Consensus document on diagnosis and management of familial hypercholesterolemia from the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis (SISA).

AIMS: Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder of lipoprotein metabolism that causes an increased risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Although early diagnosis and treatment of FH can significantly improve the cardiovascular prognosis, this disorder is underdiagnosed and undertreated. For these reasons the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis (SISA) assembled a Consensus Panel with the task to provide guidelines for FH diagnosis and treatment. DATA SYNTHESIS: Our guidelines include: i) an overview of the genetic complexity of FH and the role of candidate genes involved in LDL metabolism; ii) the prevalence of FH in the population; iii) the clinical criteria adopted for the diagnosis of FH; iv) the screening for ASCVD and the role of cardiovascular imaging techniques; v) the role of molecular diagnosis in establishing the genetic bases of the disorder; vi) the current therapeutic options in both heterozygous and homozygous FH. Treatment strategies and targets are currently based on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, as the prognosis of FH largely depends on the magnitude of LDL-C reduction achieved by lipid-lowering therapies. Statins with or without ezetimibe are the mainstay of treatment. Addition of novel medications like PCSK9 inhibitors, ANGPTL3 inhibitors or lomitapide in homozygous FH results in a further reduction of LDL-C levels. LDL apheresis is indicated in FH patients with inadequate response to cholesterol-lowering therapies. CONCLUSION: FH is a common, treatable genetic disorder and, although our understanding of this disease has improved, many challenges still remain with regard to its identification and management.

Longevity-associated BPIFB4 gene counteracts the inflammatory signaling.

BACKGROUND: Increased levels of pro-inflammatory proteins in plasma can be detected in older individuals and associate with the so called chronic low-grade inflammation, which contributes to a faster progression of aged-related cardiovascular (CV) diseases, including frailty, neurodegeneration, gastro-intestinal diseases and disorders reflected by alterations in the composition of gut microbiota. However, successful genetic programme of long-living individuals alters the trajectory of the ageing process, by promoting an efficient immune response that can counterbalance deleterious effects of inflammation and the CV complications. This is the case of BPIFB4 gene in which, homozygosity for a four single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) haplotype, the Longevity-Associated Variant (LAV) correlates with prolonged health span and reduced risk of CV complications and inflammation. The relation between LAV-BPIFB4 and inflammation has been proven in different experimental models, here we hypothesized that also human homozygous carriers of LAV-BPIFB4 gene may experience a lower inflammatory burden as detected by plasma proteomics that could explain their favourable CV risk trajectory over time. Moreover, we explored the therapeutic effects of LAV-BPIFB4 in inflammatory disease and monolayer model of intestinal barrier. RESULTS: We used high-throughput proteomic approach to explore the profiles of circulating proteins from 591 baseline participants selected from the PLIC cohort according to the BPIFB4 genotype to identify the signatures and differences of BPIFB4 genotypes useful for health and disease management. The observational analysis identified a panel of differentially expressed circulating proteins between the homozygous LAV-BPIFB4 carriers and the other alternative BPIFB4 genotypes highlighting in the latter ones a higher grade of immune-inflammatory markers. Moreover, in vitro studies performed on intestinal epithelial organs from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients and monolayer model of intestinal barrier demonstrated the benefit of LAV-BPIFB4 treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Homozygosity for LAV-BPIFB4 results in the attenuation of inflammation in PLIC cohort and IBD patients providing preliminary evidences for its therapeutic use in inflammatory disorders that need to be further characterized and confirmed by independent studies.

Apolipoprotein B compared with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases risk assessment.

The subendothelial retention of apolipoprotein B (apoB)-containing lipoproteins is a critical step in the initiation of pro-atherosclerotic processes. Recent genetic and clinical evidence strongly supports the concept that the lipid content of the particles is secondary to the number of circulating atherogenic particles that are trapped within the arterial lumen. Since each low-density lipoproteins (LDL) particle contains one apoB molecule, as do intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL) and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles, apoB level represents the total number of atherogenic lipoproteins, which is independent of particle density, and not affected by the heterogeneity of particle cholesterol content (clinically evaluated by LDL-cholesterol level). From this perspective, apoB is proposed as a better proxy to LDL-cholesterol for assessing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk, especially in specific subgroups of patients, including subjects with diabetes mellitus, with multiple cardiometabolic risk factors (obesity, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, and hypertension) and with high triglyceride levels and very low LDL-cholesterol levels. Therefore, given the causal role of LDL-cholesterol in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) development, routine measurement of both LDL-cholesterol and apoB is of utmost importance to properly estimate global cardiovascular risk and to determine the 'residual' risk of ASCVD in patients receiving therapy, as well as to monitor therapeutic effectiveness.

European guidelines for the treatment of dyslipidaemias: New concepts and future challenges.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is one of the most important causal factors for ASCVD. Based on the evidence of the clinical benefits of lowering LDL-C, the current 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines provide guidance for optimal management of people with dyslipidaemia. These guidelines include new and revised concepts, with a general tightening of LDL-C goals to be achieved, especially for patients at high and very high cardiovascular risk, based on the results of clinical trials of the recently approved drugs for the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia. However, some issues are still open for discussion. Among others, the concept of lifetime exposure to elevated LDL-C levels will probably drive the pharmacological approach and future guidelines. In addition, other factors such as non-HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein(a) are becoming increasingly important in determining cardiovascular risk. Finally, there is the question of whether combination therapy should be used as the first step to maximise the effectiveness of the pharmacological approach, avoiding the stepwise approach, which is likely to have a detrimental effect on adherence. Given the ever-changing landscape and the availability of new drugs targeting other important lipids, future guidelines will need to consider all these issues.

Lipid-lowering and anti-thrombotic therapy in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are at very high risk of cardiovascular events, but risk factor management is usually suboptimal. This Joint Task Force from the European Atherosclerosis Society and the European Society of Vascular Medicine has updated evidence on the management on dyslipidaemia and thrombotic factors in patients with PAD. Guidelines recommend a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) goal of more than 50% reduction from baseline and <1.4 mmol/L (<55 mg/dL) in PAD patients. As demonstrated by randomized controlled trials, lowering LDL-C not only reduces cardiovascular events but also major adverse limb events (MALE), including amputations, of the order of 25%. Addition of ezetimibe or a PCSK9 inhibitor further decreases the risk of cardiovascular events, and PCSK9 inhibition has also been associated with reduction in the risk of MALE by up to 40%. Furthermore, statin- based treatment improved walking performance, including maximum walking distance, and pain-free walking distance and duration. This Task Force recommends strategies for managing statin-associated muscle symptoms to ensure that PAD patients benefit from lipid-lowering therapy. Antiplatelet therapy, either daily clopidogrel 75 mg or the combination of aspirin 100 mg and rivaroxaban (2×2.5 mg) is also indicated to prevent cardiovascular events. Dual pathway inhibition (aspirin and rivaroxaban) may be considered following revascularization, taking into account bleeding risk. This Joint Task Force believes that adherence with these recommendations for lipid-lowering and antithrombotic therapy will improve the morbidity and mortality in patients with PAD.

Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids supplementation and cardiovascular outcomes: do formulation, dosage, and baseline cardiovascular risk matter? An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

The recent publication of the REDUCE-IT study has reopened the debate about the efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids in reducing the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. This meta-analysis aims at investigating the effect of omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFA) administration on CV outcomes in published randomized clinical trials (RCTs), with a focus on the role of dose, type of n-3 PUFA, and different CV risk at baseline. This meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA reporting guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE were searched since inception to March 2020. Inclusion criteria were: (1) RCTs; (2) including subjects with previous CV events; (3) administration of n-3 PUFA ≥ 1 g/day dosage for ≥1 year; (4) effects on all-cause mortality, cardiac death, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), fatal/nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or fatal/nonfatal stroke reported. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confident intervals (95 %CI) were estimated. 16 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis accounting for 81,073 participants. Supplementation of n-3 PUFA was associated with a significant risk reduction of cardiac mortality (OR 0.91 [95 % CI, 0.85-0.98]), MACE (OR 0.90 [95 % CI, 0.82-0.99]), and MI (OR 0.83 [95 % CI, 0.71-0.98]). In subgroup analyses, the risk reduction of cardiac mortality and MI was confirmed only in RCTs that enrolled patients in secondary prevention (-21 % and -31 %, respectively). Moreover, only the administration of more than 1 g per day of n-3 PUFA was effective in reducing the risk of cardiac death (-35 %), MACE (-24 %), and MI (-33 %). Finally, EPA + DHA supplementation was only associated with a significant risk reduction of cardiac death compared with EPA administered alone (-8 %). Conversely, the efficacy of EPA administered alone seemed to be greater in terms of risk reduction of MACE (-25 %) or MI (-30 %) than the combined EPA + DHA supplementation. The pharmacological approach with n-3 PUFA significantly improves cardiovascular outcomes, with higher benefit achieved by patients in secondary CV prevention, using more than 1 g/day, and taking EPA administered alone.

