The prevalence of traditional herbal medicine use among hypertensives living in South African communities.

BACKGROUND: In South Africa, over 6 million people are hypertensive and the burden of disease shows that cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death among adults. Although treatments exist, few people comply or adhere to recommended treatment due to side effects or costs of the drugs, hence the reliance on alternative forms of treatment. Traditional herbal medicines (THM) are used for the management of hypertension but the prevalence of its use among hypertensive patients living in South African communities is not sufficiently known. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional descriptive study to determine the prevalence of THM use for hypertension, among 135 purposefully selected South African participants of the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiological (PURE) study, who are THM users. Data on THM use were collected by way of face to face interviews using structured questionnaires administered by trained field workers. Standard descriptive measures were used to characterize the study sample and responses to the questionnaire. Chi-square test was used when making comparisons between groups. RESULTS: There were 135 THM users, 21% of whom used THM to treat hypertension. Majority (82.1%) of the hypertensive THM users were females, only 29% were married or co-habitating, virtually all (96%) were unemployed and 86% were Christians. More than half (56%) of the respondents were aged between 55 and 64 years. THM was occasionally used (51.9%) as a combination of tea and other mixtures (63%) and prescribed by family/ friends/self-administered. There was a significant difference in the age, marital and employment status, as well as the form and frequency of THM use of hypertensive THM users compared to other THM users. CONCLUSIONS: The study gives an insight into the prevalence of THM use by hypertensive patients in selected South African communities. The practice of self-medication was also observed which raises concern regarding the safety of medications taken by the participants. Health care providers should however be more aware of THM use and counsel patients regarding the combination of prescribed treatment regimen and herbal medicines and the potential of herb-drug interactions.

Phase II trial of FOLFOX6, bevacizumab, and cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To examine FOLFOX/bevacizumab/cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). DESIGN: Randomized phase II trial aimed at achieving a 60% objective response rate (ORR). Due to frequent cetuximab-related hypersensitivity reactions the trial was amended to a single-arm design. Eligibility: Previously untreated mCRC, measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) 0-1. TREATMENT: Modified FOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², leucovorin 350 mg, and 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m² bolus; 2.4 g/m² infusion, 46 h) day 1; bevacizumab 5 mg/kg on day 1; cetuximab 400 mg/m² on day 1, then 250 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, every 14 days (1 cycle) until progressive disease (PD); restaging occurred every 4 cycles. RESULTS: With emerging negative progression-free survival (PFS) data from a similarly designed trial, this trial closed early. Enrollment (N=31) was from August 2005-June 2008. PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Median age was 55 years (29-78); 58% were male; 71% were ECOG-PS 0. Ten cycles (median) were completed (range 2-62). The ORR was 55% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36-73%); 11 patients (35%) had stable disease; 1 patient (3%) had PD; 2 patients (6%) were unevaluable. Median PFS was 9 months (95% CI, 8.3-15.2 months); median overall survival was 25.7 months (95% CI, 15.4-27.6 months). Grade 3/4 toxicities (>1 patient) included neutropenia (25%), rash (23%; grade 2 events, 45%), diarrhea (19%), fatigue (16%), pain (16%), anemia (13%), sensory neuropathy (13%), deep-vein thrombosis (10%), nausea (10%), pulmonary embolism (7%), anorexia (6%), and vomiting (6%). CONCLUSION: In this limited trial, it is unclear whether cetuximab contributed to FOLFOX/bevacizumab efficacy, although the response rate, PFS, and overall survival were high. The regimen was generally well-tolerated, with expected skin effects; thromboembolic rates should be assessed in larger analyses. Cetuximab's role in first-line mCRC treatment is likely best guided by K-RAS testing in future clinical trials.

Demographics and outcomes at American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence.

INTRODUCTION: Surgery is currently an effective long-term therapy for morbid obesity and its complications. A variety of surgical procedures can now offer durable and safe weight control as well as previously unrealized full remission of costly comorbidities. This is a preliminary investigation of patient characteristics and outcomes at Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence) (BSCOE) hospitals. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Data were analyzed from 235 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) BSCOE hospitals receiving Full Approval status from August 2005 to May 2007. Metrics for the 66,339 bariatric surgeries performed at these hospitals included type, volume and distribution of various bariatric surgical procedures performed at each hospital, patient demographics, payer information, and adverse outcomes. RESULTS: Data from these analyses demonstrate significant differences in terms of surgical procedure selection (laparoscopic gastric bypass 61%), patient demographics (females 83%, White 60%, mean age 43 years) and type of payer (private insurance 78%), and adverse outcomes (readmission 5%, re-operation 2%, mortality 0.36%). CONCLUSIONS: The collective performance of ASMBS BSCOE hospitals in bariatric outcomes of readmissions, re-operations, and mortality are equivalent to, or more favorable, than currently reported outcomes. However, risk assessment and risk adjustment of the patients and each of the bariatric procedures will be necessary to appropriately evaluate these rates.

Relation of aortic valve sclerosis to risk of coronary heart disease in African-Americans.

To assess the relation between aortic valve sclerosis (AVS) and subsequent occurrence of coronary heart disease (CHD) events, we analyzed echocardiographic data obtained from 2,279 middle-aged African-Americans enrolled in the Jackson Mississippi Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study cohort who were free of known CHD at the time of the examination. Cox regression analyses demonstrated a hazard ratio of 3.8 for incident first myocardial infarction or fatal CHD after adjusted for multiple risk factors, including markers of inflammation. An amplification of CHD risk in the AVS subgroup with high levels of serum inflammatory markers (the highest quartile of fibrinogen and von Willebrand Factor levels) demonstrated greater than fivefold higher risk of CHD associated with AVS than risk in the lowest quartile.

Which modifiable health risks are associated with changes in productivity costs?

The purpose of this retrospective, longitudinal study was to assess longitudinal associations between modifiable health risks and workplace absenteeism and presenteeism and to estimate lost productivity costs. Across the 4-year study period (2007-2010), 17,089 unique employees from a large US computer manufacturer with a highly technical workforce completed at least 1 health risk assessment. Generalized estimating equation models were used to estimate the mean population-level absenteeism and presenteeism for 11 modifiable health risks and adjust for 9 sociodemographic and employment-related factors. Because patient age was highly correlated with several other variables, the analysis was stratified by age (<45 vs. ≥45 years). For all ages, poor emotional health, inadequate exercise, tobacco use, and having a body mass index (BMI) greater than 35 (all P<.05) were consistently associated with both absenteeism and presenteeism. Having a BMI over 35 and poor emotional health were associated with the largest impact in absenteeism (0.46 days) and presenteeism (4.03 days), respectively. Younger and older workers had similar associations between health risks and presenteeism; however, hypertension, blood sugar, inadequate exercise, and alcohol were associated (P⋜.01) with greater absenteeism among older but not younger workers. The results suggest that productivity loss is strongly related to emotional health and obesity-related health risks (eg, BMI, exercise) but differs by age. These findings could help prioritize preventive health programs offered by employers at their worksite health centers. Given the aging of the US workforce, keeping older workers healthy and productive will be crucial to remaining competitive in the global economy. (Population Health Management 2015;18:30-38).

Neighbourhood characteristics and mortality in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

BACKGROUND: This study investigates the relationship between neighbourhood characteristics and mortality (all-cause, cardiovascular disease [CVD], and cancer) in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study (ARIC). METHODS: Analysis was limited to African-American and white participants 45-64 years of age at baseline whose records were linked to census data. Deaths ascertained through 31 December 1999 were included in the analysis. Individual-level characteristics were obtained from the baseline interview. A composite index was used to characterize the neighbourhood socioeconomic environment. Proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the effect of neighbourhood socioeconomic status (SES) index and family income on the survival time. RESULTS: The rate of mortality adjusted for age and gender was highest among those who lived in disadvantaged neighbourhoods and were of lower SES. In general, all-cause and CVD mortality rates decreased with increasing neighbourhood SES advantage and family income in all race-gender groups. Although this pattern generally persisted after adjustment for individual socioeconomic factors, statistically significant associations persisted for CVD mortality in whites only (hazard ratio = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.0, 2.0) for most disadvantaged versus most advantaged tertile). When compared with the most affluent participants living in the most advantaged neighbourhoods, the increased risk of all-cause and CVD mortality associated with being poor and living in the most disadvantaged neighbourhoods was equivalent to being 11 and 13 years older at baseline for whites and African Americans, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that neighbourhood socioeconomic characteristics are associated with modest increases in CVD mortality in white adults. The lack of neighbourhood effects in African Americans needs to be interpreted with caution due to the limited range in the characteristics of the neighbourhood from which these participants were drawn.

From 1960s Evans County Georgia to present-day Jackson, Mississippi: an exploration of the evolution of cardiovascular disease in African Americans.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the No. 1 cause of mortality in the United States and it disproportionately affects African Americans. However, there are earlier reports that African Americans had significantly less CVD than whites. This racial discrepancy in CVD rates was noticed primarily for coronary heart disease (CHD). This issue was examined in the Evans County (Georgia) Cardiovascular Disease Study conducted in the 1960s. It showed that African American men had significantly lower rates of CHD than white men. Over the last couple of decades, the rates of CVD have been declining. However, the rate of decline of CVD in African Americans has not been equal to that seen in whites, such that African Americans now have a disproportionate share of CVD in the United States. In the 1990s, the Jackson Heart Study was designed to explore the reasons for the current racial discrepancy. This articles reviews the findings of the Evans County Study and explores various hypotheses for why CVD in African Americans has evolved from a disease from which African Americans may have been "protected" to one in which they shoulder a disproportionate burden.

Obesity, physical inactivity, and risk for cardiovascular disease.

Despite considerable progress in understanding disease mechanisms and risk factors, improved treatments, and public education efforts, cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death in the United States. Obesity and physical inactivity, 2 important lifestyle-related risk factors for CVD, are prevalent in the southeastern United States and are becoming more prevalent in all racial groups and areas of the country. In reviewing these risk factors, we explored topics including prevalence and trends in population data; associated psychosocial and environmental factors; and some of the mechanisms through which these risk factors are thought to contribute to CVD. We identified significant, but as yet poorly understood, racial disparities in prevalence of obesity, low levels of physical activity, and correlates of these risk factors and examined important differences in the complex relationship between obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease risk between African American and European American women. The Jackson Heart Study will provide important and unique information relevant to many unanswered questions about obesity, physical inactivity, and obesity in African Americans.

The 340B discount program: outpatient prescription dispensing patterns through contract pharmacies in 2012.

Section 340B of the Public Health Service Act provides qualified organizations serving vulnerable populations with deep discounts for some outpatient medications. A 2010 regulatory change widely expanded the 340B program's reach, allowing these organizations to contract with retail pharmacies to dispense medications for eligible patients. Little is known about which medications are dispensed by contract pharmacies under the expanded program. We provide the first comparison of 340B prescriptions and all prescriptions dispensed in contract pharmacies. We used 2012 data from Walgreens, the national leader in 340B contract pharmacies. Medications used to treat chronic conditions such as diabetes, high cholesterol levels, asthma, and depression accounted for an overwhelming majority of all prescriptions dispensed at Walgreens as part of the 340B program. A higher percentage of antiretrovirals used to treat HIV/AIDS were dispensed through 340B prescriptions than through all prescriptions dispensed at Walgreens. The majority of 340B prescriptions dispensed at Walgreens originated at tuberculosis clinics, consolidated health centers, disproportionate-share hospitals, and Ryan White clinics. Our results suggest that 340B contract pharmacies dispense medications used to treat Americans' chronic disease burden and disproportionately dispense medications used by key vulnerable populations targeted by the program.

The effect of a collaborative pharmacist-hospital care transition program on the likelihood of 30-day readmission.

PURPOSE: The effect of a collaborative pharmacist-hospital care transition program on the likelihood of 30-day readmission was evaluated. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in two acute care hospitals within the same hospital system in the southeastern United States. One hospital initiated a care transition program in January 2011; the other hospital did not have such a program. All patients who were discharged from either hospital to home from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2011, were included in the study. The two key program components included bedside delivery of postdischarge medications and follow-up telephone calls two to three days after discharge. The likelihood of readmission was assessed using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Over the 2-year study period, 19,659 unique patients had 26,781 qualifying index admissions, 2,523 of which resulted in a readmission within 30 days of discharge. After adjusting for various demographic and clinical characteristics, the usual care group (i.e., patients who did not participate in the program) had nearly twice the odds of readmission within 30 days (odds ratio [OR], 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-2.67), compared with the intervention group (i.e., program participants). For patients age 65 years or older, those in the usual care group had a sixfold increase in the odds of a 30-day readmission (OR, 6.05; 95% CI, 1.92-19.00) relative to those in the intervention group. CONCLUSION: A care transition program was associated with a lower likelihood of readmission and had a greater effect on older patients.

Hormonal therapy plus bevacizumab in postmenopausal patients who have hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a phase II Trial of the Sarah Cannon Oncology Research Consortium.

PURPOSE: Preclinical models suggest that addition of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy may improve the efficacy of anti-estrogens in hormone-sensitive breast cancer. This phase II trial evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of bevacizumab added to either anastrozole or fulvestrant in the first-line treatment of patients who have hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Women who had newly diagnosed metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer were eligible. Patients who had relapsed while receiving, or ≤ 12 months after receiving, adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy were treated with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks) and fulvestrant (loading dose 500 mg intramuscularly [IM], then 250 mg IM 2 weeks later, then 250 mg IM every 4 weeks). All other patients received fulvestrant/bevacizumab or anastrozole (1 mg orally daily)/bevacizumab. Patients who were HER2-positive could also receive trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose, then 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks). Patients were reevaluated after 8 weeks of therapy; responding or stable patients continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were enrolled (38 were administered anastrozole 41 fulvestrant). Median treatment duration was 8 months in the anastrozole group and 5.5 months in the fulvestrant group. Both regimens were efficacious: overall response rate and median progression-free survival for the entire group were 28% and 13.5 months, respectively. Both regimens were well-tolerated; toxicity was consistent with the known toxicity profiles of each single agent. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab combined with either anastrozole or fulvestrant was feasible and active in the first-line treatment of patients who have hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Phase III trials evaluating the efficacy of bevacizumab added to endocrine therapy are in progress.

A phase II study of higher dose weekly topotecan in relapsed small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Five-day topotecan is approved by the US Federal Drug Administration (FDA) for sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). We previously found that 4 mg/m(2) intravenous (I.V.) weekly dosing resulted in low-grade 3/4 toxicity but an overall response rate (ORR) < 10%. We hypothesized that higher topotecan dosing could improve ORR without significantly increasing toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter phase II trial sought a 25% ORR (α = 0.04; ß = 0.20). Eligible patients (sensitive or refractory relapsed SCLC; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status [PS] 0-1; measurable disease) received weekly topotecan (6 mg/m(2) I.V. for 6 weeks) and were restaged every 8 weeks. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were N = 38, enrolled 5/2006-10/2007; median age 64 years (range, 35-82), 47% female, 74% ECOG PS 1, 50% refractory relapsed SCLC. The median follow-up was 15 months (range, 12-24 months). No patients received all planned therapy; only 1 patient was able to receive all planned treatment in cycle 1 because of hematologic toxicity and progressive disease (PD). Among all patients, ORR was 8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2%-21%), 24% had stable disease, and disease in 47% progressed. Among sensitive relapsed patients ORR was 16% (95% CI, 3%-40%) with no complete responses; median response duration was 3.3 months. Five (26%) patients had stable disease; 8 (42%) patients had PD. Among sensitive relapsed patients, the median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) was 2.5 months and 8.6 months, respectively. Among refractory relapsed patients there were no ORRs, and median TTP and OS were 1.5 months and 3.7 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 toxicities (> 10%) included neutropenia (53%), leukopenia (42%), thrombocytopenia (37%), anemia (13%), fatigue (13%), and pain (13%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: Weekly topotecan (6 mg/m(2) I.V.) is not feasible because of hematologic toxicity and does not improve efficacy in patients with relapsed SCLC.

Concurrent radiotherapy and temozolomide followed by temozolomide and sorafenib in the first-line treatment of patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

BACKGROUND: The current study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of sorafenib, an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, when added to standard radiotherapy and temozolomide in the first-line treatment of patients with glioblastoma multiforme. METHODS: After initial surgical resection or biopsy, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme received concurrent radiotherapy (2.0 grays [Gy]/day; total dose, 60 Gy) and temozolomide (at a dose of 75 mg/m2 orally daily), followed by 6 months of maintenance therapy with temozolomide (at a dose of 150 mg/m2 orally on Days 1-5 every 28 days) and sorafenib (at a dose of 400 mg orally twice daily). Patients were re-evaluated every 2 months; the primary endpoint of the trial was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were treated; 34 had undergone previous debulking surgery. Nineteen patients withdrew from treatment before the initiation of maintenance therapy with temozolomide and sorafenib (12 because of early tumor progression). Twenty-eight patients (60% of enrolled patients) received 4 months of maintenance therapy with temozolomide and sorafenib, and 9 patients (19%) completed the planned 6 months of maintenance therapy. The median PFS for the entire group was 6 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3.7-7 months), with a 1-year PFS rate of 16%. The median overall survival was 12 months (95%CI, 7.2-16 months). Maintenance therapy with temozolomide and sorafenib was found to be well tolerated by most patients, with no grade 3/4 toxicity (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [version 3.0]) reported to occur in >10% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of sorafenib did not appear to improve the efficacy of treatment when compared with the results expected with standard therapy. A substantial percentage of patients (40%) did not receive any maintenance sorafenib, most often because of early disease progression. The administration of angiogenesis inhibitors concurrently with radiotherapy and temozolomide may optimize the opportunity to improve therapy.

Phase II trial of bevacizumab and everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of bevacizumab, an angiogenesis inhibitor, and everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, in the treatment of patients with advanced clear cell renal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two groups of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma were eligible for this study: those with no previous treatment with targeted agents and those with previous treatment with sunitinib and/or sorafenib. All patients received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks and everolimus 10 mg orally daily. Patients were evaluated for response after 8 weeks of treatment; patients with objective response or stable disease continued treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. RESULTS: Eighty patients (50 untreated, 30 previously treated) entered this clinical trial. The combination of bevacizumab/everolimus showed activity in both groups. Median progression-free survivals in previously untreated and previously treated patients were 9.1 and 7.1 months, respectively. Overall response rates (30% and 23%) were similar in both groups. The regimen was well tolerated by most patients, with a toxicity profile as expected based on the known toxicities of these two agents. Grade 3 to 4 proteinuria was more frequent than expected (25%) and led to treatment discontinuation in six patients. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab/everolimus is active and well tolerated in the treatment of advanced clear cell renal cancer, either as first-line treatment or after treatment with sunitinib and/or sorafenib. The benefits of this combination regimen, versus sequential use of these two agents, requires further study.

Phase I/II trial of preoperative oxaliplatin, docetaxel, and capecitabine with concurrent radiation therapy in localized carcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction.

PURPOSE: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy is a primary treatment option for patients with resectable esophageal cancer. Combination regimens using newer agents may improve patient outcomes. This multicenter community-based phase I/II trial examined a modern triplet regimen comprised of oxaliplatin, docetaxel, and capecitabine (ODC) combined with radiation therapy (RT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The primary end point was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Eligibility criteria included resectable stage I to III cancer of the mid-/distal-esophagus or gastroesophageal junction, measurable disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 or 1. Treatment included oxaliplatin 40 mg/m(2), docetaxel 20 mg/m(2) (intravenous, weekly x 5); capecitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) orally twice daily on days 1 to 7, 15 to 21, and 29 to 35; and concurrent RT (45 Gy). Resection was performed during weeks 9 to 12. ODC and RT safety was determined in a phase I portion (n = 10) preceding phase II. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were enrolled (September 2005 to February 2008; phase I/cohort 1, 10 patients; phase I/cohort 2/phase II, 49 patients). Baseline characteristics included median age of 63 years; 84% male; ECOG PS 0 and 1, 51% and 49%, respectively; adenocarcinoma and squamous cell, 69% and 18%, respectively; stage I, II, and III, 12%, 41%, and 45%, respectively. Phase I revealed no dose-limiting toxicity. Responses: pCR rate, 49%; objective response rate, 61% (24 complete and six partial responses); stable disease, 6%; and progressive disease, 2%. Sixty-nine percent of patients underwent surgery. Survival: median follow-up, 116 weeks; median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 16.3 and 24.1 months, respectively. Two-year DFS and OS were 45.1% and 52.2%, respectively. Most common (>or= 5%) grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicities were anorexia (20%), dehydration (16%), diarrhea (8%), dysphagia (10%), esophagitis (20%), fatigue (12%), hyperglycemia (6%), nausea (16%), pulmonary symptoms (14%), sepsis (6%), and vomiting (16%). All other grade 3 to 4 hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were uncommon (< 5%). CONCLUSION: Preoperative ODC plus RT is active and relatively safe in patients with locoregional esophageal cancer. Importantly, this therapy can be administered within 8 weeks. This regimen warrants additional study in this setting and in combination with newer biologic agents.

Bevacizumab and everolimus in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma: a phase 2 trial of the Sarah Cannon Oncology Research Consortium.

BACKGROUND: In this phase 2 study, the activity and tolerability of the combination of bevacizumab, an inhibitor of angiogenesis, and everolimus, an inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), was evaluated in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. METHODS: Patients with metastatic melanoma who had received up to 2 previous systemic regimens (chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy) were eligible. Previous treatment with angiogenesis or mTOR inhibitors was not allowed. All patients received bevacizumab at a dose of 15 mg/kg intravenously every 21 days and everolimus at a dose of 10 mg orally daily. Patients were re-evaluated every 6 weeks; those with an objective response or stable disease (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST]) continued therapy until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients with metastatic melanoma received a median of 4 treatment cycles (range, 1-14+ cycles). Seven patients (12%) achieved major responses, whereas 33 patients (58%) were found to have stable disease at the time of first evaluation. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 4 months and 8.6 months, respectively. Approximately 43% of patients were alive after 12 months of follow-up. The treatment regimen was well tolerated by the majority of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of bevacizumab and everolimus was found to have moderate activity and was well tolerated in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. Further exploration of agents with these mechanisms of action is indicated, perhaps in combination with inhibitors of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway.

A phase II trial of carboplatin and weekly topotecan in the first-line treatment of patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Carboplatin and topotecan are commonly used in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, there are no data for this combination in the first-line setting using weekly topotecan. In this multicenter, community-based phase II trial, we evaluated carboplatin and weekly topotecan in the previously untreated patients with extensive stage SCLC. METHODS: This trial was designed to achieve an objective response rate (ORR) of 70% (alpha = 0.05; beta = 0.20); secondary aims were to assess time to progression, toxicity, and overall survival (OS). Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1, measurable disease, and adequate organ function were eligible. TREATMENT: carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve = 5 (intravenous) on day 1 and topotecan 4 mg/m(2) (intravenous) on days 1 and 8, every 21 days for up to six cycles, with restaging every 6 weeks (per RECIST). RESULTS: Between June 2006 and November 2008, 61 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up is 40 weeks (range 27-109 weeks). Patient characteristics were as follows: median age 67 years (range 40-84 years); male, 53%; and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0, 28%. Complete responses were seen in two patients and partial responses in 33 patients; ORR was 57% (95% confidence interval [CI] 44-70). Stable disease was seen in 12 patients (20%), and progressive disease was seen in two patients (3%). The median time to progression was 5.5 months (95% CI 4.0-6.3 months). The median OS was 8.5 months (95% CI 7.2-11.4 months). One-year OS was 29%. Grade 3/4 toxicity in >5%: neutropenia (66%), thrombocytopenia (48%), leukopenia (40%), anemia (30%), fatigue (13%), dehydration (8%), infection (8%), and pain (7%). CONCLUSIONS: The ORR achieved with carboplatin and weekly topotecan was less than the anticipated rate of 70%; however, it was comparable with historical rates seen with other platinum doublets in the first-line extensive stage SCLC setting. This regimen was generally well tolerated, with myelosuppression as its primary toxicity.

Brief-duration rituximab/chemotherapy followed by maintenance rituximab in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who are poor candidates for R-CHOP chemotherapy: a phase II trial of the Sarah Cannon Oncology Research Consortium.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who are very elderly or have poor performance status are difficult to treat with a full course of R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/ prednisone) therapy. In this phase II trial, we treated this group of patients with a novel regimen containing 3 courses of rituximab/chemotherapy followed by maintenance rituximab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed stage II-IV DLBCL were eligible if they were considered poor candidates for 6-8 cycles of R-CHOP therapy. Patients who were eligible for anthracycline therapy received 3 cycles of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide/ mitoxantrone/vincristine/prednisone (CNOP); the remainder of patients received R-CVP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide/ vincristine/prednisone). Patients without progression after completion of 3 cycles received 4 courses of maintenance rituximab (375 mg/m2 weekly x 4, repeated every 6 months) for 24 months. RESULTS: Between May 2003 and July 2007, 51 patients were enrolled. The median age was 78 years, and 43% of patients were > 80 years of age. Nineteen patients (37%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2, and 72% had high-intermediate or high-risk International Prognostic Index scores. After a median follow-up of 48 months, the 2-, 3-, and 4-year progression-free survival rates are 71%, 65%, and 56%, respectively. The 2-, 3-, and 4-year overall survival rates are 72%, 67%, and 67%, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated, with few severe toxicities and no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: This abbreviated course of rituximab/chemotherapy, followed by maintenance rituximab, was active and well tolerated in these very elderly patients. Brief-duration rituximab/chemotherapy as well as maintenance rituximab merit further evaluation in this setting.

Paclitaxel/carboplatin/etoposide versus gemcitabine/irinotecan in the first-line treatment of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site: a randomized, phase III Sarah Cannon Oncology Research Consortium Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the results of empiric first-line therapy with paclitaxel/carboplatin/etoposide (PCE) versus gemcitabine/irinotecan, both followed by single-agent gefitinib, in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated carcinoma of unknown primary site were randomized to receive either PCE or gemcitabine/irinotecan. Responding and stable patients continued treatment for 4 to 6 cycles. Patients with no evidence of tumor progression at that time received single-agent gefitinib until tumor progression. The trial was designed to detect an improvement in the 2-year survival rate from 20% to 30%. RESULTS: Between September 2003 and July 2008, 198 patients entered this multicenter, community-based trial. Because of slow accrual, the trial was stopped short of its target accrual of 320 patients. Clinical characteristics were comparable for patients receiving PCE (N = 93) and gemcitabine/irinotecan (N = 105). PCE and gemcitabine/irinotecan produced similar 2-year survival (15% vs. 18%), median survival (7.4 months vs. 8.5 months), median progression-free survival (3.3 months vs. 5.3 months), and response rate (18% vs. 18%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, febrile neutropenia, and red blood cells transfusions were more common with PCE; diarrhea was more common with gemcitabine/irinotecan. The median duration of gefitinib maintenance was 3 months, suggesting no role as a maintenance therapy in this setting. DISCUSSION: The PCE and gemcitabine/irinotecan regimens have comparable efficacy in the first-line treatment of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site. Gemcitabine/irinotecan is the preferable regimen, due to its favorable toxicity profile. However, the moderate efficacy of both regimens underscores the need for novel treatment approaches in this patient population.

A phase II randomized crossover study of liposomal doxorubicin versus weekly docetaxel in the first-line treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We aim to compare the efficacy and toxicity of liposomal doxorubicin and weekly docetaxel as first-line treatments for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had received no previous chemotherapy for MBC were eligible. Previous hormonal therapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiation therapy were allowed. Patients were randomized to receive liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2) intravenously [I.V.] every 28 days or weekly docetaxel 36 mg/m(2) I.V. days 1, 8, and 15, repeated every 28 days. Patients with objective response or stable disease after 2 cycles continued treatment until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. At progression, patients were allowed to cross over to the other regimen. The trial was designed to detect a true difference of 10% in response rate with an 80% power. RESULTS: Between March 2001 and July 2007, 102 patients were randomized. The 2 groups had similar demographics; 68% of patients had received previous adjuvant chemotherapy. Liposomal doxorubicin and weekly docetaxel produced similar objective response rates (28% vs. 31%), disease control rates (48% vs. 44%), and progression-free survival (6.5 months vs. 5.5 months). Both agents were well tolerated. Both agents produced crossover responses as second-line treatment (liposomal doxorubicin, 35%; weekly docetaxel, 14%). CONCLUSION: Liposomal doxorubicin is well tolerated and has activity similar to weekly docetaxel in the first-line treatment of patients with MBC.