Socioeconomic inequalities in avoidable mortality in Italy: results from a nationwide longitudinal cohort.

BACKGROUND: Disparities in avoidable mortality have never been evaluated in Italy at the national level. The present study aimed to assess the association between socioeconomic status and avoidable mortality. METHODS: The nationwide closed cohort of the 2011 Census of Population and Housing was followed up for 2012-2019 mortality. Outcomes of preventable and of treatable mortality were separately evaluated among people aged 30-74. Education level (elementary school or less, middle school, high school diploma, university degree or more) and residence macro area (North-West, North-East, Center, South-Islands) were the exposures, for which adjusted mortality rate ratios (MRRs) were calculated through multivariate quasi-Poisson regression models, adjusted for age at death. Relative index of inequalities was estimated for preventable, treatable, and non-avoidable mortality and for some specific causes. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 35,708,459 residents (48.8% men, 17.5% aged 65-74), 34% with a high school diploma, 33.5% living in the South-Islands; 1,127,760 deaths were observed, of which 65.2% for avoidable causes (40.4% preventable and 24.9% treatable). Inverse trends between education level and mortality were observed for all causes; comparing the least with the most educated groups, a strong association was observed for preventable (males MRR = 2.39; females MRR = 1.65) and for treatable causes of death (males MRR = 1.93; females MRR = 1.45). The greatest inequalities were observed for HIV/AIDS and alcohol-related diseases (both sexes), drug-related diseases and tuberculosis (males), and diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, and renal failure (females). Excess risk of preventable and of treatable mortality were observed for the South-Islands. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality persist in Italy, with an extremely varied response to policies at the regional level, representing a possible missed gain in health and suggesting a reassessment of priorities and definition of health targets.

Newly arrived migrants did not represent an additional COVID-19 burden for Italy: data from the italian information flow.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, migrants arriving in host countries irregularly have not infrequently been perceived as increasing the COVID-19 burden. Italy is a transit and destination country for migrants who cross the Central Mediterranean route and, during the pandemic, all migrants who landed on Italian shores were COVID-19 tested and quarantined. Our study aimed to investigate the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 infection among migrants who landed on the Italian coasts by analyzing both incidence and health outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective observational study has been designed. The population of interest was represented by 70,512 migrants (91% male, 99% <60 years old) who landed in Italy between January 2021 and 2022. SARS-CoV-2 incidence rate per 1,000 (with 95%CI) in migrants and the resident population in Italy of the corresponding age group was computed. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) was used to compare the incidence rates in migrants and the resident population. RESULTS: 2,861 migrants out of those landed in Italy during the observation period tested positive, with an incidence rate of 40.6 (39.1-42.1) cases per 1,000. During the same period, 177.6 (177.5-177.8) cases per 1,000 were reported in the resident population, with an IRR of 0.23 (0.22-0.24). 89.7% of cases were male and 54.6% belonged to the 20-29 age group. 99% of cases reported no symptoms, no relevant comorbidities were reported and no cases were hospitalized. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found a low rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection in migrants reaching Italy by sea with an incidence rate that is roughly a quarter of that of the resident population. Thus, irregular migrants who arrived in Italy during the observation period did not increase the COVID-19 burden. Further studies are needed to investigate possible reasons for the low incidence observed in this population.

Trend and determinants of mortality in incident hemodialysis patients of the Lazio region.

BACKGROUND: . In the last decades some studies observed a moderate progressive decrease in short-term mortality in incident hemodialysis patients. The aim of the study is to analyse the mortality trends in patients starting hemodialysis using the Lazio Regional Dialysis and Transplant Registry. METHODS: . Patients who started chronic hemodialysis between 2008 and 2016 were included. Annual 1-year and 3-year Crude Mortality Rate*100 Person Years (CMR*100PY) overall, by gender and age classes were calculated. Cumulative survival estimates at 1 year and 3 years since the date of starting hemodialysis were presented as Kaplan-Meier curves for the three periods and compared using the log-rank test. The association between periods of incidence in hemodialysis and 1-year and 3-year mortality were investigated by means of unadjusted and adjusted Cox regression models. Potential determinants of both mortality outcomes were also investigated. RESULTS: . Among 6,997 hemodialysis patients (64.5% males, 66.1% over 65 years old) 923 died within 1 year and 2,253 within 3 years form incidence; CMR*100PY were 14.1 (95%CI: 13.2-15.0) and 13.7 (95%CI: 13.2-14.3), respectively; both remained unchanged over the years. Even after stratification by gender and age classes no significant changes emerged. Kaplan-Meier mortality curves did not show any statistically significant differences in survival at 1 year and 3 years from hemodialysis incidence across periods. No statistically significant associations were found between periods and 1-year and 3-year mortality. Factors associated with a greater increase in mortality are: being over 65 years, born in Italy, not being self-sufficient, having systemic versus undetermined nephropathy, having heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, cancer, liver disease, dementia and psychiatric illness, and receiving dialysis by catheter rather than fistula. CONCLUSIONS: . The study shows that the mortality rate in patients with end-stage renal disease starting hemodialysis in the Lazio region was stable over 9 years.

Education inequalities in cardiovascular and coronary heart disease in Italy and the role of behavioral and biological risk factors.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Behavioral and biological risk factors (BBRF) explain part of the variability in socioeconomic differences in health. The present study aimed at evaluating education differences in incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and coronary heart disease (CHD) in Italy and the role of BBRF. METHODS AND RESULTS: All subjects aged 30-74 years (n = 132,686) who participated to the National Health Interview Surveys 2000 and 2005 were included and followed-up for ten years. Exposure to smoking, physical activity, overweight/obesity, diabetes and hypertension at baseline was considered. Education level was used as an indicator of socioeconomic status. The outcomes were incident cases of CVD and CHD. Hazard ratios by education level were estimated, adjusting for sociodemographic covariates and stratifying by sex and geographic area. The contribution of BBRF to education inequalities was estimated by counterfactual mediation analysis, in addition to the assessment of the risk attenuation by comparing the models including BBRF or not. 22,214 participants had a CVD event and 6173 a CHD event. After controlling for sociodemographic factors, the least educated men showed a 21% higher risk of CVD and a 17% higher risk of CHD compared to the most educated (41% and 61% among women). The mediating effect (natural indirect effect) of BBRF between extreme education levels was 52% for CVD and 84% for CHD among men (16% among women for CVD). CONCLUSIONS: More effective strategies aiming at reducing socioeconomic disparities in CVD and CHD are needed, through programs targeting less educated people in combination with community-wide initiatives.

Acute kidney injury referred to the nephrologist: A single centre experience in a tertiary care hospital.

AIM: Acute kidney injury (AKI) shows an increasing incidence, accounting for a remarkable proportion of nephrology team in-hospital activity. The aim was to describe main features and outcomes of AKI observed in patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis in all consecutive AKI patients referred for nephrology consultation (November 2018-February 2020) focusing on the factors associated with in-hospital mortality within 90 days and kidney function recovery (KFR) upon discharge. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data, as well as main features of AKI episodes, were collected from medical records of the entire hospital stay. AKI was defined according to KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline. RESULTS: Among 1145 patients referred for nephrology consultation, 559 were evaluated for AKI (598 episodes). Pre-existing CKD was present in 54.7% of patients. In 69.2% of cases AKI was evaluated within 48 h from its onset. Most of the episodes (66.6%) were classified as KDIGO Stage 3. In-hospital mortality within 90 days since admission was 43.3%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed a higher mortality risk for advancing age (HR 1.02/unit, 95% CI 1.01-1.03) and oliguria (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.45-2.52), while a higher eGFR (HR 0.72/unit, 95% CI 0.54-0.95) and KFR within 7 days (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.94) were associated to a lower mortality. KFR was observed in 96.4% of survivors. In patients with partial KFR, the loss of eGFR was -29.2 ± 17.9 ml/min. KFR incidence rate was 6.79 per 100-person days (95% CI 6.72-6.87) in survivors and 2.30 (95% CI 2.25-2.35) in non-survivors. CONCLUSION: AKI-related nephrology activity accounts for most of the nephrologist workload as consultant. Referred AKI episodes are frequently severe and superimposed on CKD, carrying a relatively high mortality in a patient population developing AKI outside ICU. Early KFR appears strongly associated with a favourable impact upon in-hospital survival.

[The impact of COVID-19 on the immigrant population in Italy. Context, methodology and synthesis of the main evidence from the project of the National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty (INMP) and Italian Regions]. / L'impatto del COVID-19 nella popolazione immigrata in Italia. Contesto, metodologia e sintesi delle principali evidenze dal progetto INMP-Regioni.

COVID-19 acted on health inequalities in two ways: directly, in terms of infection risk and outcomes; indirectly, through effects on the economy, which exacerbated social inequalities. Immigrants have particularly suffered the effects of the pandemic.The Italian National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty (INMP) has promoted the project "Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection and use of health services in immigrant and vulnerable population groups in Italy" in collaboration with the Regions of Piedmont, Lombardy, Veneto, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Lazio, and Sicily, to assess the impact of the pandemic in the immigrant population.This is an observational population-based study design, based on weekly monitoring data from the COVID-19 National Surveillance System of the Italian National Health Institute (ISS). The observation period was split into five sub-periods: February-May 2020 (wave I), June-September 2020 (intermediate period I), October 2020-January 2021 (wave II), February-April 2021 (wave III), May-July 2021 (intermediate period II).Access to diagnostic testing was higher among Italians; the incidence curve showed a lower level of infection among immigrants during the three waves and higher in the two intermediate periods. Age-standardized hospitalization rates were higher among immigrants both in noncritical care areas and in the intensive care unit, particularly in the intermediate stages of the epidemic. Immigrant standardized mortality rates were higher than those of Italians since the third period among males and in the fourth period among females.Differences were also observed on a regional basis and by the immigrants' area of origin.

[Impact of COVID-19 on the immigrant population in the Veneto Region (Northern Italy), by geographical area of origin]. / Impatto del COVID-19 nella popolazione immigrata in Veneto, per area geografica di provenienza.

OBJECTIVES: to examine the differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization rates among migrant populations in Veneto Region (Northern Italy), according to the geographic area of origin. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: all residents in Veneto Region aged <65 years were included in the analyses. All subjects infected by SARS-CoV-2 and hospitalized for COVID-19 were identified by means of the regional biosurveillance system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: age- and gender-specific infection and hospitalization rates were stratified by geographic area of origin and were estimated using the number of incident cases over the resident population in Veneto on 01.01.2021. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) for infection and hospitalization rates were estimated using a Poisson model, adjusted for age and gender, among migrants compared to Italians. RESULTS: compared to Italians, SARS-CoV-2 infection rates were significantly higher among migrants from Central and South America and Central and South Asia, lower among those from North Africa and High-Income Countries (HIC), and were approximately halved for those coming from Other Asian Countries (mainly represented by China). Hospitalization rates were significantly higher for all migrant populations when compared to Italians, with the exception of those coming from HIC. Neither age nor gender seemed to modify the association of the geographic area of origin with SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization rates. IRR for SARS-CoV-2 infection of migrants compared to Italians showed how migrants from Other Asian Countries had the lowest infection rates (-53%), followed by people from HIC (-25%), North Africa (-21%), and Eastern Europe (-10%). Higher infection rates were present for Central and South America and Central and South Asia (+17% and +10, respectively). Hospitalization rates were especially high among migrants from Central and South Asia, Africa, and Central and South America, ranging from 1.84 to 3.14 times those observed for Italians. CONCLUSIONS: a significant heterogeneity in SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalization rates of migrant populations from different geographic areas of origin were observed. The significantly lower incidence rate ratio for infections, compared to that observed for hospitalizations, is suggestive of a possible under-diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection among migrant populations. Public health efforts should be targeted at increasing support among migrants to contrast the spread of the pandemic by potentiating vaccination campaigns, contact tracing, and COVID-19 diagnostic tests.

Access to SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic tests: are there barriers for the immigrants in Italy?

OBJECTIVES: to describe the epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 infection in relation with the use of nasal swabs in the immigrant population in Italy, using data from the COVID-19 national surveillance system and to verify if a difference is present comparing natives and immigrant. DESIGN: descriptive study based on longitudinal health-administrative data. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: general population of six Italian Regions (Piedmont, Lombardy, Veneto, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Lazio) covering about 55% of the resident population and 72% of foreigners' population. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: regional rates of access to at least a nasal swab, separately by country of origin. RESULTS: across all the periods, a lower rate in the foreigners' group was observed, with the only exception of the period May-June 2021. Considering separately High Migratory Pressure Countries (HMPCs) and Highly Developed Countries (HDCs), a higher proportion of nasal swabs performed in people coming from HDC with respect to HMPCs and natives was noticed. This observation is consistent in males and females. CONCLUSIONS: during the first wave of the pandemic, Italians have had a higher proportion of nasal swabs compared to migrants across all Regions. This difference disappeared in the following periods, probably due to a major availability of diagnostic tests.

