Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Women Health ; 62(6): 532-543, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35818165

RESUMO

The objective of this study was to analyze the trend of the age standardized mortality rate (ASMR) for cervical cancer in Brazil between 2005 and 2019 and investigate its association with the Socio-demographic Index (SDI), an indicator of development status strongly correlated with health outcomes. We conducted an ecological time-series study using data from the Mortality Information System of the Ministry of Health. Trend analyses were performed using Prais-Winsten regression. The association between the SDI and ASMR was evaluated using simple linear regression. Between 2005 and 2019, 105,472 deaths from cervical cancer were recorded. The ASMR was 10.18 deaths/100,000 women. The North region presented the highest magnitude (20.23 deaths/100,000 women) and the Southeast region the lowest (7.83 deaths/100,000 women). We observed a decreasing trend of the ASMR for cervical cancer in the country. The Northeast, Central-West and Southeast regions showed a decreasing trend; South stationary trend and the North region showed an increasing trend. Most of the states showed a stationary or decreasing trend. It was found that the SDI was inversely associated with the ASMR and Annual Percent Change (APC). In conclusion, we observed a decreasing trend of ASMR for cervical cancer and inverse association with SDI in Brazil.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Brasil/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidade , Adulto Jovem
2.
PEC Innov ; 1: 100101, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37213752

RESUMO

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of breast shells in preventing pain and nipple injury during breastfeeding. Method: A non-randomized clinical trial was carried out with blinding to the evaluators of the study results. The study included women with ≥35 weeks of singleton pregnancy, no nipple changes, and a desire to breastfeed. Resulting in 62 lactating women. The experimental group used breast shells and health education with clinical demonstration (n = 29), whereas the control group used no breast shells (n = 33). Pain and nipple injury were assessed three times, twice prenatally and once up to 14 days postpartum. Results: Nipple injury (50.0%) and nipple pain (67.7%) presented with similar frequency in both groups (p = 1). Breast engorgement (35,5%) was associated with nipple pain (p = 0.019) and its onset was delayed in the experimental group (p = 0.001). Health education contributes to breast and nipple care and increases favorable breastfeeding patterns. Conclusion: Breast shells do not prevent nipple pain or injury. Innovation: As far as we know, this is the first clinical research evaluating the use of breast shells since the antenatal care to prevent the occurrence of nipple pain and injury.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA