The role of empagliflozin-induced metabolic changes for cardiac function in patients with type 2 diabetes. A randomized cross-over magnetic resonance imaging study with insulin as comparator.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic effects of empagliflozin treatment include lowered glucose and insulin concentrations, elevated free fatty acids and ketone bodies and have been suggested to contribute to the cardiovascular benefits of empagliflozin treatment, possibly through an improved cardiac function. We aimed to evaluate the influence of these metabolic changes on cardiac function in patients with T2D. METHODS: In a randomized cross-over design, the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin (E) was compared with insulin (I) treatment titrated to the same level of glycemic control in 17 patients with type 2 diabetes, BMI of > 28 kg/m2, C-peptide > 500 pM. Treatments lasted 5 weeks and were preceded by 3-week washouts (WO). At the end of treatments and washouts, cardiac diastolic function was determined with magnetic resonance imaging from left ventricle early peak-filling rate and left atrial passive emptying fraction (primary and key secondary endpoints); systolic function from left ventricle ejection fraction (secondary endpoint). Coupling between cardiac function and fatty acid concentrations, was studied on a separate day with a second scan after reduction of plasma fatty acids with acipimox. Data are Mean ± standard error. Between treatment difference (ΔT: E-I) and treatments effects (ΔE: E-WO or ΔI: I -WO) were evaluated using Students' t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test as appropriate. RESULTS: Glucose concentrations were similar, fatty acids, ketone bodies and lipid oxidation increased while insulin concentrations decreased on empagliflozin compared with insulin treatment. Cardiac diastolic and systolic function were unchanged by either treatment. Acipimox decreased fatty acids with 35% at all visits, and this led to reduced cardiac diastolic (ΔT: -51 ± 22 ml/s (p < 0.05); ΔE: -33 ± 26 ml/s (ns); ΔI: 37 ± 26 (ns, p < 0.05 vs ΔE)) and systolic function (ΔT: -3 ± 1% (p < 0.05); ΔE: -3 ± 1% (p < 0.05): ΔI: 1 ± 2 (ns, ns vs ΔE)) under chronotropic stress during empagliflozin compared to insulin treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Despite significant metabolic differences, cardiac function did not differ on empagliflozin compared with insulin treatment. Impaired cardiac function during acipimox treatment, could suggest greater cardiac reliance on lipid metabolism for proper function during empagliflozin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2017-002101-35, August 2017.

The acute effects of furosemide in acute heart failure assessed by remote dielectric sensing. A protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous loop diuretics have been a key component in treating pulmonary oedema since the 1960s and have a Class 1 recommendation in the 2021 guidelines for acute heart failure (AHF). While the diuretic effect of loop diuretics is well established, it remains unclear how furosemide influences pulmonary congestion and cardiac filling pressures in the hyperacute phase before significant diuresis occurs. METHODS: This was a prospective study of adult patients with AHF and objective signs of pulmonary congestion admitted to the cardiac ward. Remote dielectric sensing (ReDS) will directly measure lung fluid content, and cardiac filling pressures will be assessed by echocardiography with Doppler and strain analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study will examine if furosemide leads to a hyperacute reduction in pulmonary congestion assessed by ReDS independent of diuretic effects in patients with AHF. We hypothesise that the haemodynamic effect of furosemide shown on pulmonary congestion may explain the subjective instant relief in patients with AHF receiving furosemide. FUNDING: Dr. Grand's salary during this project is supported by a research grant from the Danish Cardiovascular Academy funded by Novo Nordisk Foundation grant number NNF20SA0067242 and by the Danish Heart Foundation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This protocol was approved by the Scientific Ethical Committee, H-23029822, and the Danish Data Protection Agency P-2013-14703. The protocol was registered with ClinicalTrial.org on 29 August 2023 (Identifier: NCT06024889).