Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
N Engl J Med ; 385(25): 2313-2324, 2021 12 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34739196

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Daprodustat is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor. In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who are not undergoing dialysis, the efficacy and safety of daprodustat, as compared with the conventional erythropoiesis-stimulating agent darbepoetin alfa, are unknown. METHODS: In this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial with blinded adjudication of cardiovascular outcomes, we compared daprodustat with darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of anemia in patients with CKD who were not undergoing dialysis. The primary outcomes were the mean change in the hemoglobin level from baseline to weeks 28 through 52 and the first occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE; a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke). RESULTS: Overall, 3872 patients were randomly assigned to receive daprodustat or darbepoetin alfa. The mean (±SD) baseline hemoglobin levels were similar in the two groups. The mean (±SE) change in the hemoglobin level from baseline to weeks 28 through 52 was 0.74±0.02 g per deciliter in the daprodustat group and 0.66±0.02 g per deciliter in the darbepoetin alfa group (difference, 0.08 g per deciliter; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03 to 0.13), which met the prespecified noninferiority margin of -0.75 g per deciliter. During a median follow-up of 1.9 years, a first MACE occurred in 378 of 1937 patients (19.5%) in the daprodustat group and in 371 of 1935 patients (19.2%) in the darbepoetin alfa group (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.19), which met the prespecified noninferiority margin of 1.25. The percentages of patients with adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with CKD and anemia who were not undergoing dialysis, daprodustat was noninferior to darbepoetin alfa with respect to the change in the hemoglobin level from baseline and with respect to cardiovascular outcomes. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; ASCEND-ND ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02876835.).


Assuntos
Anemia/tratamento farmacológico , Barbitúricos/uso terapêutico , Darbepoetina alfa/uso terapêutico , Glicina/análogos & derivados , Hematínicos/uso terapêutico , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Idoso , Anemia/etiologia , Barbitúricos/efeitos adversos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Darbepoetina alfa/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Glicina/efeitos adversos , Glicina/uso terapêutico , Hematínicos/efeitos adversos , Hemoglobinas/análise , Humanos , Prolina Dioxigenases do Fator Induzível por Hipóxia/antagonistas & inibidores , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/sangue , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia
2.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 37(11): 2157-2170, 2022 10 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34865143

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anaemia is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and assessment of the risks and benefits of new therapies is important. METHODS: The Anaemia Study in CKD: Erythropoiesis via a Novel prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor Daprodustat-Non-Dialysis (ASCEND-ND) trial includes adult patients with CKD Stages 3-5, not using erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) with screening haemoglobin (Hb) 8-10 g/dL or receiving ESAs with screening Hb of 8-12 g/dL. Participants were randomized to daprodustat or darbepoetin alfa (1:1) in an open-label trial (steering committee- and sponsor-blinded), with blinded endpoint assessment. The co-primary endpoints are mean change in Hb between baseline and evaluation period (average over Weeks 28-52) and time to first adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular (CV) event. Baseline characteristics were compared with those of participants in similar anaemia trials. RESULTS: Overall, 3872 patients were randomized from 39 countries (median age 67 years, 56% female, 56% White, 27% Asian and 10% Black). The median baseline Hb was 9.9 g/dL, blood pressure was 135/74 mmHg and estimated glomerular filtration rate was 18 mL/min/1.73 m2. Among randomized patients, 53% were ESA non-users, 57% had diabetes and 37% had a history of CV disease. At baseline, 61% of participants were using renin-angiotensin system blockers, 55% were taking statins and 49% were taking oral iron. Baseline demographics were similar to those in other large non-dialysis anaemia trials. CONCLUSION: ASCEND-ND will define the efficacy and safety of daprodustat compared with darbepoetin alfa in the treatment of patients with anaemia associated with CKD not on dialysis.


Assuntos
Anemia , Eritropoetina , Hematínicos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases , Inibidores de Prolil-Hidrolase , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Anemia/tratamento farmacológico , Anemia/etiologia , Darbepoetina alfa/uso terapêutico , Eritropoetina/efeitos adversos , Hematínicos/uso terapêutico , Hemoglobinas , Ferro , Diálise Renal , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/complicações , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/induzido quimicamente
3.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 17(9): 1325-1336, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35918106

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Daprodustat is a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor (HIF-PHI) being investigated for the treatment of anemia of CKD. In this noninferiority trial, we compared daprodustat administered three times weekly with epoetin alfa (epoetin) in patients on prevalent hemodialysis switching from a prior erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Patients on hemodialysis with a baseline hemoglobin of 8-11.5 g/dl receiving an ESA were randomized 2:1 to daprodustat three times weekly (n=270) or conventional epoetin (n=137) for 52 weeks. Dosing algorithms aimed to maintain hemoglobin between 10 and 11 g/dl. The primary end point was mean change in hemoglobin from baseline to the average during the evaluation period (weeks 28-52). The principal secondary end point was average monthly intravenous iron dose. Other secondary end points included BP and hemoglobin variability. RESULTS: Daprodustat three times weekly was noninferior to epoetin for mean change in hemoglobin (model-adjusted mean treatment difference [daprodustat-epoetin], -0.05; 95% confidence interval, -0.21 to 0.10). During the evaluation period, mean (SD) hemoglobin values were 10.45 (0.55) and 10.51 (0.85) g/dl for daprodustat and epoetin groups, respectively. Responders (defined as mean hemoglobin during the evaluation period in the analysis range of 10 to 11.5 g/dl) were 80% in the daprodustat group versus 64% in the epoetin group. Proportionately fewer participants in the daprodustat group versus the epoetin group had hemoglobin values either below 10 g/dl or above 11.5 g/dl during the evaluation period. Mean monthly intravenous iron use was not significantly lower with daprodustat versus epoetin. The effect on BP was similar between groups. The percentage of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between daprodustat (75%) and epoetin (79%). CONCLUSIONS: Daprodustat was noninferior to epoetin in hemoglobin response and was generally well tolerated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: Anemia Studies in Chronic Kidney Disease: Erythropoiesis via a Novel Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor Daprodustat-Three Times Weekly Dosing in Dialysis (ASCEND-TD), NCT03400033.


Assuntos
Anemia , Eritropoetina , Hematínicos , Inibidores de Prolil-Hidrolase , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Humanos , Anemia/tratamento farmacológico , Anemia/etiologia , Epoetina alfa , Eritropoetina/uso terapêutico , Hemoglobinas , Ferro , Inibidores de Prolil-Hidrolase/efeitos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes/efeitos adversos , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/terapia , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Método Duplo-Cego
4.
Am Heart J ; 159(5): 716-29, 2010 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20435178

RESUMO

This white paper, prepared by members of the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium, discusses several important issues regarding the evaluation of ventricular arrhythmias in early clinical pharmacology trials and their potential consequences for later clinical drug development. Ventricular arrhythmias are infrequent but potentially important medical events whose occurrence in early clinical pharmacology trials can dramatically increase safety concerns. Given the increasing concern with all potential safety signals and the resultant more extensive electrocardiographic monitoring of subjects participating in early phase trials, an important question must be addressed: Are relatively more frequent observations of ventricular arrhythmias related simply to more extensive monitoring, or are they genuinely related to the drug under development? The discussions in this paper provide current thinking and suggestions for addressing this question.


Assuntos
Arritmias Cardíacas/induzido quimicamente , Ensaios Clínicos Fase I como Assunto , Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiologia , Arritmias Cardíacas/fisiopatologia , Ensaios Clínicos Fase I como Assunto/normas , Análise Custo-Benefício , Descoberta de Drogas , Eletrocardiografia , Humanos , Monitorização Fisiológica , Seleção de Pacientes , Prevalência , Medição de Risco , Telemetria
5.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 14(12 Suppl): S275-80; discussion S280, 2003 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15005214

RESUMO

Management of Atrial Fibrillation. There are three fundamental approaches to the management of atrial fibrillation (AF): rate control, rhythm control, and anticoagulation. Selecting a course of treatment requires a thorough knowledge of these therapeutic alternatives. This article explores treatment options, including the relative benefits of rate control versus rhythm control, which are complicated by the lack of highly effective and safe antiarrhythmic drugs. Anticoagulation is also an important issue in AF management, and warfarin effectively reduces the incidence of thromboembolic events in AF patients. The use of warfarin, however, presents its own complications. We conclude that individualization of therapy is paramount when treating AF.


Assuntos
Antiarrítmicos/uso terapêutico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/terapia , Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial/métodos , Marca-Passo Artificial , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Fibrilação Atrial/complicações , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrilação Atrial/prevenção & controle , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Varfarina/uso terapêutico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA