Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Comportamento de Escolha , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Idoso Fragilizado , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/tendências , Hospitalização/tendências , Humanos , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
The purpose was to compare the Spanish language picture version of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test with Immediate Recall (pFCSRT+IR) and the Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) in identifying very mild dementia among Spanish speaking Latino patients. The tests and an independent diagnostic assessment were administered to 112 Latino patients free of medically diagnosed dementia from an urban primary care clinic. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to examine differences in the operating characteristics of the pFCSRT+IR and the MMSE. Cut scores were manipulated to equate sensitivities (specificities) at clinically relevant values to compare differences in specificities (sensitivities) using the Pearson Chi Square test. Youden's index was used to select the optimal cut scores. Twenty-four of the 112 primary care patients (21%) received a research dementia diagnosis, indicating a substantial burden of unrecognized dementia. MMSE scores but not free recall scores were associated with years of education in patients free of dementia. AUC was significantly higher for free recall than for MMSE. Free recall performed significantly better than the MMSE in sensitivity and in specificity. Using optimal cut scores, patients with impaired free recall were 10 times more likely to have dementia than patients with intact recall, and patients with impaired MMSE scores were 4.5 times more likely to have dementia than patients with intact scores. These results suggest that the Spanish language pFCSRT+IR may be an effective tool for dementia screening in educationally diverse Latino primary care populations.
Assuntos
Demência/diagnóstico , Demência/terapia , Geriatria , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aprendizagem por Associação/fisiologia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Sinais (Psicologia) , Função Executiva , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Masculino , Rememoração Mental/fisiologia , Entrevista Psiquiátrica Padronizada , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estimulação Luminosa , Curva ROCRESUMO
Dementia is often undiagnosed in primary care, and even when diagnosed, untreated. The 5-Cog paradigm, a brief, culturally adept, cognitive detection tool paired with a clinical decision support may reduce barriers to improving dementia diagnosis and care. We performed a randomized controlled trial in primary care patients experiencing health disparities (racial/ethnic minorities and socioeconomically disadvantaged). Older adults with cognitive concerns were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the 5-Cog paradigm or control. Primary outcome was improved dementia care actions defined as any of the following endpoints within 90 days: new mild cognitive impairment syndrome or dementia diagnoses as well as investigations, medications or specialist referrals ordered for cognitive indications. Groups were compared using intention-to-treat principles with multivariable logistic regression. Overall, 1,201 patients (mean age 72.8 years, 72% women and 94% Black, Hispanic or Latino) were enrolled and 599 were assigned to 5-Cog and 602 to the control. The 5-Cog paradigm demonstrated threefold odds of improvement in dementia care actions over control (odds ratio 3.43, 95% confidence interval 2.32-5.07). No serious intervention-related adverse events were reported. The 5-Cog paradigm improved diagnosis and management in patients with cognitive concerns and provides evidence to promote practice change to improve dementia care actions in primary care.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03816644 .
Assuntos
Demência , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , Demência/diagnóstico , Demência/terapia , Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Cognição , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , AlfabetizaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment, including dementia, is frequently under-detected in primary care. The Consortium for Detecting Cognitive Impairment, including Dementia (DetectCID) convenes three multidisciplinary teams that are testing novel paradigms to improve the frequency and quality of patient evaluations for detecting cognitive impairment in primary care and appropriate follow-up. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to characterize the three paradigms, including similarities and differences, and to identify common key lessons from implementation. METHODS: A qualitative evaluation study with dementia specialists who were implementing the detection paradigms. Data was analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: We identified core components of each paradigm. Key lessons emphasized the importance of engaging primary care teams, enabling primary care providers to diagnose cognitive disorders and provide ongoing care support, integrating with the electronic health record, and ensuring that paradigms address the needs of diverse populations. CONCLUSION: Approaches are needed that address the arc of care from identifying a concern to post-diagnostic management, are efficient and adaptable to primary care workflows, and address a diverse aging population. Our work highlights approaches to partnering with primary care that could be useful across specialties and paves the way for developing future paradigms that improve differential diagnosis of symptomatic cognitive impairment, identifying not only its presence but also its specific syndrome or etiology.
