RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoid sparing in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment is crucial to minimizing adverse effects associated with long-term use. Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) could potentially offer a more potent glucocorticoid-sparing effect than biological Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of RA patients treated with JAKi or bDMARDs. Glucocorticoid tapering, rescue therapy and discontinuation were analyzed through mixed-effects models, Poisson regression, and multivariable logistic regression, respectively, adjusting for baseline disease activity, demographic factors, and treatment line. RESULTS: A total of 716 RA patients treated with JAKi (n = 156) or bDMARDs (n = 560) were evaluated. JAKi treatment was associated with a more rapid reduction in glucocorticoid dose within the first 6 months and 60% higher odds of discontinuation compared with bDMARDs (adjusted odds ratio 1.63, 95% CI 1.02-2.60, p 0.039). Despite a higher baseline glucocorticoid dose, over 50% of JAKi-treated patients discontinued glucocorticoids after 12 months, vs â¼40% for bDMARDs. The need for glucocorticoid rescue therapy was significantly higher in the bDMARD group (rate ratio 2.66 (95% CI, 1.88-3.74)). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that JAK inhibitors facilitate more rapid glucocorticoid tapering compared with bDMARDs in RA patients. These results underscore the potential of JAK inhibitors to reduce long-term glucocorticoid exposure, highlighting their value in RA management strategies, including minimizing glucocorticoid-related adverse effects.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Fatigue is a common comorbidity in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), often reported also by those in clinical remission or with moderate disease activity. The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of fatigue in patients with axSPA, and to investigate possible non-disease-related determinants, with a special focus on depression. METHODS: Patients with axSpA were assessed using the Chalder's Fatigue Questionnaire (CFQ) for fatigue, and the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) for depression. Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) were also used to assess disease activities and disability. Univariate and multivariate linear regressions were performed to identify possible predictors of fatigue. RESULTS: Out of 119 patients, 53 (44.5%) had fatigue. Patients with fatigue had higher HADS-D, ASDAS, BASFI, HAQ scores. HADS-D was predictive of CFQ score in univariate and multivariate regressions for total CFQ, and for mental and physical subscales. The correlation between HADS-D and CFQ total score was statistically significant also when taking into consideration only patients in clinical remission and with moderate disease activity. Depressed patients had higher CFQ score compared to non-depressed ones, and did not show any difference in CFQ scores when stratified for disease activity or systemic inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: The study found correlation between fatigue and disease activity and depression in patients with axSpA. These findings suggest that depression could represent the major determinant of fatigue in patients with axSpA, independently of clinical activity.
Assuntos
Espondiloartrite Axial , Depressão , Fadiga , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Fadiga/fisiopatologia , Fadiga/diagnóstico , Fadiga/etiologia , Fadiga/psicologia , Fadiga/epidemiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/psicologia , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/etiologia , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Espondiloartrite Axial/diagnóstico , Espondiloartrite Axial/epidemiologia , Espondiloartrite Axial/psicologia , Espondiloartrite Axial/complicações , Espondiloartrite Axial/fisiopatologia , Prevalência , Inquéritos e Questionários , Avaliação da Deficiência , Comorbidade , Análise Multivariada , Fatores de Risco , Modelos Lineares , Estudos TransversaisRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), anti-interleukin-17 or interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibodies (anti-IL) on comorbidities in a cohort of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA), using an average treatment effect (ATE) analysis. METHODS: SpA patients from the multicentre Italian GISEA Registry were divided into groups according to pharmacological exposure: no treatment (G0), TNFi (G1) and non-responders to TNFi switched to anti-IL (G2). In each group, we recorded the prevalence and incidence of infectious, cardiopulmonary, endocrinological, gastrointestinal, oncologic, renal and neurologic comorbidities. Each comorbidity was then fitted for ATE and baseline features were evaluated for importance. RESULTS: The main findings of this study comprising 4458 SpA patients relate to cancer, other gastrointestinal diseases (OGID) and fibromyalgia. ATE showed no increased risk of solid cancer in G1 (0.42 95% CI 0.20-0.85) and G2 (0.26 95% CI 0.08-0.71) vs. G0, with significantly higher incidence in G0 (14.07/1000 patient-years, p=0.0001). Conversely, a significantly higher risk of OGID and fibromyalgia was found in G1 (1.56 95% CI 1.06-2.33; 1.69 95% CI 1.05-2.68, respectively) and G2 (1.91 95% CI 1.05-3.24; 2.13 95% CI 1.14-3.41, respectively) vs. G0. No treatment risk reduction was observed in haematological malignancies, cardiovascular events and endocrinological comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our study confirms the safety of TNFi and anti-IL in SpA patients, albeit with some caveats pertaining to solid cancers, OGID and fibromyalgia. Furthermore, taking into consideration causality with observational data may yield more reliable and relevant clinical information.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , Fibromialgia , Neoplasias , Espondilartrite , Humanos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Comorbidade , Fibromialgia/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Espondilartrite/diagnóstico , Espondilartrite/tratamento farmacológico , Espondilartrite/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Few data are available on the role of emotional distress as a possible mediator of the relationship between coping strategies and the Patient Global Assessment (PGA). This study aims to investigate, in a large cohort of patients affected by RA, the relationship between specific copying strategies and PGA, and the role of emotional distress as a mediator. METHODS: A total of 490 patients with RA completed a set of standardized assessments including the self-reported PGA, the Coping Orientation to the Problems Experienced (COPE-NVI) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). A mediation analysis was conducted to investigate the role of emotional distress. RESULTS: The effect of coping strategies on the PGA score was significantly mediated by the emotional distress for religious (total effect mediated 42.0%), planning (total effect mediated 17.5%), behavioural disengagement (total effect mediated 10.5%), and focus on and venting of emotions (total effect mediated 9.8%). Seven coping strategies (acceptance, positive reinterpretation and growth, active coping, denial, humour, substance use-mental disengagement) resulted directly associated to PGA total score, but no mediation effect was found. The remaining four coping strategies were not associated to the PGA score. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that coping strategies could be an important factor in the perceived disease severity. Consequently, in order to reduce PGA in patients with RA, a useful tool could be represented by the implementation of psychological interventions aiming to modify the specific coping styles. Moreover, to prevent or treat emotional distress seems to further reduce PGA.
Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide , Angústia Psicológica , Humanos , Análise de Mediação , Emoções , Adaptação Psicológica , Artrite Reumatoide/psicologia , Gravidade do Paciente , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: High plasma C5a and C5b-9 levels are considered a clear sign of complement activation. We aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of these two complement activation products during quiescent phases of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) by comparing their plasma levels in the different clinical subsets and relating them to the clinical characteristics and antiphospholipid antibody profile of the patients. METHODS: The three patient subsets studied were: i) thrombotic patients responsive to anti-vitamin K therapy (TAPS); ii) patients with refractory to vitamin K antagonists recurrent thrombosis (RAPS); iii) patients diagnosed with catastrophic APS (CAPS). Plasma C5a and C5b-9 levels were assessed using commercial ELISA assays. RESULYTS: Sixty-two quiescent APS patients were recruited: 40 were affected by TAPS, 13 by RAPS and 9 by CAPS. Data analysis showed that the TAPS patients had significantly lower levels of both complement activation products with respect to the RAPS and CAPS patients. In addition, C5a and/or C5b-9 significantly prevailed in the patients with small-vessel thrombosis, just as C5b-9 did in the triple antiphospholipid antibody positive patients. The ROC curve showed that the best cut-offs for C5a and C5b-9 levels had a higher sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratio in the CAPS and RAPS groups than they did in the TAPS subset. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the persistence of high plasma C5b-9 and C5a levels during quiescent phases identifies APS patients with more severe disease who may develop rethrombosis and benefit from complement inhibition treatment during an acute disease phase.
Assuntos
Síndrome Antifosfolipídica , Trombose , Humanos , Síndrome Antifosfolipídica/complicações , Síndrome Antifosfolipídica/diagnóstico , Síndrome Antifosfolipídica/tratamento farmacológico , Complexo de Ataque à Membrana do Sistema Complemento , Anticorpos Antifosfolipídeos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Trombose/tratamento farmacológico , Trombose/etiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are exposed to impairment in left ventricular (LV) function, which is a prognosticator of poorer clinical outcomes. In this study we assessed prevalence and factors associated with adverse outcomes in patients with RA and asymptomatic LV systolic dysfunction (LVSD). METHODS: We prospectively analysed 102 RA patients with asymptomatic LVSD consecutively selected by a pool of 418 RA patients referred to the Division of Rheumatology, University of Verona, between March 2014 and March 2015. LVSD was defined as impaired global longitudinal strain (GLS) measured by echocardiography. The pre-specified study end-points were all-cause death/hospitalisation, and death/hospitalisation for cardiovascular cause. RESULTS: During a follow-up of 35 [13-54] months, all-cause death/hospitalisation occurred in 40 patients (39%). No patient died during the follow-up, 18 patients (18% of the study population) had a cardiovascular event which required hospitalisation, while 22 (22% of patients) required hospitalisation, but this was unrelated to CV. Multiple Cox regression analysis identified worse renal function, more frequent use and a higher number of biologic DMARDs used before enrolment as independent predictors of all-causes hospitalisation. The same variables together with higher LV mass predicted CV hospitalisation. Prognostic cut-off points were 90 ml/min/1.73 m2 for glomerular filtration rate and 49 g/m2.7 for LV mass. CONCLUSIONS: RA patients with asymptomatic LVSD have a very high rate of all-cause and cardiovascular hospitalisation at mid-term follow-up, predicted by worse renal function, higher LV mass, more frequent use and higher number of biologic DMARDs used before enrolment, suggesting that biologic DMARDs refractory is a proxy of adverse events.
Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide/complicações , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/complicações , Humanos , Incidência , Prognóstico , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Few studies have compared the efficacy of switching from etanercept to adalimumab in the real-life setting in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). This study evaluated the 2-year retention rate and 12-month efficacy of adalimumab in RA and PsA patients, previously treated with etanercept. RA and PsA patients from 11 Italian Rheumatology Units received adalimumab after first-line etanercept failure. Two-year adalimumab retention rate was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models were developed to examine predictors of drug persistence. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were developed to examine potential predictors of 12-month DAS-28 remission. The study population included 117 RA (disease duration of 10.1 ± 7.7 years and baseline DAS28-ESR of 4.97 ± 1.3) and 102 PsA (disease duration of 7.1 ± 5.1 years and baseline DAPSA of 24.6 ± 11.8). The 2-year retention rate was 48.2% in RA and 56.5% in PsA patients. Concomitant methotrexate treatment was not associated with increased drug survival in both groups. Similarly, cause of etanercept discontinuation or treatment duration was not associated with retention rate. 12-month remission and low disease activity were achieved, respectively, in 27.3% and 23.9% of RA patients and 27.4% and 23.5% PsA of patients. In multivariate models, etanercept discontinuation due to inefficacy (OR 0.27, 95% CI 1.03-0.73; p = 0.009) and baseline DAS-28 (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.29-0.69; p < 0.001) remained significant negative predictors of remission in RA patients. No variable was associated with remission in PsA patients. Adalimumab after etanercept failure was highly effective and safe in both RA and PsA patients.
Assuntos
Adalimumab/uso terapêutico , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Substituição de Medicamentos , Etanercepte/uso terapêutico , Adesão à Medicação , Inibidores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Psoriásica/fisiopatologia , Artrite Reumatoide/fisiopatologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of serious infections (SIs) among the spondyloarthropathy (SpA) patients from the "Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio delle Early Arthritis" (GISEA) registry and treated with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (TNFIs), and to identify the factors associated with the development of the infections. METHODS: This observational study on 3321 GISEA-registered SpA patients collected real-world demographic and clinical data relating to their biological drug treatments. The overall incidence of infections was analysed by type of SpA. RESULTS: A total of 3321 SpA patients (1731 males, 52.2%; mean age 47±13 years; median disease duration 3 years, interquartile range [IQR] 0-8) were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. Two hundred and fifty-nine patients experienced at least one of 391 microbiologically diagnosed SIs, 32% of which were recorded during the first 12 months of treatment. The overall incidence of SIs was 43.9/1000 patient-years of follow-up (95% confidence interval [CI] 39.6-48.4): 29.9/1000 (95% CI 23.1-38.1) among those treated with adalimumab (ADA); 36.1/1000 (95% CI 30.0-43.1) among those treated with etanercept (ETN); and 61.4/1000 (95% CI 53.3-70.5) among those treated with infliximab (INF). The highest incidence was observed among the patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), but the difference was statistically significant only in comparison with the patients with undifferentiated SpA (p=0.002), whose incidence of SIs was also lower than in the patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) (p=0.034). Multivariate models showed that the number of comorbidities (hazard ratio [HR] 1.29, 95%CI 1.2-1.4; p<0.001), age at the start of TNFi treatment (HR 0.99, 95%CI 0.97-0.99; p=0.030), steroid use (HR 1.40, 95%CI 1.1-1.8; p=0.012) and male sex (HR 0.72, 95%CI 0.5-0.9; p=0.012) were all statistically significant predictors of infection. The factors independently associated with a lower risk of SIs were the use of ETN (HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.4-0.7; p<0.001) or ADA (HR 0.59, 95%CI 0.4-0.8; p=0.002) rather than INF. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of SIs was higher among patients with PsA or AS than among those with undifferentiated SpA, and among patients treated with INF than among those treated with ADA or ETN. Male sex, steroid use and the number of comorbidities were all factors predictive of SIs.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Infecções/etiologia , Espondiloartropatias/complicações , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/efeitos adversos , Adalimumab , Adulto , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Etanercepte , Feminino , Humanos , Infecções/epidemiologia , Infliximab , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros , Espondiloartropatias/tratamento farmacológico , Espondiloartropatias/imunologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Objective: To define the safety and efficacy of TNF inhibitors (TNFi) in RA patients with comorbidities. Methods: A National Consensus Conference adopted a five-step process to better address the place of TNFi in the treatment of RA. Here we report the work focused on the influence of comorbidities on TNFi efficacy and the effect of TNFi on comorbidities using a Population Intervention Comparison Outcome-based strategy from 8 April 2013 to 15 January 2016. Results: A total of 4453 hits were analysed, of which 10 were eligible for full review. Data show that the presence of comorbidities influences the treatment strategy and several clinical outcomes. The risk of solid cancer is similar in RA patients treated with TNFi or with conventional synthetic DMARDs, and the risk of recurrent breast cancer is not higher in RA patients treated with TNFi. The risk of developing serious infections is higher in RA patients receiving TNFi than conventional synthetic DMARDs. Patients with previous serious infections before starting TNFi are not at increased risk of subsequent serious infection. The hazard rate of hospitalization due to infections is not different among patients remaining on the same TNFi, or switching to a different TNFi or to an agent with another mechanism of action. Longer exposure to TNFi is associated with a reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events. Conclusion: Comorbidities affect RA treatment strategies and the efficacy of TNFi. TNFi treatment may decrease the risk of cardiovascular diseases and their use in patients with previous infection is not associated with a higher risk of recurrences.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Reumatoide/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Infecções/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores , Comorbidade/tendências , Conferências de Consenso como Assunto , Saúde Global , HumanosAssuntos
Síndrome Antifosfolipídica/sangue , Ativação do Complemento , Complemento C5a/análise , Complexo de Ataque à Membrana do Sistema Complemento/análise , Adulto , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Síndrome Antifosfolipídica/imunologia , Biomarcadores , Doença Catastrófica , Inativadores do Complemento/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The clinical response of rituximab (RTX) is related to the degree of B cell depletion, although other circulating lymphocytes may be affected. We investigated the changes in lymphocyte sub-populations in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with RTX and their relationship with the therapeutic response, with attention to natural killer (NK) cells. METHODS: In fifty-one RA patients peripheral blood B and T lymphocytes and NK cells subtypes were counted by flow cytometry before and 3, 6 and 12 months after RTX administration. Patients were evaluated for disease activity with DAS28-CRP and EULAR response criteria at each visit. RESULTS: RTX significantly increased from baseline values CD56+3- cells (28 %, 19 % and 25 %; p<0.001, p=0.009 and p=0.004 respectively for month 3, 6 and 12) and CD56dimCD16+ cells (41%, 24% and 36%; p<0.001, p=0.001 and p<0.001 respectively for month 3, 6 and 12). CD56bri16- cells were unaffected by RTX treatment. The increase in both CD56+3- and CD56dimCD16+ cells was significantly greater in patients who were re-treated with another course of RTX at month 6 (p=0.046 and p=0.010 respectively). An inverse correlation between disease activity score and increase in NK cells was demonstrated. No significant changes were observed in CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ cells during the whole observation period. CONCLUSIONS: In RA patients, RTX treatment is associated with significant and persistent increase in CD56+3- and CD56dimCD16+ NK cells. A correlation with disease activity is probable, although the association with clinical response remains to be proved.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Células Matadoras Naturais/efeitos dos fármacos , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Artrite Reumatoide/sangue , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Artrite Reumatoide/imunologia , Biomarcadores/sangue , Antígeno CD56/sangue , Feminino , Citometria de Fluxo , Proteínas Ligadas por GPI/sangue , Humanos , Imunofenotipagem/métodos , Células Matadoras Naturais/imunologia , Contagem de Linfócitos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fenótipo , Receptores de IgG/sangue , Rituximab/efeitos adversos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to formulate consensus statements for the identification of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who may benefit most from abatacept treatment, in order to clear up points related to its use in rheumatology. METHODS: Two rounds of a modified Delphi process were conducted. In the first round, a board of experts defined a list of consensus statements based on data derived from a non-systematic review on the use of abatacept in adult RA patients. In the second round, clinicians with extensive experience in the treatment of RA were invited to express individually agreement on the statements, using a dedicated online platform. A face-to-face meeting of the board was held after round two. Consensus was defined as 75% agreement. RESULTS: In Delphi process round one, a board of 10 experts defined a list of 20 consensus statements on abatacept treatment. Then, a panel of 37 rheumatologists participated in round two. The majority of clinicians (75.7%) had 10 or more years of experience in the treatment of RA patients. Fifteen of the 20 statements reached the defined level of consensus. CONCLUSIONS: Identified consensus statements may help clinicians to apply to routine-care settings results from clinical studies and clinical recommendations, providing a guide for the initiation of abatacept treatment in RA patients.
