The role of chronic total occlusions in non-infarct-related arteries in acute coronary syndrome patients: a systematic review.

Aim: This systematic review evaluated the impact of a chronic total occlusion (CTO) in a non-infarct-related artery (non-IRA) on clinical outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients and assessed the benefits of staged revascularization.Methods: We performed a comprehensive systematic review to provide further insight into the impact of a CTO in a non-IRA on clinical outcomes after ACS. Moreover, we review the currently available evidence on the clinical significance of staged revascularization for a CTO in a non-IRA patients with ACS and propose whether prophylactic CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) could improve outcomes in patients who subsequently develop an ACS.Results: Our search identified 999 studies, from which 30 were selected and ten were included in the analysis. The results showed a trend of higher all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac event rates in the culprit-only-PCI group compared with the multivessel (MV)-PC I group in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients, with varying statistical significance across different outcomes.Conclusion: This review highlights the significant impact of non-IRA CTOs in ACS. Successful CTO revascularization may provide benefits, particularly in ST elevation myocardial infarction, but the optimal management approach remains uncertain. The presence of a non-IRA CTO, especially in cardiogenic shock, predicts worse outcomes. Further research is warranted to determine the effective strategies to improve survival.

Heart attacks occur when blood flow to the heart is blocked. Some people have a long-standing complete blockage in a heart artery, called a chronic total occlusion (CTO). This review examined studies on heart attack patients, who also had a CTO in a different artery.The review found that having a CTO makes heart attacks more dangerous, increasing the risk of serious complications or death. Treating the CTO might benefit some patients, potentially reducing future heart problems. However, the optimal timing for CTO treatment remains unclear, some doctors prefer immediate treatment, while others advocate waiting.For very sick heart attack patients in cardiogenic shock, a CTO further increases risks. These patients may require specialized treatments to support heart function.Although fixing CTOs might help, more research is needed to determine their effectiveness for all patients. Currently, treatment decisions are made based on each patient's situation.In conclusion, CTOs pose a significant challenge in heart attack treatment. Further studies are necessary to establish the safest and most effective approach for managing heart attack patients with CTOs.

P2Y12-inhibitor monotherapy after coronary stenting: are all P2Y12-inhibitors equal?

INTRODUCTION: P2Y12-inhibitor monotherapy following 1-3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reduces (major) bleeding without an apparent increase in ischemic events and has therefore emerged as an alternative to 6-12 months of DAPT following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, there are important differences between the available P2Y12-inhibitors (clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor) as agents of choice for P2Y12-inhibitor monotherapy. AREAS COVERED: This review critically appraises the evidence for P2Y12-inhibitor monotherapy after PCI using either clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor. Furthermore, we discuss ongoing trials and future directions for research. EXPERT OPINION: P2Y12-inhibitor monotherapy following 1-3 months of DAPT is an alternative to 6-12 months of DAPT following PCI. Ticagrelor may be considered the current preferred option due to its reliable effect on platelet reactivity and its predominant use in clinical trials. Prasugrel could serve as a useful substitute for those not tolerating ticagrelor, but more research into prasugrel monotherapy is warranted. Alternatively, clopidogrel can be used, although there are concerns of high platelet reactivity, especially when genotyping and/or platelet function testing are not used. Future research will need to address the minimal duration of DAPT before switching to P2Y12-inhibitor monotherapy and what the optimal antithrombotic therapy beyond 12 months is.

XIENCE Implantation Followed By Short Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: 'The New Normal'?

The XIENCE family of everolimus-eluting stents ranks among the most used and most widely studied drug-eluting stents worldwide. In patients at high bleeding risk undergoing non-complex percutaneous coronary intervention with these stents, a shortened dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) regimen of 1-3 months appears to be associated with a reduced rate of major bleeding, a similar rate of ischaemic events and a very low incidence of stent thrombosis after DAPT discontinuation compared with DAPT up to 12 months.

Value of the SYNTAX Score in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients With a Concomitant Chronic Total Coronary Occlusion(from the EXPLORE Trial).

`To analyze the impact of additional coronary artery disease, quantified by the SYNTAX (SYNergy between PCI with TAXus and cardiac surgery) score, on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and long-term outcomes in a cohort of ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with a concomitant chronic total coronary occlusion (CTO). A total of 302 STEMI patients were randomized to percutaneous coronary intervention of a CTO (CTO PCI) (n = 148) or conservative CTO treatment (n = 154). SYNTAX scores were calculated by an independent corelab (Cardialysis BV, Rotterdam) at two time-points: (1) at baseline, and (2) after primary PCI in the conservative CTO arm and after CTO PCI in the invasive arm (named 'discharge SYNTAX score'). The population was divided in two groups (below or equal to the median SYNTAX score preprimary PCI, or above the median). At 4-month follow-up, the LVEF was significantly lower in patients in the group with a SYNTAX score above the group median (42.8% vs 48.5%, p = 0.001), and the SYNTAX score was an independent predictor for LVEF at 4 months (ß-0.151 (SE 0.068), p = 0.028). In the group with a SYNTAX score above the group median the mortality rate was higher (10.1% vs 3.9%, p = 0.025), and there was a trend towards a higher MACE rate (15.4% vs 8.5%, p = 0.063). In conclusion, in this sub-analysis of the EXPLORE trial we observed a worse LVEF and a higher mortality rate for patients with a SYNTAX score above the median. We found that the SYNTAX score is an independent negative predictor for LVEF and an independent positive predictor for LVEDV at 4-month follow-up.