Assuntos
Transtornos Cognitivos , Disfunção Cognitiva , Demência , Idoso , Transtornos Cognitivos/diagnóstico , Disfunção Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Demência/diagnóstico , Demência/psicologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Atenção Primária à SaúdeRESUMO
Geriatric psychosocial problems are prevalent and significantly affect the physical health and overall well-being of older adults. Geriatrics fellows require psychosocial education, and yet to date, geriatrics fellowship programs have not developed a comprehensive geriatric psychosocial curriculum. Fellowship programs in the New York tristate area collaboratively created the New York Metropolitan Area Consortium to Strengthen Psychosocial Programming in Geriatrics Fellowships in 2007 to address this shortfall. The goal of the Consortium is to develop model educational programs for geriatrics fellows that highlight psychosocial issues affecting elder care, share interinstitutional resources, and energize fellowship program directors and faculty. In 2008, 2009, and 2010, Consortium faculty collaboratively designed and implemented a psychosocial educational conference for geriatrics fellows. Cumulative participation at the conferences included 146 geriatrics fellows from 20 academic institutions taught by interdisciplinary Consortium faculty. Formal evaluations from the participants indicated that the conference: a) positively affected fellows' knowledge of, interest in, and comfort with psychosocial issues; b) would have a positive impact on the quality of care provided to older patients; and c) encouraged valuable interactions with fellows and faculty from other institutions. The Consortium, as an educational model for psychosocial learning, has a positive impact on geriatrics fellowship training and may be replicable in other localities.
Assuntos
Congressos como Assunto/organização & administração , Bolsas de Estudo/organização & administração , Geriatria/educação , Relações Interinstitucionais , Faculdades de Medicina/organização & administração , Envelhecimento , Comunicação , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Saúde Mental , Sociologia/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
Older adults in the United States have been the age group hardest hit by the Covid pandemic. They have suffered a disproportionate number of deaths; Covid patients eighty years or older on ventilators had fatality rates higher than 90 percent. How could we have better protected older adults? Both the popular press and government entities blamed nursing homes, labeling them "snake pits" and imposing harsh fines and arduous new regulations. We argue that this approach is unlikely to improve protections for older adults. Rather than focusing exclusively on acute and critical resources, including ventilators, a plan that respected the best interests of older adults would have also supported nursing homes, a critical part of the health care system. Better access to protective equipment for staff members, early testing of staff members and patients, and enhanced means of communication with families were what was needed. These preventive measures would have offered greater benefit to the oldest members of our population than the exclusive focus on acute care.
Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos/organização & administração , Casas de Saúde/organização & administração , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Comunicação , Infecções por Coronavirus/mortalidade , Pessoal de Saúde/organização & administração , Instituição de Longa Permanência para Idosos/normas , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Casas de Saúde/normas , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/mortalidade , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Isolamento Social/psicologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: This study examined the operating characteristics of two-stage case finding to identify memory impairment and very mild dementia. METHODS: Primary care patients underwent two-stage testing and a subsequent diagnostic assessment to assess outcomes. Patients who screen positive for subjective cognitive decline on the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly undergo memory testing with the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test with Immediate Recall. Outcomes were determined without access to these data. A split-half design with discovery and confirmatory samples was used. RESULTS: One hundred seventeen of 563 (21%) patients had dementia and 68 (12%) had memory impairment but not dementia. Operating characteristics were similar in the discovery and confirmatory samples. In the pooled sample, combined, patients with memory impairment or dementia were identified with good sensitivity (72%) and high specificity (90%). Differences in ethnicity, educational level, or age (≤75, >75) did not affect classification accuracy. DISCUSSION: Two-stage screening facilitates the efficient identification of older adults with memory impairment or dementia.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare two screening strategies for dementia in an urban primary care clinic, serving a low-education, minority community composed largely of Latino and African American patients. METHOD: Two hundred and fifty-seven patients underwent two-stage patient-based screening (PBS) and informant-based screening (IBS) followed by a diagnostic evaluation. In the first stage, PBS included brief tests of episodic memory (Memory Impairment Screen), semantic memory (Animal Fluency), and executive function (Reciting Months Backwards). For IBS, the first stage consisted of the short Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly, administered to a family member or friend. Patients who screened positive in the first stage of either strategy underwent testing with the picture version of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test with Immediate Recall to identify memory impairment. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were computed for various cutoffs of each test and combination of tests. Dementia was diagnosed using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria without access to the screening test results. RESULTS: We identified 66 patients (25.7%) with previously undiagnosed dementia. Sensitivity was the same (77%) for both strategies but specificity was higher for IBS than for PBS (92% versus 83%). IBS's higher specificity makes it the preferred strategy if a knowledgeable informant is available. CONCLUSION: Unrecognized dementia is common in primary care. Case-finding can be improved using either PBS or IBS two-stage screening strategies.
Assuntos
Demência/diagnóstico , Função Executiva , Transtornos da Memória/diagnóstico , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Idoso , Sinais (Psicologia) , Demência/psicologia , Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais , Família , Feminino , Hispânico ou Latino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Transtornos da Memória/psicologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To describe the risk factors, etiology and referral patterns of elderly patients treated for minor burns in an urban emergency department (ED). METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of persons aged 65 years and older who were treated for a minor burn and discharged home from the ED. Medical records were reviewed for 77 burn patients that presented over a 6-year period. RESULTS: Burn patients had significant co-morbid medical illness. The etiology of the burns was scalds (58%), contact (27%) and flame (12%). Sixty-eight percent of the burns were cooking related. Heating pads, curling irons or hot pipes accounted for the majority of contact burns. Three percent of burn patients were referred to a home care agency for a home safety evaluation at the time of discharge from the ED. CONCLUSION: Cooking-related activities accounted for the majority of minor burns in this series. Common consumer items or environmental hazards were responsible for most contact burns. Elderly patients seen in the ED with minor burns were rarely referred to a home care agency.
Assuntos
Queimaduras/etiologia , Acidentes Domésticos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Queimaduras/terapia , Culinária , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar , Humanos , Masculino , Alta do Paciente , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Saúde da População UrbanaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To examine how often hospitalized older adults with a diagnosis of heel ulcers are evaluated with noninvasive vascular tests and to determine the impact of invasive vascular or surgical procedures on 1-year mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective review using an electronic database and chart review of all patients discharged with a diagnosis of heel ulcer between 2006 and 2009. SETTING: Urban teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 506 participants aged 65 years and older. MEASUREMENTS: Data collected included resident characteristics (demographics, medical history, and severity of illness using the Charlson comorbidity index), staging of heel ulcers, rates of noninvasive vascular assessments, vascular and surgical procedures, length of stay, and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: Thirty-one percent (155/506) of patients with a heel ulcer underwent noninvasive vascular testing and of these 83% (129/155) were found to have underlying ischemia. Twenty-six percent (130/506) of patients underwent at least 1 vascular or surgical procedure. The 1-year mortality rate for patients with stage 1 or 2 disease was 55%; this rose to 70% for patients with stage 3 or 4 ulcers (P = .01), and could not be explained by differences in the Charlson comorbidity index. Patients who underwent a vascular or surgical procedure had a significantly lower mortality compared with those who did not (59% vs 68% P = .04). CONCLUSION: Older adults with a heel ulcer in the acute care setting are frequently not assessed for underlying ischemia of the lower extremities. The diagnosis carries high 1-year mortality rates. Evidence-based protocols need to be developed to determine which older adults should have a vascular assessment and then undergo an invasive procedure.
