RESUMO
Rationale: Respiratory metagenomics (RMg) needs evaluation in a pilot service setting to determine utility and inform implementation into routine clinical practice. Objectives: Feasibility, performance, and clinical impacts on antimicrobial prescribing and infection control were recorded during a pilot RMg service. Methods: RMg was performed on 128 samples from 87 patients with suspected lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) on two general and one specialist respiratory ICUs at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London. Measurements and Main Results: During the first 15 weeks, RMg provided same-day results for 110 samples (86%), with a median turnaround time of 6.7 hours (interquartile range = 6.1-7.5 h). RMg was 93% sensitive and 81% specific for clinically relevant pathogens compared with routine testing. Forty-eight percent of RMg results informed antimicrobial prescribing changes (22% escalation; 26% deescalation) with escalation based on speciation in 20 out of 24 cases and detection of acquired-resistance genes in 4 out of 24 cases. Fastidious or unexpected organisms were reported in 21 samples, including anaerobes (n = 12), Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Tropheryma whipplei, cytomegalovirus, and Legionella pneumophila ST1326, which was subsequently isolated from the bedside water outlet. Application to consecutive severe community-acquired LRTI cases identified Staphylococcus aureus (two with SCCmec and three with luk F/S virulence determinants), Streptococcus pyogenes (emm1-M1uk clone), S. dysgalactiae subspecies equisimilis (STG62647A), and Aspergillus fumigatus with multiple treatments and public health impacts. Conclusions: This pilot study illustrates the potential of RMg testing to provide benefits for antimicrobial treatment, infection control, and public health when provided in a real-world critical care setting. Multicenter studies are now required to inform future translation into routine service.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Infecções Respiratórias , Humanos , Projetos Piloto , Londres , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Infecções Respiratórias/diagnóstico , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
The management of coronavirus disease 2019 has become more complex due to the expansion of available therapies. The presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants and mutations further complicates treatment due to their differing susceptibilities to therapies. Here we outline the use of real-time whole genome sequencing to detect persistent infection, evaluate for mutations confering resistance to treatments, and guide treatment decisions.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma , MutaçãoRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic demonstrated broad utility of pathogen sequencing with rapid methodological progress alongside global distribution of sequencing infrastructure. This review considers implications for now moving clinical metagenomics into routine service, with respiratory metagenomics as the exemplar use-case. RECENT FINDINGS: Respiratory metagenomic workflows have completed proof-of-concept, providing organism identification and many genotypic antimicrobial resistance determinants from clinical samples in <6âh. This enables rapid escalation or de-escalation of empiric therapy for patient benefit and reducing selection of antimicrobial resistance, with genomic-typing available in the same time-frame. Attention is now focussed on demonstrating clinical, health-economic, accreditation, and regulatory requirements. More fundamentally, pathogen sequencing challenges the traditional culture-orientated time frame of microbiology laboratories, which through automation and centralisation risks becoming increasingly separated from the clinical setting. It presents an alternative future where infection experts are brought together around a single genetic output in an acute timeframe, aligning the microbiology target operating model with the wider human genomic and digital strategy. SUMMARY: Pathogen sequencing is a transformational proposition for microbiology laboratories and their infectious diseases, infection control, and public health partners. Healthcare systems that link output from routine clinical metagenomic sequencing, with pandemic and antimicrobial resistance surveillance, will create valuable tools for protecting their population against future infectious diseases threats.
Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Pneumonia Associada a Assistência à Saúde , Metagenômica , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , COVID-19 , Pandemias , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga EscalaRESUMO
A novel bacterial strain, GSTT-20T was isolated from an infected, prosthetic endovascular graft explanted from a shepherd in London, United Kingdom. This strain was an aerobic, catalase-positive, oxidase-negative, Gram-stain-negative, motile, curved rod. It grew on blood agar, chocolate agar and MacConkey agar incubated at 37â°C in an aerobic environment after 48 h, appearing as yellow, mucoid colonies. Analysis of the complete 16S rRNA gene sequence showed closest similarity to Variovorax paradoxus with 99.6â% identity and Variovorax boronicumulans with 99.5â% identity. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence and phylogenomic analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms within 1530 core genes showed GSTT-20T forms a distinct lineage in the genus Variovorax of the family Comamonadaceae. In silico DNA-DNA hybridization assays against GSTT-20T were estimated at 32.1â% for V. boronicumulans and 31.9â% for V. paradoxus. Genome similarity based on average nucleotide identity was 87.50â% when comparing GSTT-20T to V. paradoxus. Based on these results, the strain represented a novel species for which the name Variovorax durovernensis sp. nov. was proposed. The type strain is GSTT-20T (NCTC 14621T=CECT 30390T).
Assuntos
Comamonadaceae , Ácidos Graxos , Humanos , Ácidos Graxos/química , Filogenia , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Ágar , Microbiologia do Solo , Técnicas de Tipagem Bacteriana , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Composição de Bases , Análise de Sequência de DNA , Fosfolipídeos/análiseRESUMO
There is a clear requirement for an accurate SARS-CoV-2 antibody test, both as a complement to existing diagnostic capabilities and for determining community seroprevalence. We therefore evaluated the performance of a variety of antibody testing technologies and their potential use as diagnostic tools. Highly specific in-house ELISAs were developed for the detection of anti-spike (S), -receptor binding domain (RBD) and -nucleocapsid (N) antibodies and used for the cross-comparison of ten commercial serological assays-a chemiluminescence-based platform, two ELISAs and seven colloidal gold lateral flow immunoassays (LFIAs)-on an identical panel of 110 SARS-CoV-2-positive samples and 50 pre-pandemic negatives. There was a wide variation in the performance of the different platforms, with specificity ranging from 82% to 100%, and overall sensitivity from 60.9% to 87.3%. However, the head-to-head comparison of multiple sero-diagnostic assays on identical sample sets revealed that performance is highly dependent on the time of sampling, with sensitivities of over 95% seen in several tests when assessing samples from more than 20 days post onset of symptoms. Furthermore, these analyses identified clear outlying samples that were negative in all tests, but were later shown to be from individuals with mildest disease presentation. Rigorous comparison of antibody testing platforms will inform the deployment of point-of-care technologies in healthcare settings and their use in the monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 infections.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/análise , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Testes Sorológicos/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Teste para COVID-19 , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária , Proteínas do Nucleocapsídeo de Coronavírus , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Feminino , Hospitais , Humanos , Imunoensaio , Medições Luminescentes , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteínas do Nucleocapsídeo/imunologia , Pandemias , Fosfoproteínas , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/imunologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Randomised controlled trials have shown that steroids reduce the risk of dying in patients with severe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), whilst many real-world studies have failed to replicate this result. We aim to investigate real-world effectiveness of steroids in severe COVID-19. METHODS: Clinical, demographic, and viral genome data extracted from electronic patient record (EPR) was analysed from all SARS-CoV-2 RNA positive patients admitted with severe COVID-19, defined by hypoxia at presentation, between March 13th 2020 and May 27th 2021. Steroid treatment was measured by the number of prescription-days with dexamethasone, hydrocortisone, prednisolone or methylprednisolone. The association between steroid > 3 days treatment and disease outcome was explored using multivariable cox proportional hazards models with adjustment for confounders (including age, gender, ethnicity, co-morbidities and SARS-CoV-2 variant). The outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: 1100 severe COVID-19 cases were identified having crude hospital mortality of 15.3%. 793/1100 (72.1%) individuals were treated with steroids and 513/1100 (46.6%) received steroid ≤ 3 days. From the multivariate model, steroid > 3 days was associated with decreased hazard of in-hospital mortality (HR: 0.47 (95% CI: 0.31-0.72)). CONCLUSION: The protective effect of steroid treatment for severe COVID-19 reported in randomised clinical trials was replicated in this retrospective study of a large real-world cohort.
Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Dexametasona , Humanos , Hidrocortisona , Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , RNA Viral , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Candida auris has been implicated in ICU outbreaks worldwide and is notable for being difficult to identify and treat, its resilience in the environment, and significant patient mortality associated with invasive disease. Here, we describe a small C. auris outbreak and how it was terminated. DESIGN: Single-center, observational. SETTING: Two general adult ICUs at an urban U.K. teaching hospital. PATIENTS: All patients positive for C. auris during the 5-month outbreak were included (n = 7). INTERVENTIONS: Stepwise implementation of enhanced infection prevention and control precautions was introduced including twice-weekly screening, contact tracing, isolation precautions, and environmental decontamination. A detailed environmental screen was performed to identify potential reservoirs. This included the patient bed space and clinical equipment and a frequently handled cloth lanyard attached to a key used to access controlled drugs. Personal possessions such as mobile phones, lanyards, and identification badges were also screened. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The index case and six linked acquisitions were identified. Four of six (67%) patients were identified after discharge of all known previous C. auris cases from ICU, highlighting potential for an environmental reservoir. Environmental screening identified C. auris from a patient bed space following deep cleaning, prompting review and enhancement of cleaning procedures. The controlled drug cloth lanyard was positive for C. auris, which prompted removal and culture of all staff lanyards. C. auris was identified on 1/100 staff lanyards (1%). No mobile phones or identification badges were positive for C. auris. The outbreak terminated following withdrawal of lanyards from ICU. CONCLUSIONS: This outbreak further implicates environmental reservoirs as sustaining C. auris ICU outbreaks. Identification of C. auris on cloth lanyards highlights the need to identify commonly handled moveable objects during an outbreak. We suggest that ICUs with a C. auris outbreak should investigate similar infrequently cleaned items as potential reservoirs and review their policies on lanyard use.
Assuntos
Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Vestuário/efeitos adversos , Farmacorresistência Fúngica , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Adulto , Candida , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Clostridium difficile infections declined across the UK National Health Service in the decade that followed implementation of an infection control campaign. The national impact on intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infections has not been documented. METHODS: Data on MRSA, C. difficile, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), and ICU-acquired bloodstream infections (UABSIs) for 1 189 142 patients from 2007 to 2016 were analyzed. Initial coverage was 139 ICUs increasing to 276 ICUs, representing 100% of general adult UK ICUs. RESULTS: ICU MRSA and C. difficile acquisitions per 1000 patients decreased between 2007 and 2016 (MRSA acquisitions, 25.4 to 4.1; and C. difficile acquisitions, 11.1 to 3.5), whereas VRE acquisitions increased from 1.5 to 5.9. There were 13 114 UABSIs in 1.8% of patients who stayed longer than 48 hours on ICU. UABSIs fell from 7.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.9-7.6) to 1.6 (95% CI, 1.5-1.7)/1000 bed days. Adjusting for patient factors, the incidence rate ratio was 0.21 (95% CI, 0.19-0.23, P < .001) from 2007 to 2016. The greatest reduction, comparing rates in 2007/08 and 2015/16, was for MRSA (97%), followed by P. aeruginosa (81%), S. aureus (79%) and Candida spp (72%), with lower reductions for the coliforms (E. coli 57% and Klebsiella 49%). CONCLUSIONS: Large decreases in ICU-acquired infections occurred across the UK ICU network linked with the first few years of a national infection control campaign, but rates have since been static. Further reductions will likely require a new intervention framework.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Infecção Hospitalar , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Sepse , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Escherichia coli , Humanos , Controle de Infecções , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Staphylococcus aureus , Medicina Estatal , Reino Unido/epidemiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides an overview of gastrointestinal tract colonization with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), including risk factors for colonization, determinants for duration of colonization, and whether patients can decolonize, either spontaneously or via targeted interventions. RECENT FINDINGS: CPE colonization is disseminating globally with increasing numbers of carbapenemases being identified in increasing patient cohorts. Numerous risk factors including repeated healthcare contact, patient co-morbidities and international travel have all been linked to increased rates of colonization. Duration of colonization has been investigated in various healthcare settings and ranges many months or even years. Although new methods for expediting decolonization are being investigated, including faecal microbiota transplantation, high quality evidence of impact is lacking. SUMMARY: Current evidence indicates that CPE colonization usually persists throughout the duration of most hospital admissions, although the majority of patients will subsequently spontaneously decolonize. Difficulties remain in determining the point at which patients can be considered decolonized because of the lack acceptable criteria for defining eradication. This has significance implications for infection prevention and control measures during the initial and subsequent hospital admissions. Strategies to reduce the healthcare burden of CPE colonization continue to rely predominantly on preventing acquisition, whereas decolonization efforts remain a focus of research.
Assuntos
Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/diagnóstico , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiologia , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/etiologia , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/terapia , Humanos , Remissão Espontânea , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
An evaluation of a rapid portable gold-nanotechnology measuring SARS-CoV-2 IgM, IgA and IgG antibody concentrations against spike 1 (S1), spike 2 (S) and nucleocapsid (N) was conducted using serum samples from 74 patients tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA on admission to hospital, and 47 historical control patients from March 2019. 59 patients were RNA(+) and 15 were RNA(-). A serum (±) classification was derived for all three antigens and a quantitative serological profile was obtained. Serum(+) was identified in 30% (95% CI 11-48) of initially RNA(-) patients, in 36% (95% CI 17-54) of RNA(+) patients before 10 days, 77% (95% CI 67-87) between 10 and 20 days and 95% (95% CI 86-100) after 21 days. The patient-level diagnostic accuracy relative to RNA(±) after 10 days displayed 88% sensitivity (95% CI 75-95) and 75% specificity (95% CI 22-99), although specificity compared with historical controls was 100% (95%CI 91-100). This study provides robust support for further evaluation and validation of this novel technology in a clinical setting and highlights challenges inherent in assessment of serological tests for an emerging disease such as COVID-19.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/análise , Betacoronavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Testes Sorológicos/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , COVID-19 , Teste para COVID-19 , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Estudos de Coortes , Infecções por Coronavirus/sangue , Proteínas do Nucleocapsídeo de Coronavírus , Reações Falso-Negativas , Feminino , Ouro/química , Humanos , Imunoglobulina A/análise , Imunoglobulina A/imunologia , Imunoglobulina G/análise , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Imunoglobulina M/análise , Imunoglobulina M/imunologia , Masculino , Nanopartículas Metálicas/química , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteínas do Nucleocapsídeo/imunologia , Pandemias , Fosfoproteínas , Pneumonia Viral/sangue , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/imunologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Serious infections such as endocarditis due to extremely drug-resistance gram-negative bacteria are an increasing challenge. Here, we present successful adjunctive use of cefiderocol for a patient with persistently bacteremic healthcare-associated native aortic valve endocarditis due to an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-positive Pseudomonas aeruginosa susceptible in vitro only to colistin, following failure of conventional therapeutic options.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Valva Aórtica/microbiologia , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Endocardite Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Colistina/farmacologia , Ensaios de Uso Compassivo , Endocardite Bacteriana/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Infecções por Pseudomonas/complicações , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/enzimologia , Resultado do Tratamento , beta-Lactamases , CefiderocolRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia is a common cause of severe community-acquired and hospital-acquired infection worldwide. We tested the hypothesis that adjunctive rifampicin would reduce bacteriologically confirmed treatment failure or disease recurrence, or death, by enhancing early S aureus killing, sterilising infected foci and blood faster, and reducing risks of dissemination and metastatic infection. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults (≥18 years) with S aureus bacteraemia who had received ≤96 h of active antibiotic therapy were recruited from 29 UK hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a computer-generated sequential randomisation list to receive 2 weeks of adjunctive rifampicin (600 mg or 900 mg per day according to weight, oral or intravenous) versus identical placebo, together with standard antibiotic therapy. Randomisation was stratified by centre. Patients, investigators, and those caring for the patients were masked to group allocation. The primary outcome was time to bacteriologically confirmed treatment failure or disease recurrence, or death (all-cause), from randomisation to 12 weeks, adjudicated by an independent review committee masked to the treatment. Analysis was intention to treat. This trial was registered, number ISRCTN37666216, and is closed to new participants. FINDINGS: Between Dec 10, 2012, and Oct 25, 2016, 758 eligible participants were randomly assigned: 370 to rifampicin and 388 to placebo. 485 (64%) participants had community-acquired S aureus infections, and 132 (17%) had nosocomial S aureus infections. 47 (6%) had meticillin-resistant infections. 301 (40%) participants had an initial deep infection focus. Standard antibiotics were given for 29 (IQR 18-45) days; 619 (82%) participants received flucloxacillin. By week 12, 62 (17%) of participants who received rifampicin versus 71 (18%) who received placebo experienced treatment failure or disease recurrence, or died (absolute risk difference -1·4%, 95% CI -7·0 to 4·3; hazard ratio 0·96, 0·68-1·35, p=0·81). From randomisation to 12 weeks, no evidence of differences in serious (p=0·17) or grade 3-4 (p=0·36) adverse events were observed; however, 63 (17%) participants in the rifampicin group versus 39 (10%) in the placebo group had antibiotic or trial drug-modifying adverse events (p=0·004), and 24 (6%) versus six (2%) had drug interactions (p=0·0005). INTERPRETATION: Adjunctive rifampicin provided no overall benefit over standard antibiotic therapy in adults with S aureus bacteraemia. FUNDING: UK National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment.
Assuntos
Antibióticos Antituberculose/administração & dosagem , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Rifampina/administração & dosagem , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Intravenosa , Administração Oral , Idoso , Antibióticos Antituberculose/farmacologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Rifampina/farmacologia , Falha de TratamentoRESUMO
Background: Recent evidence suggests that hospital transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is uncommon in UK centers that have implemented sustained infection control programs. We investigated whether a healthcare-network analysis could shed light on transmission paths currently sustaining MRSA levels in UK hospitals. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was performed in 2 National Health Service hospital groups and a general district hospital in Southeast London. All MRSA patients identified at inpatient, outpatient, and community settings between 1 November 2011 and 29 February 2012 were included. We identified genetically defined MRSA transmission clusters in individual hospitals and across the healthcare network, and examined genetic differentiation of sequence type (ST) 22 MRSA isolates within and between hospitals and inpatient or outpatient and community settings, as informed by average and median pairwise single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and SNP-based proportions of nearly identical isolates. Results: Two hundred forty-eight of 610 (40.7%) MRSA patients were linked in 90 transmission clusters, of which 27 spanned multiple hospitals. Analysis of a large 32 patient ST22-MRSA cluster showed that 26 of 32 patients (81.3%) had multiple contacts with one another during ward stays at any hospital. No residential, outpatient, or significant community healthcare contacts were identified. Genetic differentiation between ST22 MRSA inpatient isolates from different hospitals was less than between inpatient isolates from the same hospitals (P ≤ .01). Conclusions: There is evidence of frequent ward-based transmission of MRSA brought about by frequent patient admissions to multiple hospitals. Limiting in-ward transmission requires sharing of MRSA status data between hospitals.
Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/transmissão , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Genoma Bacteriano , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Controle de Infecções , Pacientes Internados , Londres/epidemiologia , Masculino , Meticilina/farmacologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Família Multigênica , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Sequenciamento Completo do GenomaRESUMO
Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most important bacterial pathogens in clinical practice and a major diagnostic focus for the routine microbiology laboratory. It is carried as a harmless commensal in up to two-thirds of the population at any one time predominantly not only in the anterior nares, but also in multiple other sites such as the groin, axilla, throat, perineum, vagina and rectum. It colonizes skin breach sites, such as ulcers and wounds, and causes superficial and deep skin and soft tissue infections and life-threatening deep seated infections particularly endocarditis and osteomyelitis. S. aureus is constantly evolving through mutation and uptake of mobile genetic elements that confer increasing resistance and virulence. Since the 1960s, hospitals have had to contend with emergence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains that spread better in hospitals than methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and are harder to treat. Since the 1980s, distinct community MRSA strains have also emerged that cause severe skin and respiratory infections. Conventional identification of MSSA and MRSA in the microbiology laboratory involves microscopy, culture and biochemical analysis that for most samples is straightforward but slow, taking at least 48 h. This delay has significant consequences for individual patient care and public health, through inadequate or excessive empiric antibiotic use, and failure to implement appropriate infection control measures for MRSA-colonized patients during those first 48 h. This unmet need has driven development of rapid molecular diagnostics that either complement or replace conventional culture techniques in the laboratory, or can be placed in the clinical environment as point-of-care (POC) devices. These new technologies provide results to clinicians anything from within an hour to 24 h, depending on sample and clinical setting, and should transform management of patients with S. aureus and other bacterial diseases; however, uptake is often slow due to the disruptive effect of new technologies, costs of transition and uncertainty of the optimal solution given successive advances. More evidence of the health economic, clinical and antimicrobial resistance benefit will help support introduction of these new technologies. Finally, preventing MRSA transmission has been a priority for healthcare organizations for many years. There have been significant recent reductions in transmission following local and national campaigns to re-enforce basic and heightened infection control interventions such as universal hand hygiene, barrier nursing, decolonization and isolation of MRSA-colonized patients detected through routine culture or screening policies. Developments in whole genome sequencing are providing greater insight into reservoirs and routes of transmission that should help better target interventions to ensure sustainable control of endemic strains and to identify and prevent emergence of new strains.
Assuntos
Infecções dos Tecidos Moles , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Staphylococcus aureus , Antibacterianos , Feminino , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Identifying and tackling the social determinants of infectious diseases has become a public health priority following the recognition that individuals with lower socioeconomic status are disproportionately affected by infectious diseases. In many parts of the world, epidemiologically and genotypically defined community-associated (CA) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains have emerged to become frequent causes of hospital infection. The aim of this study was to use spatial models with adjustment for area-level hospital attendance to determine the transmission niche of genotypically defined CA- and health-care-associated (HA)-MRSA strains across a diverse region of South East London and to explore a potential link between MRSA carriage and markers of social and material deprivation. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This study involved spatial analysis of cross-sectional data linked with all MRSA isolates identified by three National Health Service (NHS) microbiology laboratories between 1 November 2011 and 29 February 2012. The cohort of hospital-based NHS microbiology diagnostic services serves 867,254 usual residents in the Lambeth, Southwark, and Lewisham boroughs in South East London, United Kingdom (UK). Isolates were classified as HA- or CA-MRSA based on whole genome sequencing. All MRSA cases identified over 4 mo within the three-borough catchment area (n = 471) were mapped to small geographies and linked to area-level aggregated socioeconomic and demographic data. Disease mapping and ecological regression models were used to infer the most likely transmission niches for each MRSA genetic classification and to describe the spatial epidemiology of MRSA in relation to social determinants. Specifically, we aimed to identify demographic and socioeconomic population traits that explain cross-area extra variation in HA- and CA-MRSA relative risks following adjustment for hospital attendance data. We explored the potential for associations with the English Indices of Deprivation 2010 (including the Index of Multiple Deprivation and several deprivation domains and subdomains) and the 2011 England and Wales census demographic and socioeconomic indicators (including numbers of households by deprivation dimension) and indicators of population health. Both CA-and HA-MRSA were associated with household deprivation (CA-MRSA relative risk [RR]: 1.72 [1.03-2.94]; HA-MRSA RR: 1.57 [1.06-2.33]), which was correlated with hospital attendance (Pearson correlation coefficient [PCC] = 0.76). HA-MRSA was also associated with poor health (RR: 1.10 [1.01-1.19]) and residence in communal care homes (RR: 1.24 [1.12-1.37]), whereas CA-MRSA was linked with household overcrowding (RR: 1.58 [1.04-2.41]) and wider barriers, which represent a combined score for household overcrowding, low income, and homelessness (RR: 1.76 [1.16-2.70]). CA-MRSA was also associated with recent immigration to the UK (RR: 1.77 [1.19-2.66]). For the area-level variation in RR for CA-MRSA, 28.67% was attributable to the spatial arrangement of target geographies, compared with only 0.09% for HA-MRSA. An advantage to our study is that it provided a representative sample of usual residents receiving care in the catchment areas. A limitation is that relationships apparent in aggregated data analyses cannot be assumed to operate at the individual level. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of community transmission of HA-MRSA strains, implying that HA-MRSA cases identified in the community originate from the hospital reservoir and are maintained by frequent attendance at health care facilities. In contrast, there was a high risk of CA-MRSA in deprived areas linked with overcrowding, homelessness, low income, and recent immigration to the UK, which was not explainable by health care exposure. Furthermore, areas adjacent to these deprived areas were themselves at greater risk of CA-MRSA, indicating community transmission of CA-MRSA. This ongoing community transmission could lead to CA-MRSA becoming the dominant strain types carried by patients admitted to hospital, particularly if successful hospital-based MRSA infection control programmes are maintained. These results suggest that community infection control programmes targeting transmission of CA-MRSA will be required to control MRSA in both the community and hospital. These epidemiological changes will also have implications for effectiveness of risk-factor-based hospital admission MRSA screening programmes.
Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar , Privação Materna , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Isolamento Social , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Londres/epidemiologia , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Isolamento Social/psicologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/psicologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) are an emerging threat for healthcare providers worldwide. OBJECTIVES: To determine CPE carriage rates and risk factors in an unselected hospital cohort at the time of admission. METHODS: We approached 4567 patients within 72 h of admission to provide a rectal swab and answer a questionnaire on risk factors for carriage. Rectal swabs were cultured for carbapenem-resistant organisms on chromogenic and non-chromogenic agar, and tested for carbapenemase production by PCR (Check-Direct CPE). The study was approved by the NHS Research Ethics Committee. RESULTS: Only 6 CPE were cultured from 5 (0.1%) of 4006 patients who provided a rectal swab; only 1 was cultured using non-chromogenic media. An additional 76 culture-negative rectal swabs were initially PCR positive, but none grew a carbapenem-resistant organism despite enrichment culture and only two were positive when retested several months later by Check-Direct and a second PCR assay (Cepheid GeneXpert® Carba-R). A modified Ct cut-off of <35 would have resolved these apparent false-positives. 40% of patients had a risk factor that should prompt screening and pre-emptive isolation as defined by UK CPE guidelines but only 8.1% and 20.2% of these patients had been screened and pre-emptively isolated by clinical teams, respectively. Overseas hospitalization was the only significant risk factor for CPE carriage (Pâ<â0.001, OR 64.3, 95% CI 7.3-488.5). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights a very low carriage rate of CPE. Hospitalization abroad is the most important risk factor to guide admission screening in this low-prevalence setting.
Assuntos
Proteínas de Bactérias/análise , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/métodos , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/diagnóstico , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimologia , beta-Lactamases/análise , Adulto , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Portador Sadio/diagnóstico , Portador Sadio/epidemiologia , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Enterobacteriaceae/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiologia , Feminino , Técnicas de Genotipagem , Hospitais , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Prevalência , Reto/microbiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reino UnidoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Both low-level mupirocin resistance (LMR) and high-level mupirocin resistance (HMR) have been identified. The aim of this study was to determine the epidemiology of LMR and HMR in MRSA isolates at five hospitals that have used mupirocin for targeted decolonization as part of successful institutional control programmes. METHODS: All MRSA identified in three microbiology laboratories serving five central and south-east London hospitals and surrounding communities between November 2011 and February 2012 were included. HMR and LMR were determined by disc diffusion testing. WGS was used to derive multilocus sequence types (MLSTs) and the presence of HMR and LMR resistance determinants. RESULTS: Prevalence of either HMR or LMR amongst first healthcare episode isolates from 795 identified patients was 9.69% (95% CI 7.72-11.96); LMR was 6.29% (95% CI 4.70-8.21) and HMR was 3.40% (95% CI 2.25-4.90). Mupirocin resistance was not significantly different in isolates identified from inpatients at each microbiology laboratory, but was more common in genotypically defined 'hospital' rather than 'community' isolates (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.36-9.30, Pâ=â0.002). LMR was associated with inpatient stay, previous history of MRSA and age ≥65 years; HMR was associated with age ≥65 years and residential postcode outside London. LMR and HMR varied by clone, with both being low in the dominant UK MRSA clone ST22 compared with ST8, ST36 and ST239/241 for LMR and with ST8 and ST36 for HMR. V588F mutation and mupA carriage had high specificity (>97%) and area under the curve (>83%) to discriminate phenotypic mupirocin resistance, but uncertainty around the sensitivity point estimate was large (95% CI 52.50%-94.44%). Mutations in or near the mupA gene were found in eight isolates that carried mupA but were not HMR. CONCLUSIONS: Mupirocin resistance was identified in <10% of patients and varied significantly by clone, implying that changes in clonal epidemiology may have an important role in determining the prevalence of resistance in conjunction with selection due to mupirocin use.
Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Variação Genética , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/classificação , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Mupirocina/farmacologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Testes de Sensibilidade a Antimicrobianos por Disco-Difusão , Feminino , Genoma Bacteriano , Genótipo , Humanos , Londres/epidemiologia , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Epidemiologia Molecular , Tipagem de Sequências Multilocus , Prevalência , Análise de Sequência de DNA , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To determine long-term adherence to a 5 day antibiotic course guideline for treating intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) infections. METHODS: Descriptive analysis of patient-level data on all GNB-active antibiotics prescribed from day 3 and all GNB identified in clinical samples in 5350 patients admitted to a 30 bed general ICU between 2002 and 2009. RESULTS: Four thousand five hundred and eleven of 5350 (84%) patients were treated with one or more antibiotics active against GNB commenced from day 3. Gentamicin was the most frequently prescribed antibiotic (92.2 days of therapy/1000 patient-days). Only 6% of courses spanned >6 days of therapy and 89% of antibiotic therapy days were with a single antibiotic active against GNB. There was no significant difference between gentamicin and meropenem in the number of first courses in which a resistant GNB was identified in blood cultures [11/1177 (0.9%) versus 5/351 (1.4%); Pâ=â0.43] or respiratory tract specimens [59/951 (6.2%) versus 17/246 (6.9%); Pâ=â0.68] at the time of starting therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates long-term adherence to a 5 day course antibiotic guideline for treatment of ICU-associated GNB infections. This guideline is a potential antibiotic-sparing alternative to currently recommended dual empirical courses extending to ≥7 days.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Idoso , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Clinical metagenomics involves the genomic sequencing of all microorganisms in clinical samples ideally after depletion of human DNA to increase sensitivity and reduce turnaround times. Current human DNA depletion methods preferentially preserve either DNA or RNA containing microbes, but not both simultaneously. Here we describe and present data using a practical and rapid mechanical host-depletion method allowing simultaneous detection of RNA and DNA microorganisms linked with nanopore sequencing. METHODS: The human cells from respiratory samples are lysed mechanically using 1.4 mm zirconium-silicate spheres and the human DNA is depleted using a nonspecific endonuclease. The RNA is converted to dsDNA to allow the simultaneous sequencing of DNA and RNA. RESULTS: The method decreases human DNA concentration by a median of eight Ct values while detecting a broad range of RNA & DNA viruses, bacteria, including atypical pathogens (Legionella, Chlamydia, Mycoplasma) and fungi (Candida, Pneumocystis, Aspergillus). The first automated reports are generated after 30 min sequencing from a 7 h end-to-end workflow. Sensitivity and specificity for bacterial detection are 90% and 100%, respectively, and viral detection are 92% and 100% after 2 h of sequencing. Prospective validation on 33 consecutive lower respiratory tract samples from ventilated patients with suspected pneumonia shows 60% concordance with routine testing, detection of additional pathogens in 21% of samples and pathogen genomic assembly achieve for 42% of viruses and 33% of bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: Although further workflow refinement and validation on samples containing a broader range of pathogens is required, it holds promise as a clinically deployable workflow suitable for evaluation in routine microbiology laboratories.
Metagenomics is the analysis of genetic material from microbes such as bacteria and viruses in a sample. There are limitations with existing metagenomics methods, such as not being able to detect the full range of microbes present in a sample. This paper introduces an approach that identifies multiple types of microbes. This is accomplished through the mechanical disruption of human cells, which allows for an effective depletion of human genetic material. Our method demonstrates encouraging preliminary results within a 7 h process, achieving good sensitivity for the detection of bacteria and viruses. We demonstrate the identification of relevant microbes in samples from patients with respiratory infections. This technique holds promise for adoption in clinical settings, potentially enhancing our ability to diagnose respiratory infections quickly.