Lateral Ulnar Collateral Ligament Repair With Suture-Tape Augmentation for Traumatic Elbow Instability.

PURPOSE: Ligament repair with suture-tape augmentation has been used in the operative treatment of joint instability and may have advantages with respect to early motion and stability. The purpose of this investigation was to describe the clinical results of traumatic elbow instability treated with lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair with suture-tape augmentation. METHODS: All cases of acute and chronic elbow instability treated surgically between 2018 and 2020 were included if they underwent ligament repair with suture-tape augmentation of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament as part of the procedure. Cases with <6 months of follow-up were excluded. A manual chart review was performed to record patient demographics as well as injury and surgery characteristics. Radiographic outcomes, range of motion, and patient-reported outcome measures, including the visual analog pain scale and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, were recorded. Range of motion measurements were recorded at the end of the clinical follow-up, as were surgical complications. RESULTS: Eighteen cases were included with a mean follow-up of 20 months. Five (28%) cases involved a high-energy mechanism, and 11 (62%) cases involved terrible triad fracture dislocations. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire and visual analog pain scale scores were 17 and 2, respectively. The mean flexion-extension arc was 124°, and 2 (11%) cases had <100° flexion-extension arc. There were 2 (11%) postoperative complications, and both cases had postoperative instability requiring reoperation. We observed no cases of capitellar erosion from the suture-tape material. CONCLUSIONS: For complex elbow instability, ligament repair with suture-tape augmentation of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament results in acceptable functional outcomes and a reoperation rate comparable with other joint stabilization procedures. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Pumpkin carving knife injuries: National incidence and trends of hand injury.

INTRODUCTION: Seasonal media reports often describe the dangers of pumpkin carving, yet little data exists regarding the actual incidence of hand injuries resulting from pumpkin carving. The purpose of this study is to describe, quantify, and trend ED encounters associated with pumpkin-related knife injuries. METHODS: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) was queried for pumpkin-related knife injuries from 2012 to 2021. Patient demographic and injury data was collected and analyzed to describe trends in incidence, patient demographics, and injury patterns associated with an ED encounter for a pumpkin-related knife injury. RESULTS: There were an estimated 20,579 (95% CI: 17,738-23,420) pumpkin-related knife injuries from 2012 to 2021. The incidence of pumpkin-related knife injuries remained stable over time (R2 = 0.195, P = 0.201). Hand injuries comprised 87.6% of all injuries, with the thumb (33.5%) and index finger (25.0%) most commonly affected. Men and women were injured at similar rates (51.6% vs 48.4%). The most common demographic injured were 10 to 19-year olds (31.5%) followed by children <10-years old (19.5%). Women ages 10 to 19-years old were the most commonly injured subgroup (10.0% of all injuries). Most ED presentations occurred on Saturdays (16.5%) or Sundays (23.3%). The large majority occurred during the months of October (83.5%) followed by November (11.2%), with almost half of all cases (45.6%) occurring in the last week of October. Peak incidence of injury occurred on October 30th. CONCLUSION: Pumpkin-related knife injuries are a preventable cause of hand injury with predictably high-incidence in fall months. Additionally, our data suggests further precautions should be taken to prevent injury in pediatric patients. Understanding at-risk populations in addition to implementing public safety initiatives and education on safe pumpkin-carving techniques could prevent serious injuries in the future.

