RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive procedures performed in laparoscopy, such as salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy, can be combined with a minimally invasive anesthesia. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy under spinal anesthesia (SA) compared to general anesthesia (GA) from the point of view of the surgeon, anesthesiologist, and patient. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed at DAI Materno Infantile of AOU Federico II of Naples, analyzing all medical records of women who met the inclusion criteria between April 2020 and April 2023. Eighty-two women (35 under SA in group A and 47 under GA in group B) undergone elective or emergency laparoscopic salpingectomy for ectopic tubal or ovarian pregnancy were included. RESULTS: Patients in group A reported less pain at 0 h (adjusted mean difference: -1.5; 95% CI: -2.3 to -0.7; p < 0.001) and after 6 h (adjusted mean difference: -1.1; 95% CI: -2.0 to -0.3; p = 0.01) while no statistically significant differences between the two groups at 12 and 24 h after surgery. No differences were observed among the type of analgesic and during the postoperative observation time, except for paracetamol at 0 h in group B. A faster resumption of bowel motility, patient's mobilization, and a shorter hospital stay were observed in group A compared to group B. Also greater odds of returning faster to daily activities emerged in group A (adjusted OR: 5.39; 95% CI: 1.77-16.37). A greater number of patients in group A were satisfied with the entire procedure compared to those of group B (33 [94.3%] vs. 37 [78.7%]). The general surgeon satisfaction was always very good or excellent in group A. Finally, all surgical steps were well tolerated in group A. CONCLUSION: In specific settings, SA is a feasible and safe procedure for the laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy.
Assuntos
Raquianestesia , Laparoscopia , Gravidez Ectópica , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Raquianestesia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Gravidez Ectópica/cirurgia , Gravidez Ectópica/etiologia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Anestesia Geral/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Uterine leiomyomas are benign uterine tumors. The choice of surgical treatment is guided by patient's age, desire to preserve fertility or avoid "radical" surgical interventions such as hysterectomy. In laparotomy, the issue of extracting the fibroid from the cavity does not arise. However, in laparoscopy and robotic surgery, this becomes a challenge. The aim of the present study was to determine the optimal surgical approach for fibroid extraction following laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy in terms of postoperative pain, extraction time, overall surgical time, scar size, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: A total of 51 patients met the inclusion criteria and were considered in our analysis: 33 patients who had undergone the "ExCITE technique" (Group A), and 18 patients a minilaparotomy procedure (Group B), after either simple myomectomy, multiple myomectomy, supracervical hysterectomy, or total hysterectomy. The diagnosis of myoma was histologically confirmed in all cases. RESULTS: Regarding the postoperative pain evaluation, at 6 h, patients reported 4 [3-4] vs 6 [5.3-7] on the VAS in Group A and B, as well as at 12 h, 2 [0-2] vs 3.5 [2.3-4] in Group A and B, respectively: both differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference at 24 h from surgery was found. All patients in Group A were satisfied with the ExCITE technique, while in Group B only 67% of them. The length of the hospital stay was significantly shorter in Group A as compared to Group B (p = 0.007). In terms of the operative time for the extraction of the surgical specimen, overall operative time, and the scar size after the surgery, there was a statistically significant difference for those in Group A. CONCLUSION: The ExCITE technique does not require specific training and allows the surgeon to offer a minimally invasive surgical option for patients, with also an aesthetic result. It is a safe and standardized approach that ensures tissue extraction without the need for mechanical morcellation.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Leiomioma , Miomectomia Uterina , Neoplasias Uterinas , Feminino , Humanos , Laparotomia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cicatriz/etiologia , Cicatriz/cirurgia , Leiomioma/cirurgia , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirurgia , Miomectomia Uterina/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To date hysteroscopy is the gold standard technique for the evaluation and management of intrauterine pathologies. The cervical canal represents the access route to the uterine cavity. The presence of cervical stenosis often makes entry into the uterine cavity difficult and occasionally impossible. Cervical stenosis has a multifactorial etiology. It is the result of adhesion processes that can lead to the narrowing or total obliteration of the cervical canal. PURPOSE: In this review, we summarize the scientific evidence about cervical stenosis, aiming to identify the best strategy to overcome this challenging condition. METHODS: The literature review followed the scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles (SANRA). All articles describing the hysteroscopic management of cervical stenosis were considered eligible. Only original papers that reported data on the topic were included. RESULTS: Various strategies have been proposed to address cervical stenosis, including surgical and non-surgical methods. Medical treatments such as the preprocedural use of cervical-ripening agents or osmotic dilators have been explored. Surgical options include the use of cervical dilators and hysteroscopic treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical stenosis can present challenges in achieving successful intrauterine procedures. Operative hysteroscopy has been shown to have the highest success rate, particularly in cases of severe cervical stenosis, and is currently considered the gold standard for managing this condition. Despite the availability of miniaturized instruments that have made the management of cervical stenosis more feasible, it remains a complex task, even for experienced hysteroscopists.
Assuntos
Doenças do Colo do Útero , Útero , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Constrição Patológica/cirurgia , Constrição Patológica/patologia , Útero/cirurgia , Útero/patologia , Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Colo do Útero/patologia , Doenças do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Doenças do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Histeroscopia/métodosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Hemostasis is an important step in all surgical procedures. Mechanical methods of hemostasis have been gradually abandoned in favor of electrosurgery. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of electrosurgical instruments utilized in minimally invasive gynecological procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a systematic review, including randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective studies, comparing the outcomes of different energy devices (EDs) used in laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries. We extracted data about blood loss (BL), mean operative time, post-operative pain, hospital stay and complications associated with each electrosurgical device. RESULTS: We included 30 studies reporting comparative outcomes concerning conventional (bipolar and monopolar) and innovative EDs (Harmonic scalpel, LigaSure, Plasma kinetic gyrus, Thunderbeat, EnSeal, Marseal, Caiman and ALAN). New EDs were found to be more efficient in complex surgeries due to less intraoperative BL and shorter operative time. No significant decrease in hospital stay, post-operative pain or complications was found with the use of new energy instruments. CONCLUSIONS: Although new electrosurgical devices seem an appealing and safer option, there is still insufficient evidence for one vessel-sealing technology to be considered superior to another. Therefore, monopolar and conventional bipolar (CB) are still widely used in laparoscopic gynecology.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Eletrocirurgia/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the risk of endometrial carcinoma and atypical endometrial hyperplasia in asymptomatic postmenopausal women concerning the endometrial thickness measured by stratified threshold categories used for performing subsequent endometrial sampling and histologic evaluation. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, SciELO, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, LILACS, conference proceedings, and international controlled trials registries were searched without temporal, geographic, or language restrictions. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies were selected if they had a crossover design evaluating the risk of atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma in postmenopausal asymptomatic women and calculated the diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography thresholds (at least 3.0 mm) confirmed by histopathologic diagnosis. METHODS: This was a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy and Synthesizing Evidence from Diagnostic Accuracy Tests guidelines. Endometrial thickness thresholds were grouped as follows: from 3.0 to 5.9 mm; between 6.0 and 9.9 mm; between 10.0 and 13.9 mm; and ≥14.0 mm. Quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. Publication bias was quantified using the Deek funnel plot test. Coprimary outcomes were the risk of atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial carcinoma according to the endometrial thickness and diagnostic accuracy of each threshold group. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies provided the data of 10,334 women who were all included in the final analysis. Overall, at an endometrial thickness threshold of at least 3.0 mm, the risk of atypical endometrial hyperplasia or endometrial carcinoma was increased 3-fold relative to women below the cutoff (relative risk, 3.77; 95% confidence interval, 2.26-6.32; I2=74%). Similar degrees of risk were reported for thresholds between 3.0 and 5.9 mm (relative risk, 5.08; 95% confidence interval, 2.26-11.41; I2=0%), 6.0 and 9.9 mm (relative risk, 4.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.68-11.23; I2=0%), 10.0 and 13.9 mm (relative risk, 4.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-10.87; I2=86%), and ≥14.0 mm (relative risk, 2.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-6.16; I2=78%) with no significant difference among subgroups (P=.885). Regarding diagnostic accuracy, the pooled sensitivity decreased from thresholds below 5.9 mm (relative risk, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.49-0.85) to above 14.0 mm (relative risk, 0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.40). Furthermore, the specificity increased from 0.70 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.78) for endometrial thickness between 3.0 and 5.9 mm to 0.86 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.94) when the endometrial thickness is ≥14.0 mm. For 3.0 to 5.9 mm and 10.0 to 13.9 mm thresholds, the highest diagnostic odds ratios of 10 (95% confidence interval, 3-41) and 11 (95% confidence interval, 2-49), with areas under the curve of 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.84) and 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.86), respectively, were retrieved. The summary point analysis revealed that the 3.0 to 5.9 mm cutoff point was placed higher in the summary receiver operator curve space than the other subgroups, indicating increased endometrial carcinoma or atypical endometrial hyperplasia diagnosis using these cutoffs. CONCLUSION: Both low and high endometrial thickness thresholds in postmenopausal asymptomatic women seem equally effective in detecting endometrial carcinoma and atypical endometrial hyperplasia. However, although using a 3.0 to 5.9 mm cutoff results in a lower specificity, the offsetting improvement in sensitivity may justify using this cutoff for further endometrial evaluation in patients with suspected endometrial malignancy.
Assuntos
Hiperplasia Endometrial , Neoplasias do Endométrio , Feminino , Humanos , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina , Hiperplasia Endometrial/diagnóstico por imagem , Hiperplasia Endometrial/patologia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Pós-Menopausa , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Ultrassonografia/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess the impact of preoperative endocervicoscopy on obstetric outcomes and complications in women undergoing LEEP for CIN2 + . METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study carried out between October 2012 and April 2018. All women had undergone cervical length measurement at T0 (before LEEP), T1 (6 months after LEEP), and T2 (at 20 weeks of pregnancy) through transvaginal ultrasound examination after LEEP for CIN2 + . A total of 528 patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria and contributed to the final analysis: 288 had undergone endocervicoscopy before the excisional procedure (Group A), while the remaining 240 (Group B) did not. RESULTS: Patients who did not undergo endocervicoscopy showed a greater amount of tissue excised at LEEP compared to those of Group A (6.7% vs 31.9% in Group A and B, p < 0.01, respectively). A statistically relevant difference was detected in the lesion margins involvement: negative in 93.8% in Group A compared to 65.6% in Group B. The cervicometry before the treatment resulted in similar between the two groups, while a statistically significant difference was noted after 6 months (37.5 ± 2.9 mm in Group A vs 35.1 ± 3.8 mm in Group B, p < 0.01) and at 20th week pregnancy (36.9 ± 5.3 mm in Group A vs 33.5 ± 5.6 mm in Group B, p < 0.01). The number of pregnancies after LEEP as well as the difference in the elapsed time (in months) did not result in a statistical significance between the two groups. The threatened preterm labor (TPL) and the threatened miscarriage showed a statistically significant difference in incidence between the two groups (4,2% and 4.2% in Group A vs 15.3% and 25% in Group B, p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: Endocervicoscopy reduces the size of the LEEP sample and in particular its depth, saving healthy cervical tissue, and guarantees the total eradication of the lesion as the resection margins are negative in almost all cases, allowing for a reduction of the rate of TPL and threatened miscarriage in women with CIN2 + , especially with Type 2 or 3 cervical squamocolumnar junction (SCJ).
Assuntos
Ameaça de Aborto , Displasia do Colo do Útero , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Gravidez , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Feminino , Displasia do Colo do Útero/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Eletrocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Eletrocirurgia/métodos , Estudos de CoortesRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of endocervical and decidual polypectomy on obstetrical outcomes of pregnant women. METHODS: MEDLINE, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, Scielo, EMBASE, Cochrane Library at the CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, and LILACS were searched from inception to April 2021. No language or geographical restrictions were applied. Inclusion criteria regarded observational studies concerning pregnant women with a cervical lesion who underwent cervical polypectomy. Co-primary outcomes were incidence of late pregnancy loss and preterm birth in women with endocervical or decidual polypectomy as well as polypectomy versus expectant management. Random effect meta-analyses to calculate risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were performed. Quality assessment of included papers was performed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale criteria. RESULTS: Three studies, with data provided for 3097 women, were included in quantitative analysis, with comparisons between endocervical and decidual polyps extracted from two studies and 156 patients. After a first trimester endocervical or decidual polypectomy, no significant differences were found for late pregnancy losses (RR 0.29 [95% CI 0.05, 1.80], I2 = 11%). Risk for preterm birth was significantly higher for decidual polyps' removal (RR 6.13 [95% CI 2.57, 14.59], I2 = 0%). One paper compared cervical polypectomy vs expectant management, with increased incidence of late pregnancy loss (4/142 vs 5/2799; p < 0.001) and preterm birth (19/142 vs 115/2799; p < 0.001) in women subjected to polypectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence regarding the removal of cervical polyps in pregnancy is extremely limited. However, the removal of either decidual or endocervical polyps seems associated with increased risk of pregnancy loss and preterm birth, with increased preterm birth risk following endocervical rather than decidual polypectomy.
Assuntos
Aborto Espontâneo , Nascimento Prematuro , Doenças do Colo do Útero , Gravidez , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Aborto Espontâneo/etiologia , Colo do ÚteroRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement rate between hysteroscopy and pathological examination in case of chronic endometritis. METHODS: A retrospective observational study carried out at Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, Puerta de Hierro Hospital, Autónoma University of Madrid, Spain, from January 2021 to June 2022 was performed by obtaining data from 115 medical records of women who underwent office hysteroscopies that was compared with the findings of final histological examination of endometrial biopsy. Cohen's kappa index was used to evaluate this agreement rate. In addition, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy were obtained. RESULTS: The agreement between hysteroscopic findings and histological examination showed a modest result with a Cohen's kappa index of 34%. In addition, we obtained a specificity of 70% and a sensitivity of 64%. The positive and negative predictive value were 60.8% and 73.4%, respectively. An excellent agreement rate (100%) between histological and hysteroscopic results was observed in presence of hyperemia and micropolyps. CONCLUSION: Although the sample size is not as large as that of other studies published so far, the first glance of our experience is that hysteroscopic signs are not yet sufficient to make an accurate diagnosis of chronic endometritis, thus requiring a histopathological confirmation to make it.
Assuntos
Endometrite , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Endometrite/diagnóstico , Endometrite/patologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Endométrio/patologia , Histeroscopia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doença CrônicaRESUMO
Background and Objectives: Meigs syndrome is represented by a benign adnexal tumor, ascites, and hydrothorax. Even though the ovarian mass is often characterized by a fibroma-like origin, cancer antigen-125 (CA-125) serum levels could be elevated as in the development of ovarian cancer. Here, we present the case of a patient with Meigs syndrome and increased CA-125. Materials and Methods: We performed systematic research for articles including similar cases in PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus in February 2023, adopting the string of idioms: "Meigs syndrome AND Cancer antigen 125", and following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Results: Eligible records were 25. Hydrothorax was right-sided in 10 cases over 25; left-sided in two patients over 25. Concerning ascites, two patients showed more than 6 L of ascitic fluid, whereas three patients had 6 L or less. CA-125 elevation ranged from 149 IU/mL to 3803 IU/mL. Adnexal mass histotypes were: struma ovarii (12 cases), thecomas (two cases), fibrothecomas (five cases), fibromas (five cases), and one sclerosing stromal tumor (SST). Conclusions: In postmenopausal women with elevated CA-125 serum levels and an adnexal mass suspicious for malignancy at ultrasound (US), ascites and pleural effusion, surgery, and histopathological examination are necessary. MS is a diagnostic option, with an excellent prognosis after exeresis of the mass.
RESUMO
Background and Objectives: The standard treatment approach in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is exclusive concurrent chemoradiation therapy (RTCT). The risk of local residual disease after six months from RTCT is about 20-30%. It is directly related to relapse risk and poor survival, such as in patients with recurrent cervical cancer. This systematic review aims to describe studies investigating salvage surgery's role in persistent/recurrent disease in LACC patients who underwent definitive RTCT. Materials and Methods: Studies were eligible for inclusion when patients had LACC with radiologically suspected or histologically confirmed residual disease after definitive RTCT, diagnosed with post-treatment radiological workup or biopsy. Information on complications after salvage surgery and survival outcomes had to be reported. The methodological quality of the articles was independently assessed by two researchers with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Following the recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, we systematically searched the PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Medline, and Medscape databases in May 2022. We applied no language or geographical restrictions but considered only English studies. We included studies containing data about postoperative complications and survival outcomes. Results: Eleven studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and all were retrospective observational studies. A total of 601 patients were analyzed concerning the salvage surgery in LACC patients for persistent/recurrent disease after RTCT treatment. Overall, 369 (61.4%) and 232 (38.6%) patients underwent a salvage hysterectomy (extrafascial or radical) and pelvic exenteration (anterior, posterior, or total), respectively. Four hundred and thirty-nine (73%) patients had histologically confirmed the residual disease in the salvage surgical specimen, and 109 patients had positive margins (overall range 0-43% of the patients). The risk of severe (grade ≥ 3) postoperative complications after salvage surgery is 29.8% (range 5-57.5%). After a median follow-up of 38 months, the overall RR was about 32% with an overall death rate of 40% after hysterectomy or pelvic exenteration with or without lymphadenectomy. Conclusions: There is heterogeneity between the studies both in their design and results, therefore the effect of salvage surgery on survival and recurrence cannot be adequately estimated. Future homogeneous studies with an appropriately selected population are needed to analyze the safety and efficacy of salvage hysterectomy or pelvic exenteration in patients with residual tumors after definitive RTCT.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Histerectomia , Quimiorradioterapia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgiaRESUMO
Hereditary women's syndromes due to inherited mutations result in an elevated risk of developing gynecological cancers over the lifetime of affected carriers. The BRCA 1 and 2 mutations, Lynch syndrome (LS), and mutations in rare hereditary syndromes increase this risk and require more effective management of these patients based on surveillance and prophylactic surgery. Patients need counseling regarding risk-reducing surgery (RRS) and the time required to perform it, considering the adverse effects of premenopausal surgery and the hormonal effect on quality of life, bone density, sexual activity, and cardiological and vascular diseases. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is the gold standard for BRCA-mutated patients. An open question is that of endometrial cancer (EC) risk in patients with BRCA1/2 mutation to justify prophylactic hysterectomy during RRSO surgical procedures. RRS provides a 90-95% risk reduction for ovarian and breast cancer in women who are mutation carriers, but the role of prophylactic hysterectomy is underinvestigated in this setting of patients. In this review, we evaluate the management of the most common hereditary syndromes and the benefits of risk-reducing surgery, particularly exploring the role of prophylactic hysterectomy.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Neoplasias do Endométrio , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Feminino , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Síndrome , Salpingo-Ooforectomia/métodos , Histerectomia/métodos , Mutação , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Neoplasias Ovarianas/epidemiologia , Predisposição Genética para DoençaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of a retrograde extraperitoneal trans-inguinal novel approach to pelvic lymphadenectomy in vulvar cancer patients. The secondary objectives were to assess complications (early and late) and oncological outcomes. METHODS: In this pilot study, all patients referred to our institution from November 2019 to May 2021 were evaluated. The inclusion criteria were patients diagnosed with primary/recurrent vulvar cancer and who were candidates for concomitant groin and pelvic lymph node dissection. A consecutive sampling was planned during the study period. After conventional inguino-femoral lymph nodal dissection, ipsilateral extraperitoneal trans-inguinal pelvic lymphadenectomy (TRIPLE) was performed through a groin incision. Clinical data, type of treatment, perioperative complications, and follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS: 13 patients (8 primary, 5 recurrent vulvar cancer) underwent 16 TRIPLE procedures (10 unilateral, 3 bilateral). The median age was 69 years (range 58-93 years); 8 patients had comorbidities (61.5%). Up front locoregional radiotherapy was previously performed in two cases (15.4%). The pathology report showed metastatic lymph nodes in 20 (87%) groins and 11 (68.8%) pelvic sites; the mean number of removed and metastatic pelvic lymph nodes was 12.1 (range 5-33) and 2.9 (range 0-18), respectively. No intra-operative site-specific complications occurred. One (5.9%) post-operative site-specific complication was reported (pelvic abscess, grade 2), which was treated with antibiotics. One patient died due to concomitant pneumonia. No unilateral pelvic lymph node recurrence occurred during follow-up (median 13 months, range 2-43 months); 3 patients (23.1%) had distant site recurrence (median disease-free survival 9 months). CONCLUSIONS: TRIPLE seems to be a feasible and safe technique, providing adequate lymph node dissection. Despite being a high-risk and fragile population, morbidity was similar to previously reported data for conventional mini-invasive approaches. Prospective larger comparative series are necessary.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Vulvares , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Virilha/patologia , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Linfonodos/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Vulvares/patologiaRESUMO
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe the diagnostic workup and laparoscopic management of a noncommunicating left uterine rudimentary horn (class U4aC0V0 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology/European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Classification) with communicating endometriotic bladder nodule. DESIGN: Step-by-step description of the surgical treatment. PATIENT: A 33-year-old woman with unicornuate uterus and a left-side noncommunicating rudimentary horn affected by primary infertility, mild dysmenorrhea (visual analog scale score 6), severe catamenial dysuria (visual analog scale score 10), and catamenial hematuria. SETTING: Noncommunicating rudimentary horns are rare Müllerian anomalies present in 20% to 25% of women with a unicornuate uterus. It is associated with severe dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, subfertility, and poor obstetric outcomes and usually presents with cyclic pelvic pain that starts early after the menarche. Endometriotic bladder nodules are present in 1% to 2% of patients with endometriosis. In the literature, there are no reported cases of noncommunicating rudimentary horn with communicating endometriotic bladder nodules. Surgical excision of the rudimentary horn is the treatment of choice. In our case, the 2-dimensional/3-dimensional ultrasound revealed a right unicornuate uterus with a left noncommunicating rudimentary horn with hematometra. The uterine fundus presented «gamma sign¼ vascularization. In addition, a bladder endometriotic nodule (16 × 15 mm) communicating with hematometra was displayed. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated no additional malformations. Diagnostic hysteroscopy revealed a single cervix without vaginal malformation and small right uterine cavity with single tubal ostium. At laparoscopy, using hysteroscopic transillumination, a clear plane of dissection was identified between the rudimentary horn and the uterus confirming the presence of a noncommunicating horn. Evaluation of the abdominal cavity showed bilateral normal adnexa with normal ovaries. Chromopertubation showed a patent right Fallopian tube and obstructed left tube. INTERVENTIONS: A left salpingectomy using bipolar and the ultrasonic energy was performed. The utero-ovarian ligament was transected, and the left ovary was preserved. The left ovary was suspended at the pelvic wall, the retroperitoneum was opened, the ureter was identified, and the left uterine artery was temporary occluded. The left round ligament was transected and the left paravesical space was developed. With a lateromedial approach, we opened the vesicouterine septum to dissect the bladder from the rudimentary horn. The endometriotic bladder nodule was gently detached from the uterine horn with a lateromedial approach. The left uterine artery was coagulated and dissected at level of the cervix. A solution of vasopressin was injected between the uterine horn and the uterus. Resection of the rudimentary horn was performed. The peritoneum was closed. The temporary occlusion of the uterine artery was removed. The specimen was placed in a bag and removed using an extracorporeal tissue extraction technique. CONCLUSION: The late clinical presentation of our patient with only mild dysmenorrhea could be explained by the drainage of the hematometra from the noncommunicating horn into the endometriotic bladder nodule. The bladder symptoms in patients with Müllerian anomalies should be carefully investigated. The laparoscopic removal of rudimentary horn with mobilization of communicating bladder nodule when present is a safe and feasible method to improve symptomatology.
Assuntos
Endometriose , Hematometra , Laparoscopia , Doenças da Bexiga Urinária , Adulto , Dismenorreia/cirurgia , Endometriose/complicações , Endometriose/patologia , Endometriose/cirurgia , Feminino , Hematometra/cirurgia , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Dor Pélvica/cirurgia , Gravidez , Bexiga Urinária , Doenças da Bexiga Urinária/complicações , Doenças da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico , Doenças da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Anormalidades Urogenitais , Útero/anormalidades , Útero/patologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In the last years, spinal anesthesia (SA) has been emerging as an alternative to general anesthesia (GA) for the laparoscopic treatment of gynecological diseases, for better control of postoperative pain. The aim of the review is to compare the advantages of SA compared to GA. METHODS: MEDLINE, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched from inception until March 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRSs) about women underwent SA and GA for gynecological laparoscopic surgery were analyzed. Relevant data were extracted and tabulated. RESULTS: The primary outcomes included the evaluation of postoperative pain (described as shoulder pain), postoperative nausea and vomiting, and operative times. One hundred and eight patients were included in RCTs, 58 in NRSs. The qualitative analysis had conflicting results and for the most of parameters (hemodynamic variables, nausea, and postoperative analgesic administration) no statistically significant differences were observed: in the NRSs, contradictory results regarding the postoperative pain in SA and GA groups were reported. Regarding the quantitative analysis, in the RCTs, women who received SA had not significantly lower operative times (relative risk [RR] -4.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] -9.32-0.53) and a lower incidence of vomiting (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.17-1.55); on the other hand, in the NRS, women who received SA had longer operative times (RR 5.05, 95% CI -0.03-10.14) and more episodes of vomiting (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.10-2.97) compared to those with GA: anyway, the outcomes proved to be insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests no significant advantages to using SA over GA for laparoscopic treatment of gynecological diseases.
Assuntos
Raquianestesia , Laparoscopia , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Geral/métodos , Raquianestesia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/epidemiologia , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/etiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Regional anesthesia (RA) is considered as a "minimally invasive technique" to achieve anesthesia. To assess the feasibility and the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy in regional anesthesia from the point of view of the surgeon, anesthesiologist and patient. METHODS: A retrospective search was performed to identify patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy under RA from April 2020 to September 2021. Five patients affected by benign gynecological disease (atypical endometrial hyperplasia or uterine leiomyomas) were included. RESULTS: The postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting (PONV) and the antiemetic/analgesic intake were evaluated. Postoperative surgical and anesthesiological variables were recorded. Duration of surgery was 84 ± 4.18 and no conversion to GA was required. According to VAS score, the postoperative pain during the whole observation time was less than 4 (median). A faster resumption of bowel motility (≤ 9 h) and patient's mobilization (≤ 4 h) were observed as well as a low incidence of post-operative nausea and vomit. Early discharge and greater patient's satisfaction were recorded. Intraoperatively pain score was assessed on Likert scale during all the stages of laparoscopy in RA, with only 2 patients complaining scarce pain (= 2) at pneumoperitoneum. CONCLUSION: RA showed to have a great impact on surgical stress and to guarantee a quicker recovery without compromising surgical results. RA technique could be a viable option for patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Assuntos
Anestesia , Laparoscopia , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/complicações , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Anestesia/efeitos adversosRESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate trefoil factor 3 (TFF3), secreted frizzled-related protein 4 (sFRP4), reactive oxygen species modulator 1 (Romo1) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) as diagnostic and prognostic markers of endometrial cancer (EC) and ovarian cancer (OC). METHODS: Thirty-one patients with EC and 30 patients with OC undergone surgical treatment were enrolled together with 30 healthy controls in a prospective study. Commercial ELISA kits determined serum TFF-3, Romo-1, NF-кB and sFRP-4 concentrations. RESULTS: Serum TFF-3, Romo-1 and NF-кB levels were significantly higher in patients with EC and OC than those without cancer. Regarding EC, none of the serum biomarkers differs significantly between endometrial and non-endometrioid endometrial carcinomas. Mean serum TFF-3 and NF-кB levels were significantly higher in advanced stages. Increased serum levels of TFF-3 and NF-кB were found in those with a higher grade of the disease. Regarding OC, none of the serum biomarkers differed significantly among histological subtypes. Significantly increased serum levels of NF-кB were observed in patients with advanced-stage OC than those with stage I and II diseases. No difference in serum biomarker levels was found between those who had a recurrence and those who had not. The sensibility and specificity of these four biomarkers in discriminating EC and OC from the control group showed encouraging values, although no one reached 70%. CONCLUSIONS: TFF-3, Romo-1, NF-кB and SFRP4 could represent new diagnostic and prognostic markers for OC and EC. Further studies are needed to validate our results.
Assuntos
NF-kappa B , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Humanos , Feminino , NF-kappa B/metabolismo , Estudos Prospectivos , Prognóstico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/metabolismo , Biomarcadores , Fator Trefoil-3 , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas , Proteínas de Membrana , Proteínas MitocondriaisRESUMO
This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of postpartum depression and the associated risk factors in a sample of Italian women at three months after delivery. Eighty women were screened by completing the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Women with a score ≥10 were evaluated as positive and other variables were detected through the administration of the Postpartum Depression Predictors Inventory.The prevalence of postpartum depression in the sample was 11.25% (EPDS score >10). A statistically significant relationship was found between the predisposition to postnatal depression and various risk factors such as prenatal depression, stressful life experiences marital problems. Furthermore, strong emotional and instrumental support from the partner and a good economic status can represent protective factors. It is essential to promote an integrated approach to postpartum affective disorders in which psychosocial risk factors are taken into account, and adequate screening programs are implemented.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Pregnancy can cause emotional stress for women with consequent development, in some cases, of mood disorders such as postpartum depression.What do the results of this study add? According to this study, women suffering from postpartum depression showed a significant tendency to anxiety and depression, low perceived support from the partner, and low socio-economic status.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? It would be desirable to promote an integrated approach to postpartum affective disorders in which psychosocial risk factors are taken into account and adequate screening programs are implemented.
Assuntos
Depressão Pós-Parto , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão Pós-Parto/epidemiologia , Depressão Pós-Parto/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Período Pós-Parto/psicologia , Gravidez , Prevalência , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the leading cause of anovulatory infertility. The complex metabolic dysregulation at the base of this syndrome often renders infertility management challenging. Many pharmacological strategies have been applied for the induction of ovulation with a non-negligible rate of severe complications such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and multiple pregnancies. Ovarian drilling (OD) is currently being adopted as a second-line treatment, to be performed in case of medical therapy. Laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD), the contemporary version of ovarian wedge resection, is considered effective for gonadotropins in terms of live birth rates, but without the risks of iatrogenic complications in gonadotropin therapy. Its endocrinal effects are longer lasting and, after the accomplishment of this procedure, ovarian responsiveness to successive ovulation induction agents is enhanced. Traditional LOD, however, is burdened by the potential risks of iatrogenic adhesions and decreased ovarian reserve and, therefore, should only be considered in selected cases. To overcome these limits, novel tailored and mini-invasive approaches, which are still waiting for wide acceptance, have been introduced, although their role is still not well-clarified and none of them have provided enough evidence in terms of efficacy and safety.
Assuntos
Anovulação , Infertilidade Feminina , Laparoscopia , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico , Anovulação/complicações , Anovulação/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica , Infertilidade Feminina/tratamento farmacológico , Infertilidade Feminina/etiologia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Indução da Ovulação/efeitos adversos , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/complicações , Síndrome do Ovário Policístico/cirurgia , GravidezRESUMO
Background and Objectives: Hysteroscopic endometrial resection (ER) or global endometrial ablation (GEA) are feasible methods to treat heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was to assess patient's quality of life (QoL) in women treated with ER/GEA compared to hysterectomy. Materials and Methods: Electronic searches in MEDLINE Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE, PROSPERO and Cochrane CENTRAL were conducted from their inception to July 2022. Inclusion criteria were RCTs of premenopausal women with HMB randomized to conservative surgical treatment (ER/GEA) or hysterectomy. The primary outcome was the evaluation of QoL using the SF-36 score. Results: Twelve RCTs (2773 women) were included in the analysis. Women treated with hysteroscopic ER/GEA showed significantly lower scores for the SF-36 general health perception (mean difference (MD) -8.56 [95% CI -11.75 to -5.36]; I2 = 0%), social function (MD -12.90 [95% CI -23.90 to -1.68]; I2 = 91%), emotional role limitation (MD -4.64 [95% CI -8.43 to -0.85]; I2 = 0%) and vitality (MD -8.01 [95% CI -14.73 to -1.30]; I2 = 74%) domains relative to hysterectomy. Anxiety, depression scores and complication rates were similar between treatments. Relative to uterine balloon therapy, amenorrhea was more common with EA/GER (relative risk 1.51 [95% CI 1.03 to 1.20] I2 = 28%), but posttreatment satisfaction was similar. Conclusions: Women's perception of QoL might be seen to be less improved after hysteroscopic ER/GEA rather than hysterectomy. However, such findings need to be confirmed by additional trials due to the high number of outdated studies and recent improvements in hysteroscopic instrumentation and techniques.
Assuntos
Menorragia , Feminino , Humanos , Menorragia/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Depressão , Endométrio/cirurgia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Histerectomia , AnsiedadeRESUMO
Background and Objectives: Uterine sarcomas represents only 3% of all the female genital tract ones. The tumoral stage is the most significant prognostic factor. The role of the bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) in the surgical management of FIGO stage IA and IB appears still controversial. This review aims to investigate the impact of bilateral adnexectomy in the treatment of uterine sarcoma. Methods: Following the recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, we systematically searched the PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Medline, and Medscape databases in February 2022. We applied no language or geographical restrictions, but we considered only English studies. We included the studies containing data about Recurrence Rate (RR), Disease-free Survival (DFS), and Overall Survival (OS). We used comparative studies for meta-analysis. Results: Seventeen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria; 2 retrospective observational studies, and 15 retrospective comparative studies, And 14 out of the 15 comparative studies were enrolled in meta-analysis. A total of 3743 patients were analyzed concerning the use of adnexectomy with hysterectomy in patients with uterine sarcoma and compared with those who did not. Meta-analysis highlighted a non-significant worsening of the OS in the BSO group compared to the OP group and showed that adnexectomy does not improve the DFS (BSO OR 1.23 (95% CI 0.81-1.85) p = 0.34; I2 = 24% p = 0.22). Conclusions: Most studies selected for our review showed that adnexectomy does not significantly affect the RR, OS, and PFS in treating FIGO stage I uterine sarcomas. Therefore, even if there is a unanimous consensus about bilateral adnexectomy in menopausal patients, preservation of ovarian tissue may be considered in premenopausal women. Nonetheless, there are not enough cases in the literature to recommend this procedure.