The benefits and acceptability of virtual reality interventions for women with metastatic breast cancer in their homes; a pilot randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) report debilitating physical and psychological symptoms, including fatigue, anxiety, and pain, that greatly impact their quality of life. Immersive virtual reality (VR) has been proposed as an adjunctive pain therapy for patients with cancer, and evidence suggests it may also decrease symptoms of anxiety and depression. The purpose of this pilot study was to assess whether VR should be pursued as a feasible and acceptable adjunctive therapy to alleviate physical and psychological symptoms in women with MBC. METHODS: We conducted a pilot study testing the acceptability and efficacy of VR interventions with MBC patients to improve quality of life and to produce enduring decreases in fatigue, pain, depression, anxiety, and stress. Participants completed two different week-long VR experiences, reporting the prevalence of symptoms immediately before and after each study week, and 48 h later. Linear mixed models including fixed effects (VR intervention, counterbalancing order, and study week) and random effects (participant) were used to assess the effect of immersive VR on all outcome measures. RESULTS: Thirty-eight women with MBC completed the VR interventions and were included in analyses. Significant improvements post-intervention and/or 48 h later were demonstrated for quality of life, fatigue, pain, depression, anxiety, and stress. Across the entire study period, these differences met the criteria of a clinically important difference for quality of life, fatigue, depression, and stress. Participants reported feelings of relaxation and enjoyment and were highly likely to use the interventions gain. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that VR experiences offer enduring benefits to the physical and psychological well-being of women with MBC. VR interventions are a feasible and acceptable intervention that can be conducted in a patient's own home. Such interventions are worthy of future investigation as a novel approach to improving quality of life in a patient population that have often been overlooked. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospectively registered on 25th October 2019 with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ref: ACTRN12619001480178 ).

SHON expression predicts response and relapse risk of breast cancer patients after anthracycline-based combination chemotherapy or tamoxifen treatment.

BACKGROUND: SHON nuclear expression (SHON-Nuc+) was previously reported to predict clinical outcomes to tamoxifen therapy in ERα+ breast cancer (BC). Herein we determined if SHON expression detected by specific monoclonal antibodies could provide a more accurate prediction and serve as a biomarker for anthracycline-based combination chemotherapy (ACT). METHODS: SHON expression was determined by immunohistochemistry in the Nottingham early-stage-BC cohort (n = 1,650) who, if eligible, received adjuvant tamoxifen; the Nottingham ERα- early-stage-BC (n = 697) patients who received adjuvant ACT; and the Nottingham locally advanced-BC cohort who received pre-operative ACT with/without taxanes (Neo-ACT, n = 120) and if eligible, 5-year adjuvant tamoxifen treatment. Prognostic significance of SHON and its relationship with the clinical outcome of treatments were analysed. RESULTS: As previously reported, SHON-Nuc+ in high risk/ERα+ patients was significantly associated with a 48% death risk reduction after exclusive adjuvant tamoxifen treatment compared with SHON-Nuc- [HR (95% CI) = 0.52 (0.34-0.78), p = 0.002]. Meanwhile, in ERα- patients treated with adjuvant ACT, SHON cytoplasmic expression (SHON-Cyto+) was significantly associated with a 50% death risk reduction compared with SHON-Cyto- [HR (95% CI) = 0.50 (0.34-0.73), p = 0.0003]. Moreover, in patients received Neo-ACT, SHON-Nuc- or SHON-Cyto+ was associated with an increased pathological complete response (pCR) compared with SHON-Nuc+ [21 vs 4%; OR (95% CI) = 5.88 (1.28-27.03), p = 0.012], or SHON-Cyto- [20.5 vs. 4.5%; OR (95% CI) = 5.43 (1.18-25.03), p = 0.017], respectively. After receiving Neo-ACT, patients with SHON-Nuc+ had a significantly lower distant relapse risk compared to those with SHON-Nuc- [HR (95% CI) = 0.41 (0.19-0.87), p = 0.038], whereas SHON-Cyto+ patients had a significantly higher distant relapse risk compared to SHON-Cyto- patients [HR (95% CI) = 4.63 (1.05-20.39), p = 0.043]. Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that SHON-Cyto+ was independently associated with a higher risk of distant relapse after Neo-ACT and 5-year tamoxifen treatment [HR (95% CI) = 5.08 (1.13-44.52), p = 0.037]. The interaction term between ERα status and SHON-Nuc+ (p = 0.005), and between SHON-Nuc+ and tamoxifen therapy (p = 0.007), were both statistically significant. CONCLUSION: SHON-Nuce+ in tumours predicts response to tamoxifen in ERα+ BC while SHON-Cyto+ predicts response to ACT.

