Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 281, 2024 May 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695948

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The analysis of post-HoLEP urinary incontinence (UI) has traditionally focused on stress UI. Our aim is to evaluate the factors associated with stress and urgency UI in the first month after the surgery. METHODS: Data were obtained from patients who underwent HoLEP by the same experienced surgeon. UI was evaluated at one month and at 6 months after the surgery. Three groups were defined: continent patients, patients with pure urgency UI and patients with stress or mixed UI. Preoperative, intraoperative, urodynamic and clinical variables were analyzed and compared between the three groups. RESULTS: In total, 235 subjects were included. One month after the surgery, 156 (66.5%) were continent (group 1), 49 (20.8%) reported pure urgency UI (group 2), and 30 (12.7%) reported some level of stress UI (group 3). In Group 2, the factors associated with urgency UI in the univariate analysis were age, presurgical urgency UI, having diabetes or hypertension. In Group 3, age, prostatic volume, preoperative PSA, time of enucleation, weight of the resection in grams, having an IDC or being diabetic were significant in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, age predicts both types of UI, while prostatic volume and having an IDC predict stress or mixed UI. CONCLUSION: In the first month post-HoLEP, age is a predictive factor of urgency UI and stress UI. In addition, prostatic volume and the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter are predictive factors of stress UI.


Assuntos
Prostatectomia , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse , Incontinência Urinária de Urgência , Humanos , Masculino , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgia , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/epidemiologia , Incontinência Urinária de Urgência/epidemiologia , Incontinência Urinária de Urgência/etiologia , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prostatectomia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Urodinâmica/fisiologia , Fatores Etários
2.
Low Urin Tract Symptoms ; 16(4): e12525, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39011566

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Our goals were to study prostatic volume as a limiting factor after HoLEP surgery with short-circuit outpatient care (4 h) and to define other factors that affect the success of the proposed circuit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational analysis and review was performed using a prospective database. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were included for patients who were scheduled for short-circuit outpatient care (SCOC) and who underwent HoLEP between 2020 and 2023. We defined SCOC as a postoperative hospital stay of 4 h. Subjects who required more than 4 h in hospital were categorized as conventional hospital admission (CHA). A descriptive populational study was conducted, expressing the mean using a 95% confidence interval and percentages for the continuous variables. In order to analyze them, we used the Student's t-test for the continuous variables and the chi-squared test for the categorical variables. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were included, 54 of which completed SCOC, which represented a success ratio of 79.5%. The mean age and prostatic volume of the whole cohort were 68.9 (±6.8) years and 79.5 (±29.1) mL, respectively. We found no significant differences in age, prostatic volume, antiplatelet drug use, indwelling bladder catheter, or applied energy among the subjects who completed SCOC and those who required CHA. No patient was presented with a complication of Grade 3 (or higher) in the modified Clavien-Dindo classification. At the six-month follow-up, no differences were observed in the uroflowmetry or International Prostate Symptoms Score variables. CONCLUSIONS: Prostatic volume does not seem to be a limiting factor after undergoing HoLEP with short-circuit outpatient care.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Próstata , Hiperplasia Prostática , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Próstata/cirurgia , Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , Tamanho do Órgão , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tempo de Internação , Prostatectomia/métodos , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA