Looking past PD-L1: expression of immune checkpoint TIM-3 and its ligand galectin-9 in cervical and vulvar squamous neoplasia.

Immunotherapies targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway have shown some success in cervical and vulvar squamous cell carcinomas, but little is known about the potential vulnerability of these tumors to other checkpoint inhibitors. TIM-3 is a checkpoint molecule that exerts immunosuppressive function via its interaction with Gal-9. TIM-3 and Gal-9 have been identified on a variety of malignancies but have not been studied in cervical and vulvar cancers, nor has their relationship to PD-L1 been established. Sixty-three cervical and vulvar invasive (n = 34) and intraepithelial lesions (n = 29) were assessed for TIM-3, Gal-9, and PD-L1 in tumor/lesional cells and associated immune cells. Tumoral TIM-3 expression was identified in 85% of squamous cell carcinomas but only 21% of intraepithelial lesions (p < 0.0001). When immune cells were also accounted for, 97% of invasive and 41% of intraepithelial lesions had a TIM-3 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 1 (p < 0.0001). Tumoral membranous expression of Gal-9 was seen in 82% of squamous cell carcinomas and 31% of intraepithelial lesions (p = 0.0001); nearly all cases had Gal-9-positive immune cells. Tumoral PD-L1 was seen in 71% of squamous cell carcinomas and 10% of intraepithelial lesions (p < 0.0001), while the PD-L1 CPS was ≥1 in 82 and 21%, respectively (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in TIM-3, GAL-9, or PD-L1 expression in cervical vs. vulvar neoplasms, nor was HPV status significantly associated with any of the three markers. Dual TIM-3/Gal-9 expression was present in the majority (86%) of PD-L1-positive cases including 100% of PD-L1-positive squamous cell carcinomas, suggesting a possible role for TIM-3 checkpoint inhibition in concert with anti-PD-1/PD-L1.

PD-L1 and IDO expression in cervical and vulvar invasive and intraepithelial squamous neoplasias: implications for combination immunotherapy.

AIMS: The immunoregulatory enzyme indoleamine dioxygenase 2,3 (IDO) has been implicated in cervical and vulvar squamous carcinomas (SCC) and may represent a mechanism of resistance to anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapy. However, the relationship between IDO and PD-L1 has not been well-investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-five cases of cervical and vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia and SCC were assessed for IDO and PD-L1 expression. Overall, tumoral PD-L1 expression was seen in 72% of SCC, while 50% expressed IDO; co-expression was seen in 42%. Using the combined positive score (CPS) threshold of 1 to account for both tumoral and immune staining, 83% of SCC expressed PD-L1, 61% expressed IDO and 53% showed co-expression. Cervical SCCs were significantly more likely than human papillomavirus (HPV)-related vulvar SCCs to express tumoral IDO (75% versus 13%, P < 0.001) and demonstrate an IDO CPS ≥ 1 (88% versus 25%, P < 0.001); no significant differences were seen for PD-L1. Additionally, there were no significant differences in IDO and PD-L1 expression in dVIN-associated versus HPV-associated vulvar SCC. In contrast to SCC, the majority of intraepithelial lesions were entirely negative for tumoral PD-L1 and IDO and had a CPS score of <1. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, IDO and PD-L1 co-expression is common in cervical SCCs and, to a lesser extent, vulvar SCCs. These data suggest a role for combination immunotherapy in a subset of cervical SCCs as well as select vulvar SCCs. Expression for both markers is less common in intraepithelial lesions, providing no strong support for this form of immunotherapy in the absence of invasion.

Emerging biomarkers in ovarian granulosa cell tumors.

