Sustainable reduction of phone-call interruptions by 35% in a medical imaging department using an automatic voicemail and custom call redirection system.

BACKGROUND: Have you ever been in the trenches of a complicated study only to be interrupted by a not-so urgent phone-call? We were, repeatedly- unfortunately. PURPOSE: To increase productivity of radiologists by quantifying the main source of interruptions (phone-calls) to the workflow of radiologists, and too assess the implemented solution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To filter calls to the radiology consultant on duty, we introduced an automatic voicemail and custom call redirection system. Thus, instead of directly speaking with radiology consultants, clinicians were to first categorize their request and dial accordingly: 1. Inpatient requests, 2. Outpatient requests, 3. Directly speak with the consultant radiologist. Inpatient requests (1) and outpatient requests (2) were forwarded to MRI technologists or clerks, respectively. Calls were monitored in 15-minute increments continuously for an entire year (March 2022 until and including March 2023). Subsequently, both the frequency and category of requests were assessed. RESULTS: 4803 calls were recorded in total: 3122 (65 %) were forwarded to a radiologist on duty. 870 (18.11 %) concerned inpatients, 274 (5.70 %) outpatients, 430 (8.95 %) dialed the wrong number, 107 (2.23 %) made no decision. Throughout the entire year the percentage of successfully avoided interruptions was relatively stable and fluctuated between low to high 30 % range (Mean per month 35 %, Median per month 34.45 %). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first analysis of phone-call interruptions to consultant radiologists in an imaging department for 12 continuous months. More than 35 % of requests did not require the input of a specialist trained radiologist. Hence, installing an automated voicemail and custom call redirection system is a sustainable and simple solution to reduce phone-call interruptions by on average 35 % in radiology departments. This solution was well accepted by referring clinicians. The installation required a one-time investment of only 2h and did not cost any money.

The split apparent diffusion coefficient sign: A novel magnetic resonance imaging biomarker for cortical pathology with possible implications in autoimmune encephalitis.

INTRODUCTION: MRI is the imaging modality of choice for assessing patients with encephalopathy. In this context, we discuss a novel biomarker, the "split ADC sign," where the cerebral cortex demonstrates restricted diffusion (high DWI signal and low ADC) and the underlying white matter demonstrates facilitated diffusion (high or low DWI signal and high ADC). We hypothesize that this sign can be used as a biomarker to suggest either acute encephalitis onset or to raise the possibility of an autoimmune etiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A full-text radiological information system search of radiological reports was performed for all entities known to produce restricted diffusion in the cortex excluding stroke between January 2012 and June 2022. Initial MRI studies performed upon onset of clinical symptoms were screened for the split ADC sign. RESULTS: 25 subjects were encountered with a positive split ADC sign (15 female; median age = 57 years, range 18-82). Diagnosis included six herpes simplex encephalitis, three peri-ictal MRI changes, eight PRES, two MELAS, and six autoimmune (3 anti-GABAAR, two seronegative, and one anti-Ma2/Ta). Subjects were imaged at a mean 1.8 days after the onset of symptoms (range 0-8). DISCUSSION: We present a novel visual MRI biomarker, the split ADC sign, and highlight its potential usefulness in subjects with encephalopathy to suggest acute disease onset or to raise the possibility of an autoimmune etiology when location-based criteria are applied. When positive, the sign was present on the initial MRI and can therefore be used to help focus further clinical and laboratory workup.

Interdisciplinary strategies for diagnosis and treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.

Temporary, sudden, shooting and recurrent unilateral facial pain in the supply area of one or more trigeminal nerve branches characterises trigeminal neuralgia. Innocuous stimuli trigger the pain, e.g. chewing, speaking or brushing teeth. In some patients, paroxysms superimpose on continuous pain. In aetiological terms, idiopathic, classic (due to neurovascular compression) and secondary trigeminal neuralgia (e.g. due to multiple sclerosis, brainstem ischaemia and space-occupying lesions) are defined. Many drugs may be efficacious, with carbamazepine being first-choice therapy. However, non-pharmacological and invasive procedures may also help. To reach the correct diagnosis and determine the best therapeutic measures, adequate pain characterisation and interdisciplinary collaboration are essential. We hereby present our experience of an interdisciplinary approach for the diagnosis and treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.

Lesion follows function: video-oculography compared with MRI to diagnose internuclear ophthalmoplegia in patients with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Video-oculography (VOG) is used to quantify functional deficits in internuclear ophthalmoplegia (INO), whereas MRI can detect the corresponding structural lesions in the medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF). This study investigates the diagnostic agreement of MRI compared to VOG measurements. METHODS: We prospectively compared structural MRI findings and functional VOG measures of 63 MS patients to assess their diagnostic agreement for INO. RESULTS: MRI detected 12 true-positive and 92 true-negative MLF lesions for INO compared to VOG (12 true-positive and 38 true-negative patients) but identified one-third of the MLF lesions on the wrong side. MRI ratings were specific (92.0%) to detect MLF lesions but not sensitive (46.2%) for diagnosing INO (86.4% and 63.2% by patient). Accordingly, MRI has a high positive likelihood ratio of 5.77 but a modest negative likelihood ratio of 0.59 for the probability of INO (4.63 and 0.43) with an accuracy of 82.5% (79.4%). CONCLUSION: MRI assessments are highly specific but not sensitive for detecting INO compared to VOG. While MRI identifies MLF lesions in INO, VOG quantifies the deficit. As a simple, quick, and non-invasive test for diagnosing and tracking functional INO deficits, it will hopefully find its place in the diagnostic and therapeutic pathways of MS.