Assuntos
Abatacepte/uso terapêutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Técnica Delphi , Seleção de Pacientes , Abatacepte/efeitos adversos , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Artrite Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Artrite Reumatoide/imunologia , Consenso , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Targeted drugs against key pathogenetic molecules such as TNF-alpha have significantly improved outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). They are widely used in clinical practice and drug registries give us information to support their use. Adalimumab (ADA) is able to induce a comprehensive disease control in RA by achieving clinical, functional and radiographic control. METHODS: By interrogating 2 Italian registries, LORHEN and GISEA, we analysed the efficacy of ADA in first- or second-line in a total of 2262 RA patients. RESULTS: Patients in 1st line were significantly older, with lower disease activity and HAQ scores compared to 2nd line. In 1st line, rates of DAS28-remission (DAS28rem) at 2 years were 34.4% while 26.5% in 2nd line (p=0.038). A normal HAQ score (HAQ≤0.5) was achieved in 53.5% after 2 years in 1st line versus 30.1% in 2nd (p<0.0001). DAS28rem+HAQ≤0.5, a combined parameter that we defined global clinical disease control, was reached in 20.7% in 1st line versus 13.3% in 2nd (p<0.01). Five-year-survival on therapy was higher for patients in 1st line (45.6% vs. 33.2%, p<0.0001). Discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was lower in 1st line (37.4 vs. 54.4%, p<0.0001). Rates of adverse events were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Responses in 1st line are generally significantly better than after a first anti-TNF-alpha failure but patients in 2nd line have a worse clinical and functional profile. A global disease control with clinical and functional remission is an achievable target in both lines.
Assuntos
Adalimumab/uso terapêutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Sistema de Registros , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Indução de Remissão , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Falha de TratamentoAssuntos
Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Etanercepte/efeitos adversos , Isoniazida , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolamento & purificação , Tuberculose dos Linfonodos , Antituberculosos/administração & dosagem , Antituberculosos/classificação , Quimioprevenção/efeitos adversos , Quimioprevenção/métodos , Etanercepte/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Imunossupressores/efeitos adversos , Isoniazida/administração & dosagem , Isoniazida/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Risco Ajustado , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Prevenção Secundária/normas , Tuberculose dos Linfonodos/imunologia , Tuberculose dos Linfonodos/fisiopatologia , Tuberculose dos Linfonodos/terapiaRESUMO
Objectives: This study aims to evaluate in a real-life Italian multicenter cohort of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) (1) the 4-year effectiveness and safety of secukinumab, (2) the drug retention rate (DRR), and (3) the impact of the line of bDMARDs treatment, subtype of axSpA, and sex on achieving low disease activity (LDA) and very low disease activity (VLDA). Methods: Consecutive axSpA patients receiving secukinumab between 2016 and 2023 were prospectively evaluated. Data on disease characteristics, previous/ongoing treatments, comorbidities, and follow-up duration were collected. Treatment response was evaluated at 6 and 12 months after initiation and yearly up to 48 months (T48). DRR and effectiveness outcomes were evaluated according to bDMARDs treatment, axSpA subtype, and sex. Infections and adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Results: We enrolled 272 patients (48.2% male; median age, 51; 39.7% HLA-B27+; 40.4% nr-axSpA), of whom 30.9% were naïve to secukinumab. Overall, secukinumab yielded improvement in effectiveness outcomes; the naïve patients maintained lower disease activity vs. the non-naïve ones. At T48, the LDA and VLDA rates were higher in naïve patients and in male individuals. Treatment was discontinued in 104 patients due to primary/secondary loss of effectiveness and in 34 patients due to AEs. The DRR at T48 was 67.4% in the whole population, regardless of treatment line, axSpA subtype, and sex. Conclusions: Secukinumab was safe and effective in all axSpA patients irrespective of treatment line, disease subtype, and sex. The patients achieved sustained 4-year remission and DRR.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Espondiloartrite Axial , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Itália , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento , Espondiloartrite Axial/tratamento farmacológico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos de CoortesRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the health-related quality of life scores among rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and spondyloarthritis and to evaluate socio-demographic and clinical determinantes of quality of life across diseases. METHODS: The sample comprised 490 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, 198 with psoriatic arthritis, and 119 with spondyloarthritis who completed a series of health examinations and self-reported questionnaires. Quality of life was evaluated using the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, disease activity by DAS28-CRP, DAPSA, and ASDAS-CRP (for rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and spondyloarthritis, respectively), depression and anxiety using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. ANOVA was used to compare the quality of life dimensions and their physical and mental summary measures among rheumatic diseases, and multivariate analysis was used to explore their potential determinants. RESULTS: Rheumatoid arthritis had significantly worse scores than spondyloarthritis in the following dimensions: physical functioning, role limitation due to physical health, physical component score, and mental health. Psoriatic arthritis was not significantly different from the other two diseases. Multivariate analysis revealed that physical quality of life was mainly associated with disease activity across rheumatic diseases, rheumatological treatment and depression in rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. Mental quality of life is primarily associated with depression and anxiety across rheumatic diseases. CONCLUSION: There were differences in quality of life among patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases, but overall, approximately uniform factors explained the variance in quality of life across diseases. Clinicians should develop general approaches and strategies for inflammatory rheumatic diseases to improve patients' quality of life.
