A Smartphone Application for Teamwork and Communication in Trauma: Pilot Evaluation "in the Wild".

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential for a smartphone application to improve trauma care through shared and timely access to patient and contextual information. BACKGROUND: Disruptions along the trauma pathway that arise from communication, coordination, and handoffs problems can delay progress through initial care, imaging diagnosis, and surgery to intensive care unit (ICU) disposition. Implementing carefully designed and evaluated information distribution and communication technologies may afford opportunities to improve clinical performance. METHODS: This was a pilot evaluation "in the wild" using a before/after design, 3 month, and pre- post-intervention data collection. Use statistics, usability assessment, and direct observation of trauma care were used to evaluate the app. Ease of use and utility were assessed using the technology acceptance model (TAM) and system usability scale (SUS). Direct observation deployed measures of flow disruptions (defined as "deviations from the natural progression of an procedure"), teamwork scores (T-NOTECHS), and treatment times (total time in emergency department [ED]). RESULTS: The app was used in 367 (87%) traumas during the trial period. Usability was generally acceptable, with higher scores found by operating room (OR), ICU, and neuro and orthopedic users. Despite positive trends, no significant effects on flow disruptions, teamwork scores, or treatment times were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Pilot trials of a clinician-centered smartphone app to improve teamwork and communication demonstrate potential value for the safety and efficiency of trauma care delivery as well as benefits and challenges of "in-the-wild" evaluation.

Prefrontal versus motor cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effects on post-surgical opioid use.

BACKGROUND: Pain is often a complaint that precedes total knee arthroplasty (TKA), however the procedure itself is associated with considerable post-operative pain lasting days to weeks which can predict longer-term surgical outcomes. Previously, we reported significant opioid-sparing effects of motor cortex transcranial direct current stimulation from a single-blind trial. In the present study, we used double-blind methodology to compare motor cortex tDCS and prefrontal cortex tDCS to both sham and active-control (active electrodes over non-pain modulating brain areas) tDCS. METHODS: 58 patients undergoing unilateral TKA were randomly assigned to receive 4 20-min sessions (a total of 80 min) of tDCS (2 mA) post-surgery with electrodes placed to create 4 groups: 1) MOTOR (n = 14); anode-motor/cathode-right prefrontal, 2) PREFRONTAL (n = 16); anode-left-prefrontal/cathode-right-sensory, 3) ACTIVE-CONTROL (n = 15); anode-left-temporal-occipital junction/cathode-medial-anterior-premotor-area, and 4) SHAM (n = 13); 0 mA-current stimulation using placements 1 or 2. Patient controlled analgesia (PCA; hydromorphone) use was tracked during the ∼72-h post-surgery. RESULTS: Patients in the sham group and the active-control group used 15.4 mg (SD = 14.1) and 16.0 mg (SD = 9.7) of PCA hydromorphone respectively. There was no difference between the slopes of the cumulative PCA usage curves between these two groups (p = 0.25; ns). Patients in the prefrontal tDCS group used an average of 11.7 mg (SD = 5.0) of PCA hydromporhone, and the slope of the cumulative PCA usage curve was significantly lower than sham (p < 0.0001). However, patients in the motor tDCS group used an average of 19.6 mg (SD = 11.9) hydromorphone and the slope of the PCA use curve was significantly higher than sham (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Results from this double-blind cortical-target-optimization study suggest that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left prefrontal cortex may be a reasonable approach to reducing post-TKA opioid requirements. Given the unexpected finding that motor cortex failed to produce an opioid sparing effect in this follow-up trial, further research in the area of post-operative cortical stimulation is still needed.