Efficacy and safety of bariatric surgery for craniopharyngioma-related hypothalamic obesity: a matched case-control study with 2 years of follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Hypothalamic obesity is a devastating consequence of craniopharyngioma. Bariatric surgery could be a promising therapeutic option. However, its efficacy and safety in patients with craniopharyngioma-related hypothalamic obesity remain largely unknown. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the efficacy of bariatric surgery for inducing weight loss in patients with craniopharyngioma-related hypothalamic obesity. In addition, we studied the safety of bariatric surgery regarding its effects on hormone replacement therapy for pituitary insufficiency. METHODS: In this retrospective matched case-control study, we compared weight loss after bariatric surgery (that is, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy) between eight patients with craniopharyngioma-related hypothalamic obesity and 75 controls with 'common' obesity during 2 years of follow-up. We validated our results at 1 year of follow-up in a meta-analysis. In addition, we studied alterations in hormone replacement therapy after bariatric surgery in patients with craniopharyngioma. RESULTS: Mean weight loss after bariatric surgery was 19% vs 25% (difference -6%, 95% confidence of interval (CI) -14.1 to 4.6; P=0.091) at 2 years of follow-up in patients with craniopharyngioma-related hypothalamic obesity compared with control subjects with 'common' obesity. Mean weight loss was 25% vs 29% (difference -4%, 95% CI -11.6 to 8.1; P=0.419) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and 10% vs 20% (difference -10%, 95% CI -14.1 to -6.2; P=0.003) after sleeve gastrectomy at 2 years of follow-up in patients with craniopharyngioma-related hypothalamic obesity vs control subjects with 'common' obesity. Our meta-analysis demonstrated significant weight loss 1 year after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, but not after sleeve gastrectomy. Seven patients with craniopharyngioma suffered from pituitary insufficiency; three of them required minor adjustments in hormone replacement therapy after bariatric surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, but not sleeve gastrectomy, was comparable between patients with craniopharyngioma-related hypothalamic obesity and control subjects with 'common' obesity at 2 years of follow-up. Bariatric surgery seems safe regarding its effects on hormone replacement therapy.

Acylated and unacylated ghrelin during OGTT in Prader-Willi syndrome: support for normal response to food intake.

BACKGROUND: Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is characterized by hyperphagia with impaired satiety. PWS patients have very high acylated ghrelin (AG) with normal unacylated ghrelin (UAG) levels, resulting in an elevated AG/UAG ratio, suggesting an intrinsic defect in the ghrelin regulation. Normally, food intake induces satiety and a drop in AG and UAG levels, but it is unknown if these levels also decline in PWS. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the high AG levels in PWS decline in response to glucose intake during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and to investigate the effects of growth hormone (GH) treatment on this response. METHOD: Serum levels of AG, UAG and AG/UAG ratio during an OGTT were determined in 24 GH-treated patients with PWS (median age 19·0, range 14·2-25·9 years) and in 10 GH-stop patients (of whom five were in GH-treated group; 18·5, 14·5-20·3 years). RESULTS: In GH-treated and GH-stop young adults with PWS, there was a sharp decline of AG levels and a decrease of UAG levels in the first 30 min after the glucose load, which resulted in a lower AG/UAG ratio. GH-treated patients had significantly lower AG levels than GH-stop patients at baseline and during the OGTT. All UAG levels and AG/UAG ratios were lower in the GH-treated patients, although not significantly. CONCLUSIONS: In young adults with PWS, an oral glucose load significantly reduces AG and UAG levels, suggesting normal regulation of the ghrelin axis by food intake. GH treatment results in lower AG levels at baseline and during OGTT, suggesting a more favourable metabolic profile. Our findings might suggest that the impaired satiety is not the result of an abnormal response of the orexigenic ghrelin to food intake.

Ghrelin and unacylated ghrelin stimulate human osteoblast growth via mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathways in the absence of GHS-R1a.

Recent studies demonstrate widespread expression of ghrelin among tissues and have uncovered its pleiotropic nature. We have examined gene expression of ghrelin and its two receptor splice variants, growth hormone secretagogue receptors (GHS-R) 1a and 1b, in human bone biopsies and in the human pre-osteoblastic SV-HFO cell line during differentiation. Additionally, we examined proliferative effects of ghrelin and unacylated ghrelin (UAG) in differentiating and non-differentiating cells. We detected GHS-R1b mRNA in human bone and osteoblasts but not ghrelin's cognate receptor GHS-R1a, using two different real-time PCR assays and both total RNA and mRNA. In osteoblasts GHS-R1b mRNA expression remained low during the first 14 days of culture, but increased 300% in differentiating cells by day 21. Both human bone biopsies and osteoblasts expressed ghrelin mRNA, and osteoblasts were found to secrete ghrelin. Overall, ghrelin gene expression was greater in differentiating than non-differentiating osteoblasts, but was not increased during culture in either group. Ghrelin and UAG induced thymidine uptake dose-dependently, peaking at 1 and 10 nM respectively, at day 6 of culture in both non-differentiating and differentiating osteoblasts. The proliferative response to ghrelin and UAG declined with culture time and state of differentiation. The proliferative effects of ghrelin and UAG were suppressed by inhibitors of extracellular-signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and phosphoinositide-3 kinase, and both peptides rapidly induced ERK phosphorylation. Overall, our data suggest new roles for ghrelin and UAG in modulating human osteoblast proliferation via a novel signal transduction pathway.

Pegvisomant in combination with long-acting somatostatin analogues in acromegaly: the role of the GH receptor deletion of exon 3.

BACKGROUND: Doses of the GH receptor (GHR) antagonist pegvisomant (PEGV) that normalize insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) levels vary widely among acromegaly patients. Predictors for PEGV response are baseline IGF1 levels, sex, body weight and previous radiotherapy. A GHR polymorphism lacking exon 3 (d3-GHR) is frequent in the general population. The influence of d3-GHR on PEGV responsiveness in acromegaly is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of d3-GHR on IGF1 levels and PEGV responsiveness in acromegaly patients using combined PEGV and long-acting somatostatin receptor ligand (LA-SRIF) treatment. DESIGN: Data were collected at the Rotterdam Pituitary Centre between 2004 and 2013. Patients with elevated IGF1 levels (>1.2 upper limit of normal; n=112) and over 6 months of high-dose LA-SRIF treatment were co-treated with PEGV. GHR genotype was assessed using genomic DNA in 104 patients. RESULTS: D3-GHR was observed in 51 (49.0%) of the patients (7.7% homozygous, 41.3% heterozygous) and was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P=0.859). Baseline characteristics were similar in d3-GHR and full-length (fl)-GHR genotypes. During PEGV/LA-SRIF treatment IGF1 levels were not different between d3-carriers and non-carriers. Similarly, no difference in PEGV dose required to normalize IGF1 (P=0.337) or PEGV serum levels (P=0.433) was observed between the two groups. However, adenoma size decreased significantly (>20% of largest diameter) in 25.6% of the fl-GHR genotype but only in 7.5% of d3-carriers (P=0.034, OR: 4.6 (CI: 1.1-18.9)). CONCLUSIONS: GHR genotype does not predict the IGF1 normalizing dose of PEGV in acromegaly patients using combination PEGV/LA-SRIF treatment. However, fewer d3-carriers showed significant reductions in adenoma size.

Elevated ratio of acylated to unacylated ghrelin in children and young adults with Prader-Willi syndrome.

Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) is characterized by a switch from failure to thrive to excessive weight gain and hyperphagia in early childhood. Hyperghrelinemia may be involved in the underlying mechanisms of the switch. The purpose of this study is to evaluate acylated ghrelin (AG) and unacylated ghrelin (UAG) levels in PWS and investigate their associations with hyperphagia. This is a cross-sectional clinical study conducted in three PWS expert centers in the Netherlands and France. Levels of AG and UAG and the AG/UAG ratio were determined in 138 patients with PWS (0.2-29.4 years) and compared with 50 age-matched obese subjects (4.3-16.9 years) and 39 healthy controls (0.8-28.6 years). AEBSF was used to inhibit deacylation of AG. As a group, PWS patients had higher AG but similar UAG levels as healthy controls (AG 129.1 vs 82.4 pg/ml, p = 0.016; UAG 135.3 vs 157.3 pg/ml, resp.), resulting in a significantly higher AG/UAG ratio (1.00 vs 0.61, p = 0.001, resp.). Obese subjects had significantly lower AG and UAG levels than PWS and controls (40.3 and 35.3 pg/ml, resp.), but also a high AG/UAG ratio (1.16). The reason for the higher AG/UAG ratio in PWS and obese was, however, completely different, as PWS had a high AG and obese a very low UAG. PWS patients without weight gain or hyperphagia had a similar AG/UAG ratio as age-matched controls, in contrast to those with weight gain and/or hyperphagia who had an elevated AG/UAG ratio. The switch to excessive weight gain in PWS seems to coincide with an increase in the AG/UAG ratio, even prior to the start of hyperphagia.

Administration of acylated ghrelin reduces insulin sensitivity, whereas the combination of acylated plus unacylated ghrelin strongly improves insulin sensitivity.

We investigated the metabolic actions of ghrelin in humans by examining the effects of acute administration of acylated ghrelin, unacylated ghrelin, and the combination in eight adult-onset GH-deficient patients. We followed glucose, insulin, and free fatty acid concentrations before and after lunch and with or without the presence of GH in the circulation. We found that acylated ghrelin, which is rapidly cleared from the circulation, induced a rapid rise in glucose and insulin levels. Unacylated ghrelin, however, prevented the acylated ghrelin-induced rise in insulin and glucose when it was coadministered with acylated ghrelin. Surprisingly, the injection of acylated ghrelin induced an acute increase in unacylated ghrelin and therefore total ghrelin levels. Finally, acylated ghrelin decreased insulin sensitivity up to the end of a period of 6 h after administration. This decrease in insulin sensitivity was prevented by coinjection of unacylated ghrelin. This combined administration of acylated and unacylated ghrelin even significantly improved insulin sensitivity, compared with placebo, for at least 6 h, which warrants studies to investigate the long-term efficacy of this combination in the treatment of disorders with disturbed insulin sensitivity.