Assuntos
Artrite Psoriásica , Artrite Reumatoide , Espondilartrite , Humanos , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Artrite Psoriásica/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Transversais , Artrite Reumatoide/psicologia , Espondilartrite/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of this multicenter retrospective study was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of the available JAK-inhibitors (JAKi) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and interstitial lung disease (ILD). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with classified RA and RA-ILD undergoing JAKi in 6 Italian tertiary centers from April 2018 to June 2022. We included patients with at least 6 months of active therapy and one high-resolution chest tomography (HRCT) carried out within 3 months of the start of JAKi treatment. The HRCT was then compared to the most recent one carried out within 3 months before the last available follow-up appointment. We also kept track of the pulmonary function tests. RESULTS: We included 43 patients with RA-ILD and 23 males (53.48%) with a median age (interquartile range, IQR) of 68.87 (61.46-75.78) treated with JAKi. The median follow-up was 19.1 months (11.03-34.43). The forced vital capacity remained stable in 22/28 (78.57%) patients, improved in 3/28 (10.71%) and worsened in 3/28 (10.71%). The diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide showed a similar trend, remaining stable in 18/25 (72%) patients, improving in 2/25 (8%) and worsening in 5/25 (20%). The HRCT remained stable in 37/43 (86.05) cases, worsened in 4/43 (9.30%) and improved in the last 2 (4.65%). DISCUSSION: This study suggests that JAKi therapy might be a safe therapeutic option for patients with RA-ILD in a short-term follow-up.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Upadacitinib (UPA) is a selective JAK inhibitor recently approved for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). In this post-approval study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of UPA over 24 weeks and identify clinical predictors of response, in a multicentric cohort of patients affected by PsA. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-six patients with PsA treated with UPA were enrolled in 10 Italian centres. UPA effectiveness outcomes, such as the proportion of patients with MDA status, DAPSA remission, and low disease activity, ASDAS-CRP inactive and low disease activity, and change from baseline in DAPSA and ASDAS-CRP scores, were evaluated every 12 weeks until week 24. The proportion of DAPSA minor, moderate, and major improvement, and ASDAS clinically important improvement (CII) and major improvement (MI) were considered as well. All treatment-related adverse events were collected during the observation period. Clinical predictors of MDA response at week 24 were evaluated through multivariate analysis. RESULTS: At baseline, 124/126 (98%) and 54/126 (43%) patients showed peripheral and axial involvement, respectively; 110 (87%) patients were intolerant or resistant to biologic DMARDs. At 24 weeks, MDA status, DAPSA remission, and ASDAS-CRP inactive disease were achieved in 47%, 23%, and 48% of patients, respectively. Minor, moderate, and major DAPSA improvement was observed in 67%, 39%, and 23%, respectively; while 65% and 35% achieved ASDAS-CRP CII and MI, respectively. The mean change from baseline was 15.9 ± 13.5 (p < 0.001) for DAPSA and 1.21 ± 0.97 (p < 0.001) for ASDAS-CRP. Thirteen patients (10%) discontinued UPA due to a lack of efficacy or non-serious adverse events. No serious adverse events were observed. Male gender (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.03-6.25 p = 0.043), being naïve to biological DMARDs (OR 4.13, 95% CI 1.34-12.71, p = 0.013) and elevated baseline CRP (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.02-6.12, p = 0.046) were associated with MDA response at week 24. CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the first real-life studies supporting the effectiveness of UPA and its safety profile in PsA patients. Furthermore, the study identifies predictors of MDA response to UPA treatment at 6 months.