Subcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillators: indications and limitations.

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator is today an indisputable evidence-based treatment for cardiac sudden death both in primary and secondary prevention. However, trans-venous cardioverter defibrillator implantation still carries a not negligible risk of complications both acutely and during follow-up. Trans-venous endocardial lead is the weak link of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) technology being the source of most mechanical complications on vessels and heart structures and exposed to infection, malfunction and recalls. A totally subcutaneous defibrillation lead has recently been introduced in clinical practice. With the subcutaneous pulse generator forms a defibrillation system that leaves the vessels and the heart completely "untouched." Subcutaneous ICD has proven to be safe and effective in many clinical trials. Patients without pacing indications and at higher risk of complications from trans-venous lead implantation represent the perfect candidates to S-ICD technology. However, with technical improvement, it is reasonable to expect a further expansion of indications.

Left atrial thrombus and smoke resolution in patients with atrial fibrillation under chronic oral anticoagulation.

BACKGROUND: The study aimed to explore the resolution of left atrial and left atrial appendage (LAA) spontaneous echo-contrast or thrombus in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/AFL) under chronic oral anticoagulation (OAC). METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis of patients who underwent a transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) for an electrical cardioversion was conducted. RESULTS: Among 277 TOE performed, 73 cases (26%) of LAA echo-contrast or thrombus were detected, 53 patients with LAA/LA echo-contrast (19%) and 20 (7%) with a thrombus. All patients were under chronic anticoagulation with a VKA (65%) or with a NOAC (35%). The Echo-contrast Group maintained the same OAC strategy in 49 patients (93%). The Thrombus Group kept the same OAC strategy with a NOAC in 6 cases (30%) and changed the strategy in 14 patients (70%), titrating NOAC dose in 1 (5%) and the VKA dose in 4 (20%) and switching from NOAC to VKA in 5 (25%), from VKA to NOAC in 3 (15%), and from NOAC to NOAC in 1 (5%). Smoke resolution was observed in 4/40 cases (10%) of the smoke group and thrombus resolution in 8/15 (53%) of the thrombus group. Patients with thrombus resolution had a lower CHA2DS2-Vasc score (3.5 ± 2 vs 4 ± 1, p = 0.05), were more often under NOAC (37.5 vs 28%, p = 0.07), and had a longer anticoagulation time (7.5 vs 4 months, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION (S): Changing OAC strategy is associated with thrombus resolution in more than 50% of chronically anticoagulated patients.

Randomized comparison of sirolimus and paclitaxel drug-eluting stents for long lesions in the left anterior descending artery: an intravascular ultrasound study.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this work was to verify whether the superiority of the sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) in inhibiting neointimal hyperplasia could be demonstrated in complex coronary lesions. BACKGROUND: Both the SES (Cypher, Cordis, Miami Lakes, Florida) and the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) (Taxus, Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) have shown a marked reduction in neointimal hyperplasia compared with bare-metal stents. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is the best method to assess arterial response to stent deployment, but few IVUS data are available comparing complex lesions treated with SES or PES. METHODS: We prospectively randomized patients with complex lesions to SES or PES implantation. Intravascular ultrasound and quantitative angiography were performed post-procedure and at 9 months. Mean neointimal hyperplasia area (NIHA), percent of NIHA (NIHA%), mean peristent plaque area (PSPA), and percent of PSPA (PSPA%) were calculated. The primary end point was NIHA% at follow-up. Secondary end points included change in PSPA% and angiographic late luminal loss at follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients enrolled, 42 receiving the SES and 43 receiving the PES had adequate IVUS assessment. Vessel, plaque, and lumen areas were comparable at follow-up, but NIHA% was significantly lower with SES than PES (7.4 +/- 4.2% vs. 15.4 +/- 8.1%; p < 0.001). A significant reduction in PSPA% was observed with SES (-4 +/- 10% vs. 0 +/- 8%; p = 0.01). Late loss was significantly lower with SES (0.16 +/- 0.19 mm vs. 0.32 +/- 0.33 mm; p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The SES shows a significantly higher inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia compared with PES in complex lesions. However, both stents have excellent IVUS and angiographic results at 9 months. A significant reduction in peri-stent plaque is observed only with SES.