Predicting nonadherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy in women with early stage breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Failing to take endocrine therapy (ET) as prescribed (nonadherence) increases risk of morbidity and mortality from breast cancer recurrence. We explored predictors of nonadherence, including demographic, clinical, treatment, and personal factors, among women newly prescribed ET for early stage breast cancer. We also examined predictors of their thoughts about stopping treatment (TST). METHODS: A baseline survey prior to ET assessed demographics, illness beliefs, beliefs about medicines, fear of recurrence, symptoms, and negative affect. A follow-up survey at 3 months repeated these measures with additional questions about nonadherence and TST. Nonadherence and TST were analyzed using logistic and multiple regression, respectively. Patient record review provided clinical data. The baseline survey was completed by 125 women, with a 96% retention rate at follow-up. RESULTS: Thirty-six percent reported nonadherence, and 30% reported TST. Results of regression analyses showed that TST was most strongly associated with symptom severity at follow-up, whereas, lower coherence beliefs, and the absence of comorbid conditions were the strongest predictors of actual nonadherence. CONCLUSION: This is the first longitudinal study to examine concurrently the association of demographic, personal and treatment factors with nonadherence, and TST. Findings have potentially important clinical implications; interventions to improve adherence and reduce TST may need to target women's understanding of their diagnosis and treatment, illness beliefs, and symptoms prior to starting therapy.

Medical specialists' attitudes to prescribing biosimilars.

PURPOSE: Biosimilars are a cost-effective alternative to biologics that could improve patients' access to expensive biological medicines. Currently, there are little data on doctors' perceptions of biosimilars and in what situations they are comfortable prescribing biosimilars. In this study, we investigated medical specialists' perceptions of biosimilars and the factors associated with the acceptance of biosimilars. METHODS: A national sample of 110 of 327 medical specialists working in the areas of rheumatology, dermatology, gastroenterology, oncology and haematology completed an online questionnaire examining attitudes towards prescribing biosimilars, indication extrapolation and switching patients to a biosimilar. RESULTS: Most specialists held positive views of biosimilars, with between 54 and 74% confident in the safety, efficacy, manufacturing and pharmacovigilance of biosimilars. Seventy-one percent of specialists agreed that they would prescribe biosimilars for all or some conditions meeting relevant clinical criteria. Specialists were less confident about indication extrapolation and switching patients from an existing biologic. Acceptance of biosimilars was significantly associated with a lower perceived time to explain a biosimilar to a patient and lower number of weekly patient appointments. The most common situations that they would not prescribe a biosimilar was where there was a lack of clinical data supporting efficacy (32%), or evidence of adverse effects (17%). CONCLUSIONS: Medical specialists held generally positive attitudes towards biosimilars but were less confident in indication extrapolation and switching patients from a biologic. Providing clinicians with guidance on how to explain biosimilars to patients and written patient material may help overcome some of the barriers to the use of biosimilars. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Rationale and evidence for sunitinib in the treatment of malignant paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma.

CONTEXT: Paragangliomas are tumors that develop from extraadrenal chromaffin cells. Approximately 20% of paragangliomas are malignant, and surgical resection is considered the primary treatment when possible. The optimal systemic treatment for advanced disease is undefined, due in part to lack of effective agents. Here we report our experience suggesting that sunitinib is an effective agent in this malignancy. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Three patients with metastatic paraganglioma were treated with sunitinib at the Princess Margaret Hospital. Limited analyses of tumor tissue and germline DNA were available. INTERVENTION: Sunitinib at a standard dose (50 mg daily, 4 wk on, 2 wk off) was titrated to patient tolerance. RESULTS: One patient has achieved a near complete response, and two patients demonstrated partial responses. Two patients demonstrated germline defects suggesting a pseudo-hypoxic drive to the tumor whereas the third demonstrated immunohistochemical evidence of this phenomenon. CONCLUSIONS: Sunitinib appears to be an active agent in this malignancy based on this limited cohort, with an understandable mechanism of action similar to that described in other hypoxia-driven tumors. A single arm phase 2 trial is underway.

