Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Epilepsy Behav ; 124: 108354, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34628090

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To review the standard of clinical care of people with epilepsy (PWE) attending UK general practice after epilepsy was removed from the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) in 2014. METHOD: The case notes of 324 people were reviewed against standards based on National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Drug Safety Unit (DSU), and Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) guidelines. RESULTS: Annual face-to-face review fell significantly (p = 0.021) after the removal of epilepsy from QOF in 2014. Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) downloaded review rates fell significantly from 95% in 2010 to only 14% in 2016. One hundred and twenty seven (39%) people had seen their GP, and108 (33%) had not seen any doctor, in the past year. One hundred and seventy three (53%) were under specialist care. Forty nine percent not under specialist care had poor control. Two hundred and fifty four (78%) people were on ASM (Anti-Seizure Medication) associated with poor bone health, of these 41 (16%) were prescribed vitamin D. Fourteen women of childbearing age were taking sodium valproate, of whom only 5 (36%) had written confirmation of being counseled of the associated risks. Fifty six (17%) people were non-complaint with prescription collection, of which 66% had documented poor control. There was a discrepancy between actual face-to-face review rates and the review rates the CCG collected. CONCLUSION: This study reveals poor annual review rates for PWE in UK primary care, which have fallen further since the removal of epilepsy from QOF. Unmet needs persist for people with poorly controlled epilepsy not under specialist care, bone health, and the care of women of child bearing age. This study, along with previous work, brings into question the concept of shared care for PWE. Clinical Commissioning Groups should consider investing in the training and employment of GPwSIe (GP with Special Interest in epilepsy) and ENS (Epilepsy Nurse Specialists) to work in the community. The Government should examine re-introducing epilepsy back into QOF with measurable clinical targets and adequate remuneration.


Assuntos
Epilepsia , Medicina Geral , Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Epilepsia/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Ácido Valproico
2.
Med Care Res Rev ; 79(3): 394-403, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34323143

RESUMO

National financial incentive schemes for improving the quality of primary care have come under criticism in the United Kingdom, leading to calls for localized alternatives. This study investigated whether a local general practice incentive-based quality improvement scheme launched in 2011 in a city in the North West of England was associated with a reduction in all-cause emergency hospital admissions. Difference-in-differences analysis was used to compare the change in emergency admission rates in the intervention city, to the change in a matched comparison population. Emergency admissions rates fell by 19 per 1,000 people in the years following the intervention (95% confidence interval [17, 21]) in the intervention city, relative to the comparison population. This effect was greater among more disadvantaged populations, narrowing socioeconomic inequalities in emergency admissions. The findings suggest that similar approaches could be an effective component of strategies to reduce unplanned hospital admissions elsewhere.


Assuntos
Motivação , Melhoria de Qualidade , Inglaterra , Hospitalização , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA