Pseudoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this article, we focus on the potential benefits and risks of chemotherapy administration before (perioperative) or after (pseudoadjuvant) a curative resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases. RECENT FINDINGS: In the published evidence, there is a lack of survival benefit from peri or postoperative chemotherapy in the context of resectable metastatic CRC. However, high-risk patients may have a certain benefit when receiving a postoperative cytotoxic treatment. Apart from, according to the published data, the administration of a preoperative chemotherapy has been associated with serious parenchymal liver damage and an increase in the postoperative morbidity-mortality rate. SUMMARY: Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment for metastatic CRC, but the risk of recurrence remains high. The current guidelines recommend the administration of either a perioperative or a pseudoadjuvant chemotherapy in this setting despite the absence of survival benefit. A better selection of patients who may require and gain an advantage from chemotherapy in the setting of resectable metastasis is highly needed. In this view, a prospective trial enrolling patients at high risk of recurrence is ongoing.

Early and late outcomes after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass vs. full sternotomy off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Objectives: Minimally-invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) is a less-invasive alternative to full sternotomy off-pump coronary artery bypass (FS-OPCAB) revascularization of the left anterior descending artery (LAD). Some studies suggested that MIDCAB is associated with a greater risk of graft occlusion and repeat revascularization than FS-OPCAB LIMA-to-LAD grafting. Data comparing MIDCAB to FS-OPCAB with regard to long-term follow-up is scarce. We compared short- and long-term results of MIDCAB vs. FS-OPCAB revascularization over a maximum follow-up period of 10 years. Patients and methods: From December 2009 to June 2020, 388 elective patients were included in our retrospective study. 229 underwent MIDCAB, and 159 underwent FS-OPCAB LIMA-to-LAD grafting. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for selection bias and to estimate treatment effects on short- and long-term outcomes. IPTW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates by study group were calculated for all-cause mortality, stroke, the risk of repeat revascularization and myocardial infarction up to a maximum follow-up of 10 years. Results: MIDCAB patients had less rethoracotomies (n = 13/3.6% vs. n = 30/8.0%, p = 0.012), fewer transfusions (0.93 units ± 1.83 vs. 1.61 units ± 2.52, p < 0.001), shorter mechanical ventilation time (7.6 ± 4.7 h vs. 12.1 ± 26.4 h, p = 0.005), and needed less hemofiltration (n = 0/0% vs. n = 8/2.4%, p = 0.004). Thirty-day mortality did not differ significantly between the two groups (n = 0/0% vs. n = 3/0.8%, p = 0.25). Long-term outcomes did not differ significantly between study groups. In the FS-OPCAB group, the probability of survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 98.4%, 87.8%, and 71.7%, respectively. In the MIDCAB group, the corresponding values were 98.4%, 87.7%, and 68.7%, respectively (RR1.24, CI0.87-1.86, p = 0.7). In the FS group, the freedom from stroke at 1, 5, and 10 years was 97.0%, 93.0%, and 93.0%, respectively. In the MIDCAB group, the corresponding values were 98.5%, 96.9%, and 94.3%, respectively (RR0.52, CI0.25-1.09, p = 0.06). Freedom from repeat revascularization at 1, 5, and 10 years in the FS-OPCAB group was 92.2%, 84.7%, and 79.5%, respectively. In the MIDCAB group, the corresponding values were 94.8%, 90.2%, and 81.7%, respectively (RR0.73, CI0.47-1.16, p = 0.22). Conclusion: MIDCAB is a safe and efficacious technique and offers comparable long-term results regarding mortality, stroke, repeat revascularization, and freedom from myocardial infarction when compared to FS-OPCAB.

Mesenchymal stem cells-derived secretome and extracellular vesicles: perspective and challenges in cancer therapy and clinical applications.

Stem cell-based therapies have been foreshowed as a promising therapeutic approach for the treatment of several diseases. However, in the cancer context, results obtained from clinical studies were found to be quite limited. Deeply implicated in inflammatory cues, Mesenchymal, Neural, and Embryonic Stem Cells have mainly been used in clinical trials as a vehicle to deliver and stimulate signals in tumors niche. Although these stem cells have shown some therapeutical promises, they still face several challenges, including their isolation, immunosuppression potential, and tumorigenicity. In addition, regulatory and ethical concerns limit their use in several countries. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) have emerged as a gold standard adult stem cell medicine tool due to their distinctive characteristics, such as self-renewal and potency to differentiate into numerous cell types with lower ethical restrictions. Secreted extracellular vesicles (EVs), secretomes, and exosomes play a crucial role in mediating cell-to-cell communication to maintain physiological homeostasis and influence pathogenesis. Due to their low immunogenicity, biodegradability, low toxicity, and ability to transfer bioactive cargoes across biological barriers, EVs and exosomes were considered an alternative to stem cell therapy through their immunological features. MSCs-derived EVs, exosomes, and secretomes showed regenerative, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulation properties while treating human diseases. In this review, we provide an overview of the paradigm of MSCs derived exosomes, secretome, and EVs cell-free-based therapies, we will focus on MSCs-derived components in anti-cancer treatment with decreased risk of immunogenicity and toxicity. Astute exploration of MSCs may lead to a new opportunity for efficient therapy for patients with cancer.

Frequency and mutational spectrum of PIK3CA gene mutations in breast cancer patients: Largest and first report from Lebanon.