[Hospital assistance for COVID-19: a comparison between non-Italian and Italian resident population in five Italian Regions since the beginning of the pandemic until June 2021]. / Un confronto tra italiani e stranieri residenti nell'assistenza ospedaliera per COVID-19 in cinque Regioni italiane da inizio pandemia a giugno 2021.

OBJECTIVES: to describe trends of overall and intensive care hospitalization for COVID-19 since the beginning of the pandemic in Italy until June 2021, and to compare the results between foreign and Italian population. DESIGN: retrospective observational study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: hospital discharges of 28 million people living in Lombardy, Piedmont, Emilia-Romagna (Northern Italy), Toscana and Lazio (Central Italy) occurred between 22.02.2020 and 02.07.2021 in the hospitals located in each considered Region. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: two weekly outcomes were examined: 1. the overall number of COVID-19 hospitalizations; 2. the number of COVID-19 hospitalizations in intensive care units. RESULTS: a higher COVID-19 overall and intensive care unit hospitalization was found among the foreign population compared to Italians. The association emerged only after the adjustment for age, and it was consistent among all Regions, though less marked in Lombardy. The association varied across epidemic phases. CONCLUSIONS: the issue of vulnerability of migrants to the risk of severe COVID-19 calls for a diversity-sensitive approach in prevention. The specific country of origin and the prevalence of preventable co-morbidities that are often underestimated in the migrant populations, and related to COVID-19 complications, should be taken into consideration in future analyses.

[Mortality and impact of COVID-19 by citizenship in seven Italian Regions from the beginning of the pandemic to mid-July 2021]. / Mortalità per COVID-19 nella popolazione immigrata in sette Regioni italiane da inizio pandemia a metà luglio 2021.

OBJECTIVES: to quantify the variability of COVID-19 mortality from the beginning of the pandemic to mid-July 2021, in relation to the immigrant status and by Region and period. DESIGN: observational incidence study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: the study population consists of the residents at the beginning of 2020 in seven Regions (Piedmont, Lombardy, Veneto, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Lazio, Sicily) aged <=74 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: absolute frequency of deaths occurred in subjects who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, crude and standardized rates (standard: Italian population at the beginning of 2020), and mortality rates ratios (obtained using Poisson models), by immigrant status and stratified by gender, Region of residence, and period. The study period was divided into 5 subperiods: 22.02.2020-25.05.2020, 26.05.2020-02.10.2020, 03.10.2020-26.02.2021, 27.02.2021-16.07.2021. RESULTS: the study includes more than one half of the Italian population and most of the immigrants residing in the country, who are younger than Italians and experienced fewer COVID-19 deaths. Deaths among those who tested positive varied greatly between Regions and periods; standardized rates showed considerable increases over time among immigrants. In terms of rate ratios, there were excesses among immigrant males in the third period (MRR: 1.46; 95%CI 1.30-1.65) and in the fourth period (MRR: 1.55; 95%CI 1, 34-1.81). Among immigrant females, there is an indication of lower risk in the third period (MRR: 0.79; 95%CI 0.65-0.97) and of greater risk in the fourth period (MRR: 1. 46; 95%CI 1.21-1.77). Finally, the effect is modified by the Region of residence, both in the third and in the fourth period for males and only in the fourth period for females. CONCLUSIONS: the risk of premature mortality due to COVID-19 is linked to immigrant status and with an intensity that varies by gender, Region, and period. More accessible tools for prevention, diagnosis and early healthcare can support immigrant communities in managing the risk factors linked to the spread of infections and, in particular, counteract their evolution into more severe disease outcomes.

Self-perceived workplace discrimination and mental health among immigrant workers in Italy: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The process of immigration is associated with poor mental and physical health. While the workplace represents an important context of social integration, previous studies evaluating the effect of discrimination experienced in the workplace found worse mental health status among immigrants. The aim of this study was to investigate whether self-perceived workplace discrimination has any role in the mental health status of immigrants living and working in Italy, evaluating the contribution of other personal experiences, such as loneliness and life satisfaction. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on a sample of 12,408 immigrants (aged 15-64) living and working in Italy. Data were derived from the first national survey on immigrants carried out by the Italian National Institute of Statistics (Istat). Mental health status was measured through the Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the SF-12 questionnaire. A linear multivariate linear regression was carried out to evaluate the association between mental health status, self-perceived workplace discrimination, and sociodemographic factors; path analysis was used to quantify the mediation effect of self-perceived loneliness, level of life satisfaction, and the Physical Component Summary (PCS). RESULTS: Mental health status was inversely associated (p < 0.001) with self-perceived workplace discrimination (ß:-1.737), self-perceived loneliness (ß:-2.653), and physical health status (ß:-0.089); it was directly associated with level of life satisfaction (ß:1.122). As confirmed by the path analysis, the effect of self-perceived workplace discrimination on MCS was mediated by the other factors considered: self-perceived loneliness (11.9%), level of life satisfaction (20.7%), and physical health status (3.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that self-perceived workplace discrimination is associated with worse mental health status in immigrant workers through personal experiences in the workplace and explains the effect of the exposure to workplace discrimination on immigrants' psychological well-being. Our findings suggest that an overall public health response is needed to facilitate the social integration of immigrants and their access to health services, particularly those services that address mental health issues.

Potentially avoidable hospitalization for asthma in children and adolescents by migrant status: results from the Italian Network for Longitudinal Metropolitan Studies.

BACKGROUND: Global migration toward Europe is increasing. Providing health assistance to migrants is challenging because numerous barriers limit their accessibility to health services. Migrants may be at a greater risk of developing asthma and receiving lower quality healthcare assistance than non-migrants. We aim to investigate whether immigrants as children and adolescents have higher rates of potentially avoidable hospitalization (PAH) for asthma compared to Italians. METHODS: We performed a retrospective longitudinal study using six cohorts of 2-17-year-old residents in North and Central Italy from 01/01/2001 to 31/12/2014 (N = 1,256,826). We linked asthma hospital discharges to individuals using anonymized keys. We estimated cohort-specific age and calendar-year-adjusted asthma PAH rate ratios (HRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) among immigrants compared to Italians. We applied a two-stage random effect model to estimate asthma PAH meta-analytic rate ratios (MHRRs). We analyzed data by gender and geographical area of origin countries. RESULTS: Three thousand three hundred four and 471 discharges for asthma PAH occurred among Italians and immigrants, respectively. Compared to Italians, the asthma PAH cohort-specific rate was higher for immigrant males in Bologna (HRR:2.42; 95%CI:1.53-3.81) and Roma (1.22; 1.02-1.45), and for females in Torino (1.56; 1.10-2.20) and Roma (1.82; 1.50-2.20). Asthma PAH MHRRs were higher only among immigrant females (MHRRs:1.48; 95%CI:1.18-1.87). MHRRs by area of origin were 63 to 113% higher among immigrants, except for Central-Eastern Europeans (0.80; 0.65-0.98). CONCLUSION: The asthma PAH meta-analytic rate was higher among female children and adolescent immigrants compared to Italians, with heterogeneity among cohorts showing higher cohort-specific PAH also among males, with some differences by origin country. Access to primary care for children and adolescent immigrants should be improved and immigrants should be considered at risk of severe asthma outcomes and consequently targeted by clinicians.

[Increased offer of renal transplantation and better outcomes in the Lazio Region, Italy 2008-2017]. / Aumento dell'offerta di trapianto di rene e miglioramento degli esiti nella regione Lazio, anni 2008-2017.

OBJECTIVES: 1. to describe temporal trend (2008-2017) in kidney transplant (KT) provision in the Lazio Region; 2. to measure KT outcomes by comparing three different time periods; 3. to estimate the prevalence of individuals with functioning kidney transplant. DESIGN: cross sectional (objective 1); cohort study (objectives 2 and 3). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: the study population included people residing in Lazio Region who received a kidney transplant between 2008 and 2017. Participants were selected through the integration of data from different sources: the Hospital Information System, the Regional Register of Dialysis and Transplantation, and the Regional Waiting List for Kidney Transplantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: standardised KT incidence rates x100,000 by year and age-specific rates were calculated separately for men and women. Mortality and failure of KT were considered as outcomes at one year; for both outcomes, the cumulative incidence x100 and raw and adjusted (by gender and age) incidence rates x100,000 person-day were calculated using a Poisson model. Raw and standardised prevalence rates x100,000 of people residing in Lazio Region with functioning KT at 31.12.2016 were calculated. RESULTS: in the study period, 1,646 KTs were performed. The KT rate increased significantly overtime, ranging between 2.9 in 2008 and 3.6 in 2017. Rates were higher for men compared to women. For men aged 65+ incidence KT rate increased significantly: 3.5 in 2008 and 7.1 in 2017. Among women, there was an increasing trend in the age groups 0-18 and 35-49 years. The one-year mortality rate decreased from 11.9 in 2008-2010 to 4.2 in 2014-2016. The failure rate was stable: 21.4 in 2008-2010 and 19.2 in 2014-2016. The number of individuals with functioning kidney transplant was 1,148. The standardised prevalence rate was 25.8 in men and 14.6 in women. CONCLUSIONS: increased offer of renal transplantation and better outcomes were observed in Lazio region. The proposed methodology is useful for the construction of indicators to monitor over time both KT provision and outcomes.

A systematic review of economic evaluations of neonatal and maternal healthcare in immigrant and ethnic minority women.

BACKGROUND: less access to appropriate care during pregnancy for immigrant/ethnic minority women can lead to worse health outcomes and higher costs for health services. OBJECTIVES: to conduct a systematic review of studies on the economic evaluation of maternal and child healthcare among immigrants and racial/ethnic minority groups in advanced economy countries. METHODS: the main biomedical/economic bibliographic databases and institutional sources were searched. The systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: encouraging breastfeeding and reducing inappropriate hospital use/length of hospital stay proved potentially able to reduce costs. Most studies showed a cost reduction if immigrant and ethnic minority women were included both in national and targeted programmes, such as nutritional programmes or case management. Screening campaigns targeting immigrants and ethnic minority groups were more cost-effective than broader, universal or non-screening strategies. Screenings were cost-effective when extended to newborns/relatives of pregnant women (Chagas disease) and were cost-effective for unvaccinated women in low-vaccination rates regions (rubella), immigrant women reporting no/uncertain vaccination history (varicella), and first-generation immigrants (HCV). DISCUSSION: promoting inclusion in pregnancy healthcare programmes or in targeted screening campaigns could be effective in cost saving for health services.

[Evaluating health care of the immigrant population in Italy through indicators of a national monitoring system]. / Valutazione dell'assistenza sanitaria della popolazione immigrata in Italia attraverso alcuni indicatori di un sistema nazionale di monitoraggio.

OBJECTIVES: to evaluate maternal and child healthcare, avoidable hospitalisation, access to emergency services among immigrants in Italy. DESIGN: cross sectional study of some health and health care indicators among Italian and foreign population residing in Italy in 2016-2017. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: indicators based on the national monitoring system coordinated by the Italian National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty (INMP) of Rome, calculated on perinatal care (CedAP), hospital discharge (SDO), emergency services (EMUR) archives for the years 2016-2017, by of the following regions: Piedmont, Trento, Bolzano, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Umbria, Lazio, Basilicata, Sicily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: number and timeliness of pregnancy visits, number of ultrasounds, invasive prenatal investigations; perinatal mortality rates, birth weight, Apgar score at 5 minutes, need for neonatal resuscitation; standardized rates of avoidable hospitalisation and access to emergency services by triage code. RESULTS: more often than Italians, immigrant women have during pregnancy: less than 5 gynaecological examination (16.3% vs 8.5%), first examination after the 12th week of gestational age (12.5% vs 3.8%), less than 2 ultrasounds (3.8% vs 1.0%). Higher perinatal mortality rates among immigrants compared to Italians (3.6 vs 2.3 x1,000). Higher standardized rates (x1,000) among immigrants compared to Italians of avoidable hospitalisation (men: 2.1 vs 1.4; women: 0.9 vs 0.7) and of white triage codes in emergency (men: 62.0 vs 32.7; women: 52.9 vs 31.4). CONCLUSIONS: study findings show differences in access and outcomes of healthcare between Italians and immigrants. National monitoring system of indicators, coordinated by INMP, represents a useful tool for healthcare intervention policies aimed to health equity.