Desacyl ghrelin is influenced by changes in insulin concentration during an insulin tolerance test.

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin, a gut-brain peptide, regulates energy homeostasis and glucose metabolism and is present in acylated and nonacylated form in the circulation. Although desacyl ghrelin (DAG), the predominant form of ghrelin, is associated with insulin sensitivity and improved metabolic state, not much is known about its direct regulation by insulin. We aimed to assess changes in DAG in response to the rapid increase in insulin concentration during an insulin tolerance test (ITT) in normal weight and obese subjects. DESIGN: We performed an observational single center study. An ITT was assessed in eight subjects (four males), median age of 29.9 years (range 19.6-42.0). DAG concentrations were measured at 20, 40, 60 and 90 min after insulin infusion. Homeostatic Model Assessment (HOMA) was calculated from fasting insulin and glucose. Body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference were assessed. RESULTS: Three subjects were obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2)), one subject was overweight (BMI = 25-30 kg/m(2)) and four subjects had normal weight (BMI = 18.5-25 kg/m(2)). Median DAG decreased after insulin infusion (90 pg/mL, p = 0.028), especially in normal weight subjects. Baseline DAG was lower in subjects with higher BMI (ρ = -0.76, p = 0.028) and higher fasting insulin (ρ = -0.76, p = 0.030). DAG changes correlated with fasting insulin levels (ρ = -0.85, p = 0.007), HOMA (ρ = -0.86, p = 0.007), BMI (ρ = -0.83, p = 0.010) and waist circumference (ρ = -0.93, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: DAG levels rapidly decreased in response to insulin administration in normal subjects, but not in insulin-resistant obese who are in a state of relative DAG deficiency.

Ghrelin and glucose homeostasis.

Ghrelin plays an important physiological role in modulating GH secretion, insulin secretion and glucose metabolism. Ghrelin has direct effects on pancreatic islet function. Also, ghrelin is part of a mechanism that integrates the physiological response to fasting. However, pharmacologic studies indicate the important obesogenic/diabetogenic properties of ghrelin. This is very likely of physiological relevance, deriving from a requirement to protect against seasonal periods of food scarcity by building energy reserves, predominantly in the form of fat. Available data indicate the potential of ghrelin blockade as a means to prevent its diabetogenic effects. Several studies indicate a negative correlation between ghrelin levels and the incidence of type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance. However, it is unclear if low ghrelin levels are a risk factor or a compensatory response. Direct antagonism of the receptor does not always have the desired effects, however, since it can cause increased body weight gain. Pharmacological suppression of the ghrelin/des-acyl ghrelin ratio by treatment with des-acyl ghrelin may also be a viable alternative approach which appears to improve insulin sensitivity. A promising recently developed approach appears to be through the blockade of GOAT activity, although the longer term effects of this treatment remain to be investigated.

Ghrelin and its unacylated isoform stimulate the growth of adrenocortical tumor cells via an anti-apoptotic pathway.

Ghrelin is expressed in normal human adrenocortical cells and induces their proliferation through growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a (GHS-R1a). Consequently, it was of interest to us to determine whether acylated ghrelin and its predominant serum isoform, unacylated ghrelin, also act as factors for adrenocortical carcinoma cell growth. To examine a potential ghrelin-regulated system in adrenocortical tumors, we measured proliferative effects of acylated and unacylated ghrelin in the adrenocortical carcinoma cell lines SW-13 and NCI-H295R. We also examined the expression of ghrelin, GHS-R1a, and corticotrophin-releasing factor receptor 2 (CRF-R2). Acylated and unacylated ghrelin in the nanomolar range dose-dependently induced adrenocortical cell growth up to 200% of untreated controls, as measured by thymidine uptake and WST1 assay. The proliferative effects of acylated and unacylated ghrelin in SW-13 cells was blocked by [D-Lys(3)]growth hormone-releasing peptide 6 (GHRP6), but a CRF-R2 antagonist had no effect on unacylated ghrelin growth stimulation. Cell cycle analysis suggests that acylated and unacylated ghrelin suppress the sub-G(0)/apoptotic fraction by up to 50%. Measurement of DNA fragmentation and caspase-3 and -7 activity in SW-13 cells confirmed that acylated and unacylated ghrelin suppress apoptotic rate. SW-13 cells express preproghrelin mRNA and secrete ghrelin, and [D-Lys(3)]GHRP6 suppresses their basal proliferation rate, strongly suggesting that ghrelin could act as an auto/paracrine growth factor. Acylated and unacylated ghrelin are potential auto/paracrine factors acting through an antiapoptotic pathway to stimulate adrenocortical tumor cell growth. Unacylated ghrelin-stimulated growth is suppressed by an antagonist of GHS-R1a, suggesting either that unacylated ghrelin is acylated before its action or that ghrelin, unacylated ghrelin, and [D-Lys(3)]GHRP-6 bind to a novel receptor in these cells.