Colonic J-Pouch or Straight Colorectal Reconstruction After Low Anterior Resection For Rectal Cancer: Impact on Quality of Life and Bowel Function: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Study.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes associated with different bowel reconstruction techniques following anterior resection for rectal cancer are still a matter of debate. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess quality of life and bowel function in patients who underwent colonic J-pouch or straight colorectal anastomosis reconstruction after low anterior resection. DESIGN: Bowel function and quality of life were assessed within a multicenter randomized trial. Questionnaires were administered before the surgery (baseline) and at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. SETTINGS: Patients were enrolled by 19 centers. The enrollment started in October 2009 and was stopped in February 2016. The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT01110798). PATIENTS: Patients who underwent low anterior resection for primary mid-low rectal cancer and who were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either stapled colonic J-pouch or straight colorectal anastomosis were selected. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were quality of life and bowel function. RESULTS: Of the 379 patients who were evaluable, 312 (82.3%) completed the baseline, 259 (68.3%) the 6-month, 242 (63.9%) the 12-month, and 199 (52.5%) the 24-month assessment. Bowel functioning and quality of life did not significantly differ between arms for almost all domains. The total bowel function score, the urgency, and the stool fractionation scores significantly worsened after surgery and remained impaired over time in both arms (p < 0.0032), whereas constipation improved after surgery but recovered to baseline levels from 1 year onward (p < 0.0036). All patients showed a significant and continuous improvement in emotional functioning (p < 0.0013) and future perspective (p < 0.0001) from baseline to the end of the study. LIMITATIONS: Limitations of the study include missing data, which increased over time; the possibility that some treatments have slightly changed since the study was conducted; and investigators not blind to treatment allocation. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study do not support the routine use of colonic J-pouch reconstruction in patients with rectal cancer who undergo a low anterior resection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B328. BOLSA J COLÓNICA O RECONSTRUCCIÓN COLORRECTAL RECTA DESPUÉS DE RESECCIÓN ANTERIOR BAJA PARA CÁNCER RECTAL: IMPACTO EN LA CALIDAD DE VIDA Y LA FUNCIÓN INTESTINAL: UN ESTUDIO ALEATORIZADO PROSPECTIVO MULTICÉNTRICO: Los resultados informados por el paciente asociados con diferentes técnicas de reconstrucción intestinal después de la resección anterior para el cáncer de recto aún son tema de debate.Evaluar la calidad de vida y la función intestinal en pacientes que se sometieron a una bolsa en J colónica o reconstrucción de anastomosis colorrectal recta después de una resección anterior baja.La función intestinal y la calidad de vida se evaluaron en un ensayo aleatorizado multicéntrico. Los cuestionarios se administraron antes de la cirugía (basal) y a los 6, 12 y 24 meses después de la cirugía.Los pacientes fueron incluidos en 19 centros. La inscripción comenzó en Octubre de 2009 y se detuvo en Febrero de 2016. El estudio se registró en www.clinicaltrials.gov (Identificador: NCT01110798).Pacientes que se sometieron a resección anterior baja por cáncer rectal primario medio-bajo y que fueron aleatorizados en una proporción de 1: 1 para recibir bolsa J colónica con grapas o anastomosis colorrectal recta.calidad de vida y función intestinal.De los 379 pacientes que fueron evaluables, 312 (82.3%) completaron la evaluación inicial, 259 (68.3%) a los 6 meses, 242 (63.9%) a los 12 meses y 199 (52.5%) a los 24 meses. . El funcionamiento intestinal y la calidad de vida no difirieron significativamente entre los dos grupos en casi todos los dominios. La puntuación total de la función intestinal, la urgencia y las puntuaciones de fraccionamiento de las heces empeoraron significativamente después de la cirugía y continuaron con el tiempo extra en ambos grupos (p <0.0032), mientras que el estreñimiento mejoró después de la cirugía pero se recuperó a los niveles basales a partir de 1 año en adelante (p <0.0036). Todos los pacientes mostraron una mejora significativa y continua en el funcionamiento emocional (p <0.0013) y la perspectiva futura (<0.0001) desde el inicio hasta el final del estudio.Datos faltantes, que aumentaron con el tiempo; la posibilidad de que algunos tratamientos hayan cambiado ligeramente desde que se realizó el estudio; investigadores no cegados a la asignación del tratamiento.Los hallazgos de este estudio no respaldan el uso rutinario de la reconstrucción de la bolsa J colónica en pacientes con cáncer rectal que se someten a una resección anterior baja. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B328. (Traducción-Dr. Yesenia Rojas-Khalil).

