Barriers to recovery for medical professionals: Assessing financial support through a survey of Physician Health Programs.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is increasing focus on physician burnout, psychiatric problems, and substance use disorders. Costs of recovery for physicians enrolled in Physician Health Programs (PHPs) remain unexamined with little known regarding funding resources. We sought to elucidate perceived costs of recovery from impairing conditions and highlight resources for financial strain. METHODS: This survey study was distributed by the Federation of State Physician Health Organizations via e-mail to 50 PHPs in 2021. Questions assessed perceptions of costs and ability to pay for recommended evaluation, treatment, and monitoring. Questions also assessed limitation of engagement due to financial concerns, and availability of financial resources. RESULTS: Complete responses were received from 40 of 50 eligible PHPs. The majority (78%) of responding PHPs assessed ability to pay at initial intake evaluation. There is notable financial strain on physicians, particularly those earliest in training, to pay for services. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: PHPs are vital to physicians, especially physicians-in-training, as "safe haven programs." Methods to financially assist through PHPs included fee deferrals, sliding scale fees, and fee forgiveness. Health insurance, medical schools, and hospitals were able to provide additional assistance. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Because burnout, mental health, and substance use disorders are high stakes amongst physicians, it is critical that access to PHPs is available, destigmatized, and affordable. Our paper focuses specifically on the financial cost of recovery, the financial burden placed on PHP participants, a topic lacking in the literature, and highlights remedies and vulnerable populations.

Outcomes of a monitoring program for physicians with mental and behavioral health problems.

OBJECTIVE: Most states have programs that provide structured monitoring for physicians with substance use disorders (SUDs). In recent years, the Massachusetts Medical Society's Physician Health Services (PHS) program has used a similarly structured approach to monitor physicians with other mental and behavioral health (MBH) problems. The objective of this study was to determine the outcomes of the PHS monitoring programs for SUDs and MBH problems, compare their overall success rates, and identify correlates of success. METHOD: Data were extracted from the PHS administrative database for physicians presenting between January 1, 1993 and May 31, 2003. Variables included gender, age, specialty, type of monitoring contract (SUD vs MBH), and state licensing board involvement. Dates of contract openings and closings were used to categorize cases as successful completion, relapse, or other. RESULTS: Of 58 physicians with MBH contracts, 43 (74%) completed successfully, 7 (12%) relapsed, and 8 (14%) did not complete for other reasons. Of 120 total physicians with SUD contracts, 90 (75%) completed successfully, 10 (8%) relapsed, and 20 (17%) did not complete for other reasons. Successful completion of SUD contracts was significantly associated with licensing board involvement (84% vs 66%, p = 0.04). Survival analysis indicated that time to relapse was significantly shorter for women compared to men on both MBH and SUD contracts (log rank test for equality of survival distribution p < 0.001 for MBH and p = 0.001 for SUD). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that physicians with MBH problems can be monitored in a similar fashion as physicians with SUDs, and with similarly positive outcomes. However, greater attention should be given to services for women in physician health monitoring programs.

Effectiveness of a Unique Support Group for Physicians in a Physician Health Program.

State Physician Health Programs (PHPs) assess, support, and monitor physicians with mental, behavioral, medical, and substance abuse problems. Since their formation in the 1970s, PHPs have offered support groups following the 12-step model for recovery from substance use disorders (SUDs). However, few programs have developed support groups for physicians without SUDs. This study at the Massachusetts PHP (Physician Health Services Inc.) represents the first effort to survey physician attitudes concerning a unique support group that goes beyond classic addiction models. The group was initiated because of the observation that physicians with problems other than SUDs did not fit easily into the 12-step framework. It was hypothesized that such a group would be effective in helping participants control workplace stress, improve professional and personal relationships, and manage medical and psychiatric difficulties. With a response rate of 43% (85 respondents), the survey identified a strong overall impact of the Physician Health Services Inc. support group, identifying positive effects in all areas of personal and professional life: family and friends, wellness, professional relationships, and career. Respondents identified the role of the facilitator as particularly important, underscoring the facilitator's capacity to welcome participants, manage interactions, set limits, and maintain a supportive emotional tone. The implications for physician health extend from supporting a broader application of this model to using a skilled facilitator to manage groups intended to reduce the stress and burnout of present-day medical practice. The results encourage PHPs, hospitals, medical practices, and physician groups to consider implementing facilitated support groups as an additional tool for maintaining physician health.

Monitoring physician drug problems: attitudes of participants.

The objective of this study was to measure satisfaction with a physician alcohol/drug and behavioral health monitoring program. Participating physicians rated the program's effectiveness, staff professionalism, monitoring and advocacy, relapse services, and sensitivity to women's issues. Correlations between satisfaction and successful recovery, source of referral, and legal involvement were computed. Responders' (N = 87, 82% male) contracts were 82% alcohol/drug and 9% behavioral health; 76% first contracts (no relapse). Sources of referral were self (32.2%), a friend/colleague (31%), the state medical board (14.9%), a hospital chief (11.5%), or a family member (3.4%). Satisfaction was associated with no relapse (mean rank = 47.6 vs. 30.0, p = .005), but not with gender (p = .47), type of contract (p = .39), source of referral (p = .75-.05), or board involvement (p = .24). Participants' reactions to the PHS program were influenced more by positive clinical outcome than other factors.