Frailty as an Effect Modifier in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The effect of clinical interventions may vary by patients' frailty status. Understanding treatment effect heterogeneity by frailty could lead to frailty-guided treatment strategies and reduce overtreatment and undertreatment. This systematic review aimed to examine the effect modification by frailty in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluate pharmacological, non-pharmacological, and multicomponent interventions. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrial.gov, from their inception to 8 December 2023. Two reviewers independently extracted trial data and examined the study quality with senior authors. RESULTS: Sixty-one RCTs that evaluated the interaction between frailty and treatment effects in older adults were included. Frailty was evaluated using different tools such as the deficit accumulation frailty index, frailty phenotype, and other methods. The effect of several pharmacological interventions (e.g., edoxaban, sacubitril/valsartan, prasugrel, and chemotherapy) varied according to the degree of frailty, whereas other treatments (e.g., antihypertensives, vaccinations, osteoporosis medications, and androgen medications) demonstrated consistent benefits across different frailty levels. Some non-pharmacological interventions had greater benefits in patients with higher (e.g., chair yoga, functional walking, physical rehabilitation, and higher dose exercise program) or lower (e.g., intensive lifestyle intervention, psychosocial intervention) levels of frailty, while others (e.g., resistance-type exercise training, moderate-intensive physical activity, walking and nutrition or walking) produced similar intervention effects. Specific combined interventions (e.g., hospital-based disease management programs) demonstrated inconsistent effects across different frailty levels. DISCUSSION: The efficacy of clinical interventions often varied by frailty levels, suggesting that frailty is an important factor to consider in recommending clinical interventions in older adults. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42021283051.

Comparison of serial amnioinfusion strategies for isolated early-onset fetal renal anhydramnios.

Introduction The optimal protocol for serial amnioinfusions to maintain amniotic fluid in pregnancies with early onset-fetal renal anhydramnios before 22 weeks is not known. We compared the performance of two different approaches. Methods A secondary analysis was conducted of serial amnioinfusions performed by a single center during the external pilot and feasibility phases of the Renal Agenesis Fetal Therapy (RAFT) trial. During the external pilot, higher amnioinfusion volumes were given less frequently; in the feasibility study, smaller volume amnioinfusions were administered more frequently. Procedural details, complications, and obstetric outcomes were compared between the two groups using Pearson's chi-squared or Fisher's Exact tests for categorical variables and Student's t-tests or Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests for continuous variables. The adjusted association between procedural details and chorioamniotic separation was obtained through a multivariate repeated measure logistic regression model. Results Eleven participants underwent 159 amnioinfusions (external pilot: three patients, 21 amnioinfusions; feasibility: eight patients, 138 amnioinfusions). External pilot participants had fewer amnioinfusions (7 vs. 19.5 in the feasibility group, p = 0.04), larger amnioinfusion volume (750 vs. 500 mL, p < 0.01), and longer interval between amnioinfusions (6 [4-7] vs. 4 [3-5] days, p < 0.01). In the external pilot, chorioamniotic separation was more common (28.6% vs. 5.8%, p < 0.01), preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) occurred sooner after amnioinfusion initiation (28 ± 21.5 vs. 75.6 ± 24.1 days, p = 0.03), and duration of maintained amniotic fluid between first and last amnioinfusion was shorter (38 ± 17.3 vs. 71 ± 19 days, p=0.03), compared to the feasibility group. While delivery gestational age was similar (35.1 ± 1.7 vs. 33.8 ± 1.5 weeks, p=0.21), feasibility participants maintained amniotic fluid longer. Conclusion Small volume serial amnioinfusions performed more frequently maintain normal amniotic fluid volume longer because of delayed occurrence of PPROM.

Exceptional responses to PARP inhibitors in patients with metastatic breast cancer in oncologic crisis.

