Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 189(2): 377-386, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34264439

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In LOTUS (NCT02162719), adding the oral AKT inhibitor ipatasertib to first-line paclitaxel for locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (aTNBC) improved progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint), with an enhanced effect in patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors (FoundationOne next-generation sequencing [NGS] assay). We report final overall survival (OS) results. METHODS: Eligible patients had measurable previously untreated aTNBC. Patients were stratified by prior (neo)adjuvant therapy, chemotherapy-free interval, and tumor immunohistochemistry PTEN status, and were randomized 1:1 to paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, 15) plus ipatasertib 400 mg or placebo (days 1-21) every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. OS (intent-to-treat [ITT], immunohistochemistry PTEN-low, and PI3K/AKT pathway-activated [NGS PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered] populations) was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 19.0 versus 16.0 months in the ipatasertib-paclitaxel versus placebo-paclitaxel arms, respectively. In the ITT population (n = 124), median OS was numerically longer with ipatasertib-paclitaxel than placebo-paclitaxel (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.50-1.28; median 25.8 vs 16.9 months, respectively; 1-year OS 83% vs 68%). Likewise, median OS favored ipatasertib-paclitaxel in the PTEN-low (n = 48; 23.1 vs 15.8 months; hazard ratio 0.83) and PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered (n = 42; 25.8 vs 22.1 months; hazard ratio 1.13) subgroups. The ipatasertib-paclitaxel safety profile was unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Final OS results show a numerical trend favoring ipatasertib-paclitaxel and median OS exceeding 2 years with ipatasertib-paclitaxel. Overall, results are consistent with the reported PFS benefit; interpretation within biomarker-defined subgroups is complicated by small sample sizes and TNBC heterogeneity.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Paclitaxel/efeitos adversos , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinases , Piperazinas , Pirimidinas , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Clin Cancer Res ; 2024 Jul 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39058425

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the randomized phase II LOTUS trial, combining ipatasertib with first-line paclitaxel for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) improved progression-free survival (PFS), particularly in patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors. We aimed to validate these findings in a biomarker-selected TNBC population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In Cohort A of the randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase III IPATunity130 trial, taxane-eligible patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered measurable advanced TNBC and no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease were randomized 2:1 to ipatasertib (400 mg, days 1-21) or placebo, both plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15), every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS. RESULTS: Between February 2018 and April 2020, 255 patients were randomized (168 to ipatasertib, 87 to placebo). At the primary analysis there was no significant difference between treatment arms in PFS (hazard ratio 1.02, 95% CI, 0.71-1.45; median 7.4 months with ipatasertib vs. 6.1 months with placebo). The final analysis showed no difference in overall survival between treatment arms (hazard ratio 1.08, 95% CI, 0.73-1.58; median 24.4 vs. 24.9 months, respectively). Ipatasertib was associated with more grade ≥3 diarrhea (9% vs. 2%) and adverse events leading to dose reduction (39% vs. 14%) but similar incidences of grade ≥3 adverse events (51% vs. 46%). Exploratory subgroup analyses by PAM50 and Burstein gene expression showed inconsistent results. CONCLUSIONS: Adding ipatasertib to paclitaxel did not improve efficacy in PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered advanced TNBC. Biomarkers for benefit from PI3K/AKT pathway inhibition in TNBC remain poorly understood.

3.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 35(12): 1324-1328, 2016 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27580058

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Valganciclovir (VGCV) effectively prevents cytomegalovirus disease in adult and pediatric solid organ transplant recipients. A dosing algorithm for VGCV for pediatric patients, based on body surface area and renal function, provides a personalized dose using age-appropriate formulations. The suitability of this dosing algorithm has not been assessed specifically in infants and neonates 4 months of age and younger receiving a solid organ transplant. METHODS: This multicenter prospective study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of VGCV oral solution in 17 heart transplant recipients 4 months of age and younger who received 2 doses of VGCV on consecutive days using the pediatric dosing algorithm. Plasma concentrations of ganciclovir (GCV) were analyzed at specified times up to 24 hours post VGCV administration. RESULTS: GCV concentration data were available from 16 patients. The combined data from this study and historic study datasets were used to establish a 2-compartment population PK model with first-order formation to describe the PK of GCV after oral VGCV administration in patients across all pediatric age ranges, including those younger than 4 months of age. Estimated mean area under the curve during the 0-24 hours dosing interval for these patients was 68.1 µg·h/mL. CONCLUSIONS: The pediatric dosing algorithm for VGCV (utilizing individuals' body surface area and renal function) provides systemic GCV exposures in patients younger than 4 months that are similar to those observed in older pediatric populations. The data indicate that this dosing algorithm is appropriate across the entire pediatric age range, including this youngest age group.


Assuntos
Antivirais , Ganciclovir/análogos & derivados , Transplante de Coração , Algoritmos , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Antivirais/farmacocinética , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Ganciclovir/administração & dosagem , Ganciclovir/efeitos adversos , Ganciclovir/farmacocinética , Ganciclovir/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Valganciclovir
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA