Hypertension in the Young Adult Trauma Population: Rethinking the Traditional "Incidentaloma".

BACKGROUND: Hypertension (HTN) is a treatable and preventable risk factor for cardiovascular disease that is often overlooked in young adults. As a result, young patients with HTN may enter the health care system as a trauma without a preexisting diagnosis. The potential impact of HTN (diagnosed and undiagnosed) on trauma outcomes is not known. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients aged 18-39 y from the 2013-2017 North Carolina Trauma Registry were included. Patients were stratified as having no HTN, previously diagnosed HTN (PD-HTN), or newly diagnosed HTN (ND-HTN) during a trauma admission. Multivariable logistic and linear regression compared inpatient outcomes between patients with and without HTN, as well as ND-HTN and PD-HTN. RESULTS: Six percent of trauma patients were diagnosed with HTN (n = 1906; 14% ND-HTN). Those with HTN were more likely to have an inpatient complication (odds ratio [OR]: 1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-2.07) and intensive care unit stay (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.12-1.46) compared with patients without HTN. Compared with PD-HTN, those with ND-HTN were more likely to present with extreme injury. In addition, patients with ND-HTN had higher odds of inpatient complications (OR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.18-3.22) and 30-d readmission (OR: 2.00, 95% CI: 0.95-4.20) after accounting for demographics and injury severity. CONCLUSIONS: More than 10% of young adult trauma patients with HTN are not diagnosed before admission. HTN appears to have a detrimental impact on patient outcomes, with newly diagnosed patients having the worst outcomes. Trauma may serve as an opportunity for the diagnosis and treatment of HTN in young adults. Future studies should assess the impact of intervention on trauma outcomes.

Cues to care: Chronic disease diagnosis in young adult trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Prevention of chronic disease necessitates early diagnosis and intervention. In young adults, a trauma admission may be an early contact with the health care system, representing an opportunity for screening and intervention. This study estimates the prevalence of previously diagnosed disease and undiagnosed disease (UD)-diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity, and alcohol and substance use-in a young adult trauma population. We determine factors associated with UD and examine outcomes in patients with UD. METHODS: This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of adult trauma patients 18 to 40 years old admitted to participating Level I trauma centers between January 2018 and December 2020. Three Level 1 trauma centers in a single state participated in the study. Trauma registry data and chart review were examined for evidence of previously diagnosed disease or UD. Patient demographics and outcomes were compared between cohorts. Multivariable regression modeling was performed to assess risk factors associated with any UD. RESULTS: The analysis included 6,307 admitted patients. Of these, 4,843 (76.8%) had evidence of at least 1 UD, most commonly hypertension and obesity. In multivariable models, factors most associated with risk of UD were age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-0.99), male sex (aOR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.25-1.63), and uninsured status (aOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.38-1.80). Only 24.5% of patients had evidence of a primary care provider (PCP), which was not associated with decreased odds of UD. Clinical outcomes were significantly associated with the presence of chronic disease. Of those with UD and no PCP, only 11.2% were given a referral at discharge. CONCLUSION: In the young adult trauma population, the UD burden is high, especially among patients with traditional sociodemographic risk factors and even in patients with a PCP. Because of short hospital stays in this population, the full impact of UD may not be visible during a trauma admission. Early chronic disease diagnosis in this population will require rigorous, standard screening measures initiated within trauma centers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Trends in Surgeon Burnout in the US and Canada: Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Burnout among surgeons is increasingly recognized as a crisis. However, little is known about changes in burnout prevalence over time. We evaluated temporal trends in burnout among surgeons and surgical trainees of all specialties in the US and Canada. STUDY DESIGN: We systematically reviewed MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO for studies assessing surgeon burnout from January 1981 through September 2021. Changes in dichotomized Maslach Burnout Inventory scores and mean subscale scores over time were assessed using multivariable random-effects meta-regression. RESULTS: Of 3,575 studies screened, 103 studies representing 63,587 individuals met inclusion criteria. Publication dates ranged from 1996 through 2021. Overall, 41% of surgeons met criteria for burnout. Trainees were more affected than attending surgeons (46% vs 36%, p = 0.012). Prevalence remained stable over the study period (-4.8% per decade, 95% CI -13.2% to 3.5%). Mean scores for emotional exhaustion declined and depersonalization declined over time (-4.1 per decade, 95% CI -7.4 to -0.8 and -1.4 per decade, 95% CI -3.0 to -0.2). Personal accomplishment scores remained unchanged. A high degree of heterogeneity was noted in all analyses despite adjustment for training status, specialty, practice setting, and study quality. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to popular perceptions, we found no evidence of rising surgeon burnout in published literature. Rather, emotional exhaustion and depersonalization may be decreasing. Nonetheless, burnout levels remain unacceptably high, indicating a need for meaningful interventions across training levels and specialties. Future research should be deliberately designed to support longitudinal integration through prospective meta-regression to facilitate monitoring of trends in surgeon burnout.

Navigating the Infinite Number of Educational Resources: The Development of a Publicly Available Surgical Educational Digital Resource Library.

OBJECTIVE: There has been an explosion of digital resources available for general surgical education and board preparation. This makes it difficult for a new learner, regardless of their training level, to determine which resources best fit their needs. The uncertainty surrounding resource selection due to the large number of options causes stress, anxiety, and inefficiency for surgical learners. Our objective was to develop a digital surgical educational resource library to assist with selection. DESIGN: A needs assessment via multi-center focus groups encompassing all levels of learners from various subspecialties and training levels (medical students, trainees, junior surgeons, and senior surgeons) was performed to determine what information is desired in a surgical resource library. We conducted follow-up interviews and surveys to learn which resources were most commonly used for studying throughout training. SETTING: Multi-institutional RESULTS: The initial needs assessment detailed requests for an expansive array of surgical resources characterized by media type and price. We identified 104 resources that met these criteria. There were 33 resources used by medical students, 37 by residents, 16 used specifically for surgical boards preparation, and 25 by attending surgeons. These resources were composed of textbooks, review books, question banks, audio resources, video resources, and review courses. The prices of the resources ranged from free to greater than 400 dollars. CONCLUSIONS: A digital resource library should be broad and must address needs that change along a learner's career. Changes and improvements are required not only to meet the changing needs of the learners, but also to ensure the library remains current with the ever-growing number of resources. We plan to incorporate reviews of the resources from those surveyed to help visitors of the online library determine which resources may best suit their needs. Development of a digital resource library may assist learners by helping them easily identify what is available and has been peer reviewed allowing them to determine what best meets their educational needs.

Practice Characteristics and Job Satisfaction of Private Practice and Academic Surgeons.

Importance: Private practice and academic surgery careers vary significantly in their daily routine, compensation schemes, and definition of productivity. Data are needed regarding the practice characteristics and job satisfaction of these career paths for surgeons and trainees to make informed career decisions and to identify modifiable factors that may be associated with the health of the surgical workforce. Objective: To obtain and compare the differences in practice characteristics and career satisfaction measures between academic and private practice surgeons. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional survey performed from June 4 to August 1, 2018, an online survey accommodating smartphone, tablet, and desktop formats was distributed by email to 25 748 surgeons who were actively practicing fellows of the American College of Surgeons; had completed a general surgery residency or categorical fellowship in plastic, cardiothoracic, or vascular surgery; and had an active email address on file. Main Outcomes and Measures: Demographic, training, and current practice characteristics were obtained, and satisfaction measures were measured on a 5-point Likert scale and compared by surgeon type. Nonresponse weights adjusted for respondent sex, age, and presence of subspecialty training between respondents and the total surveyed American College of Surgeons population. Results: There were 3807 responses (15% response rate) from surgeons: 1735 academic surgeons (1390 men [80%]; median age, 53 years [interquartile range (IQR), 44-61 years]) and 1464 private practice surgeons (1276 men [87%]; median age, 56 years [IQR, 48-62 years]); 589 surgeons who reported being neither an academic surgeon nor a private practice surgeon and 19 surgeons who did not respond to questions on their practice type were excluded. Academic surgeons reported working a median of 59 hours weekly (IQR, 38-65 hours) compared with 57 hours weekly (IQR, 45-65 hours) for private practice surgeons. Academic surgeons reported more weekly hours performing nonclinical work than did private practice surgeons (24 hours [IQR, 14-38 hours] vs 9 hours [IQR, 4-17 hours]; P < .001). Academic surgeons were more likely than private practice surgeons to be satisfied with their career as a surgeon (1448 of 1706 [85%] vs 1109 of 1420 [78%]; P < .001) and their financial compensation (997 of 1703 [59%] vs 546 of 1416 [39%]; P < .001). Academic surgeons were less likely than private practice surgeons to feel that competition with other surgeons is a threat to financial security (341 of 1705 [20%] vs 559 of 1422 [39%]; P < .001) and less likely to feel that malpractice experience has decreased job satisfaction (534 of 1703 [31%] vs 686 of 1413 [49%]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that, although overall surgeon satisfaction was high, academic surgeons reported higher career satisfaction on several measures when compared with private practice surgeons. Advocacy for private practice surgeons is important to encourage career longevity and sustain US surgeon workforce needs.