Detection of circulating tumor cells in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy followed by curative surgery.

PURPOSE: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) represent an independent prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer, while their significance in early stages is still an open issue. The aim of the study is to investigate the role of CTCs in rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT). METHODS: In this prospective single institutional study, cT3-4 and/or N+ rectal cancer was treated with neoadjuvant CT-RT. The primary endpoints were as follows: evaluation of CTCs at baseline (t0), after CT-RT (t1), within 7 days after surgery (t2), and at 6 months from surgery (t3) and correlation with main patient/tumor characteristics, CEA, response to neoadjuvant therapy, and disease-free survival (DFS). CTCs were enumerated with the CellSearch System in 22.5 ml peripheral blood. A repeated measure analysis for binary outcome was used to evaluate over time changes in the percentage of CTCs detectable in blood samples. RESULTS: Of the 90 patients enrolled in this study, 85 were eligible consisting of 52 males and 33 females. Median age was 63 years and median follow-up was 38 months. CTCs were available for all patients at t0, for 67 at t1, for 68 at t2, and for 62 at t3. CTCs >0 were reported on 16 (19%) at t0, on 5 (7.5%) at t1, on 6 (9%) at t2, and on 3 (5%) at t3 (P value for trend 0.039). Only for CT-RT responders, CTCs reduced from t0 to t1. No statistically significant association was found between CTCs and main patient/tumor characteristics and DFS. CONCLUSIONS: Sixteen patients (19%) had CTCs ≥1 at t0 with reduction in CTC number in case of objective remissions. The proportion of patients with CTCs ≥1 decreased over the time as the therapeutic course proceeded. Much effort should be oriented toward increasing CTC detection rate by enhancing technical tests and achieving better patient characterization.

The Impact of pelvimetry on anastomotic leakage in a consecutive series of open, laparoscopic and robotic low anterior resections with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. .

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recently, pelvic anatomy has been taken into consideration and related to surgical outcome indicators after low anterior resection (LAR). Several pelvimetric parameters have been matched with conversion rate, postoperative complications and duration of surgery in laparoscopic series, and with the quality of specimen and pathologic outcomes in further open surgical series. METHODOLOGY: In 97 consecutive patients submitted to sphincter-saving LAR with total mesorectal excision (TME) five pelvic dimensions were measured by abdominal computed tomography scan: anteroposterior and transverse diameters in the pelvic inlet (IAP and ITRA), anteroposterior and transverse diameters in the pelvic outlet (OAP and OTRA), and the pelvic depth. The endpoint evaluated was anastomotic leakage (AL) rate. RESULTS: There were 51 open, 12 laparoscopic and 34 robotic LARs. The sum of IAP OAP and OTRA (Pelvic Index) significantly predicted AL showing that starting from the cut-point of 290 mm down to a PI of 278 mm the odds-ratio of having an AL increased from 2.63 (95% CI: 1.10,5.47) to 5.07 (95% CI: 1.35,8.02). CONCLUSIONS: The sum of the 3 pelvic dimensions which we termed "Pelvic Index" was associated to AL following sphinctersaving LAR. This may be considered in planning the surgical strategy for rectal cancer patients.

Factors predicting worse prognosis in patients affected by pT3 N0 colon cancer: long-term results of a monocentric series of 137 radically resected patients in a 5-year period.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: For patients with Stage II colon cancer, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to identify clinical and/or pathological findings related to a worse prognosis in this category of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of consecutive patients, extracted by an institutional Tumour Registry, admitted to an affiliated University Hospital in Milan (European Institute of Oncology) for adenocarcinoma of the colon (all sites), between 2000 and 2005, and having a final pT3 N0 pathology staging after curative surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy was decided as a result of a medical decision within a multidisciplinary Tumor Board. RESULTS: Data of 137 patients were obtained, with a median follow-up of 77 months (range 6-131). Patients who received chemotherapy were younger than patients who did not. Nine patients out of 137 (6.5 %) died as a consequence of colon cancer recurrence; four of them had received adjuvant chemotherapy. Only histological grade III and mucinous histotype were found to impact on cumulative incidence of colon-related events (p 0.03 and 0.02, respectively); no impact was found on cumulative incidence of colonic neoplasm recurrence-related deaths (p 0.74 and 0.74, respectively). Number of analyzed LNs (lymph nodes) emerged as a factor possibly affecting the cumulative incidence of colon-related events (p 0.09) as well as the cumulative incidence of colonic neoplasm recurrence-related deaths (p 0.10). The risk of events was inversely proportional to the number of dissected LNs, even over 20 up to about 25 LNs. Never-smokers exhibited a lower incidence of colon-related events, although the difference was not statistically significant (p 0.09). All other analyzed variables did not show any impact on survival rate, including age, gender, ASA score, BMI, site of colonic neoplasm, multifocality, perivascular invasion, and use of adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Histology grading G3 and mucinous histotype were predictors of worse outcome. Efforts to improve LN evaluation should result in clinically significant improvements in outcome, and also the quality of care for patients with radically resected stage II colon cancer.

Recurrence and prognostic factors in patients with aggressive fibromatosis. The role of radical surgery and its limitations.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is still the standard treatment for aggressive fibromatosis (AF); however, local control remains a significant problem and the impact of R0 surgery on cumulative recurrence (CR) is objective of contradictory reports. METHODS: This is a single-institution study of 62 consecutive patients affected by extra-abdominal and intra-abdominal AF who received macroscopically radical surgery within a time period of 15 years. RESULTS: Definitive pathology examination confirmed an R0 situation in 49 patients and an R1 in 13 patients. Five-year CR for patients who underwent R0 vs R1 surgery was 7.1% vs 46.4% (P = 0.04) and for limbs vs other localizations 33.3% vs 9.9% (P = 0.02) respectively. In 17 patients who had intraoperative frozen section (IFS) margin evaluation R0 surgery was more common (17 of 17 vs 32 of 45, P = 0.01) and CR lower (five-year CR 0% vs 19.1%, respectively, P = 0.04). However, in multivariate analysis only limb localization showed a negative impact on CR (HR: 1.708, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.84, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: IFS evaluation could help the surgeon to achieve R0 surgery in AF. Non-surgical treatment, including watchful follow-up, could be indicated for patients with limb AF localization, because of their high risk of recurrence even after R0 surgery.

Surgical site infections following colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized prospective trial comparing common and advanced antimicrobial dressing containing ionic silver.

BACKGROUND: An antimicrobial dressing containing ionic silver was found effective in reducing surgical-site infection in a preliminary study of colorectal cancer elective surgery. We decided to test this finding in a randomized, double-blind trial. METHODS: Adults undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery at two university-affiliated hospitals were randomly assigned to have the surgical incision dressed with Aquacel Ag Hydrofiber dressing or a common dressing. To blind the patient and the nursing and medical staff to the nature of the dressing used, scrub nurses covered Aquacel Ag Hydrofiber with a common wound dressing in the experimental arm, whereas a double common dressing was applied to patients of control group. The primary end-point of the study was the occurrence of any surgical-site infection within 30 days of surgery. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients (58 in the experimental arm and 54 in the control group) qualified for primary end-point analysis. The characteristics of the patient population and their surgical procedures were similar. The overall rate of surgical-site infection was lower in the experimental group (11.1% center 1, 17.5% center 2; overall 15.5%) than in controls (14.3% center 1, 24.2% center 2, overall 20.4%), but the observed difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.451), even with respect to surgical-site infection grade 1 (superficial) versus grades 2 and 3, or grade 1 and 2 versus grade 3. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized trial did not confirm a statistically significant superiority of Aquacel Ag Hydrofiber dressing in reducing surgical-site infection after elective colorectal cancer surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00981110.

Assessing appropriateness for elective colorectal cancer surgery: clinical, oncological, and quality-of-life short-term outcomes employing different treatment approaches.