The Preoperative Cost of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

PURPOSE: Carpal tunnel syndrome is a common condition, with well-defined diagnostic and treatment guidelines. Despite these guidelines, continued variation in care exists, with providers variably using diagnostic tests and nonsurgical treatment modalities prior to surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the variation and cost associated with the diagnosis and nonsurgical treatment of patients prior to undergoing carpal tunnel release. METHODS: We queried the Truven MarketScan database to identify patients who underwent carpal tunnel release from 2010 to 2017. Patients were identified using common current procedural terminology codes and included if they were enrolled in the database for a minimum of 12 months prior to surgery to allow all preoperative data to be captured. All associated current procedural terminology codes during the 1-year preoperative period were refined to codes related to median neuropathy and categorized as office visits, diagnostic imaging (x-ray, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging), electrodiagnostic testing, injections, occupational or physical therapy, durable medical equipment, and preoperative laboratory tests. RESULTS: In total, 378,381 patients were included in the study. A per-patient average cost of $858.74 was spent on preoperative workup and nonsurgical treatment. Electrodiagnostic testing represented 44.6% of the cost, and office visits represented 31.9%. Regarding nonsurgical treatment, 16.1% of the patients received an injection during the 1-year preoperative period, 26.8% received a medical brace, and 6.6% used physical therapy. When analyzed based on age group, the per-patient average cost for patients aged 70 years or older was significantly less than those younger than 70 years ($723.92 vs $878.76). CONCLUSIONS: Despite robust clinical practice guidelines and high volumes, significant variation in presurgical care exists. These data are useful to begin to critically analyze the causes of variation in the diagnosis and treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome and move toward a more effective, efficient, and informed treatment strategy. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic/decision analysis II.

The Curtis Hand Injury Matrix Score: Determining the Need for Specialized Upper Extremity Care.

PURPOSE: Given the limited impact of transfer guidelines and the lack of comparative metrics for upper extremity trauma, we introduced the Curtis Hand Injury Matrix (CHIM) score to evaluate upper extremity injury acuity from the specialist perspective. Our goal was to evaluate the CHIM score as an indicator of complexity and specialist need by correlating the score with arrival mode, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and procedure location. METHODS: We identified all hand and upper extremity emergency room visits at our institution in 2018 and 2019. On initial evaluation, our institution's hand surgery team assigned each patient an alphanumeric score with a number (1-5) and letter (A-H) corresponding to injury severity and pathology, respectively. Patients were divided into 5 groups (1-5) with lower scores indicating greater severity. We compared age, LOS, discharge disposition, procedure location, transfer status, and arrival mode between groups and assessed the relationships between matrix scores and discharge disposition, procedure performed, and LOS. RESULTS: There were 3,822 patients that accounted for 4,026 upper extremity evaluations. There were significant differences in LOS, discharge dispositions, procedure locations, transfer status, and arrival modes between groups. Patients with more severe scores had higher rates of admission and more operating room procedures. Higher percentages of patients who arrived via helicopter, ambulance, or transfer had more severe scores. Patients with more severe scores were significantly more likely to have a procedure, hospital admission, and longer hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: The CHIM score provides a framework to catalog the care and resources required when covering specialized hand and upper extremity calls and accepting transfers. This clinical validation supports considering broader use. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Preoperative opioid use is an independent risk factor for complication, revision, and increased health care utilization following primary total shoulder arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in increasing. Evidence in primary hip and knee arthroplasty suggest that preoperative opioid use is a risk factor for postoperative complication. This relationship in TSA is unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate this relationship. METHODS: The Truven Marketscan claims database was used to identify patients who underwent primary, unilateral TSA. Preoperative opioid use status was then used to divide patients into cohorts based on the average daily oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) received in the 6-month preoperative period. This included the following cohorts: opioid naïve and <1, 1-5, 5-10, and >10 average daily OMEs. In total, 29,454 patients with 90-day postoperative follow-up were included. Of these, 21,580 patients and 8959 patients had 1- and 3-year follow-up, respectively. Patient information and complication data were collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were then performed to assess the association of preoperative opioid use with postoperative outcomes. A subgroup analysis was performed to examine revision surgery at 1 and 3 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Forty-four percent of identified patients received preoperative opioids, but the preoperative opioid-naïve patient became more common over the study period. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that patients receiving >10 average daily OMEs (compared with opioid naïve) had higher odds of opioid overdose (odds ratio [OR] 4.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.57-11.08, P = .004), wound complication (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.44-2.89, P < .001), superficial surgical site infection (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.63-3.34, P < .001), prosthetic joint infection (OR 3.41, 95% CI 2.50-4.67, P < .001), pneumonia (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.39-2.75, P < .001), and thromboembolic event (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.18-1.72, P < .001). The same group had higher health care utilization, including extended length of stay, nonhome discharge, readmission, and emergency department visits (P ≤ .001). Total perioperative adjusted costs were more than $7000 higher in the >10-OME group when compared to preoperative opioid-naïve patients. DISCUSSION: Opioid use prior to TSA is common and is associated with increased complications, health care utilization, revision surgery, and costs. This risk is dose dependent, and efforts should be made at cessation prior to surgery.

Avocado-related knife injuries: Describing an epidemic of hand injury.

INTRODUCTION: Recent media reports have described knife injuries sustained while preparing avocados; however, this rise has not been reported in the literature. The purpose of this study is to describe, quantify, and trend emergency department (ED) encounters associated with avocado-related knife injuries. METHODS: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) was queried for avocado-related knife injuries from 1998 to 2017. Patient demographic and injury data was collected and analyzed to describe trends in incidence, patient demographics, and injury patterns associated with an ED encounter for an avocado-related knife injury. RESULTS: There were an estimated 50,413 (95% Confidence Interval: 46,333-54,492) avocado-related knife injuries from 1998 to 2017. The incidence of avocado-related knife injuries increased over this time period (1998-2002 = 3143; 2013-2017 = 27,059). This increase correlated closely with a rise in avocado consumption in the U.S. (Pearson's Correlation: 0.934, p < 0.001) Women comprised 80.1% of injuries. The most common demographic injured were 23 to 39-year old females (32.7%), while the least common was males under the age of 17 (0.9%). Most ED presentations occurred on Saturdays (15.9%) or Sundays (19.9%) and the majority occurred during the months of April through July (45.6%). Injuries were much more common on the left (and likely non-dominant) hand. CONCLUSION: Avocado-related knife injuries are a preventable cause of hand injury. The incidence has risen significantly in recent years, possibly due to an increased consumption of avocados in the United States. Education on safe avocado preparation techniques and public safety initiatives, such as warning labels, could help prevent serious injuries in the future.

The incidence of shoulder arthroplasty: rise and future projections compared with hip and knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There remains a paucity of epidemiologic data from recent years on the incidence of shoulder arthroplasty. We aimed to examine the recent trends and predict future projections of hemiarthroplasty (HA), anatomic (aTSA), and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), as well as compare these predictions to those for total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample was queried from 2011 to 2017 for HA, aTSA, and RSA, as well as TKA and THA. Linear and Poisson regression was performed to project annual procedural incidence and volume to the year 2025. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2017, the number of primary shoulder arthroplasties increased by 103.7%. In particular, RSA increased by 191.3%, with 63,845 RSAs performed in 2017. All projection models demonstrated significant increases in shoulder arthroplasty volume and incidence from 2017 to 2025. By 2025, the linear model predicts that shoulder arthroplasty volume will increase by 67.2% to 174,810 procedures whereas the Poisson model predicts a 235.2% increase, to 350,558 procedures by 2025. These growth rate projections outpace those of THA and TKA. CONCLUSIONS: The number of shoulder arthroplasties has been increasing in recent years, largely because of the exponential increases in RSA. The overall incidence is increasing at a greater rate than TKA or THA, with projections continuing to rise over the next decade. These data and projections can be used by policy makers and hospitals to drive initiatives aimed at meeting these projected future demands.

Imaging of the Peripheral Nerve: Concepts and Future Direction of Magnetic Resonance Neurography and Ultrasound.

Advanced imaging is increasingly used by upper extremity surgeons in the diagnosis and evaluation of peripheral nerve pathology. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) have emerged as the most far-reaching modalities for peripheral nerve imaging and often provide complimentary information. Technology improvements allow better depiction of the peripheral nervous system, allowing for more accurate diagnoses and preoperative planning. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of current modalities and expected advances in peripheral nerve imaging with a focus on practical applications in the clinical setting. Ultrasound is safe, inexpensive, and readily available, and allows dynamic imaging with high spatial resolution as well as immediate evaluation of the contralateral nerve for comparison. It is primarily limited by its dependency on skilled operators and soft tissue contrast. The spatial evaluation of the perineural environment, fascicular echostructure, and nerve diameter are features of particular use in the diagnosis and treatment of nerve tumors, compressive lesions, and nerve trauma. Sonoelastrography has shown promise as a useful adjunct to standard sonographic imaging. MRN refers to the optimization of magnetic resonance image sequences and technology for visualization and contrasting nerves from surrounding structures. MRN provides excellent soft tissue contrast, depicts the entire nerve in 3 dimensions, allows for early evaluation of downstream muscle injury, and functions without operator dependency limits. Images provide details of nerve anatomic relationships, congruency, size, fascicular pattern, local and intrinsic fluid status, and contrast enhancement patterns, making MRN particularly useful in the setting of trauma, tumor, compressive lesions, and evaluation of brachial plexus injuries. Advances in MR volume and cinematic rendering software, magnet and coil technology, nerve-specific contrast media, and diffusion-weighted and tensor imaging will likely continue to expand the clinical application and indications for MRN.

The Effects of Medicaid Expansion on Triage and Regional Transfer After Upper-Extremity Trauma.

PURPOSE: Underinsured hand trauma patients are more likely to be transferred to quaternary care centers, which burdens these patients and centers. By increasing insurance coverage, care for less severe upper-extremity injuries may be available closer to patients' homes. We evaluated whether the 2014 expansion of Medicaid in Maryland under the Affordable Care Act decreased the number of uninsured upper-extremity trauma patients and the volume of unnecessary emergency trauma visits at our hand center. METHODS: We identified all upper-extremity trauma patients between 2010 and 2017 at our hand trauma referral center. Injury severity was classified based on the need for subspecialty care. Bivariate relations between insurance status and demographic covariates, including injury type and distance, both before and after Medicaid expansion were evaluated. We used patient-level and multinomial logistic regression models to evaluate changes in payer and transfer appropriateness. RESULTS: We studied 12,009 acute upper-extremity trauma patients. With Medicaid expansion, the percentage of trauma patients with Medicaid coverage increased from 15% to 24%, with a decrease in uninsured from 31% to 24%. After Medicaid expansion, non-transfer patient appropriateness decreased and appropriateness of transfers remained consistent across all payers. The average distance patients traveled for care remained similar before and after expansion. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid expansion significantly decreased the proportion of uninsured upper-extremity trauma patients. We identified no significant changes in the distances these patients traveled for specialized care. In addition, the appropriateness of transferred patients did not change significantly after expansion, whereas appropriateness of nontransferred patients actually declined after Medicaid expansion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study indicates no notable change in adherence to transfer guidelines after expansion, and a possible increase in use of emergency services by newly insured patients.

Radial to Axillary Nerve Transfers: A Combined Case Series.

PURPOSE: Loss of active shoulder abduction after brachial plexus or isolated axillary nerve injury is associated with a severe functional deficit. The purpose of this 2-center study was to retrospectively evaluate restoration of shoulder abduction after transfer of a radial nerve branch to the axillary nerve for patients after brachial plexus or axillary nerve injury. METHODS: Patients who underwent transfer of a radial nerve branch to the anterior branch of the axillary nerve between 2004 and 2014 were reviewed. A total of 27 patients with an average follow-up of 22 months were included. Outcome measures included pre- and postoperative shoulder abduction and triceps strength and active and passive shoulder range of motion. RESULTS: Shoulder abduction strength increased after surgery in 89% of patients. Average preoperative shoulder abduction was 12° compared with 114° after surgery. Twenty-two of 27 patients (81.5%) achieved at least M3 strength, with 17 of 27 patients (62.9%) achieving M4 strength. No differences were observed when subgroup analysis was performed for isolated nerve transfer versus multiple nerve transfer, mechanism of injury, injury level, branch of radial nerve transferred, or time from injury to surgery. A negative correlation was found comparing increasing age and both shoulder abduction strength and active shoulder abduction. No patients lost triceps strength after surgery. There were 4 patients who achieved no significant gain in shoulder abduction or deltoid strength and were deemed failures. No postoperative complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Transfer of a branch of the radial nerve to the anterior branch of the axillary nerve was successful in improving shoulder abduction strength and active shoulder motion in the majority of the patients with brachial plexus or isolated axillary nerve injury. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Biomechanical effects of rotator interval closure in shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Subscapularis dysfunction remains a significant problem after shoulder arthroplasty. Published techniques have variable recommendations for placing a rotator interval closing suture in attempts to off-load the subscapularis repair site, the implications of which have yet to be examined in the literature. The goals of this study were to investigate the biomechanical benefit of the rotator interval closing suture on the subscapularis repair strength and to analyze the effect on shoulder range of motion. METHODS: Sixteen matched cadaveric shoulders underwent a subscapularis tenotomy and shoulder arthroplasty. The subscapularis tenotomy was repaired, and motion at physiologic torsional force was recorded. One of each matched pair was randomly assigned to receive an additional rotator interval closure suture. Each specimen then underwent a standardized cyclic loading with measurement of gap formation and load to failure. RESULTS: The rotator interval closing suture significantly increased the ultimate load to failure of the subscapularis repair (452 N vs. 219 N; P = .002) and decreased gap formation at the subscapularis repair site. Measurement of the shoulder motion showed no significant difference between shoulders with and without the rotator interval closing suture. DISCUSSION: We report the additional biomechanical benefit that the rotator interval closing suture provides to the subscapularis repair site after shoulder arthroplasty. This suture acts to improve the load to failure of the subscapularis repair and to decrease gap formation under cyclic load. Furthermore, it does not detrimentally affect shoulder external rotation or overall arc of rotation. Our findings support the application of this off-loading technique after subscapularis repair during shoulder arthroplasty.

Long-Term Oral Steroid Use: A Unique Risk Factor in 4-Corner Fusion Compared With Other Wrist Salvage Operations.

INTRODUCTION: Salvage procedures such as proximal row carpectomy, 4-corner fusion, total wrist arthroplasty, and total wrist arthrodesis are commonly used at the end stages of wrist arthritis. These operations have high complication rates, and significant controversy exists regarding the selection of procedure. Long-term oral glucocorticoid therapy has previously been identified as a risk factor for complications in multiple orthopedic procedures. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect long-term oral preoperative corticosteroid use has on complications after different salvage operations for wrist arthritis. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify patients who underwent proximal row carpectomy, 4-corner fusion, total wrist arthroplasty, or total wrist fusion between 2005 and 2020. Patients were classified by steroid use. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess the risk of complications. RESULTS: A total of 1298 patients were identified. Overall, steroid use was found to be independently associated with a higher complication rate. On multivariate analysis of patients who underwent 4-corner fusion, steroid use was found to be associated with higher complication rate and surgical site infection rate. Steroid use was not associated with increased complications in patients who underwent proximal row carpectomy, total wrist arthroplasty, or total wrist fusion when examined individually. CONCLUSION: Long-term oral corticosteroid therapy was associated with an increased risk of postoperative infections in patients who underwent 4-corner fusion, which was not found in other wrist salvage operations.

National incidence and trends of bicycle injury.

Bicycle utilization continues to increase annually, and this trend was recently accelerated by the coronavirus disease of 2019 pandemic. There is limited epidemiologic data, however, regarding the prevalence and nature of bicycle-related injuries. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to characterize trends in bicycle-related injuries. The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System was queried for bicycle-related injuries from 2012 to 2021. Patient demographic and injury data were collected and analyzed to describe trends in incidence, patient demographics, and injury patterns associated with an emergency department encounter for a bicycle-related injury. There were an estimated 4,666,491 (95% confidence interval: 4,661,472-4,671,510) bicycle-related injuries from 2012 to 2021. The incidence of these injuries has significantly decreased over time (R = -0.983, R2 = 0.967, p < 0.001). However, the rate of injury in elderly patients increased over time. Injuries occurred most often during summer months (36%) and on weekend days (31.9%). Males and younger patients were more commonly injured. Head injuries were the most commonly affected body part among all age groups. Fractures were the most common injury type overall. Upper extremity injuries were more common than the lower extremity. Despite increased public bicycle utilization, there is a significant downtrend in bicycle-related injuries over the last decade. Injuries among elderly patients are becoming more common, who demonstrate a high rate of fracture and head injury. Fractures and head injuries were the most common injuries among all age groups, highlighting the importance of bicycle safety initiatives and helmet-wearing regardless of age.

Upper-Extremity Peripheral Nerve Stimulators.

Chronic pain conditions are some of the most challenging problems upper-extremity surgeons face and often require a multimodal approach including neuromodulation. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is one of these modalities, delivering electrical stimulation to peripheral axons to modulate the spinal cord and block out nociceptive signals from the extremity. This blockade leads to long-lasting effects in both the peripheral and central nervous systems. Not only does PNS decrease peripheral pain signals but it also decreases the peripheral inflammatory response and assists with central nervous system plasticity for long-term pain control. Although PNS was initially developed in the 1960s, it has been underrepresented in the literature largely due to the advent of spinal cord stimulation and the lack of Food and Drug Administration-approved hardware for PNS. However, for upper-extremity pain, PNS provides notable benefits over spinal cord stimulation devices, as PNS allows for safer, more specific, and often more effective pain control. As clinicians attempt to limit narcotic use, therapies such as PNS have been revisited and are gaining popularity. We present a narrative review of PNS; discuss its mechanism of action, indications, and surgical technique; and provide a summary of the available literature for the upper-extremity surgeon. Peripheral nerve stimulation offers a solution for chronic, debilitating pain recalcitrant to other treatment modalities.

When Is It Safe to Operate After Therapeutic Carpal Tunnel Injections?

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest increased complications when surgery closely follows corticosteroid injection. The purpose of this study was to understand the occurrence of surgical site infection (SSI), wound complications, and reoperation rates after carpal tunnel release (CTR) when corticosteroid injections were given within 180 days preoperatively. METHODS: Data were collected from the Truven MarketScan database from 2009 to 2018. Cohorts were created based on preoperative timing of injection (<30, 30-60, 61-90, 91-180 days) and number of injections (0, 1, 2, 3+). Logistic regression was performed to assess the contribution of preoperative injections on 90-day surgical site complications and 1-year reoperation while controlling for demographics and comorbidities. RESULTS: Overall, 223 899 patients underwent CTR. Of these, 17 391 (7.76%) had a preoperative injection in the 180 days preceding surgery. Univariate analysis demonstrated a relationship between timing of injections and noninfectious wound complications (P = .006) and rate of 1-year reoperation (P = .045). Univariate analysis demonstrated a relationship between number of injections and 1-year reoperation (P < .001). On multivariate analysis, those receiving injections within 30 days preoperatively had increased rates of SSI (P = .034) and noninfectious wound complications (P = .006) compared with those with no injection or at other time points. Patients with 2 (P = .002) or 3 or more injections (P < .001) in the 180-day preoperative period had increased odds of 1-year reoperation. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests increased risk of SSI, wound complications, and 1-year reoperation when corticosteroid injections are administered in the 30-day preoperative period. In addition, multiple steroid injections may increase the risk of 1-year reoperation.

Primary care and public health activities in select US health centers: documenting successes, barriers, and lessons learned.

OBJECTIVES: We examined primary care and public health activities among federally funded health centers, to better understand their successes, the barriers encountered, and the lessons learned. METHODS: We used qualitative and quantitative methods to collect data from 9 health centers, stratified by administrative division, urban-rural location, and race/ethnicity of patients served. Descriptive data on patient and institutional characteristics came from the Uniform Data System, which collects data from all health centers annually. We administered questionnaires and conducted phone interviews with key informants. RESULTS: Health centers performed well on primary care coordination and community orientation scales and reported conducting many essential public health activities. We identified specific needs for integrating primary care and public health: (1) more funding for collaborations and for addressing the social determinants of health, (2) strong leadership to champion collaborations, (3) trust building among partners, with shared missions and clear expectations of responsibilities, and (4) alignment and standardization of data collection, analysis, and exchange. CONCLUSIONS: Lessons learned from health centers should inform strategies to better integrate public health with primary care.

Management of Proximal Pole Scaphoid Nonunions: A Critical Analysis Review.

¼: Optimal management of nonunions of the proximal pole of the scaphoid is controversial and dependent on many patient and pathophysiologic considerations. ¼: If the proximal pole subchondral bone support is sufficient, options include open reduction and internal fixation, either alone or in combination with autologous nonvascularized or vascularized bone graft. ¼: If the proximal pole is not salvageable, replacement with osteochondral autografts or osteochondral flaps is the only option for reconstruction of the native anatomy.

Telehealth Can Be Implemented Across a Musculoskeletal Service Line Without Compromising Patient Satisfaction.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to changes to in-office orthopedic care, with a rapid shift to telemedicine. Institutions' lack of established infrastructure for these types of visits has posed challenges requiring attention to confidentiality, safety, and patient satisfaction. Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility of telemedicine in orthopedics during the pandemic and its effect on efficiency and patient satisfaction. Methods: Patients seen by the Emory University Department of Orthopaedics Sports Medicine and Upper Extremity Divisions via telemedicine from March 23 to April 24, 2020, were contacted by telephone. Each patient was asked to respond to questions on satisfaction, ease of use, and potential future use; satisfaction with telemedicine and previous clinical visits were measured using a modified 5-point Likert scale. Results: Of the 762 patients seen, 346 (45.4%) completed the telemedicine questionnaire. Satisfaction varied by visit type, with average scores of 4.88/5 for in-office clinic visits versus 4.61/5 for telemedicine visits. There was no significant difference among age groups for satisfaction ratings. Patients 65 years old or older reported significantly longer visit times and decreased ease of use with the telemedicine platform. Conclusion: Telemedicine in a large orthopedics department was successfully implemented without compromising patient satisfaction. The use of telemedicine allows many patients to be seen quickly and efficiently without diminishing their musculoskeletal clinical experience.

Surgical Treatment of Wrist Arthritis in Young Patients.

Surgical treatment of wrist arthritis in the younger patient population remains a challenging issue, and various surgical options need to be carefully considered for each patient. Proximal row carpectomy and 4-corner arthrodesis have proven to be reliable options for reducing pain and restoring adequate function in most young high-demand patients if the lunate facet is spared. Selective neurectomy has proven to be a promising stand-alone or complementary procedure for the treatment of pain that is associated with wrist arthritis in patients of all ages, with spared motion and the opportunity to perform additional procedures if pain continues. Alternative procedures, including capitolunate arthrodesis, total wrist arthrodesis, radial styloidectomy, total wrist arthroplasty, and wrist hemiarthroplasty, have considerable strengths and weaknesses and need to be studied further in younger patients.

The use of tobacco is a modifiable risk factor for poor outcomes and readmissions after shoulder arthroplasty.

AIMS: The impact of tobacco use on readmission and medical and surgical complications has been documented in hip and knee arthroplasty. However, there remains little information about the effect of smoking on the outcome after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). We hypothesized that active smokers are at an increased risk of poor medical and surgial outcomes after TSA. METHODS: Data for patients who underwent arthroplasty of the shoulder in the USA between January 2011 and December 2015 were obtained from the National Readmission Database, and 90-day readmissions and complications were documented using validated coding methods. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to quantify the risk of smoking on the outcome after TSA, while controlling for patient demographics, comorbidities, and hospital-level confounding factors. RESULTS: A total of 196,325 non-smokers (93.1%) and 14,461 smokers (6.9%) underwent TSA during the five-year study period. Smokers had significantly increased rates of 30- and 90-day readmission (p = 0.025 and 0.001, respectively), revision within 90 days (p < 0.001), infection (p < 0.001), wound complications (p < 0.001), and instability of the prosthesis (p < 0.001). They were also at significantly greater risk of suffering from pneumonia (p < 0.001), sepsis (p = 0.001), and myocardial infarction (p < 0.001), postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Smokers have an increased risk of readmission and medical and surgical complications after TSA. These risks are similar to those found for smokers after hip and knee arthroplasty. Many surgeons choose to avoid these elective procedures in patients who smoke. The increased risks should be considered when counselling patients who smoke before undertaking TSA.