OBJECTIVE: Although the majority of ovarian granulosa cell tumors can be successfully managed with surgery, a subset require chemotherapy for residual and recurrent disease. The benefit of chemotherapy in this population, however, remains controversial. There is therefore interest in the development of more tolerable and effective treatment options for advanced ovarian granulosa cell tumors. We report the use of immunohistochemistry to investigate how biomarkers could inform clinical trials in granulosa cell tumors with an emphasis on emerging androgen antagonistic, immunotherapeutic, and anti-angiogenic approaches. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry for androgen receptor, the immune markers programmed cell death ligand 1, indoleamine-2,3 dioxygenase, and cluster of differentiation 8, and the vascular marker cluster of differentiation 31 were evaluated on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded whole tissue sections from 29 cases of adult-type granulosa cell tumors. Results were evaluated with clinicopathologic variables including recurrence. RESULTS: 59% of granulosa cell tumors were androgen receptor-positive, suggesting a potential role for anti-androgen therapy in this tumor type. In contrast, the targetable immune modulatory molecules programmed cell death ligand 1 and indoleamine-2,3 dioxygenase were scarcely expressed, with no cases showing tumorous programmed cell death ligand 1 and a single case demonstrating very focal tumorous indoleamine-2,3 dioxygenase staining. A minority of cases expressed programmed cell death ligand 1 in occasional tumor-associated macrophages and indoleamine-2,3 dioxygenase in peritumoral vessels. Tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic T cells were also scarce in granulosa cell tumors, arguing against a significant role for immunotherapy in the absence of additional immunostimulation. Cluster of differentiation 31 immunostaining revealed a range of vascular densities across granulosa cell tumors, and future studies evaluating the role of vascular density as a predictor of response to angiogenesis inhibition are warranted. None of the biomarkers investigated were significantly correlated with recurrence, and the only clinicopathologic feature significantly correlated with outcome was stage at presentation. CONCLUSIONS: Biomarker data suggest that many ovarian granulosa cell tumors could be candidates for anti-androgen therapy, while the potential role for immunotherapy appears more limited. Vascular density could be useful for identifying optimal candidates for angiogenesis inhibition. Incorporation of these biomarkers into clinical trials could help optimize patient selection.

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase in endometrial cancer: a targetable mechanism of immune resistance in mismatch repair-deficient and intact endometrial carcinomas.

Mismatch repair-deficient endometrial carcinomas are optimal candidates for immunotherapy given their high neoantigen loads, robust lymphoid infiltrates, and frequent PD-L1 expression. However, co-opting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is just one mechanism that tumors can utilize to evade host immunity. Another immune modulatory molecule that has been demonstrated in endometrial carcinoma is indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO). We herein evaluate IDO expression in 60 endometrial carcinomas and assess results in relation to PD-L1 and mismatch repair status. IDO immunohistochemistry was performed on 60 endometrial carcinomas (20 Lynch syndrome (LS)-associated, 20 MLH1 promoter hypermethylated, and 20 mismatch repair-intact). Eight-five percent of endometrial carcinomas showed IDO tumor staining in >1% of cells. Twenty-five percent were positive in >25% of tumor cells and only 7% exceeded 50% staining. Mismatch repair-deficient cancers were more likely than mismatch repair-intact cancers to be >25% IDO-positive (35% vs. 5% p = 0.024). Differences were amplified when Lynch syndrome-associated cases were evaluated in isolation (50% Lynch syndrome-associated vs. 10% mismatch repair-intact and MLH1-hypermethylated, p = 0.001). Of the four cases showing >50% staining, three were Lynch syndrome-associated and one was MLH1-hypermethylated; no mismatch repair-intact cases had >50% staining. Forty-three percent of IDO-positive tumors were also positive for PD-L1, whereas only two cases showed tumoral PD-L1 in the absence of IDO. In summary, IDO expression is prevalent in endometrial carcinomas and diffuse staining is significantly more common in mismatch repair-deficient cancers, particularly Lynch syndrome-associated cases. Given that the majority of PD-L1 positive cancers also express IDO, synergistic combination therapy with anti-IDO and anti-PD1/PD-L1 may be relevant in this tumor type. Furthermore, anti-IDO therapy may be an option for a small subset of mismatch repair-intact cancers.

Pathologic Evaluation and Prognostic Implications of Nodal Micrometastases in Breast Cancer.

Using modern sentinel lymph node techniques, occult nodal metastases including micrometastases or isolated tumor cells are being increasingly discovered in up to 10% of early-stage breast cancers. Furthermore, the rate of nonsentinel lymph node involvement is approximately 10%. However, the impact of these findings on disease-free survival is low, particularly with regards to axillary recurrences. Current evidence suggests small-volume lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients is only one of several factors that should guide adjuvant therapy options. In otherwise favorable patients, adjuvant radiation and systemic therapy can help mitigate the risk of recurrence when omitting axillary lymph node dissection.