Local anesthetics systemic toxicity in children: analysis of the French pharmacovigilance database.

PURPOSE: To characterize clinical profile of pediatric local anesthetic (LA) systemic toxicity (LAST) and to identify determinants of life-threatening outcomes. METHODS: Spontaneous reports notified to the French Pharmacovigilance Network were retrieved and followed by a case-by-case review, according to the following criteria: LA as suspected drug, age < 18 years, adverse drug reactions related to nervous system, cardiac, respiratory, psychiatric or general disorders. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors leading to life-threatening reaction (i.e. continuous seizures or cardiorespiratory arrest). RESULTS: Among 512 cases retrieved, 64 LAST cases were included (neonates 11%, infants 30%, children 36%, adolescents 23%) mainly involving lidocaine (47%), lidocaine + prilocaine (22%) and ropivacaine (14%). Toxicity profiles were neurological (58%), cardiac (11%) or mixed (20%) and 7 patients (11%) developed methemoglobinemia. LAST was life-threatening for 23 patients (36%) and 2 patients died. Doses were above recommendations in 26 patients (41%) and were not different between life-threatening and non-life-threatening cases. The context of use (general and orthopedic surgery, p = 0.006) and the type of LA agent (lidocaine, p = 0.016) were independently associated with a life-threatening outcome. CONCLUSION: In this national retrospective analysis, LAST in children appear to be a rare event. Neurological and cardiac signs were the most frequently reported reactions. LAST in children can be life-threatening, even at therapeutic doses. Although a fatal outcome may anecdotally occur, the vast majority of patients recovered after appropriate medical care.

Respiratory paradoxical adverse drug reactions associated with acetylcysteine and carbocysteine systemic use in paediatric patients: a national survey.

OBJECTIVE: To report pediatric cases of paradoxical respiratory adverse drug reactions (ADRs) after exposure to oral mucolytic drugs (carbocysteine, acetylcysteine) that led to the withdrawal of licenses for these drugs for infants in France and then Italy. DESIGN: The study followed the recommendations of the European guidelines of pharmacovigilance for medicines used in the paediatric population. SETTING: Cases voluntarily reported by physicians from 1989 to 2008 were identified in the national French pharmacovigilance public database and in drug company databases. PATIENTS: The definition of paradoxical respiratory ADRs was based on the literature. Exposure to mucolytic drugs was arbitrarily defined as having received mucolytic drugs for at least 2 days (>200 mg) and at least until the day before the first signs of the suspected ADR. RESULTS: The non-exclusive paradoxical respiratory ADRs reported in 59 paediatric patients (median age 5 months, range 3 weeks to 34 months, 98% younger than 2 years old) were increased bronchorrhea or mucus vomiting (n = 27), worsening of respiratory distress during respiratory tract infection (n = 35), dyspnoea (n = 18), cough aggravation or prolongation (n = 11), and bronchospasm (n = 1). Fifty-one (86%) children required hospitalization or extended hospitalization because of the ADR; one patient died of pulmonary oedema after mucus vomiting. CONCLUSION: Parents, physicians, pharmacists, and drug regulatory agencies should know that the benefit risk ratio of mucolytic drugs is at least null and most probably negative in infants according to available evidence.