Prevalence of Endolymphatic Hydrops in Cochlear Implant Candidates with Idiopathic Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of endolymphatic hydrops (EH) in cochlear implant (CI) candidates with idiopathic profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and its influence on the preservation of audiovestibular function after cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case series. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: CI candidates with idiopathic progressive SNHL, but without classic EH-associated symptoms. INTERVENTIONS: Delayed intravenous gadolinium-enhanced inner ear fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging as well as pure-tone audiograms, video head impulse tests, and vestibular evoked myogenic potentials before and 4 weeks after cochlear implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of EH before cochlear implantation, audiovestibular function before and after surgery in hydropic and nonhydropic ears. RESULTS: Thirty-two ears in 16 CI candidates were included. Nine ears (28%) with EH were detected. Although preoperative hearing thresholds, utricular function, and semicircular canal function were not different between the two groups, saccular function was reduced in hydropic ears. Ten subjects received a unilateral CI. Of these, 3 (30%) showed EH on the implanted side. There was no difference regarding postoperative hearing loss between the two groups, but the results point toward a higher vulnerability of hydropic ears with respect to loss of otolith function after cochlear implantation. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study showing that EH can be assumed in about one third of CI candidates with idiopathic profound SNHL, but no classic EH-associated symptoms. Preliminary results suggest that EH has no influence on the preservation of cochlear function but could be a risk factor for loss of otolith function after cochlear implantation.

Structured Reporting in Neuroradiology: Intracranial Tumors.

PURPOSE: The aim of this pilot study was to assess the clinical feasibility, diagnostic yield, advantages, and disadvantages of structured reporting for routine MRI-reading in patients with primary diagnosis of intracranial tumors as compared to traditional neuroradiological free text reporting. METHODS: A structured MRI reporting template was developed covering pathological, anatomical, and functional aspects in an itemized fashion. Retrospectively, 60 consecutive patients with first diagnosis of an intracranial tumor were selected from the radiology information system/PACS system. Structured reporting was performed by a senior neuroradiologist, blinded to clinical and radiological data. Reporting times were measured per patient. The diagnostic content was compared to free text reporting which was independently performed on the same MRI exams by two other neuroradiologists. The comparisons were categorized per item as: "congruent," "partially congruent," "incongruent," or "not mentioned in free-style report." RESULTS: Tumor-related items: congruent findings were found for all items (17/17) with congruence rates ranging between 98 and 39% per item. Four items achieved congruence rates ≥90%, 5 items >80%, and 9 items ≥70%. Partially congruent findings were found for all items in up to 50% per item. Incongruent findings were present in 7/17 items in up to 5% per item. Free text reports did not mention 12 of 17 items (range 7-43% per item). Non-tumor-related items, including brain atrophy, microangiopathy, vascular pathologies, and various extracranial pathologies, which were not mentioned in free-text reports between 18 and 85% per item. Mean reporting time for structured reporting was 7:49 min (3:12-17:06 min). CONCLUSION: First results showed that expert structured reporting ensured reliable detection of all relevant brain pathologies along with reproducible documentation of all predefined diagnostic items, which was not always the case for free text reporting. A mean reporting time of 8 min per patient seems clinically feasible.

Factors associated with significant MRI findings in medical walk-in patients with acute headache.

QUESTION: Acute headache is a main reason for emergency consultations and can be a symptom of dangerous neurological conditions. We hypothesised that in medical walk-in headache patients with low suspicion of intracranial bleeding significant findings in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are associated with clinical features. METHODS: Retrospective chart review on medical outpatient referrals for brain MRI (2010-2014) with the chief complaint "acute headache" (duration <4 weeks). MRI findings were classified by relevance (significant yes/no) and whether they potentially caused headache. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was applied to identify clinical features associated with pathological findings. RESULTS: Among 513 MRI examinations, acute headache was the second most common reason for a brain MRI (n = 82, 16%). Of those, forty-one (50%) were completely normal, 16 (19.5%) had an "nonsignificant" finding not causing headache, 10 (12%) had a nonsignificant finding potentially explaining the headache, 8 (9.8%) a "significant" finding probably explaining the headache, and 7 (8.5%) a significant finding probably not causing headache. Syncope (odds ratio [OR] 31.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-570), vomiting (OR 7.5, 95% CI 1.2-46.4), ophthalmological symptoms (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.0-15.6) and female gender (OR 3.1, 95% CI 0.7-13.7) were associated with significant MRI findings. A clinical score based on these variables was associated with a significant MRI finding potentially causing headache with high sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSION: Among walk-in patients who underwent MRI for acute headache with low suspicion for intracranial bleeding, 20% had a significant MRI finding. A simple clinical score identified all patients with significant findings that explained the headache. If prospectively validated, this might be a useful tool in selecting those walk-in headache patients requiring urgent cranial MRI.