median CSA 46.5 IU/dL (range of method specific medians 36.5-84 IU/dL (ANOVA p < 0.0001)). Amongst OSA, Actin FS was associated with the highest FVIII:C, APTT-SP was associated with the lowest. Variation in CSA results by different methods was also seen with highest FVIII:C levels obtained using the Technochrom FVIII:C and the lowest levels obtained with Siemens Assay. CONCLUSION: The relationship between OSA and CSA was not consistent between method or patient. Previously there has been reports of underestimation by CSA in in vitro spiked samples. Investigation into concentration of phospholipids in the APTT reagents may explain some of these variations.

Specific and global coagulation assays in the diagnosis of discrepant mild hemophilia A.

The activity of the factor VIII coagulation protein can be measured by three methods: a one or two-stage clotting assay and a chromogenic assay. The factor VIII activity of most individuals with mild hemophilia A is the same regardless of which method is employed. However, approximately 30% of patients show marked discrepancies in factor VIII activity measured with the different methods. The objective of this study was to investigate the incidence of assay discrepancy in our center, assess the impact of alternative reagents on factor VIII activity assays and determine the usefulness of global assays of hemostasis in mild hemophilia A. Factor VIII activity was measured in 84 individuals with mild hemophilia A using different reagents. Assay discrepancy was defined as a two-fold or greater difference between the results of the one-stage and two-stage clotting assays. Rotational thromboelastometry and calibrated automated thrombography were performed. Assay discrepancy was observed in 31% of individuals; 12% with lower activity in the two-stage assay and 19% with lower activity in the one-stage assay. The phenotype could not always be predicted from the individual's genotype. Chromogenic assays were shown to be a suitable alternative to the two-stage clotting assay. Thromboelastometry was found to have poor sensitivity in hemophilia. Calibrated automated thrombography supported the results obtained by the two-stage and chromogenic assays. The current international guidelines do not define the type of assay to be used in the diagnosis of mild hemophilia A and some patients could be misclassified as normal. In our study, 4% of patients would not have been diagnosed on the basis of the one-stage factor VIII assay. Laboratories should use both one stage and chromogenic (or two-stage) assays in the diagnosis of patients with possible hemophilia A.

The combination of emicizumab and recombinant factor VIII in plasma: Which assays can we use for accurate measurement?

INTRODUCTION: The bispecific antibody, emicizumab, is a prophylactic therapy used for the treatment of haemophilia A (HA). Patients may require additional replacement factor VIII (FVIII) to ensure adequate haemostasis. This study investigated the laboratory measurement of severe HA (SHA) plasma spiked with 36 combinations of emicizumab plus recombinant (r) FVIII concentrates. METHOD: FVIII assays were performed by one stage assay (OSA) using eight APTT reagents from three manufacturers and chromogenic assays (CSA) using seven kits. CSA kits comprised a range of bovine FX/FIXa, bovine FX/human FIXa or human FX/FIXa. Thrombin generation (TG) was assessed by CAT and ST-Genesia. RESULTS: Emicizumab-calibrated modified OSA and human FX CSA both overestimated rFVIII in the presence of emicizumab; median FVIII:C of up to 89% higher was observed in plasma spiked with both drugs compared to just rFVIII. In bovine FX CSA assays, there was a FVIII:C increase of up to 11% in plasmas spiked with both drugs compared to rFVIII alone. TG parameters were not all normalized by the presence of emicizumab however addition of rFVIII increased TG. ETP and peak thrombin were normalized at 50 µg/ml emicizumab using ST-Genesia but were still reduced at 75 µg/ml with CAT. Addition of rFVIII further normalized results. CONCLUSION: Modified OSA and human FX CSA could not distinguish between rFVIII or emicizumab. The presence of both emicizumab and rFVIII increased thrombin generation to normal levels compared to each drug alone. Bovine FX CSA can be used to accurately determine FVIII activity of rFVIII in plasma which also contains emicizumab.

How to assess parallelism in factor assays: coefficient of variation of results with different dilutions or slope ratio?

INTRODUCTION: Non-parallelism in factor assays can lead to incorrect factor activities. Parallelism can be assessed by calculating the coefficient of variation (CV) of results obtained on 3 dilutions of the same sample. Some authors have proposed that if there is <15% then the average activity is reportable. Some analysers use a slope ratio (SR) to calculate parallelism, with an acceptance range of approximately 0.9-1.1. METHODS: We evaluated CV and SR in one stage FII-FXII assays on Sysmex CS5100i using Innovin or Actin FS. Frozen normal and pathological plasmas, plasmas containing Direct Oral Anticoagulants, Direct Thrombin Inhibitors or Lupus Anticoagulant were analysed to assess possible non-parallelism. RESULTS: In plasmas with factor levels >25 IU/dl (plus no interfering substances) all CVs were < 15%. One sample (low factor activities 10-15 IU/dl), had CVs > 15% in FII, FVII and FXII assays only. SR outside of 0.9-1.1 were seen in FII and FXII assays at different levels of clotting factor including some within the normal range. Non-parallelism was detected more frequently with SR than CV for those with interfering substances. CONCLUSIONS: SR outside of 0.9-1.1 were seen in different levels of clotting factors, including samples which did not contain interfering substances. The target of 15% CV was a better discriminator than a SR for acceptance. When factor levels were reduced to around 10-15 IU/dl, a target 20 %CV was more appropriate than 15%. It might be appropriate for laboratories to assess locally whether their acceptance criteria need to be wider at low levels of clotting factors.

p.Tyr365Cys change in factor VIII: haemophilia A, but not as we know it.

