Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cent Afr J Med ; 60(5-8): 29-36, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26867253

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Risk factors for treatment failure in HIV positive adults have not been studied extensively in Zimbabwe. AIM: To investigate socio-demographic, psychosocial and antiretroviral drug related factors as possible risk factors for treatment failure. OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy and reliability of CD4 count results in diagnosing treatment failure versus viral load results. DESIGN: A descriptive cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Harare Central Hospital adult opportunistic infections clinic. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and eighteen (118) HIV positive participants on 1st line antiretroviral therapy (any 1 of stavudine, tenofovir or zidovudine combined with lamivudine and nevirapine or efavirenz) for at least 1 year. Participants were conveniently sampled. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: First line treatment failure as defined according to World Health Organisation (WHO) 2010 guidelines. RESULTS: Factors associated with higher odds of treatment failure were severe depression [OR 3.7; p-value 0.002; 95% CI 1.6-8.5] and discontinuing ART [OR 4.4; p-value 0.02; 95% CI 1.3-14.7]. Factors associated with lower odds of treatment failure were age = 42 [OR 0.3; p-value 0.007; 95% CI 0.1-0.7], taking ART on time [OR 0.2; p-value 0.02; 95% CI 0.05-0.8], time on ART > 4 years [OR 0.6; p-value 0.02; 95% CI 0.3-0.9] and female sex [OR 0.4; p-value 0.02; 95% CI 0.2-0.8]. There was statistically significant difference between CD4 count and viral load results in diagnosing treatment failure [OR 8.7; p-value 0.0005; 95% CI 3.6-21.2]. CONCLUSION: Severe depression and discontinuing ART predisposed to treatment failure. CD4 counts were not as reliable as viral load measurements in diagnosing treatment failure.


Assuntos
Antirretrovirais/uso terapêutico , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Contagem de Linfócito CD4 , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/imunologia , Infecções por HIV/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Falha de Tratamento , Carga Viral , Zimbábue
2.
Public Health Action ; 10(3): 92-96, 2020 Sep 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33134122

RESUMO

SETTING: Decentralisation of HIV care to nurse-led primary care services is being implemented across low- and middle-income countries in sub-Saharan Africa. OBJECTIVE: To compare services offered to clients attending for HIV care at a physician-led and a nurse-led service in Harare, Zimbabwe. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was performed at Harare Central Hospital (HCH) and Budiriro Primary Care Clinic (PCC) from June to August 2018. An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect sociodemographics, HIV treatment and clinical history from clients attending for routine HIV care. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to evaluate for differences between groups for continuous variables. For categorical variables, the χ2 test was used. RESULTS: The median age of the 404 participants recruited was 38 years (IQR 28-47); 69% were female. Viral suppression was comparable between sites (HCH, 70% vs. PCC, 80%; P = 0.07); however, screening for comorbidities such as cervical cancer screening (HCH, 61% vs. PCC, 41%; P = 0.001) and provision of referral services (HCH, 23% vs. PCC, 13%; P = 0.01) differed between sites. CONCLUSION: Efforts to improve service provision in primary care settings are needed to ensure equity for users of health services.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA