Optimizing examination time and diagnostic performance of the histamine-induced axon-reflex flare response in diabetes.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: The axon-reflex flare response is a reliable method for functional assessment of small fibers in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), but broad adoption is limited by the time requirement. The aims of this study were to (1) assess diagnostic performance and optimize time required for assessing the histamine-induced flare response and (2) associate with established parameters. METHODS: A total of 60 participants with type 1 diabetes with (n = 33) or without (n = 27) DPN participated. The participants underwent quantitative sensory testing (QST), corneal confocal microscopy (CCM), and flare intensity and area size assessments by laser-Doppler imaging (FLPI) following an epidermal skin-prick application of histamine. The flare parameters were evaluated each minute for 15 min, and the diagnostic performance compared to QST and CCM were assessed using area under the curve (AUC). Minimum time-requirements until differentiation and to achieve results comparable with a full examination were assessed. RESULTS: Flare area size had better diagnostic performance compared with CCM (AUC 0.88 vs. 0.77, p < 0.01) and QST (AUC 0.91 vs. 0.81, p = 0.02) than mean flare intensity, and could distinguish people with and without DPN after 4 min compared to after 6 min (both p < 0.01). Flare area size achieved a diagnostic performance comparable to a full examination after 6 and 7 min (CCM and QST respectively, p > 0.05), while mean flare intensity achieved it after 5 and 8 min (CCM and QST respectively, p > 0.05). DISCUSSION: The flare area size can be evaluated 6-7 min after histamine-application, which increases diagnostic performance compared to mean flare intensity.

Health literacy and cognitive function in people with diabetic foot ulcer with focus on knowledge, attitude, and practice in relation to foot self-care.

Introduction: Preventative foot self-care is vital for avoiding diabetic foot ulcer episodes and lowering the risk of amputations. Yet, it demands high levels of health literacy and cognitive function. Objective: To investigate health literacy and cognitive function in persons presenting with a diabetic foot ulcer. Methods: Participants with type 2 diabetes were recruited from the tertiary foot clinic at Steno Diabetes Center North Denmark. The European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire and Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination were applied. A semi-structured interview guide was developed to evaluate foot self-care knowledge, attitude, and practice. The qualitative data were analyzed with a deductive approach based on a qualitative thematic analysis model. Subsequently, an integrated analysis of the quantitative and qualitative results was conducted. Results: The participants (n = 12) had a mean age of 62.6 ± 8.4 years, and 11 were males. The mean diabetes duration was 15.9 ± 8.9 years. Eight participants had a recurrent diabetic foot ulcer. The health literacy level was sufficient in nine participants, and cognitive function was normal in five participants. Three different profiles related to foot self-care (proactive, active, or passive, respectively) were constructed by the final integrated analysis: a proactive profile refers to taking preventative action in concordance with knowledge and attitude, an active profile to taking action in response to a situation, but challenged by conflicting levels of knowledge and attitude, and a passive profile to not taking action. Conclusion: The study suggests that people presenting with a diabetic foot ulcer have different foot self-care profiles based on person-specific health literacy, cognitive function, and knowledge, attitude, and practice element characteristics, highlighting the need for individualized education and intervention strategy instead of a one-size-fits-all approach.

The co-existence of sensory and autonomic neuropathy in type 1 diabetes with and without pain.

AIMS: To investigate the co-existence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN), and cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) and to establish a model to predict CAN based on peripheral measurements. METHODS: Eighty participants (20 type 1 diabetes (T1DM) + PDPN, 20 T1DM + DPN, 20 T1DM-DPN (without DPN), and 20 healthy controls (HC)) underwent quantitative sensory testing, cardiac autonomic reflex tests (CARTs), and conventional nerve conduction. CAN was defined as ≥ 2 abnormal CARTs. After the initial analysis, the participants with diabetes were re-grouped based on the presence or absence of small (SFN) and large fibre neuropathy (LFN), respectively. A prediction model for CAN was made using logistic regression with backward elimination. RESULTS: CAN was most prevalent in T1DM + PDPN (50%), followed by T1DM + DPN (25%) and T1DM-DPN and HC (0%). The differences in prevalence of CAN between T1DM + PDPN and T1DM-DPN/HC were significant (p < 0.001). When re-grouping, 58% had CAN in the SFN group and 55% in the LFN group, while no participants without either SFN or LFN had CAN. The prediction model had a sensitivity of 64%, a specificity of 67%, a positive predictive value of 30%, and a negative predictive value of 90%. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that CAN predominantly co-exists with concomitant DPN.

Perception threshold tracking: validating a novel method for assessing function of large and small sensory nerve fibers in diabetic peripheral neuropathy with and without pain.

ABSTRACT: It remains unknown why some people with diabetes develop painful neuropathies while others experience no pain. This study aimed to validate a novel method for assessing the function of small sensory nerves in diabetes to further elucidate this phenomenon. The function of large and small nerves was assessed using a novel perception threshold tracking technique in 3 well-characterized groups (n = 60) with type 1 diabetes, namely, (1) painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (T1DM + PDPN), (2) painless diabetic peripheral neuropathy (T1DM + DPN), and (3) no neuropathy (T1DM - DPN), and healthy controls (n = 20). Electrical currents with different shapes, duration, and intensities were applied by 2 different skin electrodes activating large and small fibers, respectively. The minimal current needed to activate the fibers were analyzed as the rheobase of the stimulus-response function. Nerve fiber selectivity was measured by accommodation properties of stimulated nerves. The rheobase of both fiber types were highest for T1DM + PDPN, followed by T1DM + DPN, T1DM - DPN, and healthy controls, indicating that the nerve properties are specific in individuals with diabetes and pain. There was an overall significant difference between the groups ( P < 0.01). The accommodation properties of stimulated fibers were different between the 2 electrodes ( P < 0.05) apart from in the group with T1DM + PDPN, where both electrodes stimulated nerves displaying properties similar to large fibers. Perception threshold tracking reveals differences in large and small nerve fiber function between the groups with and without diabetes, DPN, and pain. This indicates that the methods have potential applications in screening DPN and explore further the features differentiating painful from nonpainful DPN.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Perception Threshold Tracking in the Detection of Small Fiber Damage in Type 1 Diabetes.

AIM: An objective assessment of small nerve fibers is key to the early detection of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). This study investigates the diagnostic accuracy of a novel perception threshold tracking technique in detecting small nerve fiber damage. METHODS: Participants with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) without DPN (n = 20), with DPN (n = 20), with painful DPN (n = 20) and 20 healthy controls (HCs) underwent perception threshold tracking on the foot and corneal confocal microscopy. Diagnostic accuracy of perception threshold tracking compared to corneal confocal microscopy was analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: The rheobase, corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD), and corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL) (all P < .001) differed between groups. The diagnostic accuracy of perception threshold tracking (rheobase) was excellent for identifying small nerve fiber damage, especially for CNFL with a sensitivity of 94%, specificity 94%, positive predictive value 97%, and negative predictive value 89%. There was a significant correlation between rheobase with CNFD, CNBD, CNFL, and Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (all P < .001). CONCLUSION: Perception threshold tracking had a very high diagnostic agreement with corneal confocal microscopy for detecting small nerve fiber loss and may have clinical utility for assessing small nerve fiber damage and hence early DPN. CLINICAL TRIALS: NCT04078516.

The Histamine-Induced Axon-Reflex Response in People With Type 1 Diabetes With and Without Peripheral Neuropathy and Pain: A Clinical, Observational Study.

Small nerve fibres are important when studying diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) as they could be first affected. However, assessing their integrity and function adequately remains a major challenge. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between different degrees of DPN, the presence of neuropathic pain, and the intensity of the axon-reflex flare response provoked by epidermal histamine. Eighty adults were included and divided into 4 groups of 20 with type 1 diabetes and: painful DPN (T1DM+PDPN), non-painful DPN (T1DM+DPN), no DPN and no pain (T1DM-DPN), and 20 persons without diabetes or pain (HC). The vasomotor responses were captured by a Full-field Laser Speckle Perfusion Imager. The response was lowest in T1DM+DPN, followed by T1DM+PDPN, T1DM-DPN and HC. The response was significantly reduced in DPN (T1DM+DPN, T1DM+PDPN) compared with people without (T1DM-DPN, HC) (P < .001). The response was also attenuated in diabetes irrespective of the degree of DPN (T1DM+PDPN, T1DM+DPN, T1DM-DPN) (P < .001). There were no differences in the response between painful neuropathy (T1DM+PDPN) and painless DPN (T1DM+DPN) (P = .189). The method can distinguish between groups with and without diabetes and with and without DPN but cannot distinguish between groups with and without painful DPN. PERSPECTIVE: This study describes how diabetes attenuates the axon-reflex response, and how it is affected by neuropathy and pain clarifying previous findings. Furthermore, the study is the first to utilize histamine when evoking the response, thus providing a new and fast alternative for future studies into the pathophysiology of neuropathic pain.