Randomized phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel vs. cediranib-olaparib (continuous or intermittent schedule) in platinum-resistant high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Previous findings showed that cediranib-olaparib increased PFS in women with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer compared to olaparib alone. METHODS: BAROCCO trial randomized 123 patients: 80mg/m2 paclitaxel weekly up to 24 weeks (control), olaparib 300mg tablets twice daily together with 20mg cediranib daily (continuous schedule) or with 20mg cediranib 5 days/week (intermittent schedule) until progression. The primary objective was the PFS comparison between each experimental arm and the control (alpha one-sided 5%; power 80%; HR 0.5). RESULTS: The median platinum-free interval was 1.9 months, 60% of patients had been pretreated with 3 or more chemotherapy lines. Median PFS for paclitaxel, the continuous, and the intermittent schedules were 3.1, 5.6, and 3.8 months. The HR for PFS in the continuous arm vs control was 0.76 (90% CI: 0.50-1.14, p = 0.265). The HR for PFS in the intermittent arm vs control was 1.03 (90% CI: 0.68-1.55, p = 0.904). Treatment was discontinued due to adverse events in 15%, 20%, and 5% of patients in the control, continuous and intermittent arms. Grade ≥ 3 anemia and diarrhea and hypertension of any grade occurred only in the experimental arms, and peripheral neuropathies and alopecia only in the control arm. Five serious adverse drug reactions occurred and two were fatal: one in the control and one in the continuous arm. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of cediranib-olaparib was not superior to chemotherapy in terms of PFS in heavily pretreated platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients. However, this oral doublet, is active and may offer a non-chemotherapy option in this difficult to treat population. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFICATION: IRFMN-OVA-7289, EudraCT: 2016-003964-38, NCT03314740.

Oral anticancer therapy project: Clinical utility of a specific home care nursing programme on behalf of Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM).

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of a specific home care nursing programme in addition to standard care in patients (pts) receiving oral anticancer treatments. BACKGROUND: Oral anticancer therapy present challenges for pts since treatment is a home-based therapy. This study evaluates the potentiality of a home care nursing programme in decreasing hospital accesses for not severe toxicity. METHODS: This is an open-label, multicentre, randomised trial including pts who were receiving an anticancer oral drug. The study complies with the CONSORT checklist published in 2010. Concomitant use of radiation therapy, intravenous or metronomic therapies, or the intake of previous oral drugs was not allowed. Pts were randomly assigned to home care nursing programme (A) or standard care (B). In arm A, dedicated nurses provided information to pts, a daily record on which pts would take note of drugs and dosages and a telephone monitoring during the first two cycles of therapy. The primary outcome was the reduction in improper hospital accesses for grade 1-2 toxicity according to CTCAE v4.0. RESULTS: Out of 432 randomised pts, 378 were analysed (184 pts in arm A and 194 in arm B). Hospital accesses were observed in 41 pts in arm A and in 42 pts in arm B (22.3% vs. 21.6%, respectively). No difference was detected in proportion of improper accesses between arm A and arm B (29.3% vs. 23.8%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience failed to support the role of a specific home care nursing programme for pts taking oral chemotherapy. An improved attention to specific educational practice and information offered to pts can explain these results. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Our results underline the role of nurse educational practice and information offered to patients. A careful nurse information of patients about drugs is essential to reduce toxicities avoiding the opportunity of a specific home monitoring.

Metabolic changes following 500 µg monthly administration of calcidiol: a study in normal females.

This study was performed to investigate the effect of monthly oral administration of 500 µg of calcidiol (25-hydroxyvitamin D(3)) for 4 months on both serum vitamin D levels and sequential changes of parameters of calcium metabolism; 18 normal women aged 24-72 years were investigated. There was a significant increase of serum 25(OH)D after the first administration; thereafter all values persisted significantly higher compared to the basal value (P < 0.001). Mean 1,25(OH)(2)D serum levels peaked at day 3 and then tended to stabilize following day 30. During the first month, all mean values observed following the initial administration were significantly higher than basal values. The first calcidiol dose produced a significant reduction of serum PTH levels (P < 0.001), which then remained constant over time. Concerning serum calcium and phosphorus, we were not able to demonstrate any significant change during the entire observation period. Considering the single values for both serum ionized and total calcium, the values of Ca(2+) exceeded upper limits of normal on only two occasions. Regarding biochemical markers of bone remodeling, mean changes of serum bone isoenzyme of alkaline phosphatase activity showed a significant trend to decrease, starting at day 30. No significant changes of serum CTX values were noted. Overall, 24-h urinary excretion of calcium did not change, seven values exceeding the threshold of 4 mg/kg body weight. Monthly administration of 500 µg of 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) may be considered an alternative for vitamin D repletion, without any detrimental effect.

Trabectedin in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Results From the Multicentre, Single Arm, Phase II ATREUS Study.