Sex-differences in factors and outcomes associated with adherence to statin therapy in primary care: Need for customisation strategies.

Despite the invaluable efficacy of statins, adherence to therapy is extremely poor in clinical practice. Improvement interventions should be as personalized as possible, but it is necessary to know factors that most influence adherence, and sex seems to be a key determinant. Thus, we aimed at exploring potential areas of sex-differences in statin adherence in a real-world population. For this purpose, we assessed adherence (as proportion of days covered) on a wide cohort of new statin users aged >40 years, and we evaluated its association with several covariates through sex-stratified log-binomial regression models. In addition, to compare also the benefits of optimal statin adherence in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease between men and women, we implemented sex-stratified Cox proportional hazard models. Our study showed that women are more likely to stop or be less adherent to statin treatment than men. Moreover, we observed significant sex-differences on effect size of several factors associated with adherence that should be taken into consideration for the management of patients. Finally, we observed no significant difference between men and women regarding statin efficacy in terms of reduction of incident hospitalization for ischemic heart disease and/or non-haemorrhagic cerebrovascular disease. These results invoke the responsibility of physicians to a prompt and personalized intervention. Physicians should consider routine screening for non-adherence in their clinical practice, target patients at higher risk of non-adherence, and improved motivation and communication.

Multilevel Models to Estimate Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Curves for Individual Cardiovascular Risk Evaluation.

Background and Purpose- The value of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT)-a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis-in defining the cardiovascular risk is still debated. The aim of this study was to estimate standard cIMT progression, adjusting values over time for the main cardiovascular risk factors, in a sample of low-to-moderate cardiovascular risk subjects, to identify normative cIMT progression values. Methods- From the progression of lesions in the intima of the carotid cohort, we selected subjects who underwent 4 planned serial clinical evaluations and ultrasound cIMT determinations, on average every 4 years. Subject taking glucose-lowering therapies in secondary cardiovascular prevention or with cardiovascular risk score >5 were excluded from the analysis. The growth of cIMT across the study period (12 years) was assessed by use of individual growth curve modeling within multilevel models. Results- A total of 1175 (36% men; mean age, 53±11 years at baseline) participants at low/intermediate cardiovascular risk have been included in this analysis. A significant and marked slope of the mean and maximum cIMT growth curves (ß=0.009 and ß=0.012, respectively) was observed, confirming that it is a function of age. A stratified analysis by decades of age highlighted a nonlinear cIMT progression over time. In addition, different patterns of cIMT development between sex were observed. Finally, different slopes in mean and maximum cIMT curves, with a significant spread since the fifth decade, were observed in the cIMT growth curve models of subjects developing multifocal carotid atherosclerosis compared with the rest of the population. Conclusions- These findings proved that the rate of change in cIMT over time is a sign of the development of atherosclerosis, which cannot be a priori assumed linear. These data, therefore, support the clinical relevance of these growth curve models for cIMT progression to be considered as useful tool to identify subjects with faster atherosclerosis progression and thus at increased cardiovascular risk.

Cardiovascular events with PCSK9 inhibitors: an updated meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

The therapy with proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors efficiently reduces plasma cholesterol levels, which has been recently associated with improvement in cardiovascular outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed at investigating the safety and efficacy of treatment with the clinically available anti-PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in all published randomized clinical trials (RCTs), updating the available results with the recently published ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial. Data search was carried out using PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE (inception - January 2019). Inclusion criteria were: (1) phase 2 or 3 RCTs; (2) comparing anti-PCSK9 mAbs (specifically evolocumab and alirocumab) with placebo; (3) with effects on outcomes reported; (4) with treatment duration longer than 8 weeks. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were used as summary statistics. We pooled the estimates by using both the DerSimonian & Laird method (random-effects model). Between-study heterogeneity was tested by Cochrane's Q test and measured with the I2 statistics. Twenty-eight RCTs comprising 62,281 participants (33,204 in the mAb arm, 29,077 in the placebo arm) were included in the meta-analysis. The treatment follow-up ranged from 8 weeks up to 208 weeks. Overall, no significant difference in all-cause mortality was observed between the two groups (OR 0.93 [95% CI, 0.85-1.03]). The treatment with an anti-PCSK9 mAb was associated with a significant reduction of CV events compared with placebo (OR 0.83 [95% CI, 0.78-0.87]), being the FOURIER and ODYSSEY OUTCOMES studies the major contributors. Both myocardial infarction and stroke were significantly reduced following the treatment with an anti-PCSK9 mAb. No significant difference was observed in cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.94 [95% CI, 0.83-1.07]). The incidence of serious adverse events was similar in the two groups (OR: 0.95, [95% CI, 0.91-0.99]). Thus, the pharmacological approach with anti-PCSK9 mAbs significantly and safely improves cardiovascular outcomes. Despite that, the pooled analysis failed to show a significant cardiovascular mortality benefit with anti-PCSK9 mAb treatment, suggesting that specific longer-term studies are warranted to address this issue. We suggest that the observed delay between the rapid effect on plasma cholesterol levels and the emergence of the clinical benefit, observed both in FOURIER and ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trials, might explain this finding.

Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin-Kexin type-9 (PCSK9) and triglyceride-rich lipoprotein metabolism: Facts and gaps.

After more than a decade of intense investigation, Pro-protein Convertase Subtilisin-Kexin type 9 (PCSK9) remains a hot topic of research both at experimental and clinical level. Interestingly PCSK9 is expressed in different tissues suggesting the existence of additional function(s) beyond the modulation of the Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) receptor in the liver. Emerging data suggest that PCSK9 might play a role in the modulation of triglyceride-rich lipoprotein (TGRL) metabolism, mainly Very Low-Density Lipoproteins (VLDL) and their remnants. In vitro, PCSK9 affects TGRLs production by intestinal cells as well as the catabolism of LDL receptor homologous and non-homologous targets such as VLDL receptor, CD36 and ApoE2R. However, the in vivo relevance of these findings is still debated. This review aims at critically discussing the role of PCSK9 on TGRLs metabolism with a major focus on the impact of its genetic and pharmacological modulation on circulating lipids and lipoproteins beyond LDL.

A simple informative intervention in primary care increases statin adherence.

PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness of an informative intervention on general practitioners aimed at improving patients' adherence to statin therapy. METHODS: In the local health unit (LHU) of Bergamo, Lombardy (Italy), each general practitioner received a synthetic scientific document on dyslipidaemia and statins and aggregated data on adherence in 2006 for his/her patients compared to the means in the LHU and in his/her working district. Furthermore, a sample of seven districts received also a table of adherence levels for single patients. Patient's level data were retrieved from the health care utilisation databases of the LHU. Adherence parameters (proportion of patients with only one prescription, medication possession ratio [MPR] and proportion of non-persistent patients) were assessed after 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 5833 and 4788 new statin users were enrolled before and after the intervention, respectively. The percentage of patients with only one prescription decreased from 28.0 to 23.9 % (p < 0.001). MPR increased from 70.3 to 76.0 % (p < 0.001), and proportion of patients with MPR ≥ 80 % increased from 45.4 to 56.4 % (p < 0.001). The persistence also showed an improvement, both in terms of decreasing proportion of non-persistent (from 51.9 to 41.4 %, p < 0.001) and of increasing duration of continued therapy (from 235 to 264 mean days of persistent therapy, p < 0.001). There were not significant differences between the two types of intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This intervention resulted in an overall improvement of the short-term adherence to therapy. This tool can be replicated in other local contexts and with other chronic therapies.

Polypharmacy Management in Chronic Conditions: A Systematic Literature Review of Italian Interventions.

Background: Potentially inappropriate polypharmacy (PIP) is among the major factors leading to adverse drug reactions, increased healthcare costs, reduced medication adherence, and worsened patient conditions. This study aims to identify existing interventions implemented to monitor and manage polypharmacy in the Italian setting. Methods: A systematic literature review (PROSPERO: CRD42023457049) was carried out according to the PRISMA statement guidelines. PubMed, Embase, ProQuest, and Web of Science were queried without temporal constraints, encompassing all published papers until October 2023. Inclusion criteria followed the PICO model: patients with polypharmacy; interventions to monitor/manage polypharmacy regimen versus no/any intervention; outcomes in terms of intervention effectiveness and cost variation. Results: After duplicate deletion, 153 potentially relevant publications were extracted. Following abstract and full-text screenings, nine articles met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 78% (n = 7) were observational studies, 11% (n = 1) were experimental studies, and 11% (n = 1) were two-phase studies. A total of 44% (n = 4) of the studies involved patients aged ≥ 65 years, while 56% (n = 5) were disease-specific. Monitoring was the most prevalent choice of intervention (67%; n = 6). Outcomes were mainly related to levels of polypharmacy (29%; n = 6) and comorbidities (29%; n = 6), effectiveness rates (14%; n = 3), and avoidable costs (9%; n = 2). Conclusions: This review outlines that Italy is still lacking in interventions to monitor/manage PIP, addressing an unmet need in developing patient-tailored strategies for reducing health-system burden.

Effect of lipid-lowering therapies on C-reactive protein levels: a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Chronic low-degree inflammation is a hallmark of atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) disease. To assess the effect of lipid-lowering therapies on C-reactive protein (CRP), a biomarker of inflammation, we conducted a meta-analysis according to the PRISMA guidelines. Databases were searched from inception to July 2023. Inclusion criteria were: (i) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in human, Phase II, III, or IV; (ii) English language; (iii) comparing the effect of lipid-lowering drugs vs. placebo; (iv) reporting the effects on CRP levels; (v) with intervention duration of more than 3 weeks; (vi) and sample size (for both intervention and control group) over than 100 subjects. The between-group (treatment-placebo) CRP absolute mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each drug class separately. A total of 171 668 subjects from 53 RCTs were included. CRP levels (mg/L) were significantly decreased by statins [-0.65 (-0.87 to -0.43), bempedoic acid; -0.43 (-0.67 to -0.20), ezetimibe; -0.28 (-0.48 to -0.08)], and omega-3 fatty acids [omega3FAs, -0.27 (-0.52 to -0.01)]. CRP was reduced by -0.40 (-1.17 to 0.38) with fibrates, although not statistically significant. A slight increase of CRP concentration was observed for proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors [0.11 (0.07-0.14)] and cholesteryl-ester transfer protein inhibitors [0.10 (0.00-0.21)], the latter being not statistically significant. Meta-regression analysis did not show a significant correlation between changes in CRP and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) or triglycerides. Statins, bempedoic acid, ezetimibe, and omega3FAs significantly reduce serum CRP concentration, independently of LDL-C reductions. The impact of this anti-inflammatory effect in terms of CV prevention needs further investigation.

Contemporary lipid-lowering management and risk of cardiovascular events in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: insights from the Italian LIPIGEN Registry.

AIMS: The availability of novel lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) has remarkably changed the clinical management of homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH). The impact of these advances was evaluated in a cohort of 139 HoFH patients followed in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: The clinical characteristics of 139 HoFH patients, along with information about LLTs and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels at baseline and after a median follow-up of 5 years, were retrospectively retrieved from the records of patients enrolled in the LIPid transport disorders Italian GEnetic Network-Familial Hypercholesterolaemia (LIPIGEN-FH) Registry. The annual rates of major atherosclerotic cardiovascular events (MACE-plus) during follow-up were compared before and after baseline. Additionally, the lifelong survival free from MACE-plus was compared with that of the historical LIPIGEN HoFH cohort. At baseline, LDL-C level was 332 ± 138 mg/dL. During follow-up, the potency of LLTs was enhanced and, at the last visit, 15.8% of patients were taking quadruple therapy. Consistently, LDL-C decreased to an average value of 124 mg/dL corresponding to a 58.3% reduction (Pt < 0.001), with the lowest value (∼90 mg/dL) reached in patients receiving proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors and lomitapide and/or evinacumab as add-on therapies. The average annual MACE-plus rate in the 5-year follow-up was significantly lower than that observed during the 5 years before baseline visit (21.7 vs. 56.5 per 1000 patients/year; P = 0.0016). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that the combination of novel and conventional LLTs significantly improved LDL-C control with a signal of better cardiovascular prognosis in HoFH patients. Overall, these results advocate the use of intensive, multidrug LLTs to effectively manage HoFH.

Contemporary real-world data from the Italian cohort of patients affected by homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia demonstrated that the addition of novel, low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR)-independent medications to conventional therapies allowed the achievement of unprecedented low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values with a trend towards a reduction of cardiovascular risk.

Genetic heterogeneity of familial hypercholesterolaemia in two populations from two different countries.

BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetically determined monogenic disorder of predominantly autosomal dominant inheritance. A number of studies on differences in the genetic profile of patients with FH have demonstrated the importance of a more substantive evaluation of genetic features. The aim of this study was to evaluate the genetic profile of patients with clinical FH among Italian and Russian patients. METHODS: We included 144 Italian and 79 Russian FH patients; clinical diagnosis was based on the same criteria. Patients were divided in: positive to genetic test (one causative variant), inconclusive (only variants of uncertain clinical significance [VUS]), and negative (with likely benign/benign variants, heterozygous variants in LDLRAP1 gene, or without causative variants). RESULTS: The genetic test was positive in 76.4 % of the Italian patients and in 49.4 % of the Russian patients. The presence of VUS alone was detected in 7.6 % and in 19.0 % (p < 0.001), respectively. Among patients with positive genetic diagnosis, pre-treatment LDL-C levels were higher in the Russian cohort (353.5 ± 111.3 vs. 302.7 ± 52.1 mg/dL, p = 0.009), as well as the percentage of treated patients (53.8 % vs. 14.5 %, p < 0.001) and the prevalence of premature coronary heart disease (12.8 % vs. 3.6 %, p = 0.039). Among patients carrying only VUS, mean pre-treatment LDL-C levels were similar between the cohorts (299.5 ± 68.1 vs. 295.3 ± 46.8 mg/dL, p = 0.863). Among pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants and VUS, only 5 % and 4 % was shared between the two cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSION: The genetic background of patients clinically diagnosed with FH in two different countries is characterized by high variability.

Effects of omega-3 fatty acids on coronary revascularization and cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis.

AIMS: Benefits of pharmacologic omega-3 fatty acid administration in cardiovascular prevention are controversial. Particularly, effects on coronary revascularization are unclear; also debated are specific benefits of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA). We investigated incident coronary revascularizations, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, heart failure (HF), unstable angina, and cardiovascular death, in subjects randomized to receive EPA or EPA + docosahexaenoic acid (EPA + DHA) vs. control. METHODS AND RESULTS: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted after MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library search. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines were followed for abstracting data and assessing data quality and validity. Data were pooled using a random effects model. Eighteen RCTs with 134 144 participants (primary and secondary cardiovascular prevention) receiving DHA + EPA (n = 52 498), EPA alone (n = 14 640), or control/placebo (n = 67 006) were included. Follow-up ranged from 4.5 months to 7.4 years. Overall, compared with controls, omega-3 supplementation reduced the risk of revascularization [0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-0.98; P = 0.001; P-heterogeneity = 0.0002; I2 = 68%], MI (0.89, 95% CI 0.81-0.98; P = 0.02; P-heterogeneity = 0.06; I2 = 41%), and cardiovascular death (0.92, 95% CI 0.85-0.99; P = 0.02; P-heterogeneity = 0.13; I2 = 33%). Lower risk was still observed in trials where most participants (≥60%) were on statin therapy. Compared with DHA + EPA, EPA alone showed a further significant risk reduction of revascularizations (0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.88; P = 0.0002; P-interaction = 0.005) and all outcomes except HF. CONCLUSION: Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation reduced the risk of cardiovascular events and coronary revascularization, regardless of background statin use. Eicosapentaenoic acid alone produced greater benefits. The role of specific omega-3 molecules in primary vs. secondary prevention and the potential benefits of reduced revascularizations on overall health status and cost savings warrant further research.

It is debated whether pharmacologic administration of omega-3 fatty acids reduces cardiac events. In particular, it is unclear whether benefits are actually restricted to the use of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), or whether combined administration of EPA + docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is needed; furthermore, little is known about possible benefits of omega-3 fatty acids in reducing incidence of coronary revascularization procedures. In this meta-analysis of all published evidence of clinical trials comparing EPA alone or EPA + DHA vs. control (134 144 participants), we demonstrate the following: In the overall analysis of all trials, omega-3 supplementation reduced the risk of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death, to a modest extent. However, when trials administering EPA alone were separately analysed, a further significant risk reduction for cardiovascular outcomes was demonstrated. Importantly, these benefits were also observed in subjects who were already taking statins as part of their chronic therapy.Administration of omega-3 fatty acids, particularly EPA alone, was also associated with a substantial decrease in the risk for subsequent coronary revascularizations. Reduction of revascularization procedures may induce additional benefits on overall health status and associated cost savings.

Appropriateness of the Prescription and Use of Medicines: An Old Concept but More Relevant than Ever.

The availability of drugs to treat diseases, control symptoms, or prevent their onset is one of the most important resources for maintaining health [...].