Development and Assessment of a Systematic Approach for Detecting Disparities in Surgical Access.

Importance: Although optimal access is accepted as the key to quality care, an accepted methodology to ascertain potential disparities in surgical access has not been defined. Objective: To develop a systematic approach to detect surgical access disparities. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used publicly available data from the Health Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database from 2016. Using the surgical rate observed in the 5 highest-ranked counties (HRCs), the expected surgical rate in the 5 lowest-ranked counties (LRCs) in North Carolina were calculated. Patients 18 years and older who underwent an inpatient general surgery procedure and patients who underwent emergency inpatient cholecystectomy, herniorrhaphy, or bariatric surgery in 2016 were included. Data were collected from January to December 2016, and data were analyzed from March to July 2020. Exposures: Health outcome county rank as defined by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportional surgical ratio (PSR), which was the disparity in surgical access defined as the observed number of surgical procedures in the 5 LRCs relative to the expected number of procedures using the 5 HRCs as the standardized reference population. Results: In 2016, approximately 1.9 million adults lived in the 5 HRCs, while approximately 246 854 lived in the 5 LRCs. A total of 28 924 inpatient general surgical procedures were performed, with 4521 being performed in those living in the 5 LRCs and 24 403 in those living in the 5 HRCs. The rate of general surgery in the 5 HRCs was 13.09 procedures per 1000 population. Using the 5 HRCs as the reference, the PSR for the 5 LRCs was 1.40 (95% CI, 1.35-1.44). For emergent/urgent cholecystectomy, the PSR for the 5 LRCs was 2.26 (95% CI, 2.02-2.51), and the PSR for emergent/urgent herniorrhaphy was 1.83 (95% CI, 1.33-2.45). Age-adjusted rate of obesity (body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared] greater than 30), on average, was 36.6% (SD, 3.4) in the 5 LRCs vs 25.4% (SD, 4.6) in the 5 HRCs (P = .002). The rate of bariatric surgery in the 5 HRCs was 33.07 per 10 000 population with obesity. For the 5 LRCs, the PSR was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.51-0.69). Conclusions and Relevance: The PSR is a systematic approach to define potential disparities in surgical access and should be useful for identifying, investigating, and monitoring interventions intended to mitigate disparities in surgical access that effects the health of vulnerable populations.

Associations Between Career Satisfaction, Personal Life Factors, and Work-Life Integration Practices Among US Surgeons by Gender.

Importance: Burnout among US surgeons is alarmingly high, particularly among women, and work-life integration conflicts contribute to career dissatisfaction. Objective: To evaluate associations between surgical career satisfaction and personal life factors such as time requirements for outside interests, household chores, and parenting responsibilities and to explore similarities and differences between men and women. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional survey study of practicing US surgeons was conducted between June 4 and August 1, 2018. The 257-item online survey was sent to 25 748 fellows of the American College of Surgeons. A 31-item subanalysis was performed from August 13 to November 4, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Degree of career satisfaction was measured on a 5-point Likert scale. Professional and personal life factors associated with career satisfaction were evaluated with gender-stratified multivariable proportional odds models. Results: Among 3807 respondents, 3166 self-identified as male (83%) and 639 (17%) as female. Fewer women reported career satisfaction (483 [77%] vs 2514 [82%]) and relatively more women reported problematic interruption of personal life owing to work (315 [50%] vs 1381 [45%]). A higher proportion of women reported being primarily responsible for meal preparation (282 [46%] vs 355 [12%]) and housekeeping (149 [24%] vs 161 [5%]). On multivariable analyses, factors independently associated with career satisfaction were generally similar between genders. Stronger collegial support of work-life integration efforts was significantly associated with higher career satisfaction for both genders (P < .001), although the odds ratio (OR) for women was higher than for men (OR, 4.52; 95% CI, 2.60-7.87 vs OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.88-3.21). For men and women, increasing age was significantly associated with higher career satisfaction (men: OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03-1.05; P < .001; women: OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06; P = .001), and insufficient time for family owing to work was associated with lower satisfaction (men: OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.90; P = 009; women: OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30-0.81; P = .006). For women only, there was a significant association between primary responsibility for at least 1 household chore and lower career satisfaction (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45-0.98; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, although women had relatively lower surgical career satisfaction than men, the associations between career satisfaction and personal life factors were largely similar. Collegial support of work-life integration efforts appeared to be the most influential factor, particularly for women. Optimization of work-life integration may not only decrease physician burnout but also promote gender equity in surgery.

Survey of the US Surgeon Workforce: Practice Characteristics, Job Satisfaction, and Reasons for Leaving Surgery.

BACKGROUND: An impending surgeon shortage looms in the US due to increasing demand and a stagnant number of surgeons entering practice. We sought to evaluate the state of our surgical workforce by exploring current practice patterns, job satisfaction, and reasons why surgeons consider leaving surgery. STUDY DESIGN: In 2018, a link to a detailed survey was distributed by email to Fellows of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) who actively practice in the US and have completed a general surgery residency or integrated cardiothoracic, vascular, or plastic surgery fellowship. Detailed questions regarding practice attributes, surgical training, professional choices, and career satisfaction were included. Nonresponse weights were adjusted for respondent sex, age, and presence of subspecialty training between respondents and the total surveyed ACS population. All estimates and analyses were weighted to account for potential nonresponse bias. RESULTS: There were 3,807 surgeons who responded (15% response rate). Overall, 81% reported career satisfaction and 80% would choose surgery over again. Twenty-six percent were considering leaving surgery within the next 2 years. Stratified by age groups 40 to 49, 50 to 59, and 60 to 69 years, the survey found that 9%, 17%, and 45% of respondents were considering leaving surgery within the next 2 years, respectively. Thirteen percent of surgeons less than 60 years old were considering leaving surgery, and only 49% of these surgeons reported career satisfaction. Among surgeons less than 60 years old who were considering leaving surgery, the top 3 reasons rated as very important were overall stress (79%), work time demands (77%), and personal time requirements (73%). CONCLUSIONS: Reported surgeon job satisfaction was high, but a surprising number of surgeons reported that they were considering leaving surgery. Work time requirements and lack of personal time are leading factors contributing to surgeons leaving practice.

Variation of surgery clerkship grades in US medical schools.

BACKGROUND: Despite efforts at standardization, evaluation and reporting of clerkships remains highly variable. This study reviews the current spectrum of surgical clerkship grading. METHODS: Data were reviewed for every medical school from which an application was received to a single surgery residency program in 2017 and were evaluated for core surgical clerkship grading systems, distributions, and components. Fischer's exact tests and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests were used for analysis. RESULTS: 133 (49 private) schools were evaluated. Geographic distribution:34 Northeast, 50 South, 31 Midwest and 18 West. 120 reported grading tiers, with public schools (95%) more likely than private (80%) to report this (p = 0.02). The number of grading categories ranged from 2 to 11; 90% with 3-5. Over 25% of the schools gave ≥40% of students the highest grade; median of 30% in the highest tier. CONCLUSIONS: Significant variation exists in core surgery clerkship grading between schools. Similarly, a sizeable difference exists in how grades are calculated and the reporting systems used. Standardizing grading schemes across medical schools would be beneficial.

Risks and Realities of Delayed Splenic Bleeding.

Delayed splenic bleeding (DSB) is a poorly understood complication of blunt splenic injury. Treatment for splenic bleeding may involve splenectomy, but angioembolization is becoming a widely used adjuvant for management. Using the North Carolina Trauma Registry, this study aimed to evaluate the incidence, mortality, and risk factors for DSB in North Carolina. Using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes, patients were stratified into two cohorts, those who underwent immediate splenectomy and those who were initially managed nonoperatively. DSB was then defined as splenectomy at greater than 24 hours after presentation. Of the 1688 patients included in the study, 269 patients (16%) underwent immediate splenectomy and 1419 (84%) were managed nonoperatively initially, with 32 (2%) having delayed splenectomy. Older age (≥30 years) was associated with increased odds of having delayed splenectomy (odds ratio 4.30; 95% confidence interval 1.08, 17.17; P = 0.04). Four per cent of patients managed nonoperatively and undergoing an angioembolization procedure eventually required splenectomy. Risk factors for DSB remain elusive. Splenic artery embolization may be used as an adjuvant to splenectomy for stable patients, but it is not always a definitive treatment, and patients may still require splenectomy.

Blunt small bowel perforation (SBP): An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter update 15 years later.

BACKGROUND: Previous work demonstrated diagnostic delays in blunt small bowel perforation (SBP) with increased mortality and inability of scans to reliably exclude the diagnosis. We conducted a follow-up multicenter study to determine if these challenges persist 15 years later. METHODS: We selected adult cases with blunt injury, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision or current procedural terminology (CPT) indicating small bowel surgery, no other major injury and at least one abdominal computed tomography (CT) within initial 6 hours. Controls had blunt trauma with abdominal CT but not SBP. After institutional review board approval, data from each center were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Data from 39 centers (from October 2013 to September 2015) showed 127,919 trauma admissions and 94,743 activations. Twenty-five centers were Level 1. Centers submitted 77 patients (mean age, 39; male, 68%; mean length of stay, 11.3 days) and 131 controls (mean age, 44; male, 64.9%; length of stay, 3.6 days). Small bowel perforation cases were 0.06% of admissions and 0.08% of activations. Mean time to surgery was 8.7 hours (median, 3.7 hours). Initial CT showed free air in 31 cases (43%) and none in controls. Initial CT was within normal in three cases (4.2%) and 84 controls (64%). Five cases had a second scan; two showed free air (one had an initial normal scan). One death occurred among the patients (mortality, 1.4%; and time to surgery, 16.9 hours). Regression analysis showed sex, abdominal tenderness, distention, peritonitis, bowel wall thickening, free fluid, and contrast extravasation were significantly associated with SBP. CONCLUSIONS: Blunt SBP remains relatively uncommon and continues to present a diagnostic challenge. Trauma centers have shortened time to surgery with decreased case mortality. Initial CT scans continue to miss a small number of cases with potentially serious consequences. We recommend (1) intraperitoneal abnormalities on CT scan should always evoke high suspicion and (2) strong consideration of additional diagnostic/therapeutic intervention by 8 hours after arrival in patients who continue to pose a clinical challenge. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Observational study, level III.

Comparison of private versus academic practice for general surgeons: a guide for medical students and residents.