PURPOSE: In recent years, colorectal cancer surgery has benefitted from new techniques such as laparoscopy and robotic surgery. However, many treatment disparities exist among different centers for patients affected by the same kind of tumors. METHODS: Forty-five (41%) open (OCO) vs. 30 (28%) laparoscopic (LCO) vs. 34 (31%) robotic-assisted (RCO) colectomies and 34 (40%) open (ORR) vs. 52 (60%) robotic (ROR) rectal resections performed during a 15-month period, in elective setting, were compared. Patients presenting contraindications for minimally invasive procedures were excluded from the study, so that all the enrolled patients were suitable for either of the surgical procedures. RESULTS: Overall morbidity rates were similar among groups. Perioperative mortality was nil. No significant differences were noted as for total number of lymph nodes harvested between arms. Mean time (days) to first bowel movement to gas was 3.3 vs. 2.3 vs. 2.6 for OCO, LCO, and RCO, respectively (p < 0.001), and 3.3 vs. 2.0 for ORR and ROR, respectively (p = 0.003). Among several European Organization in Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 functional scales considered only physical functioning was significantly better at 30 days for RCO vs. OCO (96.3 ± 10 RCO vs. 85.5 ± 12.6 OCO; p = 0.015). Robotic surgery was much more expensive in comparison to open as well as laparoscopic procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic and robotic surgeries for colorectal cancer present both the same advantages in comparison to open procedures in terms of faster recovery. However, our data do not seem to support the routine use of RCO as a cost-effective procedure.

Aggressive treatment approach for cloacogenic carcinoma of the anorectum: report from a single cancer center.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The prognosis of cloacogenic carcinoma of the anorectum has rarely been investigated, and its clinical behavior is supposed to be similar to common squamous anal cancers. During the last 10 years, chemoradiation treatment (CRT) has been considered the standard of care for anal cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated the treatment of cloacogenic cancers treated within the framework of a multidisciplinary cancer center team during an 8-year period. The medical records of 7 patients affected by cloacogenic carcinoma were analyzed. Three patients presented distant metastases at the time of diagnosis. CRT using 5-fluorouracil + mitomycin or cisplatin was considered the gold standard for those cases amenable to cure. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up time of 33 months (range 9-100), disease recurrence or progression was observed in 6 patients, which caused death in 3 of them. Three- and 5-year actuarial overall survival rates were 71 and 48%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our data seem to suggest that the cloacogenic origin could present prognostic relevance within the wide spectrum of anal cancers. This should be carefully considered when submitting patients to aggressive and prolonged treatments. However, this hypothesis needs to be confirmed by larger series of this disease.

Desmoid tumors of the anterior abdominal wall: results from a monocentric surgical experience and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Desmoid tumor, also known as aggressive fibromatosis, is a rare soft tissue tumor. For those cases localized in the anterior abdominal wall, radical resection and reconstruction with a mesh is indicated. Because the rarity of the disease, randomized trials are lacking, but in reported retrospective series, it is clear that although it is considered a benign lesion, local recurrence is not uncommon. METHODS: We analyzed the records of 14 consecutive patients (3 men, 11 women, mean age 36 years, range 25-51 years) with desmoid tumor of the anterior abdominal wall treated at the European Institute of Oncology. The surgical strategy was the same in all cases: wide surgical excision and immediate plastic reconstruction with mesh after intraoperative confirmation by frozen sections of disease-free margins of >1 cm. We considered long-term outcomes by using the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 as an instrument to evaluate the overall quality of the treatment delivered to these patients. RESULTS: No immediate postoperative complication was registered, and no patient developed recurrence after a median follow-up period of 55 months. Two women experienced mesh bulging within 1 year after the operation. The long-term mean global health status registered was 97 out of 100. CONCLUSIONS: Radical resection aided by intraoperative margin evaluation via frozen sections followed by immediate mesh reconstruction is a safe procedure and can provide definitive cure without functional limitations for patients with desmoid tumors of the anterior abdominal wall.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by hepatectomy for primarily resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hepatic resection in metastatic disease from colorectal cancer offers the best chance in selected cases for long-term survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has been advocated in some cases initially deemed irresectable with few reports of the efficacy of such a strategy and the influence of the response to chemotherapy on the outcome of radical hepatic resection. METHODOLOGY: Between December 1995 and May 2005, 88 patients with colorectal liver metastases underwent hepatic resection with curative intent. Twenty-five of these patients, (7 males, 18 females, mean age: 58+/-9 years; range: 40-75 years) deemed as resectable cases at the time of diagnosis were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A 7-year survival analysis was performed. Chemotherapy included mainly oxaliplatin or irinotecan containing regimens for a median of 6 courses. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (60%) had synchronous and 10 (40%) metachronous metastases. During preoperative chemotherapy tumor regression occurred in 8 cases (32%); stable disease (SD) in a further 10 patients (40%) and progressive disease (PD) developed in 7 cases (28%). The 5-year overall survival for NACT responders was 71% and only 15% for non-responders (p=0.026). CONCLUSIONS: The response to chemotherapy is likely to be a significant prognostic factor affecting overall survival after radical hepatic resection for colorectal metastases.