INTRODUCTION: New therapeutic approaches in unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) are eagerly awaited. Trabectedin is an antitumor agent with an effect on cancer cell proliferation and a modulating action on tumor microenvironment. The ATREUS study explored the activity and safety of trabectedin in patients with unresectable MPM. METHODS: Epithelioid patients with MPM received trabectedin as second-line while biphasic/sarcomatoid patients with MPM as first- or second-line therapy. Treatment was given intravenously at an initially planned dose of 1.3 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate at 12 weeks (PFS12wks). RESULTS: Overall, 78 patients (54%) had epithelioid and 67 (46%) nonepithelioid MPM. PFS12wks in 62 evaluable patients with epithelioid MPM was 43.5% (80% confidence interval 34.9%-52.5%); median progression-free and overall survival were 2.4 and 9.0 months, respectively. PFS12wks in 52 evaluable patients with nonepithelioid MPM was 30.8% (90% confidence interval 20.3%-42.9%); median progression-free and overall survival were 1.7 and 5.4 months. Trabectedin starting dose was amended due to excess of liver toxicity. Eighty-four (64%) and 48 (36%) patients received 1.3 mg/m2 and 1.1. mg/m2, respectively. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were hepatotoxicity, leukopenia/neutropenia, and fatigue. Grade 3-4 hepatotoxicity was reported in 59 (70%) patients treated at 1.3 mg/m2, and in 19 (40%) treated at 1.1 mg/m2. CONCLUSIONS: Trabectedin showed modest clinical activity, at the expense of relevant liver toxicity. Further development of this drug in MPM at full doses is not warranted.

Comparison of three immunosensor methods (surface plasmon resonance, screen-printed and classical amperometric immunosensors) for immunoglobulin G determination in human serum and animal or powdered milks.

Within the framework of research carried out by our team aimed at developing new immunological methods to determine proteins such as immunoglobulins G in different biological matrixes, for instance, serum and milk, tests were performed on several immunosensors based on different transducer types, i.e. amperometric (classical or screen-printed) electrodes for hydrogen peroxide. Lastly the feasibility of constructing immunosensors based on surface plasmon resonance (SPR) was investigated. "Competitive" immunological procedures were used in the first two cases. Conversely, the surface plasmon resonance transduction technique allowed a "direct" measurement. Applications were performed on human serum, powdered milks for babies and particularly on several animal milks, in the case of buffalo milk seeking a routine control method to identify possible inflammatory affections in the animals.

Several approaches for vitamin D determination by surface plasmon resonance and electrochemical affinity biosensors.

This work has been focused on the development of novel optical (Surface Plasmon Resonance) and electrochemical based biosensors for the determination of 25-OH vitamin D (25OHD) which is an important factor involved in avoiding both skeletal damage and a variety of pathological conditions, and to evaluate their potential use in clinical practice. Different approaches to the determination of vitamin D using affinity based biosensors, are described herein; firstly, an immunosensor based on SPR transduction was realized for direct determination of vitamin D, obtaining a LOD of 2 µg/ml which unfortunately is too far from the needs in clinical analysis. In order to enhance the sensitivity, the vitamin D was modified with gold nanoparticles (AuNPs): the binding of 25OHD with AuNPs determines the amplification of SPR signal, allowing to lower the LOD down to 1 µg/ml, doubling the sensitivity. An alternative SPR method, based on the indirect determination of vitamin D by means of Vitamin D Binding Protein (VDBP), led to a further sensitivity increase reaching a LOD of 45 ng/ml which is really close to the fixed accomplishment. Finally, an electrochemical transduced biosensor has been realized, based on the reaction of vitamin D with 4-ferrocenylmethyl-1,2,4-triazoline-3,5-dione (FMTAD): once derivatized, the determination of 25OHD was possible in the range 20-200 ng/ml with a LOD of 10 ng/ml. The latter proposed system fits the requirement of determining vitamin D in a concentration range which is of significance for clinical applications; moreover, since a screen printed electrode has been used, this opens the possibility to miniaturize the sensor and developing a portable and easy-to-automate point-of-care testing device. The proposed devices provide an improvement with respect to traditional methods that are time and reagents consuming and require radioactive compounds, pretreatment procedures and expensive instrumentation.

Long-term bioavailability after a single oral or intramuscular administration of 600,000 IU of ergocalciferol or cholecalciferol: implications for treatment and prophylaxis.

CONTEXT: We previously showed that a single high dose of oral (po) cholecalciferol (D3) sharply increases serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D]. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the long-term bioavailability and metabolism of a single po or intramuscular (im) high dose of ergocalciferol (D2) or D3. DESIGN: This was a prospective intervention study. SETTING: The study was conducted in an ambulatory care setting. PATIENTS: Participants were 24 subjects with hypovitaminosis D. INTERVENTIONS: A single dose of 600,000 IU of po or im D2 or D3 was administered. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serum 25(OH)D and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D] were measured at baseline and at days 30, 60, 90, and 120 by RIA. Serum 1,25(OH)2D2, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25(OH)2D3], 24,25-hydroxyvitamin D2 [24,25(OH)D2], and 24,25-hydroxyvitamin D3 [24,25(OH)D3] were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in a subgroup of patients receiving the po formulations. RESULTS: The areas under the curve of 25(OH)D after D3 were significantly higher than those after D2 (P < .0001). Serum 25(OH)D basal difference significantly increased at day 30 with po D2 and D3 (P < .01 and P < .0001) and up to day 90 with po D3 (P < .01). The im formulations produced a slow increased, and values peaked at day 120 relative to the other time points (P < .0001). We found a decrease in 1,25(OH)2D at day 30 (P < .05) and up to day 120 (P < .001) and an increase in 1,25(OH)2D2 at day 30 (P < .01) and up to day 120 (P < .01) after po D2. Oral D2 and D3 produced increases in 24,25(OH)D2 and 24,25(OH)D3, respectively, at day 30 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A po dose of 600,000 IU of D2 or D3 is initially more effective in increasing serum 25(OH)D than the equivalent im dose and is rapidly metabolized. Our RIA assay for 1,25(OH)2D may not recognize 1,25(OH)2D2.