BACKGROUND: Medical students and residents often make specialty and practice choices with limited exposure to aspects of professional and personal life in general surgery. The purpose of this study was to portray practice composition, career choices, professional experiences, job satisfaction, and personal life characteristics specific to practicing general surgeons in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: A 131-question survey was mailed to all female members (n = 1,076) and a random 2:1 sample of male members (n = 2,152) of the American College of Surgeons in three mailings between September 1998 and March 1999. Respondents who were not actively practicing general surgery in the United States and both trainees and surgeons who did not fit the definition of private or academic practice were excluded. Detailed questions regarding practice attributes, surgical training, professional choices, harassment, malpractice, career satisfaction, and personal life characteristics were included. Separate five-point Likert scales were designed to measure influences on career choices and satisfaction with professional and personal matters. Univariate analyses were used to analyze responses by surgeon age, gender, and practice type. RESULTS: A response rate of 57% resulted in 1,532 eligible responses. Significant differences between private and academic practice were noted in case composition, practice structure, and income potential; no major differences were seen in malpractice experience. Propensity for marriage and parenthood differed significantly between men and women surgeons. Overall career satisfaction was very high regardless of practice type. Some differences by surgeon gender in perceptions of equal career advancement opportunities and of professional isolation were noted. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers a comprehensive view of general surgery to enable more informed decisions among medical students and residents regarding specialty choice or practice opportunities.

Women in academic general surgery.

PURPOSE: To portray the professional experiences of men and women in academic general surgery with specific attention to factors associated with differing academic productivity and with leaving academia. METHOD: A 131-question survey was mailed to all female (1,076) and a random 2:1 sample of male (2,152) members of the American College of Surgeons in three mailings between September 1998 and March 1999. Detailed questions regarding academic rank, career aspirations, publication rate, grant funding, workload, harassment, income, marriage and parenthood were asked. A five-point Likert scale measured influences on career satisfaction. Responses from strictly academic and tenure-track surgeons were analyzed and interpreted by gender, age, and rank. RESULTS: Overall, 317 surgeons in academic practice (168 men, 149 women) responded, of which 150 were in tenure-track positions (86 men, 64 women). Men and women differed in academic rank, tenure status, career aspirations, and income. Women surgeons had published a median of ten articles compared with 25 articles for men (p <.001). Marriage or parenthood did not influence numbers of publications for women. Overall career satisfaction was high, but women reported feeling career advancement opportunities were not equally available to them as to their male colleagues and feeling isolation from surgical peers. Ten percent to 20% of surgeons considered leaving academia, with women assistant professors (29%) contemplating this most commonly. CONCLUSION: Addressing the differences between men and women academic general surgeons is critical in fostering career development and in recruiting competitive candidates of both sexes to general surgery.

Peering inside the clock: using success case method to determine how and why practice-based educational interventions succeed.

INTRODUCTION: No educational method or combination of methods will facilitate implementation of clinical practice guidelines in all clinical contexts. To develop an empirical basis for aligning methods to contexts, we need to move beyond "Does it work?" to also ask "What works for whom and under what conditions?" This study employed Success Case Method to understand how 3 performance improvement CME activities contributed to implementation of tobacco cessation practice guidelines in 9 outpatient practices. METHODS: Success criteria were applied to clinical data from 93 practices, generating a pool of 14 success cases; 9 were recruited into the study. We conducted semistructured telephone interviews with 1 to 4 informants in each practice. Individual case reports were developed summarizing changes made, what was done to effect the changes, relevant contextual factors, and contributions of the educational interventions to change. A cross-case analysis followed. RESULTS: Twenty informants were interviewed. Practice changes varied in number and degree. Implementation mechanisms included acquisition of new knowledge and skills, making improving cessation practice an active goal, engaging the clinical team, adopting a more proactive approach with smokers, and making smokers and clinical practice performance more visible. Contextual factors influencing the implementation process were also identified. DISCUSSION: The study shows that (1) the appropriate target of an educational intervention may be a team rather than an individual, (2) implementing even relatively simple practice guidelines can be a complex process, and (3) change requires scientific and practical knowledge. A richer understanding of implementation mechanisms and contextual factors is needed to guide educational planning.