Fine-needle aspiration cytology of thyroid nodules: experience at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Barbados (1998-2002).

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of the thyroid nodule has become part of accepted practice defining the role of surgery. This study assessed a 5-year period comparing cytologic with histopathologic diagnosis in 256 samples from 234 patients (203 women and 31 men). Inadequate cytologic samples were obtained in 21.1% of cases. The sensitivity and positive predictive values for the detection by FNAC of thyroid neoplasms was 21.1% and 30.8%, respectively, with a specificity and negative predictive value of 79.5% and 70.0%, respectively. The overall FNAC accuracy was 61.9%. It is anticipated that improvement in diagnosis will develop from specific cytopathological training in thyroid FNAC, consideration of the cytopathologist performing the aspiration biopsy, and the development of immunohistochemical and molecular techniques applied to the cytologic smears. The principal inherent difficulty with thyroid FNAC is the inability to confidently distinguish hyperplastic follicular adenomas from microinvasive follicular carcinomas.

Effectiveness of LigaSure diathermy coagulation in liver surgery.

The principal cause of perioperative morbidity and mortality following hepatic resection is excessive intraoperative hemorrhage. This study evaluates the operative use of the LigaSure device in sealing ductal structures during major and minor hepatic resections. Patients were analyzed between June 1994 and December 2005, comparing 89 randomly selected cases undergoing hepatic resections using the clamp-crushing technique with LigaSure electrocautery and hepatic inflow occlusion where appropriate with 70 patients undergoing various hepatic resections using the clamp-crushing technique alone with hepatic inflow occlusion where appropriate. Intraoperative blood loss and perioperative blood transfusion requirements were significantly less for patients in the LigaSure group. LigaSure-assisted hepatic resection was generally performed more quickly than the conventional clamp-crushing technique. The overall maximum postoperative AST, ALT, and bilirubin serum levels were similar in the two groups, as was the incidence of major postoperative complications. The LigaSure device in this randomized study is safe and simple to use, resulting in less perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirement during hepatic parenchymal transection.

Liver Resection or Resection Plus Intraoperative Echo-Guided Ablation in the Treatment of Colorectal Metastases: We Are Evaluating Their Effect for Cure.

This study determines the oncologic outcome of the combined resection and ablation strategy for colorectal liver metastases. Between January 1994 and December 2015, 373 patients underwent surgery for colorectal liver metastases. There were 284 patients who underwent hepatic resection only (Group 1) and 83 hepatic resection plus ablation (Group 2). Group 2 patients had a higher incidence of multiple metastases (100% in Group 2 vs 28.2% in Group 1; P < 0.001) and bilobar involvement (76.5% in Group 2 vs 12.9% in Group 1; P < 0.001) than Group 1 cases. Perioperative mortality was nil in either group, with a higher postoperative complication rate among Group 1 versus Group 2 cases (18 vs 0, respectively). The median follow-up was 90 months (range, 1-180), with a five-year overall survival for Group 1 and Group 2 of 51 per cent and 80 per cent, respectively (P = 0.193). Mean disease-free survival for patients with R0 resection was 55 per cent, 40 per cent, and 37 per cent at one, two, and three years, respectively, and remained steadily higher (at 50%) in those patients treated with resection combined with ablation up to five years (P = 0.069). The only intraoperative ablation failure was for a large lesion (≥5 cm). Our data support the use of intraoperative ablation when complete hepatic resection cannot be achieved.

A rationale multidisciplinary approach for treatment of esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer: Accurate review of management and perspectives.

Cancer of the esophagus and of gastroesophageal junction can be cured, even if with lacking cure rate. Different approaches have been developed, mostly when carcinoma has loco-regional pattern. Multimodality therapy showed a survival rate superior than 10% if compared to a single approach. This is a systematic review, carried to assess the following matters: Which therapeutic opportunities are available? Who could benefit of them? Which adverse reactions could possibly verify? How can physicians definitely choose the proper strategy? Which is the role of surgery? We mean to give either General Practitioner or specialists clear and efficient updates about current treatment of this tumour, starting from physical examination. Four eminent guidelines were consulted for our study: Cancer Care Ontario's Program in Evidence-Based Care, NCCN, Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre and Esmo.

