Patient age and donor HLA matching can stratify allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation patients into prognostic groups.

BACKGROUND: Mixed results surround the accuracy of commonly used prognostic risk scores to predict overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) recipients. We hypothesize that a simple prognostic score performs better than conventional scoring systems. PATIENTS AND METHODS: OS risk factors, HCT-CI, age-HCT-CI, and augmented-HCT-CI were studied in 299 patients who underwent allo-HCT for myeloid and lymphoid malignancies. A scoring system was developed based on results and validated in a different cohort of 455 patients. RESULTS: Two-year OS was 51% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.56); 2-year NRM was 34% (95% CI 0.29-0.39). HCT-CI and associated scores were grouped into 0-2 and ≥3. Age and HLA mismatch status were the only risk factors to affect OS in multivariate analysis (p = 0.02 and 0.05, respectively). HCT-CI and associated scores were not informative for OS prediction. The weighted scoring system assigned 0 to 2 points for age < 50, 50-64, or ≥65, respectively, and 0-1 points for no HLA mismatch versus any mismatch (except HLA-DQ). Distinct 2-year OS (62%, 53%, and 38% [p = <0.001]) and NRM (24%, 34%, and 43% [p = 0.02]) groups were characterized. The scoring system was validated in a second independent cohort with similar results on OS and NRM (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A simple scoring system based on recipient's age and mismatch status accurately predict OS and NRM in two distinct cohorts of allo-HCT patients. Its simplicity makes it a helpful tool to aid clinicians and patients in clinical decision-making.

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: a single institution experience at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, using non-cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous high-dose melphalan has a short half-life, and application of this single drug in MM transplant favors the use of stem cells without cryopreservation, for wider use in general and in resource-limited settings in particular. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ninety-two patients with MM were given high-dose melphalan and rescued with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilized noncryopreserved autologous PBSC, in our hospital during the past 18 years. Stem cells were mobilized with 4 days of G-CSF, harvested (median CD34 dose, 2.9 × 10(6)/kg) and then stored at 4°C in a refrigerator for a median of 2 days (range, 1-5 days) before reinfusion. RESULTS: Median time to neutrophil (> 500/mm(3)) and platelet (> 20,000/mm(3)) engraftment were 10 and 14 days respectively. There was no graft failure. Mucositis grade 3/4 was seen in 66 patients (72%). Transplant-related mortality at 100 days was 3.2%. The overall response to transplant was 88% and improvement compared with pretransplant status was seen in 48%. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 61.7 months and 35.4 months respectively; independent predictors of survival were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status and hemoglobin for OS and chemosensitive disease and remission status after transplant for PFS. CONCLUSION: We conclude that high-dose chemotherapy and autologous transplant with noncryopreserved PBSC is a simple, effective, and safe method for MM with equivalent results, and that cryopreservation is not necessary. It reduces the cost of transplant and avoids dimethyl sulfoxide toxicity.

Autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: identification of prognostic factors.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of prognostic factors on the outcome of patients with MM after ASCT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed results of 170 consecutive patients (121 male and 49 female) of MM who underwent ASCT. Patients' median age was 52 years (range, 26-68 years). High dose melphalan (200 mg/m(2)) was used for conditioning. One hundred thirty-two patients (77.6%) had evidence of chemosensitive disease before transplant. Response was assessed using European Group for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplantation criteria. RESULTS: Post ASCT 44.7% of patients achieved CR, 24.7% had very good partial response (VGPR), and 21.2% had partial response (PR). Presence of pretransplant chemosensitive disease (CR, VGPR, and PR) and transplant within 12 months of diagnosis for years before 2006 were associated with higher response rates on multivariate analysis. At a median follow-up of 84 months, median overall (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) is 85.5 and 41 months, respectively. Estimated OS and EFS at 60 months is 62 ± 0.04% and 41 ± 0.04%, respectively. Patients who responded to transplant (CR, VGPR, and PR) had a longer OS (P < .001) and EFS (P < .001). Additionally, patients who achieved CR post transplant had a longer OS (P < .001) and EFS (P < .001). Patients who received novel agents for induction pretransplant had a longer OS (P < .001) and EFS (P < .002). CONCLUSION: Outcome after ASCT is better for myeloma patients with pretransplant chemosensitive disease and those who achieve CR after transplant.