Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Neural Transm (Vienna) ; 131(7): 799-811, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38578434

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess amantadine use and associated factors in the patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). BACKGROUND: Immediate-release amantadine is approved for the treatment of PD and is largely used in clinical practice to treat "levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LIDs). Its use varies according to countries and PD stages. The prospective NS-Park cohort collects features of PD patients followed by 26 French PD Expert Centres. METHODS: Variables used for the analyses included demographics, motor and non-motor PD symptoms and motor complications [motor fluctuations (MFs), LIDs)], antiparkinsonian pharmacological classes and levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD). We evaluated: (i) prevalence of amantadine use and compared clinical features of amantadine users vs. non-users (cross-sectional analysis); (ii) factors associated with amantadine initiation (longitudinal analysis); (iii) amantadine effect on LIDs, MFs, apathy, impulse control disorders and freezing of gait (Fog) (longitudinal analysis). RESULTS: Amantadine use prevalence was 12.6% (1,585/12,542, median dose = 200 mg). Amantadine users were significantly younger, with longer and more severe PD symptoms, greater LEDD and more frequent use of device-aided/surgical treatment. Factors independently associated with amantadine initiation were younger age, longer PD duration, more frequent LIDs, MFs and FoG, higher LEDD and better cognitive function. 9 of the 658 patients on amantadine had stopped it at the following visit, after 12-18 months (1.3%). New users of amantadine presented a higher improvement in LIDs and MF compared to amantadine never users. CONCLUSIONS: About 12% of PD patients within the French NS-Park cohort used amantadine, mostly those with younger age and more severe PD. Amantadine initiation was associated with a subsequent reduction in LIDs and MFs.


Assuntos
Amantadina , Antiparkinsonianos , Doença de Parkinson , Amantadina/uso terapêutico , Amantadina/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Idoso , Antiparkinsonianos/efeitos adversos , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapêutico , Antiparkinsonianos/administração & dosagem , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Doença de Parkinson/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/etiologia , Estudos Transversais , Levodopa/efeitos adversos , Levodopa/administração & dosagem , Estudos Longitudinais , Estudos de Coortes
2.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord ; 64: 226-234, 2019 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31047798

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer's. The French clinical research network for PD (NS-Park) has created a national patient registry to i)report medical activity of Parkinson Expert Centers (PECs) to the Ministry of Health, ii)facilitate PD patients pre-screening for clinical trials, iii) provide a source for pharmaco-epidemiology studies. OBJECTIVE: Assess the French Parkinsonian population at a nation-wide level and discover new clinical characteristics. METHODS: In this feasibility study, PECs prospectively collected clinical data in a standardized manner. The population main clinical characteristics are described, focusing on motor and non-motor symptoms and treatments, assessing its representativeness. By using an unbiased clustering with multiple correspondence analysis (MCA), we also investigate potential relationships between multiple variables like symptoms and treatments, as clues for future studies. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2016, among 11,157 included parkinsonian syndromes, 9454 (85%) had PD. MCA identified various profiles depending on disease duration. Occurrences of motor complications, axial signs, cognitive disorders and Levodopa use increase over time. Neurovegetative symptoms, psychiatric disorders, sleep disturbances and impulse control disorders (ICDs) seem stable over time. As expected, ICDs were associated to dopaminergic agonist use but other associations, such as ICDs and sleep disturbances for instance, or anxiety and depression, were found. CONCLUSIONS: Our results report one of the biggest PD registries ever reported and demonstrate the feasibility of implementing a nation-wide registry of PD patients in France, a potent tool for future longitudinal studies and clinical trials' population selection, and for pharmaco-epidemiology and cost-effectiveness studies.


Assuntos
Transtornos Parkinsonianos , Sistema de Registros , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , França , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença de Parkinson/fisiopatologia , Transtornos Parkinsonianos/fisiopatologia
3.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord ; 60: 51-56, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30297210

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: There is an unmet need to better control motor complications in Parkinson's disease (PD). Naftazone, which exhibits glutamate release inhibition properties, has shown antiparkinsonian and antidyskinetic activity in preclinical models of PD and in a clinical proof of concept study. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled cross-over trial in PD patients with motor fluctuations and dyskinesia testing naftazone 160 mg/day versus placebo for 14 days. The two co-primary endpoints were the area under curve (AUC) of motor (MDS-UPDRS part III) and dyskinesia (AIMS) scores during an acute levodopa challenge performed at the end of each period. Secondary endpoints were UDysRS and axial symptoms scores during the challenge; AIMS, UDysRS, and time spent with or without dyskinesia the day before the challenge. The primary analysis was performed in the per protocol population. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were included in the analysis. There was no difference between naftazone and placebo for the AUC of MDS-UPDRS III (-89, 95%CI[-1071; 893], p = 0.85), and AIMS (70, 95%CI[-192; 332], p = 0.57). At the end of treatment periods, AIMS score tended to be lower with naftazone than placebo (4.4 ±â€¯3.4 versus 6.7 ±â€¯4.4, p = 0.07), but UDysRS scores and other secondary outcomes were not different. Naftazone was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not confirm previous results on the efficacy of naftazone on dyskinesia nor motor fluctuations highlighting the problem of translating results obtained in preclinical models into clinical trials. Further investigation of naftazone may be conducted in PD with longer treatment duration.


Assuntos
Antiparkinsonianos/farmacologia , Dopaminérgicos/efeitos adversos , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/tratamento farmacológico , Levodopa/efeitos adversos , Naftoquinonas/farmacologia , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Antiparkinsonianos/administração & dosagem , Antiparkinsonianos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Cross-Over , Método Duplo-Cego , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Naftoquinonas/administração & dosagem , Naftoquinonas/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA