The EMA Assessment of Asciminib for the Treatment of Adult Patients With Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase Who Were Previously Treated With at Least Two Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

Asciminib is an allosteric high-affinity tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of the BCR-ABL1 protein kinase. This kinase is translated from the Philadelphia chromosome in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Marketing authorization for asciminib was granted on August 25, 2022 by the European Commission. The approved indication was for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive CML in the chronic phase which have previously been treated with at least 2 TKIs. Clinical efficacy and safety of asciminib were evaluated in the open-label, randomized, phase III ASCEMBL study. The primary endpoint of this trial was major molecular response (MMR) rate at 24 weeks. A significant difference in MRR rate was shown between the asciminib treated population and the bosutinib control group (25.5% vs. 13.2%, respectively, P = .029). In the asciminib cohort, adverse reactions of at least grade 3 with an incidence ≥ 5% were thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, increased pancreatic enzymes, hypertension, and anemia. The aim of this article is to summarize the scientific review of the application which led to the positive opinion by the European Medicines Agency's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use.

EMA Review of Isatuximab in Combination with Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Isatuximab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the human CD38 antigen. On May 30, 2020, a marketing authorization valid through the European Union (EU) was issued for isatuximab in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (IsaPd) for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed and refractory (RR) multiple myeloma (MM). The recommended dose of isatuximab was 10 mg/kg, administered intravenously weekly at cycle 1 and then biweekly in subsequent 28-day cycles. Isatuximab was evaluated in a phase III, open-label, multicenter, randomized trial that randomly allocated IsaPd versus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone (Pd) to adult patients with RR MM. The primary endpoint of the trial was progression-free survival, as assessed by an independent review committee, which was superior for the IsaPd arm (hazard ratio, 0.596; 95% confidence interval, 0.436-0.814; p = .001) compared with the Pd arm. Treatment with IsaPd led to higher incidences of treatment-related adverse events (AEs), grade ≥ 3 AEs, and serious AEs compared with Pd treatment. Most frequently observed AEs that occurred more often in the IsaPd arm were infusion-related reactions, infections, respiratory AEs, neutropenia (including neutropenic complications), and thrombocytopenia. The aim of this article is to summarize the scientific review of the application leading to regulatory approval in the EU. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Isatuximab was approved in the European Union, in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone, for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have already received therapy but whose disease did not respond or relapsed afterward. The addition of isatuximab resulted in a clinically meaningful and significant prolongation of the time from treatment initiation to further disease relapse or patient's death. The safety profile was considered acceptable, and the benefit-risk ratio was determined to be positive.

EMA Review of Acalabrutinib for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

On November 5, 2020, a marketing authorization valid through the European Union (EU) was issued for acalabrutinib monotherapy or acalabrutinib in combination with obinutuzumab (AcalaObi) in adult patients with treatment-naïve (TN) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and also for acalabrutinib monotherapy in adult patients with relapsed or refractory (RR) CLL. Acalabrutinib inhibits the Bruton tyrosine kinase, which plays a significant role in the proliferation and survival of the disease. Acalabrutinib was evaluated in two phase III multicenter randomized trials. The first trial (ACE-CL-007) randomly allocated acalabrutinib versus AcalaObi versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab (ChlObi) to elderly/unfit patients with TN CLL. The progression-free survival (PFS), as assessed by an independent review committee, was superior for both the AcalaObi (hazard ratio [HR], 0.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.17) and acalabrutinib (HR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.13-0.3) arms compared with the ChlObi arm. The second trial (ACE-CL-309) randomly allocated acalabrutinib versus rituximab plus idelalisib or bendamustine to adult patients with RR CLL. Also in this trial, the PFS was significantly longer in the acalabrutinib arm (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.20-0.49). Adverse events for patients receiving acalabrutinib varied across trials, but the most frequent were generally headache, diarrhea, neutropenia, nausea, and infections. The scientific review concluded that the benefit-risk ratio of acalabrutinib was positive for both indications. This article summarizes the scientific review of the application leading to regulatory approval in the EU. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Acalabrutinib was approved in the European Union for the treatment of adult patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia who have not received treatment before and for those who have received therapy but whose disease did not respond or relapsed afterward. Acalabrutinib resulted in a clinically meaningful and significant lengthening of the time from treatment initiation to further disease relapse or patient's death compared with standard therapy. The overall safety profile was considered acceptable, and the benefit-risk ratio was determined to be positive.

EMA Review of Belantamab Mafodotin (Blenrep) for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

On August 25, 2020, a marketing authorization valid through the European Union was issued for belantamab mafodotin monotherapy for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) in adult patients who have received at least four prior therapies, whose disease is refractory to at least one proteasome inhibitor (PI), one immunomodulatory agent (IMiD), and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb), and who have demonstrated disease progression on the last therapy. Belantamab mafodotin is an antibody-drug conjugate that combines a mAb, which binds specifically to B-cell maturation antigen, with maleimidocaproyl monomethyl auristatin F, which is a cytotoxic agent. It was evaluated in Study 205678 (DREAMM-2), an open-label, two arm, phase II, multicenter study in patients with MM who had relapsed following treatment with at least three prior therapies, who were refractory to an IMiD, a PI, and an anti-CD38 mAb alone or in combination. Patients were randomized to receive 2.5 mg/kg (n = 97) or 3.4 mg/kg (n = 99) belantamab mafodotin by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Belantamab mafodotin achieved an overall response rate (ORR) of 32% (97.5% confidence interval [CI]: 22-44) with a median duration of response (DoR) of 11 months (95% CI: 4.2 to not reached). The most frequently (≥20%) reported adverse reactions grades 3-4 with belantamab mafodotin were keratopathy (31%), thrombocytopenia (22%), and anemia (21%). With regard to the corneal risks associated with belantamab mafodotin, patients would need to undergo specific ophthalmic examinations so that any findings can be promptly and adequately managed. The scientific review concluded that a 32% ORR and a median DoR of 11 months observed with belantamab mafodotin was considered clinically meaningful. Given the manageable toxicity profile and considering that belantamab mafodotin has a mechanism of action that is different from that of authorized treatments in this group of highly pretreated patients whose disease is refractory to three classes of agents, the benefit risk for belantamab mafodotin monotherapy was considered positive, although the efficacy and safety evidence were not as comprehensive as normally required. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Belantamab mafodotin (Blenrep, GlaxoSmithKline, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A) was approved in the European Union as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma. Belantamab mafodotin resulted in durable response in highly pretreated patients whose disease is refractory to three classes of agents. Belantamab mafodotin is a monoclonal antibody against B-cell maturation antigen conjugated with the potent antimitotic agent maleimidocaproyl monomethyl auristatin. This is the first monoclonal antibody to target this antigen in multiple myeloma, which represents a true novelty from a pharmacological point of view.

EMA Review of Daratumumab (Darzalex) for the Treatment of Adult Patients Newly Diagnosed with Multiple Myeloma.

The use of daratumumab in combination with established regimens for the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma has recently been authorized by the European Medicines Agency based on results from three separate phase III randomized, active controlled, open-label studies that have confirmed enhanced efficacy and tolerability in both transplant-ineligible (MMY3008 and MMY3007) and transplant-eligible (MMY3006) patients, without compromising transplant ability. Trial MMY3008 showed an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) when daratumumab was added to lenalidomide and dexamethasone compared with lenalidomide and dexamethasone; the median PFS had not been reached in the daratumumab arm and was 31.9 months in the control arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-0.73; p < .0001). Trial MMY3007 showed an improvement in PFS when daratumumab was added to bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone compared with bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone; PFS had not been reached in the daratumumab arm and was 18.1 months in the control arm (HR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.38-0.65; p < .0001). In trial MMY3006, daratumumab added to bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone was compared with bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction and consolidation treatment prior to autologous stem cell transplant. The stringent complete response rate at day 100 after transplant in the daratumumab group was 29% compared with 20% in the control group (odds ratio, 1.60; 1.21-2.12 95% CI; p = .0010). Overall adverse events were manageable, with an increased rate of neutropenia and infections in the daratumumab arms. Regulatory assessment of efficacy and safety results from trials MMY3006, MMY3007, and MMY3008 confirmed a positive benefit-risk ratio leading to an approval of the extensions of indication. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: A set of extensions of indication was recently approved for daratumumab (Darzalex) in the setting of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in combination with established regimens. Results of the MMY3006, MMY3007, and MMY3008 trials have shown enhanced efficacy and a favorable side effect profile of several daratumumab-based combinations in patients both ineligible and eligible for transplant, without compromising transplant ability. The combinations of daratumumab with either lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone or bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone were approved for transplant-ineligible patients. The combination of daratumumab with bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone was approved for transplant-eligible patients. These combinations are expected to improve the survival outlook for patients with multiple myeloma, without an unacceptable risk of increase in adverse events, and updated information on progression-free survival and overall survival is expected from the above trials.

The European Medicines Agency Review of Gilteritinib (Xospata) for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia with an FLT3 Mutation.

On October 24, 2019, a marketing authorization valid through the European Union (EU) was issued for gilteritinib monotherapy for adult patients who have relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with an Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutation. Gilteritinib inhibits FLT3 receptor signaling and proliferation in cells exogenously expressing FLT3 including FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD), FLT3 D835Y, and FLT3 ITD D835Y, and it induced apoptosis in leukemic cells expressing FLT3 ITD. The recommended starting dose of gilteritinib is 120 mg (three 40 mg tablets) once daily. Gilteritinib was evaluated in one, phase III, open-label, multicenter, randomized study of gilteritinib (n = 247, gilteritinib arm) versus salvage chemotherapy (n = 124, salvage chemotherapy arm) in patients with relapsed or refractory AML with FLT3 mutation. Overall survival (OS) was statistically significantly different between the two groups with a median OS of 9.3 months in the gilteritinib arm compared with 5.6 months for salvage chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.637; 95% confidence interval, 0.490-0.830; p = .0004 one-sided log-rank test). The most common adverse reactions with gilteritinib treatment were blood creatine phosphokinase increase, alanine aminotransferase increase, aspartate aminotransferase increase, blood alkaline phosphatase increase, diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, constipation, cough, peripheral edema, dyspnea, dizziness, hypotension, pain in extremity, asthenia, arthralgia, and myalgia. The objective of this article is to summarize the scientific review of the application leading to regulatory approval in the EU. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Xospata was approved in the European Union as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with an Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutation. Gilteritinib resulted in a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement of overall survival compared with salvage chemotherapy. At the time of the marketing authorization of gilteritinib, there were no approved standard therapies specifically for adult patients diagnosed with relapsed or refractory AML with FLT3 mutation. In terms of safety, the overall accepted safety profile was considered manageable.

Bioequivalence decision for nanoparticular iron complex drugs for parenteral administration based on their disposition.

Although parenteral iron products have been established to medicinal use decades before, their structure and pharmacokinetic properties are not fully characterized yet. With its' second reflection paper on intravenous iron-based nano-colloidal products (EMA/CHMP/SWP/620008/2012) the European Medicine Agency provided an extensive catalogue of methods for quality, non-clinical and pharmacokinetic studies for the comparison of nano-sized iron products to an originator (EMA, 2015). For iron distribution studies, the reflection paper assumed the use of rodents. In our tests, we used a turkey fetus model to investigate time dependent tissue concentrations in pharmacological and toxicological relevant tissues liver, heart and kidney. We found turkey embryos to be a suitable alternative to rodents with high discriminatory sensitivity. Clear differences were found between equimolar doses of iron products with hydroxyethyl amylopectin, sucrose, dextrane and carboxymaltose shell. A linear dose dependency for the tissue accumulation was also demonstrated.

New trends and challenges in the European regulation of innovative medicines.

Regulators' marketing authorizations for innovative medicines are linked into a complex process with successive crucial decisions. Objectives and decision criteria of the stakeholders in this process, e.g. health technology assessment (HTA) bodies, payers, physicians and patients, vary and may result not only in different but even mutually exclusive requirements. Reacting to changes in scientific, economic and social demands, European regulatory agencies alter content and format of their assessment procedures and their communication. New diagnostic options (e.g. genotyping and biomarkers) and pharmaceutical innovations (e.g. targeted medicines, nanomedicines) are the scientific drivers of this development. Social drivers are the price and reimbursement decisions by HTA bodies and payers, prerequisites for most patients' access to innovative medicines. The European Medicines Agency's adaptive licensing concept and priority medicines scheme foster the early authorization of innovative medicines. HTA builds on regulators' assessment, with additional requirements and economic components. An intensified exchange between all stakeholders, e.g. in multilateral scientific advice procedures has been initiated. Diminishing the differences in the requirements of regulators and HTA bodies is in the best interest of both patients and the pharmaceutical industry, avoiding duplication of work and accelerating patients' access by early decisions on price and reimbursement.

Differences in tissue distribution of iron from various clinically used intravenous iron complexes in fetal avian heart and liver.

Nanomedicines are more complex than most pharmacologically active substances or medicines and have been considered as non-biological complex drugs. For nanomedicines pivotal pharmacokinetic properties cannot be assessed by plasma concentration data from standard bioequivalence studies. Using intravenous iron complexes (IICs) as model we show that fetal avian tissues can be used to study time dependent tissue concentrations in heart and liver. Clear differences were found between equimolar doses of sucrose, gluconate or carboxymaltose coated iron particles. The range in tissue iron concentrations observed with these clinically widely used IICs provides an orientation as to what should be acceptable for any new IICs. Moreover, sensitivity of the experimental model was high enough to detect a 20% difference in tissue iron concentration. For the authorization of generic products under Article 10 (1) of Directive 2001/83/EC a plasma concentration of an active substance in the range of 80%-125% versus the reference product is usually considered acceptable. Based on its high discriminatory sensitivity this method was used to support a positive marketing authorization decision for a generic nanomedicine product.

The European medicines agency review of bosutinib for the treatment of adult patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia: summary of the scientific assessment of the committee for medicinal products for human use.

On March 27, 2013, a conditional marketing authorization valid throughout the European Union was issued for bosutinib (Bosulif) for the treatment of adult patients with chronic-phase, accelerated-phase, and blast-phase Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph⁺) chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) previously treated with one tyrosine kinase inhibitor or more and for whom imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib are not considered appropriate treatment options. Bosutinib is a kinase inhibitor that targets the BCR-ABL kinase. The recommended dose is 500 mg of bosutinib once daily. The main evidence of efficacy for bosutinib was based on a CML subgroup analysis of study 3160A4-200, a phase I/II study of bosutinib in Ph⁺ leukemia in imatinib-resistant or intolerant CML. The subgroup was defined based on the presence of a BCR-ABL kinase domain mutation that would be expected to confer resistance to dasatinib (F317, E255) or nilotinib (E255, Y253, F359) and expected to have sensitivity to bosutinib or based on the presence of medical conditions or prior toxicities that may predispose the patient to unacceptable risk in the setting of nilotinib or dasatinib therapy. A conditional marketing authorization was granted because of the limited evidence of efficacy and safety currently supporting this last-line indication.

Florbetapir (18F) for brain amyloid positron emission tomography: highlights on the European marketing approval.

Florbetapir (18F) for brain amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has been recently approved in Europe to estimate ß-amyloid neuritic plaque density in the brain when the subject is still alive. Such density is one of the key issues for the definitive diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) at autopsy. This capability of florbetapir (18F) is regarded as a significant improvement in the diagnostic procedures for adult patients with cognitive impairment who are being evaluated for AD and other causes of cognitive impairment. The current paper highlights the specific characteristics of the European marketing authorization of florbetapir (18F).

Insulin action on H292 bronchial carcinoma cells as compared to normal bronchial epithelial cells.

Inhaled insulin may contribute to bronchial carcinoma due to IGF-I receptor activation by high local concentrations. Therefore, effects of insulin and IGF-I on human bronchial carcinoma cells (H292) and normal bronchial epithelium cells (HBE) were studied. TGF-ß was included since it also influences carcinoma progression. H292 and HBE cells expressed both the insulin receptor and the IGF-I receptor; in H292 cells an additional, shorter, splicing variant (IR-A) of the insulin receptor was present. Insulin receptor expression was around four to five times higher in H292 than in HBE cells at mRNA and protein levels. Insulin and TGF-ß exerted contrary actions on proliferation and gene expression in H292 cells. Genes regulated by insulin, IGF-I, and TGF-ß were linked to inflammation, cell adhesion, muscle contraction and differentiation. Insulin and IGF-I also suppressed DNA repair genes. EC(50) for insulin-induced proliferation was around 5 nM in H292 and around 30 nM HBE cells. The EC(50) values for gene expression ranged from 9 to 90 nM in both cell types, dependent on the gene studied. In H292 cells, the proliferative response was much stronger if TGF-ß was present. In HBE cells this interaction of insulin and TGF-ß was not observed, and changes in gene expression were mostly lower by at least 10-fold as compared to H292. All in all, the insulin effects in H292 were generally much stronger than in HBE cells and - with regard to proliferation - occurred at lower concentrations. Thus, insulin will hardly induce cancer from normal bronchial cells but may favour progression of pre-existing tumours.

Attention for sex in COVID-19 trials: a review of regulatory dossiers.

An under-representation of women and a lack of sex-specific analyses in COVID-19 trials has been suggested. However, the higher number of men than women who are severely affected by COVID-19 and the restricted information in scientific publications may have biased these suggestions. Therefore, we evaluated sex proportionality and sex-specific efficacy and safety data in trials of COVID-19 treatments and vaccines using both publicly available regulatory documents and confidential documents used by regulators in their review of medicinal products. Included were two treatments (ie, remdesivir and dexamethasone) and four vaccines (ie, BNT162b2 mRNA (BioNTech/Pfizer), mRNA-1273 (Moderna), ChAdOx1-S (AstraZeneca) and Ad26.COV2-S (Janssen)) that received marketing authorisation by the European Commission at the time of the study conduct. An under-representation of women was shown in three of the nine data sets for one treatment (ie, remdesivir), but the proportion of women included was representative in each of the data sets for the other five products. This indicates that there is no structural under-representation of women in the COVID-19 trials. Currently, sex-specific efficacy data are available for five of the six assessed products and sex-specific safety data are available for half of the products only. It is important that this information will also be made available for the other products. There are only small differences in efficacy and safety between men and women which are likely to be of limited clinical relevance. Sex-specific efficacy information can generally be found in the publicly available regulatory documents other than the Summary of Product Characteristics, for which more awareness might be required.

Production of liver preneoplasia and gallbladder agenesis in turkey fetuses administered diethylnitrosamine.

The in ovo carcinogenicity assessing (IOCA) assay was used to examine the morphological changes in fetal turkey livers caused by the DNA-reactive carcinogen diethylnitrosamine (DEN). Fertilized turkey eggs were allocated into 3 groups: nondosed control (NDC), vehicle (water) control (VC) and DEN-dosed. At day 0, the fertilized eggs of the dosed groups were injected with 1 (LD) or 4 (HD) mg/egg (about 12.5 or 50 mg/kg egg) of DEN and the VC were injected with water. All eggs were allowed to incubate at 37°C and 60% humidity for 24 days. The fetal livers were collected and processed for histopathological evaluation (H&E staining). Typical survival rates were 82% for the NDC, 50% for the VC and 16-65% for the DEN-dosed fetuses. No difference in histology was found between NDC and VC control groups. Both DEN concentrations produced dose-related liver findings consisting of foci of altered hepatocytes (FAH), which had assumed a tubular cord (glandular) pattern, and in HD DEN group the FAH assumed a tumor-like morphology. In addition, the high DEN dose produced gallbladder agenesis. Thus, DEN produced both hepatocellular transformation (FAH) similar to preneoplastic microscopic changes in adult rodents, reflecting disruption of the fetal processes of differentiation and proliferation, and also teratogenicity (gallbladder agenesis).

Diode laser treatment in therapy-resistant allergic rhinitis: impact on nasal obstruction and associated symptoms.

The ideal treatment in severe obstructive allergic rhinitis unresponsive to standard therapy is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of endonasal corrective laser surgery in perennial (pAR) and seasonal (sAR) allergic rhinitis. Forty subjects (20 pAR, 20 sAR) underwent videoendoscopic diode laser surgery. Examinations were performed preoperatively and at follow-ups 1, 12, and 24 months after surgery, including objective parameters (rhinomanometry, videoendoscopy, allergy tests) and subjective visual analog scales (evaluation of surgery, satisfaction, allergic symptoms). Of all patients, 95% received inferior turbinate, 40% septal, and 15% middle turbinate surgery. Postoperatively, two subjects showed considerable residual symptomatology (95% response rate). Throughout follow-up, objective rhinomanometry and subjective scores for nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, sneezing, itching, and overall satisfaction improved significantly with time (p < 0.0005). The improvement was greatest for nasal obstruction, initially higher in pAR but more sustained in sAR. After 2 years, 30% sAR and 40% pAR subjects had been receiving pharmacotherapy due to recurrent symptoms. The allergic condition remained unchanged (skin and in-vitro tests). Outpatient endonasal diode laser surgery appears to be effective, safe and well tolerated for treating otherwise therapy-resistant pAR and sAR, providing long-lasting symptom reduction with complete stop or decreased use of antiallergics.

The European Medicines Agency Review of Luspatercept for the Treatment of Adult Patients With Transfusion-dependent Anemia Caused by Low-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes With Ring Sideroblasts or Beta-thalassemia.

Luspatercept is a recombinant fusion protein that selectively binds to ligands belonging to the transforming growth factor-beta superfamily, resulting in erythroid maturation and differentiation. On June 25, 2020, a marketing authorization valid through the European Union (EU) was issued for luspatercept for the treatment of adult patients with transfusion-dependent anemia caused by very low-, low-, and intermediate-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) with ring sideroblasts, or those with transfusion-dependent beta thalassemia (BT). Luspatercept was evaluated in 2 separate phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trials. The primary endpoints of these trials were the percentage of patients achieving transfusion independence over ≥8 weeks or longer for patients with MDS, and the percentage of patients achieving a ≥33% reduction in transfusion burden from baseline to week 13-24 for patients with BT. In the MDS trial, the percentage of responders was 37.91% versus 13.16%, P < 0.0001, for patients receiving luspatercept versus placebo, respectively. In the BT trial, the percentage of responders was 21.4% versus 4.5% (P < 0.0001) for luspatercept versus placebo, respectively. Treatment with luspatercept led to similar incidences of adverse events (AEs), but higher incidences of grade ≥3 AEs and serious AEs compared to placebo. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent AEs (≥15%) in the pooled luspatercept group were headache; back pain, bone pain, and arthralgia; diarrhea; fatigue; pyrexia; and cough. The aim of this article is to summarize the scientific review of the application, which led to the regulatory approval in the EU.

The European Medicines Agency Review of Crizanlizumab for the Prevention of Recurrent Vaso-Occlusive Crises in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease.

Crizanlizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to P-selectin. On October 28, 2020, a conditional marketing authorization valid through the European Union (EU) was issued for crizanlizumab for the prevention of recurrent vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs) in patients with sickle cell disease aged 16 years or older. Crizanlizumab was evaluated in a phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized multicenter trial comparing high-dose (5 mg/kg) crizanlizumab, low-dose (2.5 mg/kg) crizanlizumab and placebo in patients with a history of 2-10 VOCs in the previous year. Patients who were receiving concomitant hydroxycarbamide (HC) as well as those not receiving HC were included in the study. The primary endpoint of the trial was the annual rate of sickle cell-related pain crises as adjudicated by a central review committee. High-dose crizanlizumab led to a 45.3% lower median annual rate of sickle cell-related pain crises compared to placebo (P = 0.010), with no statistically significant difference for the low dose. Treatment with high-dose crizanlizumab led to similar incidences of adverse events (AEs), grade 3 AEs, and serious AEs compared to placebo. Most frequently observed AEs that occurred more often in the crizanlizumab arm compared to placebo were infusion related reactions (34.8% versus 21%), arthralgia (18.2% versus 8.1%), diarrhea (10.6% versus 3.2%), and nausea (18.2% versus 11.3%). The aim of this article is to summarize the scientific review of the application leading to regulatory approval in the EU.

The European Medicines Agency Review of Tafasitamab in Combination With Lenalidomide for the Treatment of Adult Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma.

Tafasitamab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the CD19 antigen, which is expressed in tumor cells from patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). On June 24, 2021, a positive opinion for a conditional marketing authorization was issued by the European Medicines Agency (EMA)'s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) for tafasitamab, in combination with lenalidomide, for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation. Tafasitamab was evaluated in the phase 2 single-arm, multicenter, open-label L-MIND clinical trial. The primary endpoint of this trial was objective response rate (ORR). The best ORR, achieved at any time during the study, was 56.8% (95% confidence interval: 45.3%-67.8%), and the median duration of response was 34.6 months (95% confidence interval: 26.1-not reached). The most frequently reported adverse events by system organ class were infections and infestations (72.8%; grade ≥3: 29.6%), blood and lymphatic system disorders (65.4%; grade ≥3: 56.8%), gastrointestinal disorders (64.2%; grade ≥3: 2.5%), and general disorders and administration site conditions (58.0%; grade ≥3: 8.6%). The aim of this article is to summarize the scientific review of the application which led to the positive opinion by the CHMP.

Clinical Trials for COVID-19: Can we Better Use the Short Window of Opportunity?

The scientific community has risen to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) challenge, coming up with an impressive list of candidate drugs and vaccines targeting an array of pharmacological and immunological mechanisms. Yet, generating clinical evidence of efficacy and safety of these candidate treatments may be frustrated by the absence of comprehensive trial coordination mechanisms. Many small stand-alone trials and observational studies of single-agent interventions are currently running or in planning; many of these will likely not deliver robust results that could support regulatory and patient-level treatment decisions. In this paper, we discuss actions that all stakeholders in the clinical trial ecosystem need to take to ensure that the window of opportunity during this pandemic will not shut, both for patients in need of treatment and for researchers to conduct decision-relevant clinical trials.