Haemophilia A is caused by a reduction in clotting factor VIII (FVIII). FVIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) can be measured by three methods; the one-stage activated partial thromboplastin time-based clotting assay, the two-stage Xa generation-based clotting assay and the chromogenic Xa generation-based assay. The FVIII:C of most patients with haemophilia A are concordant regardless of the assay method employed. Up to a third of patients show assay discrepancy, usually with the two-stage and chromogenic assays being much lower than the one-stage assay. Very rarely, patients have been reported with lower one-stage compared to two-stage and chromogenic assays, but here we report that the mutation p.Tyr365Cys accounts for most of these patients and, at least in the UK, is not rare. We have identified this mutation in 23 different families. Affected male index individuals had a lower mean one-stage FVIII:C of 27 iu/dl compared to two-stage FVIII:C mean of 77 iu/dl. Affected individuals had minimal or absent bleeding symptoms and when these were present they were usually in patients with another co-inherited bleeding disorder. Affected individuals often had surgery without the need to correct the one-stage FVIII:C.

Calibrated automated thrombin generation and modified thromboelastometry in haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: Global coagulation tests may have a better relation with phenotype in haemophilia than traditional coagulation tests. These include the Calibrated Automated Thrombin generation assay (CAT) and modified thromboelastometry using low tissue factor triggering. Both have shown marked variability in thrombin generation and clot formation profiles respectively despite similar FVIII:C levels and have been suggested as means to monitor treatment. Data with modified thromboelastometry are largely limited to severe and moderate haemophiliacs. CAT measurements in haemophilia are generally performed at low TF concentrations (1 pM) because of a higher sensitivity for the intrinsic pathway at this concentration but is also sensitive for FVIII at higher concentrations (5 pM) and this has the advantage that inhibition of contact factor activation can be avoided. No formal comparison of both TF concentrations has been reported and the data on modified thromboelastometry in mild haemophilia are limited. METHODS: In this study we compared thrombin generation at 1 and 5 pM in 57 haemophilia patients without exposure to treatment and 41 patients after treatment. We also assessed the sensitivity of thromboelastometry for haemophilia A in 29 patients. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: We found that CAT discriminates well between normal individuals and haemophilia patients; also FVIII:C correlates well with the ETP/peak. We found no clear advantages of measurements at 1 compared to 5 pM but found increased variation over time at 1 pM. The sensitivity of modified thromboelastometry for haemophilia A was less than CAT with abnormal measurements largely limited to severe and moderate patients. Larger studies correlating both methods with clinical outcome are required.

A cost-effective approach to factor assay calibration using a truncated live calibration curve.

INTRODUCTION: The measurements of clotting factor activities are usually performed using a one-stage clotting assay (OSA) or chromogenic substrate assay (CSA). Advances in automated coagulation analysers have led to the utilization of stored calibration curves. There are sometimes substantial intervals between test calibration and analysis of samples. Variability in results can be influenced by calibrant and methodology. Several guidelines recommend calibration and patient samples be performed together in parallel; this incurs costs, but reliance on a stored calibration curve may lead to inaccuracy of results over time. METHODS: We evaluated inclusion of a live truncated (3 point) calibration curve using calibrator plasma alongside test samples and compared results calculated against the stored calibration curves and live truncated calibration to assess the impact on precision and accuracy. The feasibility of this was tested on two hospital sites in the UK; OSA and CSA were performed on Sysmex CS5100 using Actin FS, SynthASil, Innovin, Biophen chromogenic VIII and Rossix chromogenic IX. RESULTS: Results of two batches of IQC were compared for FII, FV, FVII, FX, FIX:C, FXI, FXII and OSA FVIII (FVIII:C1) and CSA FVIII:C (FVIII:CR) and FXI:C. By utilizing a live truncated calibration, precision improved with the most striking examples: FXII %CV 23.1% to 3.1% (site A) FXI 7.3% to 2.4% (site B). The improvement in other clotting factors was more modest. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that demonstrates that the use of a live truncated calibration curve will improve precision and accuracy.

Corn trypsin inhibitor in fluorogenic thrombin-generation measurements is only necessary at low tissue factor concentrations and influences the relationship between factor VIII coagulant activity and thrombogram parameters.

