Layer- and area-specificity of the adrenergic modulation of synaptic transmission in the rat neocortex.

The mammalian neocortex is a multilayered structure receiving extensive adrenergic projections both in rostral and caudal areas. The cellular mechanisms of norepinephrine (NE) in the neocortex are incompletely understood. We used electrophysiology to determine whether NE modulation of synaptic transmission were similar in rostral versus caudal cortical areas, and in infra- versus supra-granular cortical layers. To address these questions we used bath applications of NE (20 µM) to determine its effects on pharmacologically isolated electrically-evoked 2-amino-3-(3-hydroxy-5-methyl-isoxazol-4-yl) propionic acid receptor (AMPAR)-mediated excitatory synaptic currents (eEPSCs), or γ-amino butyric acid A receptor (GABAAR)-mediated inhibitory synaptic currents (eIPSCs). We monitored synaptic currents in pyramidal neurons using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings from supragranular layer 2/3 (L2/3) and infragranular layer 5 (L5) neurons in a thin-slice preparation of rat medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). These results were compared with the effects in the temporal cortex (TC) under similar experimental conditions. We found that NE uniformly and transiently depressed eEPSCs from supragranular to infragranular layers in both the PFC and the TC. On the contrary, the effects of NE on eIPSC were area- and layer-dependent, as NE enhanced the mean amplitude in TC L2/3 and PFC L5 eIPSCs (which displayed the largest saturation currents in the areas studied) but depressed PFC L2/3 eIPSCs, without affecting TC L5 eIPSCs. While the precise physiological meaning of these results is still unclear, our data are consistent with the existence of a dense noradrenergic-controlled GABAergic cortical network in the PFC, in which L5 may act as a decisional bottleneck for behavioral inhibition.

Peripheral oscillators: the driving force for food-anticipatory activity.

Food-anticipatory activity (FAA) and especially the food-entrained oscillator (FEO) have driven many scientists to seek their mechanisms and locations. Starting our research on FAA we, possibly like many other scientists, were convinced that clock genes held the key to the location and the underlying mechanisms for FAA. In this review, which is aimed especially at discussing the contribution of the peripheral oscillators, we have put together the accumulating evidence that the clock gene machinery as we know it today is not sufficient to explain food entrainment. We discuss the contribution of three types of oscillating processes: (i) within the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), neurons capable of maintaining a 24-h oscillation in electrical activity driven by a set of clock genes; (ii) oscillations in metabolic genes and clock genes in other parts of the brain and in peripheral organs driven by the SCN or by food, which damp out after a few cycles; (iii) an FEO which, we propose, is a system built up of different oscillatory processes and consisting of an as-yet-unidentified network of central and peripheral structures. In view of the evidence that clock genes and metabolic oscillations are not essential for the persistence of FAA we propose that food entrainment is initiated by a repeated metabolic state of scarcity that drives an oscillating network of brain nuclei in interaction with peripheral oscillators. This complex may constitute the proposed FEO and is distributed in our peripheral organs as well as within the central nervous system.