RESUMO
BACKGROUND: No randomized controlled trials have substantiated endoscopic decompression of the pancreatic duct in patients with painful chronic pancreatitis. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pain-relieving effect of pancreatic duct decompression in patients with chronic pancreatitis and intraductal stones. DESIGN: 24-week, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03966781). SETTING: Asian Institute of Gastroenterology in India from February 2021 to July 2022. PARTICIPANTS: 106 patients with chronic pancreatitis. INTERVENTION: Combined extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) compared with sham procedures. MEASUREMENTS: The primary end point was pain relief on a 0- to 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes were assessed after 12 and 24 weeks and included 30% pain relief, opioid use, pain-free days, questionaries, and complications to interventions. RESULTS: 52 patients in the ESWL/ERP group and 54 in the sham group were included. At 12 weeks, the ESWL/ERP group showed better pain relief compared with the sham group (mean difference in change, -0.7 [95% CI, -1.3 to 0] on the VAS; P = 0.039). The difference between groups was not sustained at the 24-week follow-up, and no differences were seen for 30% pain relief at 12- or 24-week follow-up. The number of pain-free days was increased (median difference, 16.2 days [CI, 3.9 to 28.5 days]), and the number of days using opioids was reduced (median difference, -5.4 days [CI, -9.9 to -0.9 days]) in the ESWL/ERP group compared with the sham group at 12-week follow-up. Safety outcomes were similar between groups. LIMITATION: Single-center study and limited duration of follow-up. CONCLUSION: In patients with chronic pancreatitis and intraductal stones, ESWL with ERP provided modest short-term pain relief. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Asian Institute of Gastroenterology and Aalborg University Hospital.
Assuntos
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Litotripsia , Ductos Pancreáticos , Pancreatite Crônica , Humanos , Pancreatite Crônica/complicações , Pancreatite Crônica/terapia , Masculino , Feminino , Litotripsia/efeitos adversos , Litotripsia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efeitos adversos , Ductos Pancreáticos/diagnóstico por imagem , Medição da Dor , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Dor Abdominal/terapia , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Diabetic gastroenteropathy frequently causes debilitating gastrointestinal symptoms. Previous uncontrolled studies have shown that transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation (tVNS) may improve gastrointestinal symptoms. To investigate the effect of cervical tVNS in individuals with diabetes suffering from autonomic neuropathy and gastrointestinal symptoms, we conducted a randomised, sham-controlled, double-blind (participants and investigators were blinded to the allocated treatment) study. METHODS: This study included adults (aged 20-86) with type 1 or 2 diabetes, gastrointestinal symptoms and autonomic neuropathy recruited from three Steno Diabetes Centres in Denmark. Participants were randomly allocated 1:1 to receive active or sham stimulation. Active cervical tVNS or sham stimulation was self-administered over two successive study periods: 1 week of four daily stimulations and 8 weeks of two daily stimulations. The primary outcome measures were gastrointestinal symptom changes as measured using the gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) and the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS). Secondary outcomes included gastrointestinal transit times and cardiovascular autonomic function. RESULTS: Sixty-eight participants were randomised to the active group, while 77 were randomised to the sham group. Sixty-three in the active and 68 in the sham group remained for analysis in study period 1, while 62 in each group were analysed in study period 2. In study period 1, active and sham tVNS resulted in similar symptom reductions (GCSI: -0.26 ± 0.64 vs -0.17 ± 0.62, p=0.44; GSRS: -0.35 ± 0.62 vs -0.32 ± 0.59, p=0.77; mean ± SD). In study period 2, active stimulation also caused a mean symptom decrease that was comparable to that observed after sham stimulation (GCSI: -0.47 ± 0.78 vs -0.33 ± 0.75, p=0.34; GSRS: -0.46 ± 0.90 vs -0.35 ± 0.79, p=0.50). Gastric emptying time was increased in the active group compared with sham (23 min vs -19 min, p=0.04). Segmental intestinal transit times and cardiovascular autonomic measurements did not differ between treatment groups (all p>0.05). The tVNS was well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Cervical tVNS, compared with sham stimulation, does not improve gastrointestinal symptoms among individuals with diabetes and autonomic neuropathy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04143269 FUNDING: The study was funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant number NNF180C0052045).
