Temporal modelling of the biofilm lifecycle (TMBL) establishes kinetic analysis of plate-based bacterial biofilm dynamics.

Bacterial biofilms are critical to pathogenesis and infection. They are associated with rising rates of antimicrobial resistance. Biofilms are correlated with worse clinical outcomes, making them important to infectious diseases research. There is a gap in knowledge surrounding biofilm kinetics and dynamics which makes biofilm research difficult to translate from bench to bedside. To address this gap, this work employs a well-characterized crystal violet biomass accrual and planktonic cell density assay across a clinically relevant time course and expands statistical analysis to include kinetic information in a protocol termed the TMBL (Temporal Mapping of the Biofilm Lifecycle) assay. TMBL's statistical framework quantitatively compares biofilm communities across time, species, and media conditions in a 96-well format. Measurements from TMBL can reliably be condensed into response features that inform the time-dependent behavior of adherent biomass and planktonic cell populations. Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms were grown in conditions of metal starvation in nutrient-variable media to demonstrate the rigor and translational potential of this strategy. Significant differences in single-species biofilm formation are seen in metal-deplete conditions as compared to their controls which is consistent with the consensus literature on nutritional immunity that metal availability drives transcriptomic and metabolomic changes in numerous pathogens. Taken together, these results suggest that kinetic analysis of biofilm by TMBL represents a statistically and biologically rigorous approach to studying the biofilm lifecycle as a time-dependent process. In addition to current methods to study the impact of microbe and environmental factors on the biofilm lifecycle, this kinetic assay can inform biological discovery in biofilm formation and maintenance.

Urinary tract infections in cystic fibrosis patients.

Improved understanding of non-respiratory infections in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients will be vital to sustaining the increased life span of these patients. To date, there has not been a published report of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in CF patients. We performed a retrospective chart review at a major academic medical center during 2010-2020 to determine the features of UTIs in 826 CF patients. We identified 108 UTI episodes during this period. Diabetes, distal intestinal obstruction syndrome (DIOS), and nephrolithiasis were correlated with increased risk of UTIs. UTIs in CF patients were less likely to be caused by Gram-negative rods compared to non-CF patients and more likely to be caused by Enterococcus faecalis. The unique features of UTIs in CF patients highlight the importance of investigating non-respiratory infections to ensure appropriate treatment.

Learning through a Pandemic: The Current State of Knowledge on COVID-19 and Cancer.

The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has left patients with current or past history of cancer facing disparate consequences at every stage of the cancer trajectory. This comprehensive review offers a landscape analysis of the current state of the literature on COVID-19 and cancer, including the immune response to COVID-19, risk factors for severe disease, and impact of anticancer therapies. We also review the latest data on treatment of COVID-19 and vaccination safety and efficacy in patients with cancer, as well as the impact of the pandemic on cancer care, including the urgent need for rapid evidence generation and real-world study designs. SIGNIFICANCE: Patients with cancer have faced severe consequences at every stage of the cancer journey due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This comprehensive review offers a landscape analysis of the current state of the field regarding COVID-19 and cancer. We cover the immune response, risk factors for severe disease, and implications for vaccination in patients with cancer, as well as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care delivery. Overall, this review provides an in-depth summary of the key issues facing patients with cancer during this unprecedented health crisis.

Coinfections in Patients With Cancer and COVID-19: A COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) Study.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of coinfections and their association with outcomes have not been adequately studied among patients with cancer and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a high-risk group for coinfection. METHODS: We included adult (≥18 years) patients with active or prior hematologic or invasive solid malignancies and laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) infection, using data from the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19, NCT04354701). We captured coinfections within ±2 weeks from diagnosis of COVID-19, identified factors cross-sectionally associated with risk of coinfection, and quantified the association of coinfections with 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Among 8765 patients (hospitalized or not; median age, 65 years; 47.4% male), 16.6% developed coinfections: 12.1% bacterial, 2.1% viral, 0.9% fungal. An additional 6.4% only had clinical diagnosis of a coinfection. The adjusted risk of any coinfection was positively associated with age >50 years, male sex, cardiovascular, pulmonary, and renal comorbidities, diabetes, hematologic malignancy, multiple malignancies, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, progressing cancer, recent cytotoxic chemotherapy, and baseline corticosteroids; the adjusted risk of superinfection was positively associated with tocilizumab administration. Among hospitalized patients, high neutrophil count and C-reactive protein were positively associated with bacterial coinfection risk, and high or low neutrophil count with fungal coinfection risk. Adjusted mortality rates were significantly higher among patients with bacterial (odds ratio [OR], 1.61; 95% CI, 1.33-1.95) and fungal (OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.28-3.76) coinfections. CONCLUSIONS: Viral and fungal coinfections are infrequent among patients with cancer and COVID-19, with the latter associated with very high mortality rates. Clinical and laboratory parameters can be used to guide early empiric antimicrobial therapy, which may improve clinical outcomes.