Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 78(1): 188-198, 2024 01 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37590953

RESUMO

The optimal treatment of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains uncertain. Patients undergoing debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) receive extended antimicrobial treatment, and some experts leave patients at perceived highest risk of relapse on suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT). In this narrative review, we synthesize the literature concerning the role of SAT to prevent treatment failure following DAIR, attempting to answer 3 key questions: (1) What factors identify patients at highest risk for treatment failure after DAIR (ie, patients with the greatest potential to benefit from SAT), (2) Does SAT reduce the rate of treatment failure after DAIR, and (3) What are the rates of treatment failure and adverse events necessitating treatment discontinuation in patients receiving SAT? We conclude by proposing risk-benefit stratification criteria to guide use of SAT after DAIR for PJI, informed by the limited available literature.


Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Desbridamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Falha de Tratamento , Artrite Infecciosa/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia
2.
Instr Course Lect ; 73: 675-687, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38090933

RESUMO

The treatment of spinal infections is not well defined, and a cursory review of the literature can lead to conflicting treatment strategies. To add to the complexity, infections can include primary infection of the spine, infection secondary to another primary source, and postoperative infections including epidural abscesses, discitis, osteomyelitis, paraspinal soft-tissue infections, or any combination. Furthermore, differing opinions often exist within the medical and surgical communities regarding the outcomes and effectiveness of varying treatment strategies. Given the paucity of defined treatment protocols and long-term follow-up, it is important to develop multidisciplinary treatment teams and treatment strategies. This, along with defined protocols for the treatment of varying infections, can provide the data needed for improved treatment of spinal infections.


Assuntos
Discite , Abscesso Epidural , Osteomielite , Humanos , Discite/diagnóstico , Discite/cirurgia , Abscesso Epidural/diagnóstico , Abscesso Epidural/cirurgia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Osteomielite/diagnóstico , Osteomielite/terapia , Coluna Vertebral
4.
Orthopedics ; 47(2): e61-e66, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38285551

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Atypical mycobacterial infections of the spine can be difficult to treat and represent a subset of the vertebral osteomyelitis and diskitis spectrum often requiring early and aggressive surgical intervention. The purpose of this review is to improve the understanding of and approach to disease management from the perspective of the spine surgeon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Debridement or excision of the affected levels may be necessary to decrease mycobacterial loads and restore biomechanics. A close relationship with the patient's internal medicine and infectious disease specialists should be maintained to ensure disease eradication or remission. Long-term suppressive antibiotic therapy may be required for infection control. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Atypical mycobacterial spine infections are rare, complex, and difficult to eradicate. Our institution proposes a collaborative effort among the spine surgeon, infectious disease specialists, and internal medicine specialists to best approach the work-up, diagnosis, and treatment of these infections. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(2):e61-e66.].


Assuntos
Doenças Transmissíveis , Infecções por Mycobacterium não Tuberculosas , Osteomielite , Humanos , Coluna Vertebral , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Osteomielite/diagnóstico , Osteomielite/terapia , Osteomielite/microbiologia
5.
Ther Adv Infect Dis ; 10: 20499361231196664, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37693861

RESUMO

Background: Many patients with decubitus-related osteomyelitis are ineligible for myocutaneous flapping, and optimal management in this population is unknown. We describe treatments and outcomes of hospitalized patients with decubitus ulcer-related osteomyelitis who did not undergo surgical reconstruction or coverage. Methods: We systematically identified hospitalized patients with diagnoses of pelvic, sacral, or femoral osteomyelitis due to decubitus ulceration between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2018. Demographics, comorbidities, laboratory data, and outcomes were collected by manual chart review. T-tests or Chi-square tests were used for descriptive statistical comparisons; logistic regressions were used to explore the odds of readmission, osteomyelitis-related readmission, and death. Results: Of 89 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 34 (38%) received surgical debridement and ⩾6 weeks of antibiotics; 55 (62%) received either antibiotics alone or debridement and <6 weeks of antibiotics. Mean age was 55 (standard deviation 18) years, 55% of patients were male, and 69% had spinal cord injury or other form of paralysis. Within 1 year, 56 (63%) patients were readmitted, 38 (44%) patients were readmitted due to complications from osteomyelitis, and 15 (17%) died. We found no significant differences in readmission (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 0.54-3.21, p = 0.53), readmission related to osteomyelitis (OR = 1.64, 95% CI: 0.69-4.04, p = 0.27), subsequent sepsis (OR = 2.27, 95% CI: 0.83-6.93, p = 0.13), or death (OR = 2.88, 95% CI: 0.83-13.4, p = 0.12) by treatment group. Conclusions: Among patients with decubitus-related osteomyelitis who did not undergo myocutaneous flapping, outcomes were generally poor regardless of treatment, and not significantly improved with prolonged antibiotics. Prospective studies are needed to assess best practice strategies for this challenging patient population.

