The Impact of an Intensivist-Led Critical Care Transition Program.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the impact of a post-discharge critical care transition program (CTP) on intensive care unit (ICU) readmission, in-hospital mortality, and six-month survival. METHODS: This was a prospective observational, single-center study, with a before-after design, in a critical care department in a tertiary hospital in Northern Portugal. Critically ill patients with ICU stay > 48 h or intermediate care stay >72 h or tracheostomized patients were included in the program. Historic controls included critically ill patients admitted in the six months prior to program implementation. The follow-up visit included a medical evaluation by an intensivist and a meeting with the attending physician. The primary outcome was critical care department readmission. Secondary outcomes were mortality at hospital discharge, 28-day, and six-month mortality. The readmission rate was compared between groups. Multivariate analysis and Kaplan-Meyer survival analysis were used to evaluate survival benefits. RESULTS:  Between September 2020 and March 2021, 132 patients were included in the CTP. The Control group included 196 patients. The intensivist's assessment led to management change in 15.1% of patients. The CTP group had a non-significant lower readmission rate (0.8% vs. 4.1%; p=0.09). Multivariate analysis showed a benefit for the CTP regarding in-hospital, 28-day, and six-month mortality. Kaplan-Meyer survival analysis showed improved survival in the CTP group. CONCLUSIONS:  The CTP reduced, non-significantly, the readmission rate, and significantly improved in-hospital and six-month mortality. Further analyses are needed to improve inclusion criteria and better allocate human resources.

Fighting the pandemic with collaboration at heart: Report from cardiologists in a COVID-19-dedicated Portuguese intensive care unit.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spread quickly around the world. Although mainly a respiratory illness, there is growing interest in non-respiratory manifestations, particularly cardiovascular ones. At our center, mobilization of cardiologists with intensive care training was needed. Our aim is to describe patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to a Portuguese intensive care unit (ICU), the cardiovascular impact of the disease and the experience of cardiologists working in a COVID-19 ICU. METHODS: Data from adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU of Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho between 16 March 2020 and 21 April 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were admitted. Mean age was 62.6±6.0 years and 23 (65.7%) were male. Dyslipidemia was the most common cardiovascular risk factor (65.7%, n=23), followed by hypertension (57.1%, n=20). Mean ICU stay time was 15.9±10.0 days. Patients had high rates of mechanical ventilation (88.6%, n=31) and vasopressor support (88.6%, n=31). Low rates of new onset left systolic dysfunction were detected (8.5%, n=2). One patient required venoarterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation. Mortality was 25% (n=9). Acute myocardial injury and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) elevation was detected in 62.9% (n=22). Patients that died had higher NT-proBNP compared to those discharged alive (p<0.05). Care by cardiologists frequently changed decision making. CONCLUSIONS: The cardiovascular impact of COVID-19 seems relevant but is still widely unknown. Studies are needed to clarify the role of cardiac markers in COVID-19 prognosis. Multidisciplinary care most likely results in improved patient care.

Fighting the pandemic with collaboration at heart: Report from cardiologists in a COVID-19-dedicated Portuguese intensive care unit.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spread quickly around the world. Although mainly a respiratory illness, there is growing interest in non-respiratory manifestations, particularly cardiovascular ones. At our center, mobilization of cardiologists with intensive care training was needed. Our aim is to describe patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to a Portuguese intensive care unit (ICU), the cardiovascular impact of the disease and the experience of cardiologists working in a COVID-19 ICU. METHODS: Data from adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU of Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho between 16 March 2020 and 21 April 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were admitted. Mean age was 62.6±6.0 years and 23 (65.7%) were male. Dyslipidemia was the most common cardiovascular risk factor (65.7%, n=23), followed by hypertension (57.1%, n=20). Mean ICU stay time was 15.9±10.0 days. Patients had high rates of mechanical ventilation (88.6%, n=31) and vasopressor support (88.6%, n=31). Low rates of new onset left systolic dysfunction were detected (8.5%, n=2). One patient required venoarterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation. Mortality was 25% (n=9). Acute myocardial injury and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) elevation was detected in 62.9% (n=22). Patients that died had higher NT-proBNP compared to those discharged alive (p<0.05). Care by cardiologists frequently changed decision making. CONCLUSIONS: The cardiovascular impact of COVID-19 seems relevant but is still widely unknown. Studies are needed to clarify the role of cardiac markers in COVID-19 prognosis. Multidisciplinary care most likely results in improved patient care.

INTRODUÇÃO E OBJETIVOS: A doença pelo novo coronavirus (COVID-19) espalhou-se rapidamente pelo globo. Embora tenha atingimento essencialmente respiratório, existe interesse nas manifestações extrarrespiratórias, nomeadamente nas cardiovasculares. No nosso centro, foi necessária a mobilização de cardiologistas com experiência em cuidados intensivos para enfrentar este desafio. O objetivo desta investigação é descrever a população internada com COVID-19 grave numa UCI portuguesa, o impacto cardiovascular desta doença e a nossa experiência enquanto cardiologistas numa UCI COVID-19. MÉTODOS: Dados de adultos com COVID-19 internados na UCI do Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho entre 16/03/2020 e 21/04/2020 foram analisados retrospetivamente. RESULTADOS: Foram internados 35 doentes. A média de idade foi 62,6±6,0 anos e 23 (65,7%) doentes eram homens. A dislipidemia foi o fator de risco cardiovascular mais prevalente (65,7%, n=23), seguida pela hipertensão (57,1%, n=20). O tempo médio de internamento em UCI foi 15,9±10,0 dias. A necessidade de ventilação mecânica (88,6%, n=31) e suporte vasopressor (88,6%, n=31) foi alta, mas poucos doentes desenvolveram disfunção sistólica de novo (n=2,85%). A mortalidade foi de 25% (n=9). Foi detetada lesão miocárdica aguda e elevação do NT-proBNP em 62,9% (n=22) dos doentes, sendo os níveis de NT-proBNP mais elevados nos doentes que faleceram (p<0,05). A participação de cardiologistas na UCI alterou frequentemente a decisão clínica. CONCLUSÃO: O impacto cardiovascular da COVID-19 parece relevante mas é parcamente conhecido, sendo necessários mais estudos para clarificar o papel dos marcadores cardíacos no prognóstico da COVID-19. As equipas multidisciplinares provavelmente melhoram os cuidados de saúde prestados a estes doentes.

Determinants of the Need for Tracheostomy in Neurocritical Patients.

BACKGROUND: Given the difficulties in predicting the need for prolonged intubation and the timing of tracheostomy, the stroke-related early tracheostomy score (SETscore) was developed, and this tool has demonstrated moderate accuracy in predicting intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LoS), ventilation duration, and need for tracheostomy. We aim to assess the usefulness of SETscore in a more heterogeneous population that includes trauma patients to whom this score has not yet been applied. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective consecutive analysis of all neurocritical patients who were admitted to our medical-surgical ICU between 2016 and 2018 and who required endotracheal intubation within 48 h of admission was performed in this study. Clinicodemographic data, as well as tracheostomy timing, imaging results, and SETscore were evaluated. RESULTS: The medical records of 732 neurocritical patients were reviewed, but only 493 patients were included, 68 of whom were tracheostomized (TR). These TR patients presented longer LoS and ventilation and antibiotic duration, lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score at admission, and more respiratory comorbidities. Severity scores, including SETscore, were higher in the TR group. A SETscore of >10 demonstrated 92.6% sensitivity and 79.1% specificity in predicting the need for tracheostomy. The majority of patients were tracheostomized after the seventh day of ICU admission. No significant differences in SETscore as well as in severity scores, age, and gender were observed between the early and late TR groups. However, the need for tracheostomy was significantly associated with lower ICU death rate even after controlling for GCS at admission, gender, age, and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSION: SETscore can be applied to a heterogeneous population. However, more data and prospective analyses are needed to validate their clinical usefulness on a daily basis. Nevertheless, the present data are expected to contribute to the management of neurocritical patients, particularly in the setting of ICUs managing a broad spectrum of critically ill patients.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in circulatory and respiratory failure - A single-center experience. / Oxigenação por membrana extracorporal na falência circulatória e respiratória ­ experiência de um centro.

INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides mechanical pulmonary and circulatory support for patients with shock refractory to conventional medical therapy. In this study we aim to describe the indications, clinical characteristics, complications and mortality associated with use of ECMO in a single tertiary hospital. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of all patients supported with ECMO in two different intensive care units (general and cardiac), from the first patient cannulated in April 2011 up to October 2016. RESULTS: Overall, 48 patients underwent ECMO: 29 venoarterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) and 19 venovenous ECMO (VV-ECMO). In VA-ECMO, acute myocardial infarction was the main reason for placement. The most frequent complication was lower limb ischemia and the most common organ dysfunction was acute renal failure. In VV-ECMO, acute respiratory distress syndrome after viral infection was the leading reason for device placement. Access site bleeding and hematologic dysfunction were the most prevalent complication and organ dysfunction, respectively. Almost 70% of ECMO episodes were successfully weaned in each group. Survival to discharge was 37.9% for VA-ECMO and 63.2% for VV-ECMO. In VA-ECMO, the number of inotropic agents was a predictor of mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients with respiratory indications for ECMO experienced better survival than cardiac patients. The need for more inotropic drugs was a predictor of mortality in VA-ECMO. This is the first published record of the overall experience with ECMO in a Portuguese tertiary hospital.

[Abdominal compartment syndrome: survey on the awareness of Portuguese general surgeons]. / Síndrome de compartimento abdominal: questionário sobre a sensibilidade dos cirurgiões gerais Portugueses.

The Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (ACS) is a clinical entity recognized for over a century, but only recently its risk criteria, monitorization and treatment have been defined by the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (WSACS). The general surgeon's involvement is vital since this syndrome is common in surgical patients and because its treatment may culminate in a laparostomy. 250 questionnaires of 17 questions were distributed among general surgeons attending the XXVIII Portuguese Congress of Surgery. The data were analyzed using SPSS® v16. We received 36,4% (91) of the delivered questionnaires, most of which from male surgeons (63,7%), from central hospitals (75,8%), working 42 h per week (70.3%), whose average of age was 38 years. About half of the respondents received training in Intensive Care Units. All surgeons had already heard about measuring the Intra- abdominal Pressure (IAP), which was being performed at 89% of their hospitals. About 40% of surgeons only admitted intra-abdominal hypertension above 20 mmHg (only 22% indicated the correct value of 12 mmHg). 36,3% of surgeons suggested that a decompressive laparostomy must be carried out for primary ACS if IAP greater then 20 mmHg with new organ failure; 36.3% favoured the "Vacuum-pack"-like system, and 56% only re-operate the patients "as needed". 48,4% of surgeons had already performed decompressive laparostomy, 66% of which had residence training in a ICU (p = 0,005). Respondents also pointed an average mortality related to ACS of 81% without laparostomy, and a reduction to 38,5% after performing that procedure. Only 26% of the surgeons were aware of the WSACS consensus definitions and recommendations, of those, 83% had already performed a laparostomy (P<0,001). It can be concluded that, in spite of recognizing the ACS as a clinical entity, portuguese general surgeons are quite unaware of the WSACS definitions and treatment guidelines, urging the need for its divulgation.