Low-voltage shock impedance measurements: A false sense of security.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators use low-voltage shock impedance measurements to monitor the lead integrity. However, previous case reports suggest that low-voltage shock impedance measurements may fail to detect insulation breaches that can cause life-threatening electrical short circuits. METHODS AND RESULTS: We report six cases of insulation breaches in transvenous defibrillation leads that were not obvious during standard interrogations and testing of the lead beforehand. In two cases, an electrical short circuit during commanded shock delivery for internal electrical cardioversion resulted in a total damage of the ICD generator. In one of these cases, commanded shock delivery induced ventricular fibrillation, which required external defibrillation. In two cases, a shock due to ventricular tachycardia was aborted as the shock impedance was less than 20 Ω. However, in both cases the tiny residual shock energy terminated the ventricular tachycardia. In contrast, in one case the residual energy of the aborted shock did not end ventricular fibrillation induced at defibrillator threshold testing. In one case, the ICD indicated an error code for a short circuit condition detected during an adequate shock delivery. CONCLUSIONS: This case series illustrates that low-voltage shock impedance measurements can fail to detect insulation breaches. These data suggest that in patients without a contraindication, traditional defibrillator threshold testing or high voltage synchronized shock at the time of device replacement should be considered.

Functional brain imaging of speeded decision processing in Parkinson's disease and comparison with Schizophrenia.

This study examined whether Parkinson's disease (PD1) and schizophrenia (SCZ2) share a hypo dopaminergic dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex leading to cognitive impairments in decision processing. 24 medicated PD patients and 28 matched controls performed the Eriksen flanker two-choice reaction time (RT3) task while brain activity was measured throughout, using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI4). Results were directly compared to those of 30 SCZ patients and 30 matched controls. Significant differences between SCZ and PD were found, through directly comparing the z-score deviations from healthy controls across all behavioral measures, where only SCZ patients showed deviances from controls. Similarly a direct comparison of z-score activation deviations from controls indicated significant differences in prefrontal and cingulate cortical activation between SCZ and PD, where only SCZ patients showed hypo-activation of these areas compared to controls. The hypo-activation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was related to larger RT variability (ex-Gaussian tau) in SCZ but not PD patients. Overall, the concluding evidence does not support a shared neural substrate of cognitive dysfunction, since the deficit in speeded decision processing and the related cortical hypo-activation observed in SCZ were absent in PD.