Changes in estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and Her-2/neu status with time: discordance rates between primary and metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Changes in the receptor profile between primary and metastatic breast cancer tissue have been suggested. The degree of hormone receptor discordance in archival paired pathological samples was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Archival data were collected on 100 patients for whom tissue from primary and metastatic sites was available. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and Her-2/neu status in the primary and metastasis were compared. RESULTS: The discordance rate for ER was 17.7% (2-sided p=0.0039) with 9.7% of tumours changing from ER-positive to ER-negative and 8.0% changing from ER-negative to ER-positive. The discordance rate for PR was 37.3% (2-sided p<0.0001), with all of these tumours changing from PR-positive to PR-negative. No significant discordance for Her-2/neu was found. CONCLUSIONS: This series suggests that significant discordance exists for hormone receptor status between primary and metastatic breast cancer samples. Loss of PR was particularly frequent.

Derivation of Breast Cancer Cell Lines Under Physiological (5%) Oxygen Concentrations.

Background: Most human breast cancer cell lines currently in use were developed and are cultured under ambient (21%) oxygen conditions. While this is convenient in practical terms, higher ambient oxygen could increase oxygen radical production, potentially modulating signaling pathways. We have derived and grown a series of four human breast cancer cell lines under 5% oxygen, and have compared their properties to those of established breast cancer lines growing under ambient oxygen. Methods: Cell lines were characterized in terms of appearance, cellular DNA content, mutation spectrum, hormone receptor status, pathway utilization and drug sensitivity. Results: Three of the four lines (NZBR1, NZBR2, and NZBR4) were triple negative (ER-, PR-, HER2-), with NZBR1 also over-expressing EGFR. NZBR3 was HER2+ and ER+ and also over-expressed EGFR. Cell lines grown in 5% oxygen showed increased expression of the hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) target gene carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9) and decreased levels of ROS. As determined by protein phosphorylation, NZBR1 showed low AKT pathway utilization while NZBR2 and NZBR4 showed low p70S6K and rpS6 pathway utilization. The lines were characterized for sensitivity to 7-hydroxytamoxifen, doxorubicin, paclitaxel, the PI3K inhibitor BEZ235 and the HER inhibitors lapatinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, and ARRY-380. In some cases they were compared to established breast cancer lines. Of particular note was the high sensitivity of NZBR3 to HER inhibitors. The spectrum of mutations in the NZBR lines was generally similar to that found in commonly used breast cancer cell lines but TP53 mutations were absent and mutations in EVI2B, LRP1B, and PMS2, which have not been reported in other breast cancer lines, were detected. The results suggest that the properties of cell lines developed under low oxygen conditions (5% O2) are similar to those of commonly used breast cancer cell lines. Although reduced ROS production and increased HIF-1 activity under 5% oxygen can potentially influence experimental outcomes, no difference in sensitivity to estrogen or doxorubicin was observed between cell lines cultured in 5 vs. 21% oxygen.

Systematic review of early and long-term outcome of liver resection for metastatic breast cancer: Is there a survival benefit?

BACKGROUND: Isolated liver metastases occur rarely in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The success of liver resection (LR) for other metastatic disease has led centres to explore the option of LR for patients with isolated breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM). A number of small series have been published in the literature, however the evidence is conflicting. This study aimed to systematically review the literature to determine the perioperative outcome and survival of patients undergoing LR for BCLM. METHODS: An electronic search of Medline and Embase databases was performed to identify all published series. Patient demographics, management, peri-operative outcome and overall survival (OS) were obtained. RESULTS: A total of 1705 articles were identified of which 531 included patients with non-colorectal and non-neuroendocrine metastases. 43 articles including 1686 patients, met all the inclusion and exclusion criteria. R0 resection was achieved in 83% (683/825). Morbidity and 30-day mortality rates were 20% (174/852) and 0.7% (6/918), respectively. The median OS was 36 months (12-58 months). The median 1-, 3-and 5-year OS were 90%, 56% and 37%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LR for BCLM can be carried out with acceptable peri-operative risks in selected patients with survival outcomes that appear to be superior to chemotherapy alone.

Discontinuing VEGF-targeted Therapy for Progression Versus Toxicity Affects Outcomes of Second-line Therapies in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: A significant subgroup of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients discontinue vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapies (VEGF-TT) because of toxicity. Whether clinical outcomes differ in patients who receive second-line (2L) targeted therapy on the basis of reason for discontinuation of first-line (1L) therapy is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients from 15 International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) centers who started 2L targeted therapy were included and the reason for discontinuation of 1L therapy retrospectively collected. Treatment outcomes of 2L, including response, time to treatment failure, and overall survival (OS) were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 1124 patients were identified: 866 patients (77%) discontinued 1L VEGF-TT because of disease progression, and 208 patients (19%) because of toxicity. The reason for discontinuation of 1L therapy did not differ according to IMDC risk group. Compared with patients who stopped 1L VEGF-TT because of disease progression, patients who stopped because of toxicity had greater clinical benefit (nonprogressive disease as best response) in 2L treatment (68% vs. 56%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-2.35; P = .023) and longer OS (17.4 vs. 11.2 months; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.84; P = .0002) adjusted for type of therapy, time to initiation of 2L treatment, IMDC risk group, and number of metastases at initiation of 2L treatment. CONCLUSION: mRCC patients who discontinue 1L VEGF-TT because of toxicity have better outcomes with 2L therapy than patients who stop therapy because of disease progression. These findings should be taken into consideration when designing clinical trials for 2L therapies in mRCC.

A durable complete remission between two isolated presentations of metastatic breast cancer, the second with intracardiac disease.

We report a case of a postmenopausal patient with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who, while receiving tamoxifen, experienced relapse with isolated ovarian metastases 4.5 years after her primary treatment. After resection of her pelvic disease, she commenced anastrozole, and while receiving this, remained disease free for an additional 7.5 years before experiencing relapse again with isolated metastatic disease in an unusual location: intracardiac disease causing superior vena cava obstruction.

Change in Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio in Response to Targeted Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma as a Prognosticator and Biomarker of Efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), if elevated, is associated with worse outcomes in several malignancies. OBJECTIVE: Investigation of NLR at baseline and during therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective analysis of 1199 patients from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC cohort) and 4350 patients from 12 prospective randomized trials (validation cohort). INTERVENTION: Targeted therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: NLR was examined at baseline and 6 (± 2) wk later. A landmark analysis at 8 wk was conducted to explore the prognostic value of relative NLR change on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate using Cox or logistic regression models, adjusted for variables in IMDC score and NLR values at baseline. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Higher NLR at baseline was associated with shorter OS and PFS (Hazard Ratios [HR] per 1 unit increase in log-transformed NLR = 1.69 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 1.46-1.95] and 1.30 [95% CI = 1.15-1.48], respectively). Compared with no change (decrease < 25% to increase < 25%, reference), increase NLR at Week 6 by 25-50% and > 75% was associated with poor OS (HR=1.55 [95% CI=1.10-2.18] and 2.31 [95% CI=1.64-3.25], respectively), poor PFS (HR=1.46 [95% CI=1.04-2.03], 1.76 [95% CI=1.23-2.52], respectively), and reduced objective response rate (odds ratios = 0.77 [95% CI=0.37-1.63] and 0.24 [95% CI=0.08-0.72], respectively). By contrast, a decrease of 25-50% was associated with improved outcomes. Findings were confirmed in the validation cohort. The study is limited by its retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with no change, early decline of NLR is associated with favorable outcomes, whereas an increase is associated with worse outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY: We found that the proportion of immune cells in the blood is of prognostic value, namely that a decrease of the proportion of neutrophils-to-lymphocytes is associated with more favorable outcomes while an increase had the opposite effect.

Clinical experience with sunitinib dose escalation in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

The oral multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib malate is a standard first-line therapy in clear-cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Sunitinib is usually administered daily for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks without treatment. Some patients experience worsening of disease symptoms during the treatment break. We report three cases of mRCC in whom continuous daily dosing and dose escalation were evaluated. In two cases, sunitinib was well tolerated at doses of 75 mg continuously and in all cases escalation of dose enabled regain of disease control. This suggests that continuous higher daily dosing of sunitinib is feasible and may provide additional clinical benefit for selected patients who experience minimal toxicity on the standard schedule.

