Computer-assisted quantitative assessment of power Doppler US: effects of microbubble contrast agent in the differentiation of breast tumors.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To objectively quantify the effects of a microbubble contrast agent to differentiate breast tumors with power doppler ultrasound and to compare these results with color doppler ultrasound (CD US). METHODS: In 47 patients a microbubble contrast agent was injected intravenously. Computer-assisted quantitative assessment of the color pixel density was performed to evaluate the increase in Doppler signals. Results were compared to previously published results of a color Doppler ultrasound study. RESULTS: Peak color pixel density at contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasound was higher for carcinomas than for benign tumors (P < 0.03). Time to peak enhancement was shorter in carcinomas than in benign tumors (P < 0.01). For both parameters, diagnostic accuracy of power Doppler ultrasound was 69 and 78%, and for color Doppler ultrasound 62 and 76%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative assessment of contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasound showed significant differences in malignant and benign breast tumors. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasound was higher compared to color Doppler ultrasound.

Ivabradine versus metoprolol for heart rate reduction before coronary computed tomography angiography.

Several studies have demonstrated the correlation of heart rate (HR) and image quality in coronary computed tomography angiography. Beta-blocker administration is critical because of its negative inotropic effect. Ivabradine is a selective HR-lowering agent that exclusively inhibits the I(f) current in sinoatrial node cells without having any effect on cardiac contractility or atrioventricular conduction. A total of 120 patients were randomized to oral premedication with ivabradine 15 mg or metoprolol 50 mg. HR and blood pressure (BP) were measured before the administration of premedication and immediately before coronary computed tomographic angiography. The mean time between premedication administration and follow-up was 108 ± 21.5 minutes for ivabradine and 110 ± 22.2 minutes for metoprolol (p = NS). When comparing groups, there were no significant differences in reduction of HR (-11.83 ± 8.6 vs -13.20 ± 7.8 beats/min, p = NS) and diastolic BP (-5.05 ± 14.2 mm Hg vs -4.08 ± 10.8 mm Hg, p = NS), whereas the decrease of systolic BP was significantly lower in patients who received ivabradine compared to those in the metoprolol group (-3.95 ± 13.6 vs -13.65 ± 17.3 mm Hg, p <0.001). In the subgroup of patients who were receiving long-term ß-blocker therapy, significantly stronger HR reduction was achieved with ivabradine (-13.19 ± 5.4 vs -10.04 ± 6.0 beats/min, p <0.05), while the decrease in systolic BP was less (-2.00 ± 13.6 vs -15.04 ± 20.8 mm Hg, p <0.05) compared to metoprolol. In conclusion, ivabradine decreases HR before coronary computed tomographic angiography sufficiently, with significantly less depression of systolic BP compared to metoprolol.