Assuntos
Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea , Estimulação do Nervo Vago , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método Duplo-Cego , Estimulação do Nervo Vago/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Estimulação Elétrica Nervosa Transcutânea/métodos , Neuropatias Diabéticas/terapia , Neuropatias Diabéticas/fisiopatologia , Gastroenteropatias/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To investigate profiles of circulating immune signatures in healthy controls and chronic pancreatitis patients (CP) with and without a preceding history of acute pancreatitis (AP). METHODS: We performed a phase 1, cross-sectional analysis of prospectively collected serum samples from the PROspective Evaluation of Chronic Pancreatitis for EpidEmiologic and Translation StuDies (PROCEED) study. All samples were collected during a clinically quiescent phase. CP subjects were categorized into two subgroups based on preceding episode(s) of AP. Healthy controls were included for comparison. Blinded samples were analyzed using an 80-plex Luminex assay of cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules. Group and pairwise comparisons of analytes were performed between the subgroups. RESULTS: In total, 133 patients with CP (111 with AP and 22 without AP) and 50 healthy controls were included. Among the 80 analytes studied, CP patients with a history of AP had significantly higher serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-1 receptor antagonist, IL-15) and chemokines (Cutaneous T-Cell Attracting Chemokine (CTACK), Monokine induced Gamma Interferon (MIG), Macrophage-derived Chemokine (MDC), Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 (MCP-1)) compared to CP without preceding AP and controls. In contrast, CP patients without AP had immune profiles characterized by low systemic inflammation and downregulation of anti-inflammatory mediators, including IL-10. CONCLUSION: CP patients with a preceding history of AP have signs of systemic inflammatory activity even during a clinically quiescent phase. In contrast, CP patients without a history of AP have low systemic inflammatory activity. These findings suggest the presence of two immunologically diverse subtypes of CP.
Assuntos
Citocinas , Pancreatite Crônica , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Doença Aguda , Estudos Transversais , Quimiocinas , Interleucina-6RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) may cause intermittent or continuous pain and complications requiring invasive interventions. No specific recommendations for surgical interventions have been presented. Our aim was to determine the surgical treatment strategies for the treatment of CP in the Scandinavian and Baltic countries. METHODS: This multi-centre cross sectional study included 1327 CP patients from eight centres. The data was gathered from the Scandinavian Baltic Pancreatic Club (SBPC) database. Patients who underwent pancreatic surgery were analysed. The baseline CP population from the eight centres was used as a reference. The information registered included comorbidities, pancreatic function, previous interventions, time and type of surgery and the EORTC-30 quality of life (QOL) questionnaire. RESULTS: Overall, 95/1327 (7%) patients underwent pancreatic surgery. Fifty-one (54%) of these underwent pancreatic surgery for chronic pain (PSCP) and formed the final study group. Median follow-up time was two (range 0-8) years after surgery and seven (1-46) years after diagnosis. The most common surgical procedures were pancreatic resection combined with drainage (54%) followed by pancreatic resections (32%) and drainage procedures (14%). Postoperatively, 47% of the patients were pain free with or without pain medication while 16% had chronic pain episodes, this did not differ from the base CP population. In QOL questionnaires, PSCP patients reported the same QOL but worse social functioning and more symptoms compared to the CP population. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic surgery for CP is rare: surgical procedures were performed on only 7% of the CP patients in the SBPC database. In half of the patients the indication was pain. Most of these patients underwent endoscopic procedures before surgery. Half of the patients reported being pain-free after surgery.
Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Pancreatite Crônica , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Transversais , Pancreatite Crônica/cirurgia , Pancreatite Crônica/complicações , Hormônios PancreáticosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Diabetes type 1 and type 2 may develop gastrointestinal complications e.g., gastroparesis and gastroenteropathy. Concomitant celiac disease and pancreatic exocrine insufficiency occur with high prevalence in diabetes and with symptomatic overlap. Consequently, it is a challenge to disentangle symptoms of these conditions and separate them from functional dyspepsia. We aim to develop a clinical decision-support tool to differentiate the underlying disease in a plethora of gastrointestinal symptoms. METHODS: An internet-based computerized survey will collect basic characteristics (diabetes type, age, gender, duration, HbA1c, treatment) and patient reported outcomes by validated questionnaires focusing on (1) gastroparesis using Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index; (2) gastroenteropathy using Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale; (3) celiac disease using Celiac Symptom Index and (4) pancreatic exocrine insufficiency with Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency Questionnaire. Logistic regression and multiple regression analyses will identify risk factors and gastrointestinal complications. Cluster analyses and machine learning will classify different symptoms and co-existing presentations, into a likely diagnosis. We seek biomarkers for autonomic neuropathy by characterizing development of retinopathy using the Visual Function Questionnaire-25 and peripheral neuropathy by the Michigan neuropathy questionnaire. Participants are re-examined yearly for disease progression over time. RESULTS: From focus group studies gastrointestinal symptoms are of major concern in diabetes. Potentially, estimates of symptom prevalence, risk factor identification and classifications of gastrointestinal complications can be unraveled for feedback to health care providers. CONCLUSION: The web-based DICODI project will open up possibilities to detect gastrointestinal complications of diabetes in a societal setting, benefitting people living with diabetes, health care professionals, and society.
Assuntos
Doença Celíaca , Complicações do Diabetes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Insuficiência Pancreática Exócrina , Gastroparesia , Humanos , Gastroparesia/epidemiologia , Gastroparesia/etiologia , Gastroparesia/diagnóstico , Doença Celíaca/complicações , Fatores de Risco , Complicações do Diabetes/complicaçõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal symptoms originating from different segments overlap and complicate diagnosis and treatment. In this study, we aimed to develop and test a pan-alimentary framework for the evaluation of gastrointestinal (GI) motility and different static endpoints based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without contrast agents or bowel preparation. METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers (55.6 ± 10.9 years, BMI 30.8 ± 9.2 kg/m2) underwent baseline and post-meal MRI scans at multiple time points. From the scans, the following were obtained: Gastric segmental volumes and motility, emptying half time (T50), small bowel volume and motility, colonic segmental volumes, and fecal water content. Questionnaires to assess GI symptoms were collected between and after MRI scans. KEY RESULTS: We observed an increase in stomach and small bowel volume immediately after meal intake from baseline values (p<.001 for the stomach and p=.05 for the small bowel). The volume increase of the stomach primarily involved the fundus (p<.001) in the earliest phase of digestion with a T50 of 92.1 ± 35.3 min. The intake of the meal immediately elicited a motility increase in the small bowel (p<.001). No differences in colonic fecal water content between baseline and 105 min were observed. CONCLUSION & INFERENCES: We developed a framework for a pan-alimentary assessment of GI endpoints and observed how different dynamic and static physiological endpoints responded to meal intake. All endpoints aligned with the current literature for individual gut segments, showing that a comprehensive model may unravel complex and incoherent gastrointestinal symptoms in patients.
Assuntos
Esvaziamento Gástrico , Gastroenteropatias , Humanos , Esvaziamento Gástrico/fisiologia , Estômago/diagnóstico por imagem , Motilidade Gastrointestinal , Gastroenteropatias/etiologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/efeitos adversos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Refeições , ÁguaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bowel dysfunction following treatment of pelvic organ cancer is prevalent and impacts the quality of life (QoL). The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and effects of treating bowel dysfunction in two nurse-led late sequelae clinics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Treatment effects were monitored prospectively by patient-reported outcome measures collected at baseline and discharge. Change in bowel function was evaluated by 15 bowel symptoms, the St. Mark's Incontinence Score, the Patients Assessment of Constipation-Symptoms (PAC-SYM) score and self-rated bowel function. QoL was evaluated by the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) utility score and by measuring the impact of bowel function on QoL. RESULTS: From June 2018 to December 2021, 380 cancer survivors (46% rectal, 15% gynaecological, 13% anal, 12% colon, 12% prostate, and 2% other cancers) completed a baseline questionnaire and started treatment for bowel dysfunction. At referral, 96% of patients were multisymptomatic. The most frequent symptoms were faecal urgency (95%), fragmented defaecation (93%), emptying difficulties (92%), flatus/faecal incontinence (flatus 89%, liquid 59%, solid 33%), and obstructed defaecation (79%). In total, 169 patients were discharged from the clinics in the follow-up period. At discharge, 69% received conservative treatment only and 24% also received transanal irrigation; 4% were surgically treated; 3% discontinued treatment. Improvements were seen in all 15 bowel symptoms (p < 0.001), the mean St. Mark's Incontinence Score (12.0 to 9.9, p < 0.001), the mean PAC-SYM score (1.04 to 0.84, p < 0.001) and the mean EQ-5D-5L utility score (0.78 to 0.84, p < 0.001). Self-rated bowel function improved in 56% (p < 0.001) of cases and the impact of bowel function on QoL improved in 46% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Treatment of bowel dysfunction in nurse-led late sequelae clinics is feasible and significantly improved bowel function and QoL.
Assuntos
Incontinência Fecal , Neoplasias Pélvicas , Masculino , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Flatulência/complicações , Papel do Profissional de Enfermagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Constipação Intestinal/terapia , Constipação Intestinal/complicações , Incontinência Fecal/etiologia , Incontinência Fecal/terapia , Neoplasias Pélvicas/complicações , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to translate and validate the chronic pain score (CP score) in a cohort of colon cancer patients. Chronic pain following colon cancer surgery is still poorly understood, in particular the lack of a validated tool for measuring chronic pain is a major issue as such an instrument is critical for evaluating the incidence and risk factors. The CP score was created using data from Danish rectal cancer patients. METHODS: Danish colorectal cancer survivors diagnosed between 2001 and 2014 completed the CP score and two quality of life (QoL) measures. Clinical data were obtained from a national database. Convergent validity was investigated by testing the association of the CP score with a single ad hoc QoL item and the EORTC QLQ-C30, and discriminative validity was tested as the score's ability to differentiate between gender and age groups. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated by determining the ability of the score to identify patients with a major impact of pain on QoL. RESULTS: Responses from 7127 colon cancer were included. Convergent validity was confirmed, as the score was associated with both QoL measures (p < 0.001). Moreover, the score could differentiate between males/females and older/younger patients (p < 0.001, respectively), reflecting high discriminative validity. Finally, the score was able to identify patients with a major impact on QoL, with a sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 82%. CONCLUSION: The CP score is a valid tool for measuring chronic pain after colon cancer surgery and should be used to homogenize outcomes in future studies.
Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Neoplasias do Colo , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório , Neoplasias Retais , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Previous neuroimaging studies have shown that patients with chronic pain display altered functional connectivity across distributed brain areas involved in the processing of nociceptive stimuli. The aim of the present study was to investigate how pain chronification modulates whole-brain functional connectivity during evoked clinical and tonic pain. METHODS: Patients with osteoarthritis of the hip (n = 87) were classified into 3 stages of pain chronification (Grades I-III, Mainz Pain Staging System). Electroencephalograms were recorded during 3 conditions: baseline, evoked clinical hip pain, and tonic cold pain (cold pressor test). The effects of both factors (recording condition and pain chronification stage) on the phase-lag index, as a measure of neuronal connectivity, were examined for different frequency bands. RESULTS: In women, we found increasing functional connectivity in the low-frequency range (delta, 0.5-4 Hz) across pain chronification stages during evoked clinical hip pain and tonic cold pain stimulation. In men, elevated functional connectivity in the delta frequency range was observed in only the tonic cold pain condition. CONCLUSIONS: Across pain chronification stages, we found that widespread cortical networks increase their synchronization of delta oscillations in response to clinical and experimental nociceptive stimuli. In view of previous studies relating delta oscillations to salience detection and other basic motivational processes, our results hint at these mechanisms playing an important role in pain chronification, mainly in women.
Assuntos
Osteoartrite do Quadril , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Dor , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Eletroencefalografia/métodos , Mapeamento Encefálico/métodos , ArtralgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis (AP) has variable clinical courses. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the safety, efficacy, and impact of epidural anaesthesia (EA) use in AP. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched between 1980 and 2022 using the PRISMA guidelines, to identify observational and comparative studies reporting on EA in AP. The meta-analysis was performed in R Foundation for Statistical Computing using the meta R Package for Meta-Analysis. RESULTS: A total of 9 studies with 2006 patients of which 726 (36%) patients had EA were included. All studies demonstrated high safety and feasibility of EA in AP with no reported major local or neurological complications. One randomised controlled trial demonstrated an improvement in pain severity using a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS) at the outset (1.6 in EA vs 3.5 in non-EA, P = 0.02) and on day 10 (0.2 in EA vs 2.33 in non-EA, P = 0.034). There was also improvement in pancreatic perfusion with EA measured with computerised tomography 13 (43%) in EA vs 2 (7%) in non-EA, P = 0.003. The need for ventilatory support and overall mortality was lower in EA patients 40 (19%) vs 285 (24%) P = 0.025 (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.28-0.84) and 16 (7%) vs 214 (20%), P = 0.050 (OR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.15-1.00), respectively. CONCLUSION: EA is infrequently used for pain management in AP and yet the available evidence suggests that it is safe and effective in reducing pain severity, improving pancreatic perfusion, and decreasing mortality.
Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural , Anestesia Epidural , Pancreatite , Humanos , Pancreatite/complicações , Doença Aguda , Pâncreas , Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Several factors have been suggested to mediate pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis. However, it is unknown whether these factors are overlapping and if they have cumulative effects on patient-reported outcomes (PROs). DESIGN: We performed a multicentre cross-sectional study of 201 prospectively enrolled subjects with definitive chronic pancreatitis. All subjects underwent evaluation for pancreatic duct obstruction, abnormalities in pain processing using quantitative sensory testing, and screening for psychological distress (anxiety, depression and pain catastrophising) based on validated questionnaires. Abnormality was defined by normal reference values. PROs included pain symptom severity (Brief Pain Inventory short form) and quality of life (EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire). Associations between pain-related factors and PROs were investigated by linear trend analyses, multiple regression models and mediation analyses. RESULTS: Clinical evaluation suggestive of pancreatic duct obstruction was observed in 29%, abnormal pain processing in 23%, anxiety in 47%, depression in 39% and pain catastrophising in 28%; each of these factors was associated with severity of at least one PRO. Two or more factors were present in 51% of subjects. With an increasing number of factors, there was an increase in pain severity scores (p<0.001) and pain interference scores (p<0.001), and a reduction in quality of life (p<0.001). All factors had independent and direct effects on PROs, with the strongest effect size observed for psychological distress. CONCLUSION: Pain-related factors in chronic pancreatitis are often present in an overlapping manner and have a cumulative detrimental effect on PROs. These findings support a multidisciplinary strategy for pain management. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03434392).
Assuntos
Pancreatite Crônica , Angústia Psicológica , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Transversais , Pancreatite Crônica/complicações , Dor , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Ductos PancreáticosRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Quantitative sensory testing (QST) has been previously used to study pain in chronic pancreatitis (CP) but included methods that are not suitable for clinical purposes. The aims of this study were to determine if pancreatic QST (P-QST) can differentiate patients into distinct pain phenotypes and to determine the association of these with their clinical pain and psychiatric comorbidities. METHODS: A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted where patients completed validated questionnaires assessing quality of life (QoL), depression and anxiety scores as well as clinical pain symptoms followed by P-QST which included a cold pressor test, repetitive pinprick stimuli and pressure stimulation of the upper abdominal (T10) and control dermatomes. P-QST categorized patients into pain phenotypes based on a previously established nomogram. QoL, clinical pain and psychiatric assessment scores were compared across these groups. RESULTS: A total of 179 patients were enrolled with a mean age of 54.1±13.6 years among whom 59% were males and 42% had an alcoholic etiology. P-QST showed no hyperalgesia in 91 (51%), segmental hyperalgesia in 50 (28%) and widespread hyperalgesia in 38 (21%) patients. Patients with widespread hyperalgesia had significantly higher pain intensity scores (P = .03) and rates of constant pain (P = .002) as well as decreased QoL (P < .001) and physical functioning (P =.03) in comparison with the other two pain phenotypes. In contrast, psychiatric comorbidities were similar across all groups. CONCLUSIONS: P-QST may serve as a novel unbiased pain assessment tool in CP as it categorizes patients into distinct pain phenotypes independent of their psychiatric comorbidities.
Assuntos
Pancreatite Crônica , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Masculino , Dor , Pancreatite Crônica/complicações , Pancreatite Crônica/diagnóstico , FenótipoRESUMO
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: While pain is the predominant symptom of chronic pancreatitis (CP), a subset of patients may experience a painless course. This systematic review aimed to determine the prevalence of primary painless CP. METHODS: MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE and Web of Science Core Collection databases were searched for published studies through September 15, 2020 that included at least 10 consecutive patients with CP and which reported the number with painless CP. The presence of a history of recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP), exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI), diabetes mellitus (DM) and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) in the painless CP patients was also recorded. A random effects model was used to determine pooled prevalence estimates with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: Among the 5057 studies identified and screened, 42 full-text articles were included in the final analysis. There were a total of 14,277 patients with CP among whom 1569 had painless CP. The pooled prevalence of painless CP was 12% (95% CI 10-15%). Among a subset of studies that reported on calcifications (n = 11), DM (n = 12), EPI (n = 8) and history of RAP (n = 14), the pooled prevalence estimates were 96% (95% CI 73-100%), 51% (95% CI 32-70%), and 47% (95% CI 15-81%), respectively. Alcohol, idiopathic/genetic and other etiologies were attributed to be the cause of painless CP in 32.4%, 56.9% and 8.9% patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Approximately one in ten patients with CP have primary painless disease with the majority being attributable to an idiopathic/genetic etiology. Further research is needed to determine the optimal management of these patients.
Assuntos
Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Insuficiência Pancreática Exócrina , Pancreatite Crônica/epidemiologia , Doença Aguda , Adenocarcinoma , Diabetes Mellitus , Insuficiência Pancreática Exócrina/epidemiologia , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicações , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiologia , PrevalênciaRESUMO
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: There is scarce information about risk factors for exocrine pancreas insufficiency (EPI) in chronic pancreatitis (CP), and how it associates with other complications. The aim of the present study was to examine risk factors for EPI and associations to procedures and other CP related complications in a large, Northern European cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrieved cross-sectional data on demographics, status on EPI, aetiological risk factors for CP, CP related complications as well as surgical and endoscopic treatment from the Scandinavian Baltic Pancreatic Club Database. Associations were assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results are presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: We included 1869 patients with probable or definitive CP in the study. Exocrine pancreas insufficiency was present in 849 (45.4%) of patients. In multivariate analyses, EPI associated with smoking aetiology (OR 1.47 (1.20-1.79), p < 0.001), and nutritional/metabolic aetiology (OR 0.52 (0.31-0.87), p = 0.01) to CP. Pancreatic or common bile duct stenting procedure and pancreatic resection were both associated with EPI (ORs 1.44 (1.15-1.80), p = 0.002 and 1.54 (1.02-2.33), p = 0.04, respectively). The presence of diabetes mellitus (OR 2.45 (1.92-3.15), p < 0.001), bile duct stenosis (OR 1.48 (1.09-2.00), p = 0.02) and underweight (2.05 (OR 1.40-3.02), p < 0.001) were all associated with presence of EPI. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking, bile duct stenosis, previous stenting and resection procedures are all associated with EPI in patients with CP. Presence of EPI were also associated with malnutrition and diabetes mellitus. Hence, intensive nutritional surveillance is needed in these patients.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Pancreática Exócrina , Pâncreas Exócrino , Pancreatite Crônica , Constrição Patológica/complicações , Estudos Transversais , Insuficiência Pancreática Exócrina/complicações , Insuficiência Pancreática Exócrina/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pancreatite Crônica/complicações , Pancreatite Crônica/epidemiologia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
ABSTRACT: Pain perception in chronic pancreatitis (CP) is governed by the transmission of nociceptive inputs into the pain processing centers of the brain. These regions of the brain overlap with those that regulate and process emotions and cognition. Disorders in these regions also result in psychiatric conditions such as depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder. The present study by Dunbar et al. evaluated 24 single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with anxiety and/or posttraumatic stress disorder and found correlations with constant and severe pain phenotypes in CP patients from a large cross-sectional cohort study. Although causation cannot be proven, the findings suggest that there may be a role for neuromodulator drugs for the treatment of pain in CP based on individual genetic susceptibility.
Assuntos
Dor , Pancreatite Crônica , Transtornos de Ansiedade , Estudos Transversais , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Humanos , Dor/genética , Pancreatite Crônica/complicações , Pancreatite Crônica/genéticaRESUMO
Pain is the most common symptom in chronic pancreatitis (CP) with a major impact on quality of life. Few validated questionnaires to assess pain in CP exist, and the lack of consensus negatively impacts clinical management, research and meta-analysis. This guideline aims to review generic pain questionnaires for their usability in CP, to outline how pain assessment can be modified by confounding factors and pain types, to assess the value of additional measures such as quality of life, mental health and quantitative sensory testing, and finally to review pain assessment questionnaires used specifically in CP. A systematic review was done to answer 27 questions that followed the PICO (Population; Intervention; Comparator; Outcome) template. Quality of evidence of the statements was judged by Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. The manuscript was sent for review to 36 experts from various disciplines and continents in a multi-stage Delphi process, and finally reviewed by patient representatives. Main findings were that generic pain instruments are valid in most settings, but aspects of pain are specific for CP (including in children), and instruments have to account for the wide phenotypic variability and development of sensitization of the central nervous system. Side effects to treatment and placebo effects shall also be considered. Some multidimensional questionnaires are validated for CP and are recommended together with assessment of quality of life and psychiatric co-morbidities. This guideline will result in more homogeneous and comprehensive pain assessment to potentially improve management of painful CP.
Assuntos
Dor Abdominal , Dor Crônica , Medição da Dor , Pancreatite Crônica , Dor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Dor Abdominal/psicologia , Dor Crônica/diagnóstico , Dor Crônica/etiologia , Dor Crônica/psicologia , Consenso , Humanos , Medição da Dor/métodos , Pancreatite Crônica/complicações , Pancreatite Crônica/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a debilitating fibro-inflammatory disease with a profound impact on patients' quality of life (QOL). We investigated determinants of QOL in a large cohort of CP patients. METHODS: This was a multicentre study including 517 patients with CP. All patients fulfilled the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Questionnaire responses were compared to results obtained from a general reference population (n = 11,343). Demographic characteristics, risk factors (smoking and alcohol consumption), pain symptoms, disease phenotype (complications) and treatments were recorded. A multivariable regression model was used to identify factors independently associated with QOL scores. RESULTS: Included patients had a mean age of 56.3 ± 12.8 years, 355 (69%) were men and 309 (60%) had alcohol aetiology. Compared to the reference population, patients with CP had lower global health status (50.5 vs. 66.1; p < 0.001) as well as reduced scores for all functional scales (all p < 0.001). Additionally, CP patients reported a higher burden for all symptom items, with pain being the most prominent complaint (all p < 0.001). Constant pain (coefficient -11.3; p = 0.02), opioid based pain treatment (coefficient -19.7; p < 0.001) and alcoholic aetiology (coefficient -5.1; p = 0.03) were independently associated with lowered global health status. The final multivariable model explained 18% of the variance in global health status. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CP have significantly lower QOL compared to a population-based reference population. Factors independently associated with a lowered QOL are constant pain, opioid based pain treatment and alcohol aetiology. However, these factors only explain a fraction of QOL and additional factors need identification.
Assuntos
Dor/complicações , Pancreatite Crônica/complicações , Pancreatite Crônica/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Pancreatite Alcoólica/complicações , Pancreatite Alcoólica/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco , Fumar , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: This paper is part of the international consensus guidelines on chronic pancreatitis, presenting for interventional endoscopy. METHODS: An international working group with experts on interventional endoscopy evaluated 26 statements generated from evidence on 9 clinically relevant questions. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to evaluate the level of evidence. To determine the level of agreement, a nine-point Likert scale was used for voting on the statements. RESULTS: Strong consensus was obtained for 15 statements relating to nine questions including the recommendation that endoscopic intervention should be offered to patients with persistent severe pain but not to those without pain. Endoscopic decompression of the pancreatic duct could be used for immediate pain relief, and then offered surgery if this fails or needs repeated endoscopy. Endoscopic drainage is preferred for portal-splenic vein thrombosis and pancreatic fistula. A plastic stent should be placed and replaced 2-3 months later after insertion. Endoscopic extraction is indicated for stone fragments remaining after ESWL. Interventional treatment should be performed for symptomatic/complicated pancreatic pseudocysts. Endoscopic treatment is recommended for bile duct obstruction and afterwards surgery if this fails or needs repeated endoscopy. Surgery may be offered if there is significant calcification and/or mass of the pancreatic head. Percutaneous endovascular treatment is preferred for hemosuccus pancreaticus. Surgical treatment is recommended for duodenal stenosis due to chronic pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS: This international expert consensus guideline provides evidenced-based statements concerning indications and key aspects for interventional endoscopy in the management of patients with chronic pancreatitis.
Assuntos
Endoscopia/normas , Pancreatite Crônica/diagnóstico por imagem , Calcinose/diagnóstico por imagem , Calcinose/cirurgia , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/normas , Colestase Extra-Hepática/diagnóstico por imagem , Colestase Extra-Hepática/cirurgia , Consenso , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , Litotripsia , Dor/etiologia , Manejo da Dor , Pancreatectomia , Ductos Pancreáticos/diagnóstico por imagem , Ductos Pancreáticos/cirurgia , Pancreatite Crônica/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Pain is the primary symptom of chronic pancreatitis (CP) and associates with a number of patient and disease characteristics. However, the complex interrelations of these parameters are incompletely understood, and pain treatment remains unsatisfactory in a large proportion of patients. The aim of this study is to investigate multiple pain risk factors in a large population of CP patients, with a special emphasis on patients' patterns of smoking and alcohol use. METHODS: This was a multicenter, cross-sectional study including 1384 patients with CP. Patient demographics and disease characteristics, as well as current patterns of smoking and alcohol use, were compared for patients with pain (n = 801) versus without pain (n = 583). Multivariate logistic regression models were performed to assess the variables associated with the presence and type of pain (constant vs intermittent pain). RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 52.1 ± 14.6 years, and 914 (66%) were men. Active smoking (odds ratio 1.6 [95% confidence interval 1.1-2.2], P = 0.005) and alcohol consumption (odds ratio 1.8 [95% confidence interval 1.1-3.0], P = 0.03) were independently associated with the presence of pain. In addition, patients' age at diagnosis, pancreatic duct pathology, and the presence of pseudocysts, duodenal stenosis, and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency were confirmed as pain risk factors (all P ≤ 0.01). Constant pain, as opposed to intermittent pain, was more frequently reported by smokers (P = 0.03), while alcohol consumption was associated with intermittent pain (P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Multiple patient and disease characteristics, including patterns of smoking and alcohol consumption, associate with the presence and type of pain in patients with CP.
Assuntos
Dor/etiologia , Pancreatite Crônica/complicações , Adulto , Idoso , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreatite Crônica/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP) is a common complication of surgery that significantly affects quality of life. A better understanding of which patients are likely to develop PPSP would help to identify when perioperative and postoperative pain management may require specific attention. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) of a patient's preoperative pain perception is associated with acute postoperative pain, and acute postoperative pain is a risk factor for PPSP. The direct association between preoperative QST and PPSP has not been reviewed to date. In this systematic review, we assessed the relationship of preoperative QST to PPSP. We searched databases with components related to (1) preoperative QST; (2) association testing; and (3) PPSP. Two authors reviewed all titles and abstracts for inclusion. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) QST performed before surgery; (2) PPSP assessed ≥3 months postoperatively; and (3) the association between QST measures and PPSP is investigated. The search retrieved 905 articles; 24 studies with 2732 subjects met inclusion criteria. Most studies (22/24) had moderate to high risk of bias in multiple quality domains. Fourteen (58%) studies reported a significant association between preoperative QST and PPSP. Preoperative temporal summation of pain (4 studies), conditioned pain modulation (3 studies), and pressure pain threshold (3 studies) showed the most frequent association with PPSP. The strength of the association between preoperative QST and PPSP varied from weak to strong. Preoperative QST is variably associated with PPSP. Measurements related to central processing of pain may be most consistently associated with PPSP.