Everolimus and zoledronic acid in patients with renal cell carcinoma with bone metastases: a randomized first-line phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are a major cause of morbidity. Post hoc analysis has suggested that bone turnover markers can identify patients at risk of skeletal-related events (SREs) among those receiving zoledronic acid. This study sought to evaluate the effect on bone metastases of everolimus alone compared with everolimus plus zoledronic acid. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty treatment-naive patients with RCC and ≥ 1 bone metastases were randomized 1:1 to everolimus (10 mg daily) versus everolimus plus zoledronic acid (4 mg intravenously 4-weekly). Bone-specific assessments were performed at baseline and at weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12. Treatment was continued on allocated arm until progression per RECIST 1.1 (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1). The primary outcome measure was urine N-telopeptide (uNTX) level, with secondary measures of plasma C-telopeptide (CTX), quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Pain [FACT-BP], Brief Pain Inventory [BPI]), progression-free survival (PFS), SREs, and safety. RESULTS: After 12 weeks, reduction in mean uNTX and CTX on everolimus plus zoledronic acid relative to everolimus was 68.4% (95% CI, 60.1%-74.9%; P < .0001) and 76.2% (95% CI, 67.3%-82.7%; P < .0001), respectively. There was no evidence of a difference for FACT-BP (P = .5), but evidence was favorable for BPI Severity (P = .05) and BPI Interference (P = .06). Median PFS was 7.5 months (95% CI, 3.4-11.2) on everolimus plus zoledronic acid and 5.4 months (95% CI, 3.2-6.3) on everolimus (P = .009). Median time to first SRE was 9.6 months (95% CI, 4.3-15.5) on everolimus plus zoledronic acid and 5.2 months (95% CI, 1.6-8.2) on everolimus (P = .03). CONCLUSION: In this RCC population, the addition of zoledronic acid to everolimus significantly reduced bone resorption markers and may prolong tumor control.

Characterizing the impact of lymph node metastases on the survival outcome for metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with targeted therapies.

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether lymph node metastases (LNM) and their localization negatively affect clinical outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinicopathological features, survival outcome, and treatment response in mRCC patients with LNM versus those without LNM after treatment with targeted therapies (TT). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients (n=2996) were first analyzed without consideration of lymph node (LN) localization or histologic subtype. Additional analyses (n=1536) were performed in subgroups of patients with supradiaphragmatic (SPD) LNM, subdiaphragmatic (SBD) LNM, and patients with LNM in both locations (SPD+/SBD+) without histologic considerations, and then separately in clear cell RCC (ccRCC) and non-clear cell RCC (nccRCC) patients, respectively. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and the secondary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: All patients with LNM had worse PFS (p=0.001) and OS (p<0.001) compared to those without LNM. Compared to patients without LNM (PFS 8.8 mo; OS 25.1 mo), any SBD LNM involvement was associated with worse PFS (SBD, 6.8 mo; p=0.003; SPD+/SBD+, 5.5 mo; p<0.001) and OS (SBD, 16.2 mo; p<0.001; SPD+/SBD+, 11.5 mo; p<0.001). Both SBD and SPD+/SBD+ LNM were retained as independent prognostic factors in multivariate analyses (MVA) for PFS (p=0.006 and p=0.022, respectively) and OS (both p<0.001), while SPD LNM was not an independent risk factor. Likewise, in ccRCC, SBD LNM (19.8 mo) and SPD+/SBD+ LNM (12.85 mo) patients had the worst OS. SPD+/SBD+ LNM (p=0.006) and SBD LNM (p=0.028) were independent prognostic factors for OS in MVA, while SPD LNM was not significant (p=0.301). The study is limited by its retrospective design and the lack of pathologic evaluation of LNM in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: The metastatic spread of RCC to SBD lymph nodes is associated with poor prognosis in mRCC patients treated with TT. PATIENT SUMMARY: The presence of lymph node metastases below the diaphragm is associated with shorter survival outcome when metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients are treated with targeted therapies. Clinical trials should evaluate whether surgical removal of regional lymph nodes at the time of nephrectomy may improve outcomes in high-risk RCC patients.

Analysis of molecular cytogenetic changes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the setting of everolimus treatment: a pilot project.

BACKGROUND: The mTOR inhibitors have improved outcomes for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) but the duration of benefit is variable. Currently there are no predictive biomarkers for preselecting patients who are more likely to benefit from these agents. We undertook an exploratory translational study evaluating molecular cytogenetic changes in the context of outcomes from treatment with everolimus. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten patients with clear cell mRCC treated with everolimus were enrolled. Pretreatment tissue specimens were analyzed for molecular cytogenetic changes using fluorescence in situ hybridization and progression-free survival (PFS) data were obtained. Gene probes chosen for this analysis were: Von Hippel Lindau, fragile histidine triad, fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1, FGFR3, PDGFß, PDGFRß, epidermal growth factor receptor, and myelocytomatosis viral oncogene. RESULTS: Median PFS was 8.75 months. Two patients with the longest PFS (28 months and 23 months) had gain of PDGFß and PDGFRß. This was also observed in 3 other patients who had a PFS of 11.5 months, 8 months, and 5.5 months, respectively. Cytogenetic evolution was observed between primary and metastatic specimens. CONCLUSION: PDGFß and PDGFRß gene status might be of relevance to everolimus therapy. Further research evaluating the utility of these potential biomarkers is required.