Aggressive Surgical Approach for Treatment of Primary and Recurrent Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

To analyze treatment and survival in a series of resected patients with primary or recurrent retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) treated and prospectively followed at a single institution. Between July 1994 and December 2015, 89 patients (36 M, 53 F; mean age 60 years, range 25-79) were evaluated. For the purpose of analysis, complete resection was defined as removal of gross tumor with histologically confirmed clear resection margins. Eighty-three out of the 89 patients (93%), 46 of whom affected by primary RPS, and 37 by recurrent RPS, underwent surgical exploration. Sixty-two had a grossly and microscopically complete resection. Fifty-three out of 83 patients (64%) underwent removal of contiguous intra-abdominal organs. Preoperative mortality was nil and significant preoperative complications occurred in six cases only (7%). High-grade tumor pointed out to be a significant variable for a worse survival in all 83 patients amenable to undergo surgical resection (57% 5 years survival for low grade vs 14% for high grade; P = 0.0004). Among completely resected patients, only histologic grade clearly affected disease-free survival (72% 5 years survival for low grade vs 50% for high grade; P = 0.04), while the role of preoperative blood transfusions (67% 5 years survival for non-transfused patients vs 29% for transfused patients; P = 0.05) has to be evaluated in connection to patient complexity. Histological grade and recurrence are the most valuable prognostic predictors; in this clinical subset, an aggressive surgical approach in both primary and recurrent RPS is associated with a best long-term survival and disease-free survival.

Surgical outcomes for colon and rectal cancer over a decade: results from a consecutive monocentric experience in 902 unselected patients.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the surgical morbidity and long-term outcome of colorectal cancer surgery in an unselected group of patients treated over the period 1994-2003. METHODS: A consecutive series of 902 primary colorectal cancer patients (489 M, 413 F; mean age: 63 years +/- 11 years, range: 24-88 years) was evaluated and prospectively followed in a university hospital (mean follow-up 36 +/- 24 months; range: 3-108 months). Perioperative mortality, morbidity, overall survival, curative resection rates, recurrence rates were analysed. RESULTS: Of the total, 476 colorectal cancers were localized to the colon (CC, 53%), 406 to the rectum (RC, 45%), 12 (1%) were multicentric, and 8 were identified as part of HNPCC (1%). Combining all tumours, there were 186 cancers (20.6%) defined as UICC stage I, 235 (26.1%) stage II, 270 (29.9%) stage III and 187 (20.6%) stage IV cases. Twenty-four (2.7%) cases were of undetermined stage. Postoperative complications occurred in 38% of the total group (37.8% of CC cases, 37.2% of the RC group, 66.7% of the synchronous cancer patients and 50% of those with HNPCC, p = 0.19) Mortality rate was 0.8%, (1.3% for colon cancer, 0% for rectal cancer; p = 0.023). Multivisceral resection was performed in 14.3% of cases. Disease-free survival in cases resected for cure was 73% at 5-years and 72% at 8 years. The 5- and 8-year overall survival rates were 71% and 61% respectively (total cases). At 5-year analysis, overall survival rates are 97% for stage I disease, 87% for stage II, 73% for stage III and 22% for stage IV respectively (p < 0.0001). The 5-year overall survival rates showed a marked difference in R0, R1+R2 and non resected patients (82%, 35% and 0% respectively, p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, resection for cure and stage at presentation but not tumour site (colon vs. rectum) were independent variables for overall survival (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: A prospective, uniform follow-up policy used in a single institution over the last decade provides evidence of quality assurance in colorectal cancer surgery with high rates of resection for cure where only stage at presentation functions as an independent variable for cancer-related outcome.

Prognostic factors and outcome of resected patients for gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of 33 patients with primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) who were observed and treated in a single teaching hospital and followed up prospectively. METHODOLOGY: Thirty-three GISTs patients (21 male; 12 female; mean age: 57 +/- 12 years; range: 23-76 years) between June 1994 and October 2004, were reviewed retrospectively. Patient, tumor, and treatment variables were analyzed to identify patterns of tumor relapse and factors affecting survival. RESULTS: Of 33 patients, 30 patients (91%) had primary tumor without metastasis, and all of them underwent complete surgical resection of gross disease. Three patients (9%) had metastasis. Among patients radically resected, the 5-year actuarial survival rate was 85%, and the disease-free survival was 76%. Among patients resected for cure, there were 6 recurrences. The mean time to recurrence was 22 +/- 11 months (range: 4-36 months), and liver was the prevalent site for relapsing disease (n = 5; 83%). After recurrence, survival at 2 and 3 years was 44% and 0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: GISTs are uncommon sarcomas. Tumor recurrence tends to be intra-abdominal. Investigational protocols are indicated to reduce the rate of recurrence after resection and to improve the outcome for patients with GIST.

