Endometriosis fertility index predicts pregnancy in women operated on for moderate and severe symptomatic endometriosis.

Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI) is a clinical staging system created to predict spontaneous pregnancy outcomes in patients with endometriosis. The present study aimed at evaluating the performance of EFI in symptomatic patients, submitted to laparoscopy for moderate and severe endometriosis associated to infertility in a Brazilian population. Seventy-seven women with endometriosis and pelvic pain, who desired to become pregnant, were selected from a tertiary care unit between those operated on between May 2007 and March 2017. All of them were submitted to laparoscopy for the surgical treatment of endometriosis and allowed to attempt natural conception for 36 months or immediately referred to in vitro fertilization (IVF). EFI was calculated according to surgical description and clinical information in medical records. Pregnancy rates and live birth rates after natural conception or IVF are reported and correlated to EFI. Fifty-three women tried natural conception and 24 were referred to IVF. Of the 53 who tried natural conception, 29 achieved pregnancy (54.7%) and 28 had live birth (52.8%). The majority of pregnancies (82.7%) occurred in the first 12 months after surgery and 75% of the patients who became spontaneously pregnant had EFI ≥ 7. Of the 24 patients referred to IVF, 13 became pregnant (54.1%) and 10 had live birth (41.7%). Infertility duration of 36 months or more and the presence of endometrioma increased the probability of having EFI ≤ 5. The overall live birth rate (LBR) for patients with low EFI scores (2-4) was 17% compared with 83.8% for those with higher EFI scores (6-9). EFI predicts pregnancy rates in patients operated on for moderate and severe endometriosis. Scores seem also to predict pregnancy rates after IVF.

Barriers and myths that limit the use of intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women: a survey of Brazilian gynaecologists.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the extent to which barriers and misperceptions about intrauterine contraception (IUC) remain among Brazilian gynaecologists, particularly for nulliparous women. METHODS: An online survey was developed to assess Brazilian gynaecologists' knowledge and attitudes towards IUC. Data collected included demographic and professional data, main barriers when considering IUC for women in general and/or nulliparous women, attitudes towards inclusion of IUC in contraceptive counselling, and opinions on what could increase IUC prescription for nulliparous women. A question regarding knowledge about WHO medical eligibility criteria (WHO MEC) was also included in the survey. RESULTS: 101 gynaecologists completed the survey. The insertion rate in nulliparous women was 79.2%. Brazilian gynaecologists were more likely to consider IUC in counselling or provide it on request for parous than for nulliparous women (p<0.05) and perceived more complications in nulliparous women. 74.2% of gynaecologists recognised a higher risk of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID)/infertility associated with IUC use in nulliparous women than in parous women. Difficult and painful insertion were also relevant for 83.2% and 77.3% of the gynaecologists, respectively. Respondents showed a high level of awareness of the WHO MEC classification. CONCLUSIONS: The three most commonly reported barriers to considering IUC as a contraceptive option for nulliparous woman were concerns about PID and difficult or painful insertion. The challenge is to ensure that gynaecologists understand the evidence and do not disregard IUC as a potential option for nulliparous women.