The PIK3CA pathway is one of the most frequently altered pathways in human cancers, especially in breast cancer with approximately 40% of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer cases exhibiting mutations in the PIK3CA gene. While the mutations can occur across the entire gene, the most common are observed in exon 9 corresponding to the helical domain, and in exon 20 encompassing the kinase domain. This study constitutes the first attempt at determining the frequency and mutational spectrum in Lebanese breast cancer patients. For this purpose, DNA samples from 280 breast cancer patients from across Lebanon were screened for PIK3CA mutations using the Therascreen® PIK3CA RGQ Real-time PCR assay. In line with previous reports, 38.57% of cases were positive for at least one PIK3CA mutation, among which approximately 59% were in exon 9 and 37% in exon 20. However, PIK3CA mutations are breast cancer are heterogeneous whereby 20% of known PIK3CA mutants might not be detected by compact PCR based assays. Thus, the adoption of comprehensive Next Generation Sequencing based panels to decipher the complete clinical, molecular and immunohistochemical profile of breast cancer tumor requires further investigation.

Abemaciclib, a third CDK 4/6 inhibitor for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The field of metastatic luminal breast cancer (hormone receptor positive, HER-2 negative) is dynamic and evolving, harboring some of the most significant therapeutic advances in medical oncology. Over the last decade, many pivotal trials showed excellent results with drastic improvements in survival as well as the quality of life of metastatic luminal breast cancer patients. AREAS COVERED: The successful inhibition of the cyclinD/cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6)-retinoblastoma protein (RB) pathway with potent CDK4/6 inhibitors improved the outcome of advanced luminal breast cancers. Abemaciclib is the third CDK 4/6 inhibitor arriving to the market after palbociclib and ribociclib. Here, we describe the biology of the CDK4/6 pathway and summarize clinical data of previously published pivotal trials emphasizing the efficacy and toxicity of abemaciclib. The aim was to define its place in the current guidelines and to make a brief comparison with other available drugs of same class in the absence of cross trials comparison. EXPERT OPINION: As there are no available biomarkers to predict response or resistance to abemaciclib, the promising overall survival data of MONARCH-2 could possibly impact the clinician's choice to optimize treatment for endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer.

Recent advances in understanding breast cancer and emerging therapies with a focus on luminal and triple-negative breast cancer.

Breast cancer is a global health issue. For decades, breast cancer was classified into many histological subtypes on the basis of microscopic and immunohistochemical evaluation. The discovery of many key genomic driver events involved in breast cancer carcinogenesis resulted in a better understanding of the tumor biology, the disease heterogeneity and the prognosis leading to the discovery of new modalities of targeted therapies and opening horizons toward a more personalized medicine. In recent years, many therapeutic options emerged in the field of metastatic breast carcinoma, especially for the luminal subtypes. They were able to transform the course of the disease while maintaining quality of life. However, the options are still limited for triple-negative breast cancer, but the better knowledge of its complex biology and the discovery of molecular targets are promising for more efficient novel therapies.

RETRACTED: Drug-Induced Thrombocytopenia.

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). This article has been retracted at the request of the authors. This is an ongoing trial yet to be completed.

Classic Testicular Seminoma in Men Aged 50 Years or Over: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Testicular cancer is the most frequent solid tumor detected in young adult men. Germ cell tumors (GCTs), particularly seminomas, are the most common type of testicular neoplasms seen in that age population. Most publications have reported decreasing incidence of GCTs in patients above forty years of age. Since the biologic activity of seminomas appears similar across ages, recommended management of senior adults involves a multimodal therapy of radical inguinal orchiectomy with radiation or cytotoxic treatment as needed. Attenuating chemotherapy dosages are critical to ensure better tolerability of associated adverse events. Here we report a case series of 2 men older than fifty years of age with metastatic testicular seminoma. We aim to emphasize a rare clinical entity encountered in the senior adult population.

Pituitary Gland and Neurological Involvement in a Case of Hemophagocytic Syndrome Revealing an Intravascular Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma is a rare entity characterized by the proliferation of neoplastic lymphocytes in the lumen of small blood vessels and high mortality. Diagnosis of intravascular lymphoma is often delayed or established postmortem. Here, we report the case of a 48-year-old woman presenting hemophagocytic syndrome, with pituitary gland and neurological involvement. Diagnosis of intravascular large B-cell lymphoma was made on perisplenic vessels, while liver and bone marrow biopsy was noncontributive. This case demonstrates the importance of thorough histopathologic investigations in the setting of high suspicion.

Treatment of advanced HER2-positive breast cancer: 2018 and beyond.

In the 1980s the importance of HER2 signalling to the aberrant behaviour of a subset of breast cancer cells was recognized for the first time and, consequently, a hitherto unknown subtype of breast cancer - HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer was identified. The development of the anti-HER2 class of drugs, first with trastuzumab, followed closely by lapatinib, pertuzumab, and T-DM1, has improved outcomes dramatically. Nevertheless, metastatic HER2+ breast cancer remains an incurable disease and new therapeutic options are needed. Additionally, the rapid changes in treatment standards 5 years ago have left unanswered numerous questions, including the "real-life" benefit of pertuzumab and T-DM1, since both the CLEOPATRA and EMILIA trials were conducted in populations that no longer exist in practice and, moreover, on the role of endocrine therapy in HER2+ disease. Furthermore, despite significant research efforts, including translational efforts and new imaging techniques, no predictive biomarkers have been clinically validated and therefore a more refined approach to treatment tailoring remains beyond our reach. Finally, a better understanding of resistance to currently existing anti-HER2 agents and of the role played by the microenvironment (e.g. immune system) and of interconnected signalling pathways (e.g. PI3K-mTOR-AKT) is at the core of clinical trials exploring new drugs and new regimens. These include the combination of anti-HER2 agents and anti-PD-1/PDL-1, PI3K inhibitors and CDK 4/6 inhibitors, as well as a host of new panHER inhibitors, drug antibody conjugates and anti-HER antibodies, which may, in coming years further push the boundaries of what we can do for our patients.