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , Artrite Psoriásica , Humanos , Masculino , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Dados Preliminares , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disease affecting the neuromuscular junction, often associated with other autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis. Patients with rheumatoid arthritis present an increased prevalence of myasthenia gravis compared to the general population. While these two diseases share some therapeutic options, such as glucocorticoids, methotrexate, and rituximab, there are no guidelines for treating concomitant disease. We aim to review the available evidence and to discuss the efficacy and safety of the therapeutic options in patients with rheumatoid arthritis associated with myasthenia gravis. METHOD: We described three patients with rheumatoid arthritis associated with myasthenia gravis and we performed a systematic review of the associated literature. RESULTS: A 48-year-old man and two women (48 and 55 years old) with concomitant diagnoses of active rheumatoid arthritis and well-controlled myasthenia gravis are described. They were treated with methotrexate, leflunomide, upadacitinib, and adalimumab. None of them experienced changes in their myasthenic symptoms. We found 9 additional cases from our literature review. Methotrexate, rituximab, upadacitinib, diphenyl sulfone, auranofin, and loxoprofen sodium did not show an impact on the seven patients with previously well-controlled myasthenia. Glucocorticoids, methotrexate, and rituximab proved effective in active myasthenia gravis and arthritis. Conflicting data emerged for Tumor-necrosis factor inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Although the available evidence remains scarce, we consider glucocorticoids, methotrexate, and rituximab as safe and effective options. The role of tumor-necrosis factor inhibitors remains uncertain. Eventually, Janus Kinase inhibitors are a novel interesting option for these patients. Key Points ⢠To date, the only evidence on the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and concomitant myasthenia gravis derives from case reports. ⢠Based on the review of the available case reports and on the cases we described, we consider glucocorticoids, methotrexate, and rituximab as safe and effective options, while the role of Tumor-necrosis factor inhibitors remains uncertain. ⢠Based on the cases we described, Janus Kinase inhibitors are a novel interesting option for patients with concomitant rheumatoid arthritis and myasthenia gravis.
Assuntos
Artrite Reumatoide , Inibidores de Janus Quinases , Miastenia Gravis , Adalimumab/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/induzido quimicamente , Artrite Reumatoide/complicações , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Inibidores de Janus Quinases/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Miastenia Gravis/induzido quimicamente , Miastenia Gravis/complicações , Miastenia Gravis/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Identifying factors that influence problematic beliefs and behaviors related to pharmacotherapy may be useful for clinicians to improve the patients' adherence. The study aims to assess patients' beliefs about the necessity and concerns regarding pharmacotherapy in rheumatic diseases and attitude styles, and to investigate the association between clinical factors and negative beliefs about medication. A sample of 712 patients affected by Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis was enrolled. They were assessed using the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaires-Specific (BMQ), the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), the Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS), the Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFQ) and the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). The balance between benefits and costs in the BMQ-Specific was positive in the 79.4% of patients, negative in the 12.1% and equal in the 8.6%. SDAI, taking more than 5 medications, taking anti interleukin 6 (Anti-IL6) or biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tsDMARDs), pain, and fatigue were significantly associated to higher Concerns. Having a longer disease duration was significantly associated with a higher Necessity, together with the current pharmacological treatments and the disability. The multivariate regression models estimated that higher pain and fatigue were associated to higher Concerns (p < 0.001), while a longer disease duration (p < 0.001) and all pharmacological treatments for a rheumatologic disease (p = 0.001) were associated to higher Necessity levels. A high length of disease, a low level of remission, a high number of total medications, the prescription of an Anti-IL6/bDMARDs/tsDMARDs drug, a high level of pain, fatigue and disability identified patients potentially less adherent to pharmacotherapy to be carefully looked after by clinicians.