The fluorogenic calibrated automated thrombin-generation assay is influenced by contact pathway activation in platelet-rich and platelet-poor plasma. This influence lessens with increasing tissue factor (TF) concentrations and is inhibited by corn trypsin inhibitor (CTI). CTI is expensive and at what TF concentration its influence becomes irrelevant is unclear. Spiking of factor VIII (FVIII)-depleted plasma with FVIII, in samples without CTI, shows a plateau of thrombin generation at low normal FVIII levels. Given the association with thrombosis at high levels, a continuing increase in thrombin generation would be expected. We studied the effect of CTI on this relation by spiking experiments up to 4.8 IU/ml at 1 pmol/l TF and compared the influence of CTI at 1 and 5 pmol/l in platelet-poor plasma. CTI significantly influences thrombin generation in platelet-poor plasma at 1 pmol/l TF (difference of means for endogenous thrombin potential of 232.5 nmol/l per min, P<0.0001) and peak of 48 nmol/l (P<0.0001)) but not at 5 pmol/l. Spiking experiments without CTI confirm the hyperbolic relation between FVIII coagulant activity (FVIII:C) and endogenous thrombin potential with a plateau at 0.70-1.40 IU/ml. With CTI, a near-linear response up to 1.0 IU/ml was found with a plateau at 2.4-4.8 IU/ml. For peak thrombin, no plateau was reached with CTI. The present study confirms and extends previous data on CTI and the relationship between FVIII:C and thrombin generation. CTI is not necessary at 5 pmol/l TF, and thrombin generation remains dependent on FVIII:C up to 4.8 IU/ml at 1 pmol/l with CTI. Higher levels than previously thought may be needed to normalize thrombin generation.

Evaluation of a semi-automated von Willebrand factor multimer assay, the Hydragel 5 von Willebrand multimer, by two European Centers.

BACKGROUND: The phenotypic diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) is a multistep process with classification dependent on the quantification of von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimeric structure. VWF multimer analysis is a technically challenging, lengthy and non-standardised assay, usually performed in specialist laboratories. Recently, a new semi-automated multimer assay, the Hydragel 5 von Willebrand multimers (H5VWM) has become available. OBJECTIVES: This study, performed in two European centres, compared existing in-house multimer assays to the H5VWM in individuals with and without VWD. RESULTS: Overall agreement of 91.1% was observed in 74 individuals with normal VWF levels, 57 patients grouped as type 1 VWD, 33 type 2A, 16 type 2B, 28 type 2M, 11 type 2N. Patients tested following Desmopressin or VWF concentrate, with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and acquired von Willebrand syndrome were also evaluated. Many of the discrepancies between methods were in patients with genetic mutations linked to more than one type of VWD including p.R1374C/H and p.R1315C. Quantifiable multimer results were available within one working day. Densitometry improved the interpretation of the multimers with slight structural variations that were not apparent by visual inspection of the in-house method. CONCLUSIONS: 5VWM was a rapid, sensitive, standardised assay which used existing technology and could be included as an initial screen of VWF multimers in a VWD diagnostic algorithm in conjunction with traditional multimer analysis.

A rapid, automated VWF ristocetin cofactor activity assay improves reliability in the diagnosis of Von Willebrand disease.

INTRODUCTION: The effective diagnosis and monitoring of Von Willebrand Disease (VWD) requires an accurate assessment of ristocetin co-factor activity (VWF:RCo). Current methodologies include automated platelet aggregometry and manual visual agglutination both of which are laborious to perform and notoriously subject to a high degree of inter and intra assay variation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We have evaluated an automated VWF:RCo assay (BC Von Willebrand Reagent, Siemens, Marberg, Germany) for use on the Sysmex CS2100i analyser (Milton Keynes, UK) and retrospectively compared the results with an in-house manual visual agglutination assay and VWF antigen (Siemens) in normal subjects and in 53 patients with various types of VWD and 23 patients following VWF therapeutic treatment. RESULTS: The intra and interassay CV was improved with the automated assay (2.3% and 3.8% respectively) compared to 7% with the manual VWF:RCo assay. Good correlation was found between the two assays (r=0.91) in 53 patients with VWD. The mean manual VWF:RCo was 0.25IU/ml and mean automated VWF:RCo was 0.27IU/ml. A comparable increase in VWF:RCo following treatment, mostly with Desmopressin, was found in 13 patients with type 1 VWD (mean 3.9 fold increase with manual VWF:RCo and 3.1 fold with the automated VWF:RCo). In 13 patients with type 2 or 3 VWD following treatment mostly with concentrate , a higher increase was found with the automated VWF:RCo assay than the manual assay (mean 11.9 fold manually and mean 20.3 automated). CONCLUSION: The automated VWF:RCo assay shows enhanced precision and analysis time in this difficult and time consuming laboratory test and its introduction should greatly improve the reliability of VWF testing.