Sequential antigen loss and branching evolution in lymphoma after CD19- and CD20-targeted T-cell-redirecting therapy.

ABSTRACT: CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells and CD20 targeting T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies (bispecs) have been approved in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma lately, heralding a new clinical setting in which patients are treated with both approaches, sequentially. The aim of our study was to investigate the selective pressure of CD19- and CD20-directed therapy on the clonal architecture in lymphoma. Using a broad analytical pipeline on 28 longitudinally collected specimen from 7 patients, we identified truncating mutations in the gene encoding CD20 conferring antigen loss in 80% of patients relapsing from CD20 bispecs. Pronounced T-cell exhaustion was identified in cases with progressive disease and retained CD20 expression. We also confirmed CD19 loss after CAR T-cell therapy and reported the case of sequential CD19 and CD20 loss. We observed branching evolution with re-emergence of CD20+ subclones at later time points and spatial heterogeneity for CD20 expression in response to targeted therapy. Our results highlight immunotherapy as not only an evolutionary bottleneck selecting for antigen loss variants but also complex evolutionary pathways underlying disease progression from these novel therapies.

Spatial transcriptomics reveals profound subclonal heterogeneity and T-cell dysfunction in extramedullary myeloma.

Extramedullary disease (EMD) is a high-risk feature of multiple myeloma (MM) and remains a poor prognostic factor even in the era of novel immunotherapies. Here we applied spatial transcriptomics (tomo-seq [n=2] and 10X Visium [n=12]), and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq [n=3]) to a set of 14 EMD biopsies to dissect the three-dimensional architecture of tumor cells and their microenvironment. Overall, the infiltrating immune and stromal cells showed both intra- and inter-patient variation with no uniform distribution over the lesion. We observed substantial heterogeneity at the copy number level within plasma cells, including the emergence of new subclones in circumscribed areas of the tumor, consistent with genomic instability. We further identified spatial expression differences of GPRC5D and TNFRSF17, two important antigens for bispecific antibody therapy. EMD masses were infiltrated by various immune cells, including T-cells. Notably, exhausted TIM3+/PD-1+ T-cells diffusely co-localized with MM cells, whereas functional and activated CD8+ T-cells showed a focal infiltration pattern along with M1 macrophages in otherwise tumor-free regions. This segregation of fit and exhausted T-cells was resolved in the case of response to T-cell engaging bispecific antibodies. MM cells and microenvironment cells were embedded in a complex network that influenced immune activation and angiogenesis, and oxidative phosphorylation represented the major metabolic program within EMD lesions. In summary, spatial transcriptomics has revealed a multicellular ecosystem in EMD with checkpoint inhibition and dual targeting as potential new therapeutic avenues.

Safety and efficacy of tafasitamab with or without lenalidomide added to first-line R-CHOP for DLBCL: the phase 1b First-MIND study.

Anti-CD19 immunotherapy tafasitamab is used in combination with lenalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplant. Open-label, phase 1b, First-MIND study assessed safety and preliminary efficacy of tafasitamab + R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) ± lenalidomide as first-line therapy in patients with DLBCL. From December 2019 to August 2020, 83 adults with untreated DLBCL (International Prognostic Index 2-5) were screened and 66 were randomly assigned (33 per arm) to R-CHOP-tafasitamab (arm T) or R-CHOP-tafasitamab-lenalidomide (arm T/L) for 6 cycles. Primary end point was safety; secondary end points included end-of-treatment (EoT) overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate. All patients had ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event, mostly grade 1 or 2. Grade ≥3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred, respectively, in 57.6% and 12.1% (arm T) and 84.8% and 36.4% (arm T/L) of patients. Nonhematologic toxicities occurred at similar rates among arms. R-CHOP mean relative dose intensity was ≥89% in both arms. EoT ORR was 75.8% (CR 72.7%) in arm T and 81.8% (CR 66.7%) in arm T/L; best ORR across visits was 90.0% and 93.9%. Eighteen-month duration of response and of CR rates were 72.7% and 74.5% (arm T) and 78.7% and 86.5% (arm T/L); 24-month progression-free and overall survival rates were 72.7% and 90.3% (arm T) and 76.8% and 93.8% (arm T/L). Manageable safety and promising signals of efficacy were observed in both arms. Potential benefit of adding tafasitamab + lenalidomide to R-CHOP is being investigated in phase 3 frontMIND (NCT04824092). This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04134936.

The future of immunotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

With the introduction of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell (CAR T) therapies, bispecific CD3/CD20 antibodies and anti-CD19 antibodies, immunotherapy continues to transform the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). A number of novel immunotherapeutic strategies are under investigation to build upon current clinical benefit and offer further options to those patients who cannot tolerate conventional intensive therapies due to their age and/or state of health. Alongside immunotherapies that leverage the adaptive immune response, natural killer (NK) cell and myeloid cell-engaging therapies can utilize the innate immune system. Monoclonal antibodies engineered for greater recognition by the patient's immune system can enhance antitumor cytotoxic mechanisms mediated by NK cells and macrophages. In addition, CAR technology is extending into NK cells and macrophages and investigational immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting macrophage/myeloid cell checkpoints via the CD47/SIRPα axis are in development. Regimens that engage both innate and adaptive immune responses may help to overcome resistance to current immunotherapies. Furthermore, combinations of immunotherapy and oncogenic pathway inhibitors to reprogram the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of DLBCL may also potentiate antitumor responses. As immunotherapy treatment options continue to expand, both in the first-line setting and further lines of therapy, understanding how to harness these immunotherapies and the potential for combination approaches will be important for the development of future DLBCL treatment approaches.

Changes in T-cell subsets, preexisting cytopenias and hyperferritinaemia correlate with cytopenias after BCMA targeted CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Results from a prospective comprehensive biomarker study.

Biomarkers for cytopenias following CAR T-cell treatment in relapsed/refractory (RR) multiple myeloma (MM) are not completely defined. We prospectively analysed 275 sequential peripheral blood (PB) samples from 58 RRMM patients treated with BCMA-targeted CAR T cells, and then divided them into three groups: (i) baseline (before leukapheresis), (ii) ≤day+30, and (iii) >day+30 after CAR T-cell therapy. We evaluated laboratory data and performed flow cytometry to determine the (CAR) T-cell subsets. Baseline hyperferritinaemia was a risk factor for long-lasting grade ≥3 anaemia (r = 0.47, p < 0.001) and thrombocytopenia (r = 0.44, p = 0.002) after CAR T-cell therapy. Low baseline haemoglobin (Hb) and PLT were associated with long-lasting grade ≥3 anaemia (r = -0.56, p < 0.001) and thrombocytopenia (r = -0.44, p = 0.002) respectively. We observed dynamics of CAR-negative T-cell subsets following CAR T-cell infusion. In the late phase after CAR T-cell therapy (>day+30), CD4Tn frequency correlated with anaemia (r = 0.41, p = 0.0014) and lymphocytopenia was related to frequencies of CD8+ T cells (r = 0.72, p < 0.001) and CD8Teff (r = 0.64, p < 0.001). CD4Tcm frequency was correlated with leucocytopenia (r = -0.49, p < 0.001). In summary, preexisting cytopenias and hyperferritinaemia indicated long duration of grade ≥3 post-CAR T-cell cytopenias. Prolonged cytopenia may be related to immune remodelling with a shift in the CAR-negative T-cell subsets following CAR T-cell therapy.

Tafasitamab for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: final 5-year efficacy and safety findings in the phase II L-MIND study.

Tafasitamab, an anti-CD19 immunotherapy, is used with lenalidomide for patients with autologous stem cell transplant-ineligible relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma based on the results of the phase II L-MIND study (NCT02399085). We report the final 5-year analysis of this study. Eighty patients ≥18 years who had received one to three prior systemic therapies, and had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2 received up to 12 cycles of co-administered tafasitamab and lenalidomide, followed by tafasitamab monotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the best objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Exploratory analyses evaluated efficacy endpoints by prior lines of therapy. At data cutoff on November 14, 2022, the objective response rate was 57.5%, with a complete response rate of 41.3% (n=33), which was consistent with prior analyses. With a median follow-up of 44.0 months, the median duration of response was not reached. The median progression-free survival was 11.6 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 5.7-45.7) with a median follow-up of 45.6 months. The median overall survival was 33.5 months (95% CI: 18.3-not reached) with a median follow-up of 65.6 months. Patients who had received one prior line of therapy (n=40) showed a higher objective response rate (67.5%; 52.5% complete responses) compared to patients who had received two or more prior lines of therapy (n=40; 47.5%; 30% complete responses), but the median duration of response was not reached in either subgroup. Other exploratory analyses revealed consistent long-term efficacy results across subgroups. Adverse events were consistent with those described in previous reports, were manageable, and their frequency decreased during tafasitamab monotherapy, with no new safety concerns. This final 5-year analysis of L-MIND demonstrates that the immunotherapy combination of tafasitamab and lenalidomide is well tolerated and has long-term clinical benefit with durable responses.

