Evaluation and Validation of Thorax Model Responses: A Hierarchical Approach to Achieve High Biofidelity for Thoracic Musculoskeletal System.

As one of the most frequently occurring injuries, thoracic trauma is a significant public health burden occurring in road traffic crashes, sports accidents, and military events. The biomechanics of the human thorax under impact loading can be investigated by computational finite element (FE) models, which are capable of predicting complex thoracic responses and injury outcomes quantitatively. One of the key challenges for developing a biofidelic FE model involves model evaluation and validation. In this work, the biofidelity of a mid-sized male thorax model has been evaluated and enhanced by a multi-level, hierarchical strategy of validation, focusing on injury characteristics, and model improvement of the thoracic musculoskeletal system. At the component level, the biomechanical responses of several major thoracic load-bearing structures were validated against different relevant experimental cases in the literature, including the thoracic intervertebral joints, costovertebral joints, clavicle, sternum, and costal cartilages. As an example, the thoracic spine was improved by accurate representation of the components, material properties, and ligament failure features at tissue level then validated based on the quasi-static response at the segment level, flexion bending response at the functional spinal unit level, and extension angle of the whole thoracic spine. At ribcage and full thorax levels, the thorax model with validated bony components was evaluated by a series of experimental testing cases. The validation responses were rated above 0.76, as assessed by the CORA evaluation system, indicating the model exhibited overall good biofidelity. At both component and full thorax levels, the model showed good computational stability, and reasonable agreement with the experimental data both qualitatively and quantitatively. It is expected that our validated thorax model can predict thorax behavior with high biofidelity to assess injury risk and investigate injury mechanisms of the thoracic musculoskeletal system in various impact scenarios. The relevant validation cases established in this study shall be directly used for future evaluation of other thorax models, and the validation approach and process presented here may provide an insightful framework toward multi-level validating of human body models.

Development and multi-level validation of a computational model to predict traumatic aortic injury.

Traumatic aortic injury (TAI) is one of the leading causes of fatalities in blunt impact. However, there is no consensus on the injury mechanism of TAI in traffic accidents, mainly due to the complexity of occurrence scenarios and limited real-world crash data relevant to TAI. In this study, a computational model of the aorta with nonlinear mechanical characteristics and accurate morphology was developed and integrated within a thorax finite element model that included all major anatomical structures. To maximize the model's capability for predicting TAI, a multi-level process was presented to validate the model comprehensively. At the component level, the in vitro aortic pressurization testing was simulated to mimic the aortic burst pressure. Then, a sled test of a truncated cadaver was modeled to evaluate aorta response under posterior acceleration. The frontal chest pendulum impact was utilized to validate the performance of the aorta within full body model under direct chest compression. A parametric study was implemented to determine an injury tolerance for the aorta under these different loading conditions. The simulated peak pressure before aortic rupture was within the range of the experimental burst pressure. For the sled test, the simulated chest deflection and cross-sectional pressure of the aorta were correlated with the experimental measurement. No aorta injury was observed in simulated results of both sled test and chest pendulum impact, which matched the experimental findings. The present model will be a useful tool for understanding the TAI mechanisms, evaluating injury tolerance, and developing prevention strategies for aortic injuries.

Finite Element Model of a Deformable American Football Helmet Under Impact.

Despite the use of helmets in American football, brain injuries are still prevalent. To reduce the burden of these injuries, novel impact mitigation systems are needed. The Vicis Zero1 (VZ1) American football helmet is unique in its use of multi-directional buckling structures sandwiched between a deformable outer shell and a stiff inner shell. The objective of this study was to develop a model of the VZ1 and to assess this unique characteristic for its role in mitigating head kinematics. The VZ1 model was developed using a bottom-up framework that emphasized material testing, constitutive model calibration, and component-level validation. Over 50 experimental tests were simulated to validate the VZ1 model. CORrelation and Analysis (CORA) was used to quantify the similarity between experimental and model head kinematics, neck forces, and impactor accelerations and forces. The VZ1 model demonstrated good correlation with an overall mean CORA score of 0.86. A parametric analysis on helmet compliance revealed that the outer shell and column stiffness influenced translational head kinematics more than rotational. For the material parameters investigated, head linear acceleration ranged from 80 to 220 g, whereas angular velocity ranged from 37 to 40 rad/s. This helmet model is open-source and serves as an in silico design platform for helmet innovation.