Aortic events and relative survival in patients with moderately dilated proximal thoracic aorta.

Objectives. This study describes growth, local and remote aortic events, and survival in patients with proximal (root, ascending) aortic diameters just below threshold for operation. Methods. Patients with proximal aortic diameter of 4.5 to 5.4 cm at baseline, were followed with serial computed tomography studies and data collected retrospectively. Aortic growth rate was estimated using mixed effects modelling. Clinical and radiological features associated with outcomes (all-cause death, aortic death, local or remote aortic events (dissection, rupture, intramural hematoma, or intervention)) were assessed with Cox analysis. Survival and freedom from events were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results. 80 patients underwent 274 CT scans during 265 patient-years. Median proximal aortic growth was 0.2 cm in 3 years. 32 events occurred in 28 patients (35%). Eleven events were local, all elective proximal aortic surgery. Nine events were remote: 5 type B aortic dissections, 3 descending aneurysms undergoing elective repair, and one infrarenal aortic rupture. Twelve patients died, half of type B aortic dissection. Relative survival compared to a matched normal population was 82% (95% confidence limits 55-98%) at 10 years. In Cox analysis, increased descending aortic diameter was an independent predictor of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39) and aortic death (HR 1.96). Conclusions. Descending, but not proximal, aortic growth was predictive of lethal events. The decreased relative survival, the substantial number of remote aortic events and aortic deaths strongly suggest continuous serial CT surveillance of the entire aorta. Other indicators than proximal aortic diameter appear needed to improve management of this patient group.

Reoperation or Aortic Regurgitation Progression after Reimplantation of the Aortic Valve (David's Procedure) Using the Valsalva Graft.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess predictors of a composite endpoint (reoperation for aortic valve [AV] failure or aortic regurgitation [AR] grade ≥ 2) after reimplantation of the aortic valve (RAV) using the Valsalva graft. METHODS: From 2012 to 2021, 112 patients underwent RAV in a single center. Clinical and echocardiographic data were collected retrospectively. Cox regression analysis was used to identify predictors of the composite endpoint. Kaplan-Meier methods were used for time-to-event analysis. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) age was 52 years (44, 62). Nineteen patients (17%) were operated for acute Type A aortic dissection, and the remainder for aortic root aneurysm, 60 mm or larger in 12/112 (11%). Thirty-day mortality was 1/112 (1%). During follow-up, four patients (3.6%) were reoperated for AV failure, and another nine patients (8.1%) developed AR grade ≥ 2. Overall estimated freedom from reoperation or AR grade ≥ 2 was 87% (95% confidence interval: 76-93%) at 5 years. Significantly lower estimated 5-year freedom from the composite endpoint was found in cases with simultaneous aortic valve repair (AVr; 77 vs. 90%, p = 0.007) and nearly significant for large (≥ 6 cm) aortic root diameter (82 vs. 87%, p = 0.055). In Cox's analysis, aortic root diameter and simultaneous AVr were independent predictors for the composite endpoint. CONCLUSION: Outcomes (survival, reoperation, freedom from AR grade ≥ 2) with RAV were good up to 11-year follow-up. Larger aortic root diameter and simultaneous AVr were identified as predictors for reoperation or AR grade ≥ 2. Long-term follow-up remains necessary to confirm adequate AV function.

High Prevalence of Thoracic Aortic Dilatation in Men with Previous Inguinal Hernia Repair.

BACKGROUND: Identifying a useful marker for thoracic aortic dilatation (TAD) could help improve informed clinical decisions, enhance diagnosis, and develop TAD screening programs. Inguinal hernia could be such a marker. This study tested the hypothesis that the thoracic aorta is larger and more often dilated in men with previous inguinal hernia repair versus nonhernia controls. METHODS: Four hundred men each with either previous inguinal hernia repair or cholecystectomy (controls) were identified to undergo chest computed tomography to measure the diameter of the thoracic aorta in the aortic root, ascending, isthmic, and descending aorta and to provide self-reported health data. Presence of TAD (root or ascending diameter > 45 mm; isthmic or descending diameter > 35 mm) and thoracic aortic diameters were compared between groups and associations explored using uni- and multivariable statistical methods. RESULTS: Complete data were obtained from 470/718 (65%) eligible participants. TAD prevalence was significantly higher in the inguinal hernia group: 21 (10%) versus 6 (2.4%), p = 0.001 for proximal TAD, 29 (13%) versus 21 (8.3%), p = 0.049 for distal TAD, and 50 (23%) versus 27 (11%), p < 0.001 for all aortic segments combined. In multivariable analysis, previous inguinal hernia repair was independently associated with dilatation of the proximal aorta (odds ratio 5.3, 95% confidence interval 1.8-15, p = 0.003). Contrarily, mean thoracic aortic diameters were similar (root and ascending aorta) or showed clinically irrelevant differences (isthmus and descending aorta). CONCLUSION: TAD, but not increased aortic diameters on average, was common and significantly more prevalent in men with previous inguinal hernia repair. Hernia could be a marker condition associated with increased prevalence of TAD. Ultimately, TAD screening could consider hernia as a possible selection criterion.

Proximal aortic repair in asymptomatic patients.

Objective: Current guidelines for elective proximal aortic repair are applicable to elective first-time procedures in asymptomatic patients without other primary indications or connective tissue disorders and with specified aortic diameter or growth rate. The objective was to characterize the surgical outcomes in this narrowly defined patient-population. Methods: Guideline-compliant patients were identified from a recent (2014-2019) single unit consecutive surgical cohort (n = 935) by excluding total arch replacements, redos, acute and symptomatic patients, and genetic syndromes. Remaining patients were included regardless of surgical procedure performed. Early (30-day or in-hospital) and 1-year mortality were primary outcome measures. Major complications (stroke, severe renal or respiratory insufficiency, postcardiotomy shock, deep sternal wound infection, permanent pacemaker, and re-exploration) up to 1 year postoperatively were secondary outcome measures. Results: In the resulting study population (n = 262), median age was 63 (interquartile range, 52-71) years, and median surgical risk (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II) was 3.2% (2.0%-4.4%). Early mortality was 2 of 262 (0.76%) without additional deaths up to 1-year postoperatively. The occurrence of major complications was low: stroke, 2 (0.76%); renal insufficiency, 2 (0.76%); respiratory insufficiency, 1 (0.38%); postcardiotomy shock, 1 (0.38%); deep sternal wound infection, 0; permanent pacemaker, 3 (1.1%); and re-exploration, 20 (7.6%), all occurring in the immediate (30-day) postoperative period and without additional events up to 1 year postoperatively. Conclusions: In this recent cohort including the target population referred to by and managed in accordance with current guidelines, mortality and major complications were exceptionally infrequent. Guidelines should adequately weigh risks of conservative management against current surgical outcomes.