Chemokine receptor-targeted PET/CT provides superior diagnostic performance in newly diagnosed marginal zone lymphoma patients: a head-to-head comparison with [18F]FDG.

BACKGROUND: In patients with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), [18F]FDG PET/CT provided inconsistent diagnostic accuracy. C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is overexpressed in MZL and thus, may emerge as novel theranostic target. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of CXCR4-targeting [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor when compared to [18F]FDG PET/CT in MZL. METHODS: Thirty-two untreated MZL patients (nodal, n = 17; extranodal, n = 13; splenic, n = 2) received [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor and [18F]FDG PET/CT within median 2 days. We performed a visual and quantitative analysis of the total lymphoma volume by measuring maximum/peak standardized uptake values (SUVmax/peak), and calculating target-to-background ratios (TBR, defined as lesion-based SUVpeak divided by SUVmean from blood pool). Visual comparisons for both radiotracers were carried out for all target lesions (TL), and quantitative analysis of concordant TL evident on both scans. Last, MZL subtype analyses were also conducted. RESULTS: On a patient-based level, [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor identified MZL manifestations in 32 (100%) subjects (vs. [18F]FDG, 25/32 [78.1%]). Of the 256 identified TL, 127/256 (49.6%) manifestations were evident only on CXCR4-directed imaging, while only 7/256 (2.7%) were identified on [18F]FDG but missed by [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor. In the remaining 122/256 (47.7%) concordant TL, [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor consistently provided increased metrics when compared to [18F]FDG: SUVmax, 10.3 (range, 2.53-37.2) vs. 5.72 (2.32-37.0); SUVpeak, 6.23 (1.58-25.7) vs. 3.87 (1.54-27.7); P < 0.01, respectively. Concordant TL TBR on [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor (median, 3.85; range, 1.05-16.0) was also approximately 1.8-fold higher relative to [18F]FDG (median, 2.08; range, 0.81-28.8; P < 0.01). Those findings on image contrast, however, were driven by nodal MZL (P < 0.01), and just missed significance for extranodal MZL (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: In newly diagnosed MZL patients, [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor identified more sites of disease when compared to [18F]FDG, irrespective of MZL subtype. Quantitative PET parameters including TBR were also higher on [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT, suggesting improved diagnostic read-out using chemokine receptor-targeted imaging.

The addition of rituximab to chemotherapy improves overall survival in mantle cell lymphoma-a pooled trials analysis.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a distinct subtype of B-cell lymphoma and commonly used induction immunochemotherapies include the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab. However, efficacy data for rituximab regarding overall survival (OS) in first line MCL therapy remain conflicting.We report long-term outcomes of a pooled trials analysis comparing Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicine, Vincristine, Prednisone (CHOP) to R-CHOP in MCL to confirm efficacy on failure free survival (FFS) and OS in relevant subgroups. Untreated, adult MCL patients of two prospective trials assigned to CHOP or R-CHOP were included. Primary endpoints were FFS and OS, secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), secondary malignancies and OS after relapse. Between 1996 and 2003, 385 MCL patients were assigned to CHOP (201) or R-CHOP (184). After a median follow-up of 13.4 years, the addition of Rituximab significantly improved FFS (1.36 vs. 2.07 years, HR 0.62 (0.50-0.77)), OS (4.84 vs. 5.81 years, HR 0.78 (0.61-0.99)) and DOR (1.48 vs. 2.08 years, HR 0.67 (0.53-0.86)). Furthermore, Rituximab improved survival across different MCL risk groups. In a post-hoc analysis of OS after relapse comparing patients receiving chemotherapy with / without rituximab, rituximab maintained efficacy with a median OS of 3.10 vs. 2.11 years (HR 0.70, 0.54-0.91). The rate of secondary malignancies was 0.5 and 3.9% for hematological and 7 and 8% for non-hematological malignancies for CHOP and R-CHOP patients, respectively. We present mature results of a pooled MCL cohort, demonstrating prolonged FFS, OS and DOR for the combined immuno-chemotherapy, confirming the standard of care in first line treatment.

Long-term outcomes from the phase II L-MIND study of tafasitamab (MOR208) plus lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Not available.

Long-term outcomes from the Phase II L-MIND study of tafasitamab (MOR208) plus lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Tafasitamab (MOR208), an Fc-modified, humanized, anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody, combined with the immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide was clinically active with a good tolerability profile in the open-label, single-arm, phase II L-MIND study of patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation. To assess long-term outcomes, we report an updated analysis with ≥35 months' follow-up. Patients were aged >18 years, had received one to three prior systemic therapies (including ≥1 CD20-targeting regimen) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2. Patients received 28-day cycles of tafasitamab (12 mg/kg intravenously), once weekly during cycles 1-3, then every 2 weeks during cycles 4-12. Lenalidomide (25 mg orally) was administered on days 1-21 of cycles 1-12. After cycle 12, progression-free patients received tafasitamab every 2 weeks until disease progression. The primary endpoint was best objective response rate. After ≥35 months' follow-up (data cut-off: October 30, 2020), the objective response rate was 57.5% (n=46/80), including a complete response in 40.0% of patients (n=32/80) and a partial response in 17.5% of patients (n=14/80). The median duration of response was 43.9 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 26.1-not reached), the median overall survival was 33.5 months (95% CI: 18.3-not reached) and the median progression-free survival was 11.6 months (95% CI: 6.3-45.7). There were no unexpected toxicities. Subgroup analyses revealed consistent long-term efficacy results across most subgroups of patients. This extended follow-up of L-MIND confirms the long duration of response, meaningful overall survival, and well-defined safety profile of tafasitamab plus lenalidomide followed by tafasitamab monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02399085.

Tafasitamab plus lenalidomide in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (L-MIND): a multicentre, prospective, single-arm, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who are ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation have poor outcomes and few treatment options. Tafasitamab (MOR208) is an Fc-enhanced, humanised, anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody that has shown preclinical and single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies. Preclinical data suggested that tafasitamab might act synergistically with lenalidomide. We aimed to assess the antitumour activity and safety of tafasitamab plus lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who were ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation. METHODS: In this multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study (L-MIND), patients older than 18 years with histologically confirmed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, who relapsed or had refractory disease after previous treatment with one to three systemic regimens (with at least one anti-CD20 therapy), were not candidates for high-dose chemotherapy and subsequent autologous stem-cell transplantation, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had measurable disease at baseline were recruited from 35 academic and community hospitals in ten countries. Patients received coadministered intravenous tafasitamab (12 mg/kg) and oral lenalidomide (25 mg/day) for up to 12 cycles (28 days each), followed by tafasitamab monotherapy (in patients with stable disease or better) until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with an objective response (centrally assessed), defined as a complete or partial response according to the 2007 International Working Group response criteria for malignant lymphoma. Antitumour activity analyses are based on all patients who received at least one dose of both tafasitamab and lenalidomide; safety analyses are based on all patients who received at least one dose of either study medication. Recruitment is complete, and the trial is in follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02399085. FINDINGS: Between Jan 18, 2016, and Nov 15, 2017, 156 patients were screened: 81 were enrolled and received at least one dose of either study medication, and 80 received at least one dose of both tafasitamab and lenalidomide. Median follow-up was 13·2 months (IQR 7·3-20·4) as of data cutoff on Nov 30, 2018. 48 (60%; 95% CI 48-71) of 80 patients who received tafasitamab plus lenalidomide had an objective response: 34 (43%; 32-54) had a complete response and 14 (18%; 10-28) had a partial response. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of grade 3 or worse were neutropenia (39 [48%] of 81 patients), thrombocytopenia (14 [17%]), and febrile neutropenia (ten [12%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 41 (51%) of 81 patients. The most frequently reported serious adverse events (in two or more patients) were pneumonia (five [6%]), febrile neutropenia (five [6%]), pulmonary embolism (three [4%]), bronchitis (two [2%]), atrial fibrillation (two [2%]), and congestive cardiac failure (two [2%]). INTERPRETATION: Tafasitamab in combination with lenalidomide was well tolerated and resulted in a high proportion of patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation having a complete response, and might represent a new therapeutic option in this setting. FUNDING: MorphoSys.

Hematopoietic stem cell involvement in BCR-ABL1-positive ALL as a potential mechanism of resistance to blinatumomab therapy.

The bispecific T-cell engager blinatumomab targeting CD19 can induce complete remission in relapsed or refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL). However, some patients ultimately relapse with loss of CD19 antigen on leukemic cells, which has been established as a novel mechanism to escape CD19-specific immunotherapies. Here, we provide evidence that CD19-negative (CD19-) relapse after CD19-directed therapy in BCP-ALL may be a result of the selection of preexisting CD19- malignant progenitor cells. We present 2 BCR-ABL1 fusion-positive BCP-ALL patients with CD19- myeloid lineage relapse after blinatumomab therapy and show BCR-ABL1 positivity in their hematopoietic stem cell (HSC)/progenitor/myeloid compartments at initial diagnosis by fluorescence in situ hybridization after cell sorting. By using the same approach with 25 additional diagnostic samples from patients with BCR-ABL1-positive BCP-ALL, we identified HSC involvement in 40% of the patients. Patients (6 of 8) with major BCR-ABL1 transcript encoding P210BCR-ABL1 mainly showed HSC involvement, whereas in most of the patients (9 of 12) with minor BCR-ABL1 transcript encoding P190BCR-ABL1, only the CD19+ leukemia compartments were BCR-ABL1 positive (P = .02). Our data are of clinical importance, because they indicate that both CD19+ cells and CD19- precursors should be targeted to avoid CD19- relapses in patients with BCR-ABL1-positive ALL.

GRP78-directed immunotherapy in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma - results from a phase 1 trial with the monoclonal immunoglobulin M antibody PAT-SM6.

UNLABELLED: The primary objective of this phase 1 study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the anti-glucose regulated protein 78 monoclonal immunoglobulin M antibody PAT-SM6 in subjects with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Twelve heavily pretreated patients received four intravenous infusions of PAT-SM6 at doses of 0.3, 1, 3, and 6 mg/kg within 2 weeks. Efficacy, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity were followed up until the end of the trial (day 36). In addition, immune cell patterns in peripheral blood were assessed by flow cytometry and glucose regulated protein 78 expression status was evaluated in bone marrow specimens by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry at screening. All doses administered were found to be safe and well tolerated; the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The most common treatment emergent adverse event was leukopenia (grades 1 and 2) in eight out of the 12 multiple myeloma patients. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated dose-proportional increases in drug serum concentration. The terminal half-life ranged from 5.86 to 8.41 h, the apparent volume of distribution ranged from 101 to 150 mL/kg, and clearance ranged from 8.11 to 16.1 mL/h/kg. All patients showed glucose regulated protein 78 surface expression on multiple myeloma cells. Four out of the 12 patients (33.3 %) had stable disease, according to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria, after PAT-SM6 treatment across the doses 1, 3 and 6 mg/kg. In summary, single-agent PAT-SM6 was well tolerated with modest clinical activity in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Further trials exploring the combination of PAT-SM6 with existing myeloma therapies are planned. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01727778.

The lymphoma-like polychemotherapy regimen "Dexa-BEAM" in advanced and extramedullary multiple myeloma.

Extramedullary disease (EMD) in multiple myeloma (MM) is characterised by an aggressive biology and an adverse prognosis especially when occurring at relapse. Due to the high proliferation found in EMD lesions, we analysed outcome data of patients treated with a lymphoma-type therapy not based on novel compounds, the Dexa-BEAM protocol. Retrospective analysis of MM patients having received Dexa-BEAM (including dexamethasone, carmustine, cytarabine, etoposide and melphalan) at our institution from January 2007 to November 2012. In all, 18 patients were identified, 11 of whom had EMD. Objective response (≥PR) to Dexa-BEAM was achieved in more than half of the patients with EMD (6/11); consecutive high-dose consolidation strategy with autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation improved upon the depth of remission in two thirds of EMD patients (4/6) with ongoing remissions in three patients. In contrast, all patients without consolidation relapsed. Progression-free survival after Dexa-BEAM was short in both patient groups with intramedullary or extramedullary myeloma with a median of 3 and 4 months, respectively. Toxicity was relevant with one treatment-related death and grades 3 and 4 toxicities in all 18 patients. Dexa-BEAM is an effective induction regimen in medically fit patients with extramedullary manifestations to regain disease control prior to an intended autologous or allogeneic transplantation.

Interobserver Agreement Rates on CXCR4-Directed PET/CT in Patients with Marginal Zone Lymphoma.

C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4)-directed molecular imaging provides excellent read-out capabilities in patients with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). We aimed to determine the interobserver agreement rate of CXCR4-targeted PET/CT among readers with different levels of experience. METHODS: 50 subjects with MZL underwent CXCR4-targeted PET/CT, which were reviewed by four readers (including two experienced and two less experienced observers). The following 8 parameters were investigated: overall scan result, CXCR4 density in lymphoma tissue, extranodal organ involvement, No. of affected extranodal organs and extranodal organ metastases, lymph node (LN) involvement and No. of affected LN areas and LN metastases. We applied intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC; < 0.4, poor; 0.4-0.59, fair; 0.6-0.74, good and > 0.74 excellent agreement rates). RESULTS: Among all readers, fair agreement was recorded for No. of affected extranodal organs (ICC, 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.68), overall scan result (ICC, 0.42; 95%CI, 0.28-0.57), CXCR4 density in lymphoma tissue (ICC, 0.52; 95%CI, 0.38-0.66), and No. of extranodal organ metastases (ICC, 0.55; 95%CI, 0.41-0.61) and LN involvement (ICC, 0.59; 95%CI, 0.46-0.71). Good agreement rates were observed for No. of LN metastases (ICC, 0.71; 95%CI, 0.60-0.81) and No. of LN areas (ICC, 0.73; 95%CI, 0.63-0.82), while extranodal organ involvement (ICC, 0.35; 95%CI, 0.21-0.51) achieved poor concordance. On a reader-by-reader comparison, the experienced readers achieved significantly higher agreement rates in 4/8 (50%) investigated scan items (ICC, range, 0.21-0.90, P < / = 0.04). In the remaining 4/8 (50%), a similar trend with higher ICCs for the experienced readers was recorded (n.s.). CONCLUSION: CXCR4-directed PET/CT mainly provided fair to good agreement rates for scan assessment, while a relevant level of experience seems to be required for an accurate imaging read-out.

CXCR4-targeted Theranostics in Hematooncology: Opportunities and Challenges.

C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) is overexpressed in a multitude of cancers, including neoplasms of hematopoietic origin. This feature can be leveraged by a theranostic approach, which provides a read-out of the actual CXCR4 expression in vivo, followed by CXCR4-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) exerting anti-cancer as well as myeloablative efficacy. In a recent meeting of hematooncology and nuclear medicine specialists, statements on the current clinical practice and future perspectives of this innovative concept were proposed and summarized in this opinion article. Experts concluded that i) CXCR4-directed [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT has the potential to improve imaging for patients with marginal zone lymphoma; ii) CXCR4-targeted RLT exerts anti-lymphoma efficacy and myeloablative effects in patients with advanced, treatment-refractory T-cell lymphomas; iii) prospective trials with CXCR4-based imaging and theranostics are warranted.

Recent Advances in the Biology and CD123-Directed Treatment of Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm.

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is an aggressive myeloid malignancy of the dendritic cell lineage that affects patients of all ages, though the incidence appears to be highest in patients over the age of 60 years. Diagnosis is based on the presence of plasmacytoid dendritic cell precursors expressing CD123, the interleukin-3 (IL-3) receptor alpha, and a distinct histologic appearance. Timely diagnosis remains a challenge, due to lack of disease awareness and overlapping biologic and clinical features with other hematologic malignancies. Prognosis is poor with a median overall survival of 8 to 14 months, irrespective of disease presentation pattern. Historically, the principal treatment was remission induction therapy followed by a stem cell transplant (SCT) in eligible patients. However, bridging to SCT is often not achieved with induction chemotherapy regimens. The discovery that CD123 is universally expressed in BPDCN and is considered to have a pathogenetic role in its development paved the way for the successful introduction of tagraxofusp, a recombinant human IL-3 fused to a truncated diphtheria toxin payload, as an initial treatment for BPDCN. Tagraxofusp was approved in 2018 by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients aged 2 years and older with newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory BPDCN, and by the European Medicines Agency in 2021 for first-line treatment of adults. The advent of tagraxofusp has opened a new era of precision oncology in the treatment of BPDCN. Herein, we present an overview of BPDCN biology, its diagnosis, and treatment options, illustrated by clinical cases.

Molecular assessment of intratumoral immune cell subsets and potential mechanisms of resistance to odronextamab, a CD20×CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R B-NHL) have a significant need for effective treatment options. Odronextamab is an Fc-silenced, human, CD20×CD3 bispecific antibody that targets CD20-expressing cells via T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity independent of T-cell/major histocompatibility complex interaction. Phase I results in patients with R/R B-NHL demonstrated that odronextamab monotherapy could achieve deep and durable responses with a generally manageable safety profile (ELM-1; NCT02290951). As part of a biomarker analysis of the same study, we investigated potential biomarkers and mechanisms of resistance to odronextamab. METHODS: Patients with R/R B-NHL enrolled in ELM-1 received one time per week doses of intravenous odronextamab for 4×21 day cycles, then doses every 2 weeks thereafter. Patient tumor biopsies were obtained at baseline, on-treatment, and at progression. Immune cell markers were analyzed by immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, single-cell RNA sequencing, and whole genome sequencing. RESULTS: Baseline tumor biopsies showed that almost all patients had high proportions of B cells that expressed the CD20 target antigen, whereas expression of other B-cell surface antigens (CD19, CD22, CD79b) was more variable. Responses to odronextamab in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma were not related to the relative level of baseline CD20 expression, cell of origin, or high-risk molecular subtype. A potential link was observed between greater tumor programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression and increased likelihood of response to odronextamab. Similarly, a trend was observed between clinical response and increased levels of CD8 T cells and regulatory T cells at baseline. We also identified an on-treatment pharmacodynamic shift in intratumoral immune cell subsets. Finally, loss of CD20 expression through inactivating gene mutations was identified as a potential mechanism of resistance in patients who were treated with odronextamab until progression, as highlighted in two detailed patient cases reported here. CONCLUSIONS: This biomarker analysis expands on clinical findings of odronextamab in patients with R/R B-NHL, providing verification of the suitability of CD20 as a therapeutic target, as well as evidence for potential mechanisms of action and resistance.

Lymphoma-Sink Effect in Marginal Zone Lymphoma Based on CXCR4-Targeted Molecular Imaging.

PURPOSE: Recent studies investigating a tumor-sink effect in solid tumors reported on decreasing uptake in normal organs in patients with higher tumor burden. This phenomenon, however, has not been evaluated yet for theranostic radiotracers applied to hematological neoplasms. As such, we aimed to determine a potential "lymphoma-sink effect" in patients with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) imaged with C-X-C motif chemokine receptor (CXCR) 4-directed PET/CTs. PROCEDURES: We retrospectively analyzed 73 patients with MZL who underwent CXCR4-directed [68Ga]Ga-PentixaFor PET/CT. Normal unaffected organ uptake (heart, liver, spleen, bone marrow, kidneys) was quantified using volumes of interests (VOIs) and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmean) were derived. MZL manifestations were also segmented to determine the maximum and peak standardized uptake values SUV (SUVmax/peak) and volumetric parameters, including lymphoma volume (LV), and fractional lymphoma activity (FLA, defined as LV*SUVmean of lymphoma burden). This approach resulted in 666 VOIs to capture the entire MZL manifestation load. We used Spearman's rank correlations to determine associations between organ uptake and CXCR4-expressing lymphoma lesions. RESULTS: We recorded the following median SUVmean in normal organs: heart, 1.82 (range, 0.78-4.11); liver, 1.35 (range, 0.72-2.99); bone marrow, 2.36 (range, 1.12-4.83); kidneys, 3.04 (range, 2.01-6.37); spleen, 5.79 (range, 2.07-10.5). No relevant associations between organ radiotracer uptake and MZL manifestation were observed, neither for SUVmax (ρ ≤ 0.21, P ≥ 0.07), SUVpeak (ρ ≤ 0.20, P ≥ 0.09), LV (ρ ≤ 0.13, P ≥ 0.27), nor FLA (ρ ≤ 0.15, P ≥ 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Investigating a lymphoma-sink effect in patients with hematological neoplasms, we observed no relevant associations between lymphoma burden and uptake in normal organs. Those observations may have therapeutic implications, e.g., for "cold" SDF1-pathway disrupting or "hot," CXCR4-directed radiolabeled drugs, as with higher lymphoma load, normal organ uptake seems to remain stable.