Surgery for advanced colorectal cancer in elderly patients with special emphasis for radio-chemotherapy role.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare the short- and long-term outcome of older and younger patients with advanced colorectal cancer who underwent elective surgery. METHODOLOGY: Six hundred and ninety-two patients were analyzed. Four hundred and seventy-nine patients were < 70 years (group 1), and 213 were > or = 70 years (group 2). RESULTS: The overall peroperative mortality rate in younger patients was 0.8% (n = 7), and 1.4% (n = 3) in the elderly (p = NS); morbidity was 35% and 42%, respectively (p = NS). On univariate analysis, elderly patients had a worse overall survival (OS) compared to younger, when only patients undergoing postoperative chemo-radiotherapy were considered (54% OS vs. 67% OS at 5 years; p = 0.03). Using logistic regression analysis, tumor stage (p < 0.0001) and radicality of surgery (p < 0.0001), were strongly associated with OS rates in the elderly. CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal surgery for malignancy can be performed safely in the elderly. Clinical trials are necessary to understand the real advantage of adjuvant or palliative treatments in these patients.

The influence of type of operation for distal rectal cancer: survival, outcomes, and recurrence.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study analyzed the results of treatment of rectal cancer (tumor within 12 cm of the anal verge) with different techniques. METHODOLOGY: Two hundred and sixty-four patients who had undergone elective curative surgical resection of rectal cancer within 12cm of the anal verge were evaluated. The operative data and follow-up data were collected prospectively. Comparisons were made between patients who had different surgical procedures. RESULTS: The overall peroperative mortality rate was nil, and the morbidity 39.4%. Local recurrence occurred in 21 of the patients with a median follow-up of 34 months (range: 5-105 months). The 3-year actuarial local recurrence rates for double-stapled anastomosis, low straight anastomosis and APR were 25%, 6%, and 5%, respectively. The local recurrence rate was significantly higher for double-stapled low anterior resection than for the other types of operation (p = 0.013). On multivariate analysis reconstruction with Knight-Griffen anastomosis (p = 0.013) and tumor distance from the anal verge <6 cm (p = 0.001), were associated with local recurrence but only stage was a significant prognosticator of overall survival (p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Following total mesorectal excision, the local recurrence rate was higher in patients treated with double-stapled low anterior resection than in those with termino-terminal low anterior resection or APR; survival rates were similar in these groups.

The Ligasure vessel sealer in liver resection: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The major complication for liver resection is hemorrhage. Energy sources other than electrosurgery have become popular with the promise of quick and effective vascular control. This study evaluates alternative energy sources in sealing ductal structures for use in liver resection with minimal blood loss. METHODOLOGY: Between June 1994 and December 2003, a consecutive 116 patients (59 male; 57 female; mean age: 60 +/- 11 years; range: 27-79 years) underwent surgery for primary (n = 30), metastatic liver cancer (n = 79), or benign lesions (n = 7). The extent of hepatic parenchymal division is marked on the surface with a diathermy-scored line. The arteries, veins, and bile ducts crossing the line of division are grasped, singly or in groups, by the Ligasure (Autosuture, United States Surgical Corp., Norwalk, CT) electrocautery device. RESULTS: Fifty-eight formal hepatic resections, and 58 non-anatomical wedge resection were performed. The blood loss ranged from 100 mL to 3000 mL (median: 430 mL). Only 32 patients received preoperative blood transfusions. Perioperative mortality was nil (within 30 days following surgery), and postoperative major complications were seen in 14 patients (12%). CONCLUSIONS: The Ligasure device uses bipolar electrothermal energy to coagulate the opposing walls of the target vessels. A feedback-control mechanism ensures that tissues are not charred by overcoagulation. This results in a high-burst strength vessel seal. Sealing is effective in vessels up to 7mm in diameter. Larger vessels require formal suture or stapling. This described technique is simple, rapid, safe for parenchymal division during hepatectomy, resulting in minimal blood loss.