Italian Atlas of mortality inequalities by education level. / Atlante italiano delle disuguaglianze di mortalità per livello di istruzione.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the geographical and socioeconomic differences in mortality and in life expectancy in Italy; to evaluate the proportion of mortality in the population attributable to a medium-low education level through the use of maps and indicators. DESIGN: Longitudinal design of the population enrolled in the 2011 Italian Census, following the population over time and registering any exit due to death or emigration. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The study used the database of the Italian National Institute of Statistics (Istat) developed by linking the 2011 Census with the Italian National Register of Causes of Death (2012-2014) for 35 groups of causes of death. Age, sex, residence, and education level information were collected from the Census. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Life expectancy at birth was calculated by sex, Italian region, and education level. For the population aged 30-89 years, the following items were developed by sex: 1. provincial maps showing, for each cause of death, the distribution in quintiles of smoothed standardized mortality ratio (SMR), adjusted for age and education level and estimated with Bayesian models for small areas (spatial conditional autoregressive model); 2. regional maps of population attributable fraction (PAF) for low and medium education levels, calculated starting from age-standardized mortality ratios; 3. tables illustrating for each region standardized mortality rates and standardized years of life lost rate by age (standardized YLL rate), and mortality rate ratios standardized by age (MMRs). RESULTS: Males with a lower education level throughout Italy show a life expectancy at birth that is 3 years less than those with higher education; residents in Southern Italy lose an additional year in life expectancy, regardless of education level. Social inequalities in mortality are present in all regions, but are more marked in the poorer regions of Southern Italy. Geographical differences, taking into account the different population distributions in terms of age and education level, produce mortality differences for all causes: from -15% to +30% in women and from -13% to +26% in men, compared to the national average. Among the main groups of causes, the geographical differences are greater for cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases, and accidents, and lower for many tumour sites. A clear mortality gradient with an excess in Southern Italy can be seen for cardiovascular diseases: there are some areas where mortality for people with higher education level is higher than that for residents in Northern Italy with low education level. The gradient for "All tumours", instead, is from South to North, as it is for most single tumour sites. Population attributable fraction for low education level in Italy, taking into account the population distribution by age, is 13.4% in women and 18.3% in men. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlighted important geographical differences in mortality, regardless of age and socioeconomic level, with a more significant impact in the poorer Southern regions, revealing a never-before-seen health advantage in the regions along the Adriatic coast. A lower education level explains a considerable proportion of mortality risk, although with differing effects by geographical area and cause of death. There are still mortality inequalities in Italy, therefore, representing a possible missed gain in health in our Country; these inequalities suggest a reassessment of priorities and definition of health targets. Forty years after the Italian National Health Service was instituted, the goal of health equity has not yet been fully achieved.

[Immigrants' health and socioeconomic inequalities of overall population residing in Italy evaluated through the Italian network of Longitudinal Metropolitan Studies]. / Salute degli immigrati e disuguaglianze socioeconomiche nella popolazione residente in Italia valutate attraverso la rete degli Studi Longitudinali Metropolitani.

INTRODUCTION: Describing and monitoring socioeconomic inequalities in health are the prerequisite for planning equity policies. In Italy, some cities have integrated personal information from the municipal registries with Census data and with data from healthcare information systems to set up Longitudinal Metropolitan Studies (LMS). Under the coordination of the Italian National Institute for Health, Migration, and Poverty (NIHMP), six cities in the LMS network have contributed to the present monograph: Turin, Venice, Reggio Emilia, Modena, Bologna, and Rome. MORTALITY RESULTS. Significant socioeconomic differences by level of education were seen in all the participating centres. People who live alone or in single-parent households are more likely to die, as are those living in a substandard dwelling. Immigrants resident in the six cities included in the study showed lower all-cause mortality than Italians (males: MRR 0.83; 95%CI 0.78-0.90 - females: MRR 0.70; 95%CI 0.64-0.77). Sub-Saharan Africans experienced a significant higher mortality than Italians (males: MRR 1.33; 95%CI 1.12-1.59 - females: MMR 1.69; 95%CI 1.31-2.17). Immigrants had a neonatal and post-neonatal mortality risk about 1.5 times higher than Italians (neonatal: OR 1.71; 95%CI 1.22-2.39 - post-neonatal: OR 1.63; 95%CI 1.03-2.57). A difference between Italians and immigrants was also observed for mortality in children aged 1-4 years, though less marked (OR 1.24; 95%CI 0.73-2.11). Excesses concerned particularly immigrants from North Africa and from sub-Saharan Africa as well as those residing in Italy for >5 years. HOSPITALISATION RESULTS. Hospitalisation rates are lower for immigrants than for Italians, except when due to infectious diseases, blood disorders, and, among women, for reasons linked to pregnancy and childbirth. Avoidable hospitalisation rates of adults from low migratory pressure Countries are lower than or equal to those of Italians. On the contrary, adults from low migratory pressure Countries show higher avoidable hospitalisation rates compared to Italians in every cohort, with the exception of Rome (RR 0.81; 95%CI 0.78-0.85), with RR ranging from 1.08 (95%CI 0.96-1.22) in Venice to 1.64 (95%CI 1.47-1.83) in Modena. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal and child health is the most critical area of health for immigrant population. Considering the importance that the issue of health equity has taken on in the political agenda, the data presented in this volume are a great asset, particularly in light of the long recession and the social crisis that have impacted the Country.

Infectious and dermatological diseases among arriving migrants on the Italian coasts.

Background: Since 2008 Italy has been the destination of the 'central Mediterranean route', used by migrants to reach Europe. The aim of this study is to describe demographic characteristics and health problems of migrants at the time of arrival on the Italian coasts, focussing on dermatological and infectious diseases. Methods: Cross-sectional study of data routinely collected (n = 6, 188) by the National Institute for Health Migration and Poverty (INMP) in the centres for migrants of Lampedusa and Trapani-Milo (2015-16). Logistic models were performed to identify factors associated with scabies, varicella and the occurrence of two or more not related diagnosis. Results: The average age was 21.6 years; 83.5% of the patients were males. The most frequent countries of origin were Eritrea, Nigeria, and Somalia. The most frequent diagnosis was scabies (58% of patients), skin infections, pediculosis and dermatitis; respiratory infections and varicella were the most represented infectious diseases. The diagnosis of scabies was more probable among Somalis (OR: 11.60) and Eritreans (OR: 10.05); the diagnosis of varicella was more probable among Ghanaians (OR: 13.58) and Nigerians (OR: 9.79). Somalis (OR: 4.10) and Eritreans (OR: 3.32) were the patients more likely to receive two or more diagnosis. Conclusions: The majority of the diseases affecting migrants is in most cases, related to the migration experience and is likely not to represent a major threat for public health. Up-to-date information regarding the burden of diseases is needed in order to identify the health needs of incoming migrants and to arrange the appropriate response in terms of health services provision.

The variation in the health status of immigrants and Italians during the global crisis and the role of socioeconomic factors.

BACKGROUND: The effects of the recent global economic and financial crisis especially affected the most vulnerable social groups. Objective of the study was to investigate variation of self-perceived health status in Italians and immigrants during the economic global crisis, focusing on demographic and socioeconomic factors. METHODS: Through a cross-sectional design we analyzed the national sample of multipurpose surveys "Health conditions and use of health services" (2005 and 2013) conducted by the Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT). Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores, derived from SF-12 questionnaire, were assumed as study outcome, dichotomizing variables distribution at 1st quartile. Prevalence rate ratios (PRR) were estimated through log-binomial regression models, stratified by citizenship and gender, evaluating the association between PCS and MCS with surveys' year, adjusting for age, educational level, employment status, self-perceived economic resources, smoking habits, body mass index. RESULTS: From 2005 to 2013 the proportion of people not employed or reporting scarce/insufficient economic resources increased, especially among men, in particular immigrants. Compared with 2005 we observed in 2013 among Italians a significant lower probability of worse PCS (PRR = 0.96 both for males and females), while no differences were observed among immigrants; a higher probability of worse MCS was observed, particularly among men (Italians: PRR = 1.26;95%CI:1.22-1.29; immigrants: PRR = 1.19;95%CI:1.03-1.38). Self-perceived scarce/insufficient economic resources were strongly and significantly associated with worse PCS and MCS for all subgroups. Lower educational level was strongly associated with worse PCS in Italians and slightly associated with worse MCS for all subgroups. Being not employed was associated with worse health status, especially mental health among men. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the hypothesis that economic global crisis could have negatively affected health status, particularly mental health, of Italians and immigrants. Furthermore, results suggest socioeconomic inequalities increase, in economic resources availability dimension. In a context of public health resources' limitation due to financial crisis, policy decision makers and health service managers must face the challenge of equity in health.