PURPOSE: Cancers deficient in homologous recombination DNA repair, such as those with BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutations rely on a pathway mediated by the enzyme poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP). PARP inhibitors (PARPi's) have demonstrated efficacy in treating patients with germline (g)BRCA1/2, somatic (s)BRCA1/2, and gPALB2 mutations in clinical trials. However, patients with a poor performance status (PS) and those with severe organ impairment are often excluded from clinical trials and cancer-directed treatment. METHODS: We report the cases of two patients with metastatic breast cancer who had poor PS, significant visceral disease, and gPALB2 and sBRCA mutations, who derived significant clinical benefit from treatment with PARP inhibition. RESULTS: Patient A had germline testing demonstrating a heterozygous PALB2 pathogenic mutation (c.3323delA) and a BRCA2 variant of unknown significance (c.9353T>C), and tumor sequencing revealed PALB2 (c.228_229del and c.3323del) and ESR1 (c.1610A>C) mutations. Patient B was negative for pathologic BRCA mutations upon germline testing, but tumor sequencing demonstrated somatic BRCA2 copy number loss and a PIK3CA mutation (c.1633G>A). Treatment with PARPi's in these two patients with an initial PS of 3-4 and significant visceral disease resulted in prolonged clinical benefit. CONCLUSION: Patients with a poor PS, such as those described here, may still have meaningful clinical responses to cancer treatments targeting oncogenic drivers. More studies evaluating PARPi's beyond gBRCA1/2 mutations and in sub-optimal PS would help identify patients who may benefit from these therapies.

A qualitative study of health-care experiences and challenges faced by ageing homebound adults.

BACKGROUND: The ageing of the global population is associated with an increasing prevalence of chronic diseases and functional impairments, resulting in a greater proportion of homebound individuals. OBJECTIVE: To examine the health-care experiences of older homebound adults who have not previously received home-based primary care (HBPC). To explore their impressions of this method of care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional qualitative study using semi-structured interviews. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 18 older homebound individuals in Central Virginia. RESULTS: Our findings revealed that homebound individuals faced significant health challenges, including pain resulting from various comorbidities. They felt that their mobility was restricted by their physical conditions and transportation challenges. These were major barriers to social outings and health-care access. Participants left their homes infrequently and typically with assistance. Regarding office-based care, participants were concerned about long wait times and making timely appointments. Some thought that HBPC would be convenient and could result in better quality care; however, others believed that the structure of the health-care system and its focus on efficiency would not permit routine HBPC. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Older homebound adults in this study faced high burdens of disease, a lack of mobility and difficulty accessing quality health care. Our observations may help researchers and clinicians better understand the health-care experiences and personal opinions of older homebound individuals, informing the development of effective and empathetic home-based care. Participant responses illuminated a need for education about HBPC. We must improve health-care delivery and develop comprehensive, patient-centered HBPC to meet the needs of homebound individuals.

Case report: prolonged durable clinical benefit and low toxicity from combination endocrine therapy in a patient with recurrent endometrial carcinoma.

Background: Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecologic cancer, with increasing incidence and mortality. Combination endocrine therapy comprised of tamoxifen and progestational agents has demonstrated promising results in treating recurrent disease. This case report describes the prolonged clinical benefit of treatment with tamoxifen and megestrol acetate in a woman with recurrent, metastatic endometrial endometrioid carcinoma positive for estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR). Case: A 71-year-old gravida 1 para 1 woman presented with postmenopausal bleeding and vaginal discharge. Pelvic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging confirmed a 4.7 cm endometrial mass. The patient underwent a total laparoscopic hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, and cystoscopy; pathology revealed a FIGO stage IA grade 1 ER/PR-positive endometroid endometrial adenocarcinoma. She continued under active surveillance for approximately 42 months until she experienced bone metastases in her pelvis, for which she received radiation therapy. Five months later, pulmonary metastases were detected, and she received six cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel. She then started megestrol acetate and tamoxifen and has remained clinically stable with minimal side effects and reasonable quality of life for approximately 57 months. Conclusion: Our case suggests that combination endocrine therapy has the potential to provide substantial long-term clinical benefit in women with recurrent endometrial cancer and bone metastases, despite multiple prior treatments, allowing patients to experience stable disease and quality of life. In patients with recurrent endometrioid, ER/PR-positive disease, endocrine therapy alone or in combination with other targeted therapies are regimens that may be considered due to their low overall toxicity.

A Qualitative Study of the Social and Lived Experiences of Homebound Older Adults.

OBJECTIVE: The number of homebound older adults is increasing in the United States. We aimed to examine their social and lived experiences and to understand their perspectives on their situation, feelings, and coping mechanisms. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 18 older homebound individuals in Central Virginia. RESULTS: Homebound older adults experienced both physical and mental health challenges that restricted their ability to participate in activities of daily living, recreation, and social interactions. Participants often felt dependent, helpless, lonely, and socially isolated. Those who communicated regularly with friends, family, and health care providers reported positive benefits from these interactions. DISCUSSION: Participants faced challenges to their physical, emotional, and mental well-being. Our findings might help clinicians, policymakers, and community organizations understand how to better support homebound older adults. We should provide educational opportunities, respect their autonomy, and implement initiatives to address their isolation and loneliness.