Validity of diagnosis and procedure codes for identifying neural tube defects in infants.

PURPOSE: The use of validated criteria to identify birth defects in electronic healthcare databases can avoid the cost and time-intensive efforts required to conduct chart reviews to confirm outcomes. This study evaluated the validity of various case-finding methodologies to identify neural tube defects (NTDs) in infants using an electronic healthcare database. METHODS: This analysis used data generated from a study whose primary aim was to evaluate the association between first-trimester maternal prescription opioid use and NTDs. The study was conducted within the Medication Exposure in Pregnancy Risk Evaluation Program. A broad approach was used to identify potential NTDs including diagnosis and procedure codes from inpatient and outpatient settings, death certificates and birth defect flags in birth certificates. Potential NTD cases were chart abstracted and confirmed by clinical experts. Positive predictive values (PPVs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) are reported. RESULTS: The cohort included 113 168 singleton live-born infants: 55 960 infants with opioid exposure in pregnancy and 57 208 infants unexposed in pregnancy. Seventy-three potential NTD cases were available for the validation analysis. The overall PPV was 41% using all diagnosis and procedure codes plus birth certificates. Restricting approaches to codes recorded in the infants' medical record or to birth certificate flags increased the PPVs (72% and 80%, respectively) but missed a substantial proportion of confirmed NTDs. CONCLUSIONS: Codes in electronic healthcare data did not accurately identify confirmed NTDs. These results indicate that chart review with adjudication of outcomes is important when conducting observational studies of NTDs using electronic healthcare data.

Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in women delivering liveborn infants and other women of child-bearing age within the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Mini-Sentinel program.

This study was conducted in order to assess the prevalence of use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) among pregnant women delivering a liveborn infant in the USA. A retrospective study was conducted using the automated databases of 15 health-care systems participating in the Mini-Sentinel program. Diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify women ages 10 to 54 years delivering a liveborn infant between April 2001 and December 2013. A comparison group of age- and date-matched women without live births was identified. The frequency of use of SSRIs was identified from outpatient dispensing data. Among the 1,895,519 liveborn deliveries, 113,689 women (6.0 %) were exposed to an SSRI during pregnancy during the period 2001-2013; 5.4 % were exposed to an SSRI during 2013. During the corresponding time period, 10.5 % of the age- and date-matched cohort of women without live births was exposed to an SSRI, with 10.1 % exposed to an SSRI during 2013. The most common agents dispensed during pregnancy were sertraline (n = 48,678), fluoxetine (n = 28,983), and citalopram (n = 20,591). Among those women exposed to an SSRI during pregnancy, 53.8 % had a diagnosis of depression and 37.3 % had a diagnosis of an anxiety disorder during pregnancy or within 180 days prior to pregnancy. Our finding that 6 % of women with live births were prescribed SSRIs during pregnancy highlights the importance of understanding the differential effects of these medications and other therapeutic options on the developing fetus and on the pregnant women.

Perspectives on drug development for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in pregnant patients and patients who are breastfeeding.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have improved the outcome and life expectancy of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Patients are diagnosed with CML at younger ages, and patients treated for CML may become pregnant or choose to breastfeed. The information available to date on the safety of TKIs during pregnancy and lactation and the optimal management of these patients is largely anecdotal, based on personal or small-group experience, and heterogeneous. A panel of interested parties was convened by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to analyze the current data and discuss possible solutions. Possible solutions include prospective data collection, in clinical trials and in routine clinical practice, a more uniform and specific data collection, and greater coordination among involved entities. Since patients with cancer are living longer, frequently receiving therapies for extended periods of time (or for life), data on appropriate management of patients through different reproductive phases of life are needed. It is thus time to change our approach for how to study treatment of cancer (including CML) during pregnancy or breastfeeding to develop evidence-based guidelines for safe and effective patient care.

Healthcare providers' use of a concise summary to prescribe for lactating patients.

BACKGROUND: Most breastfeeding individuals take at least one prescription drug, yet limited data from lactation studies are available to inform the safety of these drugs during breastfeeding. As a result, healthcare providers (HCPs) rely on available information about safety of drugs used during pregnancy or on personal experiences to inform prescribing/counseling decisions for breastfeeding individuals. To improve risk communication regarding drugs used during lactation, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration published the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule (PLLR) in 2015, which added a narrative summary of available risk information to the lactation section of Prescribing Information (PI). Prior studies on labeling in PLLR format revealed that although HCPs found these details valuable, they regarded the narrative as too long to support decision-making during patient encounters. OBJECTIVE: This qualitative study's objective was to assess the utility of adding a concise summary to the Lactation subsection of PI to complement the narrative and succinctly communicate to busy HCPs a drug's risks when used during lactation. The concise summary consisted of a bolded headline, bulleted descriptions of available study findings and potential adverse reactions, and recommendations for risk mitigation. METHODS: Twenty-five online focus groups were conducted with five segments of HCPs to obtain their feedback on the concise summary and discuss their prescribing/counseling decisions for four fictitious prescription drugs including one vaccine. RESULTS: HCPs utilized the concise summary to make initial prescribing/counseling decisions. Many also used the labeling narrative for a comprehensive benefit-risk assessment. CONCLUSION: The findings indicate a need to continue to improve communication about safety of drugs used during lactation, and that the concise summary may help facilitate this communication. The study also highlights the need to educate HCPs about PI limitations when clinical data are lacking and the need to encourage clinical studies to be conducted to support actionable recommendations about use of prescription drugs during lactation.

Clinical Lactation Studies of Neuropsychiatric Medications: Clinical Pharmacology and Labeling Considerations.

The availability of clinical pharmacology and safety data regarding the use of prescription medications in pregnant and lactating individuals has been historically limited, despite significant efforts to improve the quantity and quality of the information in labeling. The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule took effect on June 30, 2015, and updated information in labeling to more clearly describe available data to assist health care providers in counseling pregnant and lactating individuals. Additionally, the FDA published a revised draft guidance, "Clinical Lactation Studies: Considerations for Study Design," to provide pharmaceutical companies and investigators with information about how and when to conduct lactation studies. Clinical pharmacology information derived from lactation studies is important in determining the presence of medications in breast milk and counseling lactating individuals regarding the potential of medication exposure in the breast milk and its attendant risks to the breastfed infant. Examples of Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule labeling changes that resulted from dedicated clinical lactation studies for certain neuropsychiatric medications are described in this publication. These medications are discussed because neuropsychiatric conditions commonly affect women of reproductive potential, including lactating individuals. As the FDA guidance and these studies illustrate, bioanalytical method validation, study design, and data analysis considerations are essential for obtaining quality lactation data. Well-designed clinical lactation studies play an important role in informing product labeling that ultimately is useful to health care providers in making prescribing decisions with lactating individuals.

Pharmacokinetic Evaluation in Pregnancy-Current Status and Future Considerations: Workshop Summary.

As pregnant individuals have traditionally been excluded from clinical trials, there is a gap in knowledge at the time of drug approval regarding safety, efficacy, and appropriate dosing for most prescription medications used during pregnancy. Physiologic changes in pregnancy can result in changes in pharmacokinetics that can impact safety or efficacy. This highlights the need to foster further research and collection of pharmacokinetic data in pregnancy to ensure appropriate drug dosing in pregnant individuals. Therefore, the US Food and Drug Administration and the University of Maryland Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation hosted a workshop on May 16 and 17, 2022, titled "Pharmacokinetic Evaluation in Pregnancy." This is a summary of the workshop proceedings.

Clinicians' Perspective of the New Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule (PLLR): Results from an AAAAI/FDA Survey.

BACKGROUND: On June 30, 2015, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) began implementation of the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule (PLLR), which replaced the pregnancy letter category system (A, B, C, D, and X) with integrated narrative summaries of the risks of using a drug or biological product during pregnancy and lactation. The letter category system, first established in 1979, was regarded as overly simplistic and misinterpreted as a grading system. The PLLR labeling format was created to improve the presentation of available data on use of the drug during pregnancy and/or lactation. OBJECTIVE: To survey clinician awareness, assessment, and use of this new labeling format. METHODS: In January 2018, an online survey, developed in collaboration between the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology and the FDA, was sent to a random sample of the US membership of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The survey content consisted of questions addressing the following: demographic characteristics, awareness and use of the PLLR, and value and understanding of the PLLR format on the basis of an example of the "Pregnancy" subsection of labeling. RESULTS: Of the 1500 members who received the survey via an email, 184 (12%) completed the survey. Respondents had a mean age of 56 years and treated on average 2 pregnant women per month. Less than half (46%) of the respondents were aware that the pregnancy letter category system was replaced with a narrative summary. After reading the example, most of the respondents (68%) did not feel that the narrative summary was concise. However, 71% of the respondents found the background risk and disease-associated risk information helpful. Most of the respondents (95%) continued to use the pregnancy letter category system to make prescribing decisions. CONCLUSIONS: These survey results suggest that the PLLR format was not known by most prescribers and that the pregnancy letter category format is continuing to be used despite significant flaws in the old system. However, the survey did not address why prescribers were continuing to rely on the pregnancy letter category system. Whether this is due to the PLLR format itself or the lack of quality data to inform the safe use of medications in pregnancy cannot be determined from these survey results. The FDA will use these survey results to refine the communication of pregnancy safety information in labeling and will expand outreach efforts to educate health care providers in the new labeling system.

The Importance of Clinical Research in Pregnant Women to Inform Prescription Drug Labeling.

Pregnant women have historically been an understudied population and have been excluded from clinical trials. Recent efforts by stakeholders have raised awareness of the importance of clinical research in pregnant women to inform prescribing decisions. The Food and Drug Administration continues working to improve the format and content of prescription drug labeling for pregnant and lactating women, as demonstrated with the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule (PLLR), effective in 2015. The pregnancy labeling subsection now includes a subheading dedicated to the inclusion of pharmacokinetic (PK) data that inform the need for dose adjustments during pregnancy and the postpartum period. In addition, the PLLR also requires prescription drug labeling to be updated when important pregnancy information becomes available. Although PLLR improved the presentation of pregnancy-related information in labeling, there is a need to increase the quality and quantity of human data on the use of prescription drugs during pregnancy. PK studies in pregnant women should be incorporated into drug development programs and prioritized to obtain important information about safe and appropriate doses of a drug when used during pregnancy. In addition, opportunistic PK studies, postapproval pregnancy safety studies, ex vivo studies, and in silico modeling can be leveraged to better inform the risks and benefits of using a drug during pregnancy to inform study design and to further understand various mechanisms impacting pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic of drugs during pregnancy. It is important to address the significant existing data gaps and better inform the safety and dosing of prescription drugs for pregnant women.