Paying for Pediatric Home Health Care: How Families of Children With Medical Complexity Navigate Gaps in Coverage.

Limited private and public financing of home health care for children with medical complexity can have harmful and costly consequences. Little is known of how parents and professionals in the United States navigate coverage for these services or how payer restrictions are shaping service quality. Qualitative interviews were conducted with families and professionals (eg, prescribers, providers, administrators of pediatric home health care [PHHC]) caring for children with medical complexity. Interview transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. In total, 47 families and 45 professionals from across 31 states and the District of Columbia had experiences with the full range of PHHC services. Participants detailed the need to patch together multiple insurances and payment programs to cover a child's home health needs. They described nontransparent eligibility determinations that do not reflect the diagnostic uncertainty and static functional status that is common for many children. Coverage denials are common, leaving gaps in care that can potentiate downstream cost escalation. Evidence-based health care reform must ensure that children get the PHHC needed to maintain function and reduce the need for hospital-based services. Recommendations are offered to improve PHHC financing and care for the most medically vulnerable children and their families.

Where do families turn? Ethical dilemmas in the care of chronically critically Ill children.

Advancements in early diagnosis and novel treatments for children with complex and chronic needs have improved their chances of survival. But many survive with complex medical needs and ongoing medical management in the setting of prognostic uncertainty. Their medical care relies more and more on preference-sensitive decisions, requiring medical team and family engagement in ethically challenging situations. Many families are unprepared as they face these ethical challenges and struggle to access relevant ethical resources. In this paper, Timmy's narrative, situated in the context of what is known about ethical challenges in the care of children with chronic critical illness (CCI), serves as a case study of the gap in available ethical resources to guide families in their approach to difficult decision making for children with significant medical complexity and CCI. Our author group, inclusive of parents of children with complex medical needs and medical professionals, identifies domains of ethical challenges facing families of children with CCI and we highlight the development of family/caregiver-oriented ethics resources as an essential expansion of pediatric bioethics.

Advance Care Planning for Children With Rare Diseases: A Pilot RCT.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pediatric rare diseases are often life-limiting conditions and/or require constant caregiving. Investigators assessed the initial efficacy of the FAmily CEntered (FACE) pediatric advance care planning (pACP), FACE-Rare, intervention on families' quality of life. METHODS: A pilot-phase, single-blinded, intent-to-treat, randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled families from 1 pediatric quaternary hospital between 2021 and 2023. Intervention families received 3 weekly 60-minute (FACE-Rare pACP) sessions: (1) Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool or Action Plan, (2) Carer Support Needs Assessment Tol Action Plan Review, and (3) Pediatric Next Steps: Respecting Choices pACP. Controls received treatment as usual (TAU). Outcome measures were Beck Anxiety Inventory, Family Appraisal of Caregiving, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Spirituality, and health care utilization. Generalized mixed effect models with γ response assessed the intervention effect at 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Children (n = 21) were aged 1 to 10 years, 48% male, 24% Black; and 100% technology dependent. Primary family caregivers (n = 21) were aged 30 to 43 years, 19% male, 19% Black; and 27% household income below the Federal poverty level. Dyads underwent 1:1 randomization: 9 to FACE-Rare and 12 to TAU. TAU caregivers reported statistically lower meaning and peace than FACE-Rare caregivers (0.9, P = .03, confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-0.99). Black caregivers reported significantly less caregiver distress (0.7, P = .04, CI: 0.47-0.98) than non-Black caregivers. Poor families reported more anxiety (3.5, P = .002, CI: 1.62-7.94), more caregiver strain (1.2, P = .006, CI: 1.07-1.42); and less family well-being (0.8, P = .02, CI: 0.64-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: FACE®-Rare was feasible, acceptable, safe, and demonstrated initial efficacy, providing greater feelings of meaning and peace to caregivers. Poverty impacted well-being. A multisite trial is needed to determine generalizability.

Lived Experience of Pediatric Home Health Care Among Families of Children With Medical Complexity.

Background. For children with complex medical conditions, pediatric home health care is a chronic need. It is a clinical service delivered entirely outside of clinical settings, granting families unparalleled expertise regarding service quality. Methods. Telephone interviews with parents whose children have extensive experiences with home health care. Results: Five themes emerged: (1) benefits of home health care include child survival and family stability; (2) family life is inextricable from home health care schedules, staffing, and services; (3) home health care gaps threaten family physical, mental, and financial well-being; (4) Out-of-pocket costs are common; and (5) families must fight for services as their children's medical conditions evolve. Conclusions. Families understand better than prescribers, providers, or policy makers what is working, and what is not, with home health care. Family expertise should be the foundation for training other families, clinicians, and home health care agencies, and should be a central component of policy and advocacy in this area.

The Pediatric Home Health Care Process: Perspectives of Prescribers, Providers, and Recipients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Children with medical complexity (CMC) often require pediatric home health care (PHHC) to meet their daily intensive care needs. Pediatricians are central to planning, implementing, and maintaining quality PHHC for CMC, yet a comprehensive road map for this process is lacking. With this national study, we aim to fill that gap. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with parents and professionals from the 10 US Health Resources and Services Administration regions. Parents were recruited via advocacy groups for families of CMC; professionals with experience with PHHC for CMC were identified by using purposive and snowball sampling. Interview transcripts were qualitatively analyzed for themes. RESULTS: A comprehensive process of prescribing, providing, and maintaining PHHC requires 5 steps: identifying needs, investigating options, developing plans of care, initiating services, and navigating evolving needs. The success of the PHHC process is built on knowledge, anticipation, and early identification of needs; communication; care-coordination infrastructure; skilled home health providers; and the parent-provider relationship. CONCLUSIONS: Many CMC require PHHC to live safely outside of the hospital. Although the PHHC process involves multiple steps and participants, pediatricians' understanding of the process is the foundation of PHHC success. Fostering interagency relationships, increasing longitudinal care coordination, and investing in the PHHC infrastructure may reduce the burden placed on families and CMC as they navigate the complex process of PHHC.