6.
JBJS Case Connect ; 12(3)2022 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36075022

RESUMO

CASE: This report describes a histoplasma capsulatum total knee prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in an immunosuppressed patient treated with a 2-stage revision. The diagnosis of PJI was made based on minor criteria, and the causative organism was identified from cultures obtained at the time of explantation. The patient underwent induction with amphotericin B, followed by oral antifungal therapy and a successful 2-stage revision with a hinged prosthesis with an interval of ∼7 months between stage 1 and stage 2. At the most recent follow-up (18 months), she remained clear from infection with planned lifetime antifungal suppression. CONCLUSION: This case report highlights the importance of consideration of atypical organisms when treating immunocompromised patients. Furthermore, this case report documents one of the few cases of histoplasma PJI and provides a successful treatment algorithm to potentially be applied to future cases.


Assuntos
Artrite Infecciosa , Artroplastia do Joelho , Prótese do Joelho , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Infecciosa/cirurgia , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Histoplasma , Humanos , Prótese do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/cirurgia , Reoperação/efeitos adversos
7.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 9(1): ofab637, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35028337

RESUMO

We present a case of a patient with chronic Q fever who presented with digital necrosis, autoamputations, and positive anticentromere antibody, mimicking a scleroderma vasculopathy or thromboangiitis obliterans. Coxiella burnetii infection has long been associated with the presence of autoantibodies and autoimmune phenomena including vasculitis. Clinicians should consider Q fever testing in patients with new-onset autoimmune diseases or autoantibodies and appropriate exposure histories.

8.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 9(6): ofac028, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35615295

RESUMO

Tedizolid has activity against Gram-positive pathogens as well as Mycobacterium spp and Nocardia spp. Real-world evidence supporting long-term tolerability and clinical success of tedizolid is lacking. Prolonged tedizolid therapy (median, 188 days; interquartile range, 62-493 days) appeared to be well tolerated in 37 patients (8.1% experienced adverse effect leading to discontinuation). Clinical success was 81.3% in those evaluated.

9.
Pharmacotherapy ; 40(5): 469-478, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32239771

RESUMO

Treatment of serious gram-positive infections presents multiple challenges. Treatment often results in prolonged hospitalization for administration of intravenous antimicrobials and presents an inefficient use of hospital resources. Prolonged hospitalization is typically also unfavorable to patient preferences and potentially subjects patients to additional health care-associated complications. Current strategies of transition to outpatient settings-outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy and use of oral antibiotics-often do not adequately serve vulnerable populations for whom there is often no alternative to inpatient therapy. Specifically, people who use drugs, those who cannot reliably adhere to unsupervised treatment (poor mental or physical health), people with complicating life circumstances (e.g., homelessness, incarceration, rural location), and those with inadequate health insurance remain hospitalized for weeks longer than persons without such conditions. We suspected that long-acting lipoglycopeptides (laLGP), such as dalbavancin and oritavancin, may be useful in patient transitions to outpatient settings. Thus, we conducted a search of the peer-reviewed literature using the PubMed, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE databases. Based on accumulating literature, it appears that laLGPs offer a reliable alternative therapeutic strategy that addresses many of the personal and systemic barriers to the traditional transitioning approaches. Current evidence also suggests that these agents may be cost-effective from patient, payer, and hospital perspectives. Barriers to broader use of laLGPs include, among others, a relative lack of prospective data regarding efficacy in serious infections, a narrow United States Food and Drug Administration-approved indication restricted to only acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, and lack of reimbursement infrastructure for inpatient settings.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/tratamento farmacológico , Lipoglicopeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Teicoplanina/análogos & derivados , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/química , Preparações de Ação Retardada , Humanos , Lipoglicopeptídeos/administração & dosagem , Lipoglicopeptídeos/química , Teicoplanina/administração & dosagem , Teicoplanina/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA