Association of cardiac biomarkers with long-term cardiovascular events in a community cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study assessed major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous intervention, stroke, and death. Cox proportional hazards models assessed apolipoprotein AI (ApoA1), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), ceramide score, cystatin C, galectin-3 (Gal3), LDL-C, Non-HDL-C, total cholesterol (TC), N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT proBNP), high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (HscTnI) and soluble interleukin 1 receptor-like 1. In adjusted models, Ceramide score was defined by from N-palmitoyl-sphingosine [Cer(16:0)], N-stearoyl-sphingosine [Cer(18:0)], N-nervonoyl-sphingosine [Cer(24:1)] and N-lignoceroyl-sphingosine [Cer(24:0)]. Multi-biomarker models were compared with C-statistics and Integrated Discrimination Index (IDI). RESULTS: A total of 1131 patients were included. Adjusted NT proBNP per 1 SD resulted in a 31% increased risk of MACE/death (HR = 1.31) and a 31% increased risk for stroke/MI (HR = 1.31). Adjusted Ceramide per 1 SD showed a 13% increased risk of MACE/death (HR = 1.13) and a 29% increased risk for stroke/MI (HR = 1.29). These markers added to clinical factors for both MACE/death (p = 0.003) and stroke/MI (p = 0.034). HscTnI was not a predictor of outcomes when added to the models. DISCUSSION: Ceramide score and NT proBNP improve the prediction of MACE and stroke/MI in a community primary prevention cohort.

In a community cohort, where a wide range of biomarkers were evaluated, Ceramide score provided additive value over traditional cardiac risk factors alone for predicting stroke/MI. NT ProBNP provided additive value in prediction of MACE/death. Other biomarkers failed to improve the discrimination of these models.

Case Report: Rescue of Relapsed Pain in a Patient with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type II by Adding Another Dorsal Root Ganglion Lead.

We present on a patient with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) following ankle surgery. Pain was refractory to both conservative and surgical measures including neurotomies, ankle fusion, hardware removal, and spinal cord stimulation (SCS) trial. A dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation trial with lead placements at L4, L5, and S1 provided significant pain and functional improvement. However, during the implantation, we were able to place only two DRG leads at L4 and L5 and not S1 due to difficulties with advancing the lead to the desired location. Nonetheless, the two DRG leads provided 90% pain relief and 75% functional improvement for 9 months. However, the patient experienced pain symptoms similar to that of pre-implant without a clear trigger after 9 months despite no DRG stimulator hardware malfunction or lead migration. A decision was made to re-try implanting the S1 DRG lead, which was successful and provided significant pain relief.

Multimodal imaging risk factors predictive of small choroidal melanocytic lesion growth to melanoma: An educational study and pictorial guide.

BACKGROUND: Risk factors for small choroidal melanocytic lesion growth to melanoma have been redefined using multimodal imaging. We explored provider ability to recognize risk factors for small choroidal melanocytic lesion growth to melanoma before and after image-based education and with and without multimodal imaging. METHODS: Providers were invited to participate in a survey assessing ability to identify risk factors for small choroidal melanocytic lesion growth to melanoma using either fundus imaging or multimodal imaging. Risk factors included thickness >2 mm on ultrasonography, subretinal fluid on optical coherence tomography, presence of orange pigment by autofluorescence, acoustic hollowness by ultrasonography, and diameter >5 mm by fundus imaging. Performance was assessed before and after reviewing an educational PowerPoint providing pictorial examples of risk factors. Comparison between groups was conducted using two-tailed Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Thirty and 26 providers completed the pre-education and post-education assessments, respectively. Post-education participants were more accurate within ±1 risk factor for lesions with zero risk factors (77% vs. 100%, p = 0.01) or two risk factors (79% vs. 91%, p = 0.03). Following education, participants presented with multimodal imaging more often correctly identified lesions with four (12% vs. 42%, p = 0.03) or five (4% vs. 39%, p = 0.004) risk factors, demonstrated lower mean level of concern for lesions with zero risk factors (2.0 vs. 1.4, p < 0.001), and expressed higher level of concern for lesions with 5 risk factors (2.4 vs. 3.6, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Use of multimodal imaging may be more beneficial than education itself to improve accuracy of risk factor identification for small choroidal melanocytic lesions.

Pulmonary vein thrombosis: Clinical presentation and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein thrombosis (PVT) is a rare thromboembolic disease with potential high-risk complications related to arterial embolization, but little is known regarding risk factors and outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To describe the etiology, management, and clinical course of PVT. METHODS: Institutional health records were queried (1/1/2001-12/30/2023) to identify patients ≥18 years of age diagnosed with PVT. Thrombosis, bleeding, respiratory failure, and all-cause mortality were analyzed. Suspected tumor thrombus cases were excluded. RESULTS: 72 patients with PVT were identified (median age 62 years, 50 % female), and PVT was overall rare at 3.1 diagnosed cases per year at our institution. PVT primarily affected a single vein (89 %), most commonly the left upper PV (40 %). Of these, 37 % occurred while on therapeutic anticoagulation. The most common risk factors included cancer (55 %) and related surgical lobectomy (21 %). Extrinsic vein compression (17 %) and recent surgery (19 %) were also common; 19 % were deemed idiopathic. Most patients (76 %) were treated with anticoagulation and frequently indefinite duration (80 %). During a median follow-up of 11.7 months (IQR 39.5 months), serial imaging (available for 68 %) revealed PVT resolution in 64 %. Four-year Kaplan-Meier probability of outcome included: left atrial thrombus (21 %), need for mechanical ventilation (14 %), pneumonia (9 %), and ischemic stroke (9 %). The mortality rate was 46 % with median survival 14 months after PVT diagnosis. CONCLUSION: PVT is often associated with active malignancy, lobectomy, recent surgery, and extrinsic vein compression; 1 in 5 cases were idiopathic. Notable complications include left atrial thrombus with arterial embolism including stroke. With anticoagulation, most thrombi resolve over time. Mortality rates are high, reflecting the high the prevalence of cancer.

Arrhythmic manifestations and outcomes of definite and probable cardiac sarcoidosis.

BACKGROUND: The 2014 Heart Rhythm Society consensus statement defines histological (definite) and clinical (probable) diagnostic categories of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), but few studies have compared their arrhythmic phenotypes and outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the electrophysiological/arrhythmic phenotype and outcomes of patients with definite and probable CS. METHODS: We analyzed the arrhythmic/electrophysiological phenotype in a single-center North American cohort of 388 patients (median age 56 years; 39% female, n = 151) diagnosed with definite (n = 58) or probable (n = 330) CS (2000-2022). The primary composite outcome was survival to first ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) event or sudden cardiac death. Key secondary outcomes were also assessed. RESULTS: At index evaluation, in situ cardiac implantable electronic devices and antiarrhythmic drug use were more common in definite CS. At a median follow-up of 3.1 years, the primary outcome occurred in 22 patients with definite CS (38%) and 127 patients with probable CS (38%) (log-rank, P = .55). In multivariable analysis, only a higher ratio of the 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose maximum standardized uptake value of the myocardium to the maximum standardized uptake value of the blood pool (hazard ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.15; P = .003, per 1 unit increase) was associated with the primary outcome. During follow-up, patients with definite CS had a higher burden of device-treated VT/VF events (mean 2.86 events per patient-year vs 1.56 events per patient-year) and a higher rate of progression to heart transplant/left ventricular assist device implantation but no difference in all-cause mortality compared with patients with probable CS. CONCLUSION: Patients with definite and probable CS had similarly high risks of first sustained VT/VF/sudden cardiac death and all-cause mortality, though patients with definite CS had a higher overall arrhythmia burden. Both CS diagnostic groups as defined by the 2014 Heart Rhythm Society criteria require an aggressive approach to prevent arrhythmic complications.

Arrhythmic Prognosis According to Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Severity in Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines present varying classes of recommendations for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) utilization in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the ventricular arrhythmia risk in CS patients with ICDs and varying degrees of LV systolic dysfunction. METHODS: We included CS patients with an ICD and LVEF <50% at index evaluation. The primary outcome was survival free of sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) after ICD implantation and was assessed comparatively for LVEF ≤35 vs 36-49% and for primary vs secondary prevention ICD indication. RESULTS: We included 61 patients (median age 57 years, 61% male) with LVEF 36-49% (n=23) or LVEF ≤35% (n=38). An ICD was implanted for secondary prevention in 24% and 44% of the LVEF ≤35% and 36-49% groups, respectively (p=0.11). The primary outcome did not differ between the two groups in univariable analysis (LVEF ≤35% vs 36-49% HR 0.85 [95% CI 0.39, 1.82], p=0.67). In multivariable analysis, secondary prevention ICD indication was the only significant predictor of incident sustained VT/VF (HR 2.86 [95% CI 1.23, 6.67], p=0.015). The mean sustained VT/VF event burden was higher in the secondary as compared with the primary prevention ICD patients (0.47 vs 0.11 events/patient-year, p=0.005) but did not differ significantly between LVEF ≤35% and 36-49% patients. CONCLUSIONS: CS patients with ICD indications and LVEF 36-49% carry similarly high arrhythmic risk as those with LVEF ≤35%. Patients with secondary prevention ICDs have the highest overall risk.