Assuntos
Úlcera do Pé/mortalidade , Isquemia/mortalidade , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Amputação Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Angiografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Angioplastia/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice Tornozelo-Braço/estatística & dados numéricos , População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Desbridamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Úlcera do Pé/classificação , Úlcera do Pé/cirurgia , Calcanhar , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Isquemia/classificação , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/cirurgia , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguínea , Masculino , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/epidemiologia , Pletismografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pulso Arterial , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ultrassonografia Doppler/estatística & dados numéricos , População Urbana , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether dementia status and medical burden were independent predictors of emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations in older patients from an urban geriatric practice participating in a primary care based cognitive screening program. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: A comprehensive chart review was conducted for 300 African American and Caucasian patients, including 46 with prevalent dementia and 28 with incident dementia using the Cumulative Illness Burden Scale. Hospital-based claims data was used to retrieve ED visits and hospital admissions for 5 years following baseline assessment. RESULTS: Patients with dementia had a 49% higher rate of ED visits (IRR = 1.49; 95% CI = 1.06, 2.09) and an 83% higher risk of death than patients without dementia (HR = 1.83; 95% CI = 3.07, 0.03). Dementia status predicted hospital admissions after adjustment for medical burden (IRR = 1.37; 95% CI = 0.99, 1.89). For each one point increase in medical burden, there was an 11% increase in ED visits (IRR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.06, 1.16), a 13% increase in hospital admissions (IRR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.09, 1.17), and an 11% higher risk of death (HR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.04, 1.17). Age did not predict utilization. CONCLUSION: Dementia status and medical burden were independent predictors of ED visits and death in patients with clinically diagnosed dementia followed from the early stage of disease.
RESUMO
A randomized controlled trial examined whether the diagnostic process for Alzheimer's disease and other dementias may be influenced by knowledge of the patient's education and/or self-reported race. Four conditions were implemented: diagnostic team knows (a) race and education, (b) education only, (c) race only, or (d) neither. Diagnosis and clinical staging was established at baseline, at Wave 2, and for a random sample of Wave 3 respondents by a consensus panel. At study end, a longitudinal, "gold standard" diagnosis was made for patients with follow-up data (71%). Group differences in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) diagnosis were estimated using logistic regression and generalized estimating equations. Sensitivity and specificity were examined for baseline diagnosis in relation to the gold standard, longitudinal diagnosis. Despite equivalent status on all measured variables across waves, members of the "knows race only" group were less likely than those of other groups to receive a diagnosis of dementia. At final diagnosis, 19% of the "knows race only" group was diagnosed with dementia versus 38% to 40% in the other 3 conditions (p = .038). Examination of sensitivities and specificities of baseline diagnosis in relation to the gold standard diagnosis showed a nonsignificant trend for lower sensitivities in the knowing race conditions (0.3846), as contrasted with knowing education only (0.480) or neither (0.600). The finding that knowledge of race may influence the diagnostic process in some unknown way is timely, given the recent State-of-the-Science conference on Alzheimer's disease prevention, the authors of which called for information about and standardization of the diagnostic process.
Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/diagnóstico , Demência/diagnóstico , Geriatria/normas , Neuropsicologia/normas , Psiquiatria/normas , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Consenso , Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais , Escolaridade , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Grupos Raciais , Autorrelato , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
This study examines the prevalence of risk factors for fires and burns in homebound urban elderly. A home safety assessment was performed on 83 patients enrolled in a physician home visiting program. Information was collected on the presence and functioning of smoke alarms, the presence of fire extinguishers and the maximum temperature of hot tap water. Functional smoke alarms were not present in 37% of households, 82% of households had no access to a fire extinguisher, 46% of households had hot tap water temperature greater than the recommended 120 degrees F. Multiple risk factors for burns and fires exist in the homes of elderly homebound patients that are well known to the medical community. Further attention to burn and fire prevention should be incorporated into the medical and geriatrics curriculum.