Small molecule targeted therapies for the second-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and indirect comparison of safety and efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and a good performance status typically receive an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) TKI (sunitinib or pazopanib) as initial therapy. Upon disease progression or intolerance, there are four orally administered agents approved in the second-line setting (including cytokine-refractory). However, head-to-head comparative trial data are limited. In this study, an indirect statistical comparison of safety and efficacy was undertaken between axitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib and everolimus in second-line therapy mRCC. METHODS: A systematic review of major databases was conducted from January 2005 to June 2013 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating at least one of the four agents in second-line mRCC. Bayesian mixed treatment comparison models were fitted to assess relative effectiveness on multiple endpoints such as objective response rates, dose-limiting grade III/IV toxicities, treatment discontinuations and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Four RCTs met the inclusion criteria. All four agents seem able to induce tumor shrinkage and to provide patients with a clinically meaningful PFS benefit. Axitinib was superior to pazopanib [hazard ratio (HR) 0.64; 95 % credible interval (95 % Crl) 0.42-0.96] and sorafenib (HR 0.70; 95 % Crl 0.57-0.87) in terms of PFS. However, axitinib was associated with an elevated risk of fatigue and to a lesser extent stomatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Keeping in mind the caveats associated with cross-trial statistical comparisons, axitinib provides superior PFS relative to pazopanib and sorafenib. Everolimus, an mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, is mechanistically distinct from the other agents and remains a useful option for patient's post-anti-VEGFR TKI failure.

Beliefs about medicine and illness are associated with fear of cancer recurrence in women taking adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Adjuvant endocrine therapy for early-stage breast cancer has greatly reduced the morbidity and mortality associated with breast cancer recurrence. Despite this, a significant proportion of women report fears of cancer recurrence. This study examined the associations between fear of cancer recurrence (FoR) and illness perceptions, medication beliefs, and treatment side effects in women taking adjuvant endocrine therapy following breast cancer. METHODS: A total of 153 post-menopausal women with early-stage breast cancer completed a postal survey. Analyses were conducted to examine the association between FoR and illness perceptions, medication beliefs, treatment side effects, demographic factors, and emotional distress and to identify which of these factors would be most strongly associated with FoR in a regression model. RESULTS: All illness perceptions (apart from personal control) were associated with FoR, as were patient beliefs about endocrine therapy. Although treatment side effects, being unemployed, and higher levels of anxiety and depression were associated with FoR, only illness perceptions (identity, treatment control, timeline, and emotional representation) and medication necessity beliefs were significantly correlated with FoR in the final model. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that, in addition to directly targeting FoR, it may be worthwhile to address the illness and medication beliefs supporting the fear. Additionally, helping women to differentiate everyday symptoms from those indicative of breast cancer may help to reduce fear of recurrence. STATEMENT OF CONTRIBUTION: What is already known on this subject? A significant proportion of women report fear of cancer recurrence following breast cancer. The literature shows that illness perceptions, side effects of treatment, and beliefs about medicines are related to fear of recurrence among cancer patients. However, because these variables have often been looked at in isolation, it is not clear whether some perceptions or cues are more likely to relate to fear of recurrence than others. What does this study add? This study shows illness perceptions and medication beliefs are strongly related to fears of cancer recurrence. The results point to ways in which the self-regulatory model of illness may be used to reduce patients' fear of recurrence. The study results show that women with higher fear of recurrence may be balancing a tension between believing that they need to take the medication to protect their future health alongside concerns that the treatment may not be working.

Renal cell carcinoma bone metastases: clinical advances.

Bone is a common site of metastatic spread in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) occurring in around one-third of patients enrolled in clinical trials evaluating modern systemic therapies for this disease. Until recently, limited systemic therapeutic options were available for advanced RCC. Nowadays, a quiver of agents have demonstrated activity, including compounds targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) axis and those targeting the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Despite a detailed biological understanding of how these drugs work, their effect on bony metastases is less clear. Data suggesting that bisphosphonates (namely zoledronic acid) benefit patients with bone metastases from advanced RCC was gathered prior to the targeted therapy era; therefore, there is some uncertainty about their role in patients on modern RCC therapies. This review summarizes the current targeted therapies registered for use in advanced RCC and postulates how some of them might affect the behavior of bone metastases. It also explores the data available on the role of bisphosphonates for bone metastases from RCC, describes methods of assessing response to therapy for bone metastases and delineates future expectations for the treatment of bone metastases from advanced RCC.