RESUMO
PURPOSE: Can certain characteristics identify as solvable some undiagnosed patients who seek extensive evaluation and thorough record review, like by the Undiagnosed Diseases Network (UDN)? METHODS: The UDN is a national research resource to solve medical mysteries through team science. Applicants provide informed consent to access to their medical records. After review, expert panels assess if applicants meet inclusion and exclusion criteria to select participants. When not accepting applicants, UDN experts may offer suggestions for diagnostic efforts. Using minimal information from initial applications, we compare features in applicants not accepted with those accepted and either solved or still not solved by the UDN. The diagnostic suggestions offered to non-accepted applicants and their clinicians were tallied. RESULTS: Non-accepted applicants were more often female, older at first symptoms and application, and longer in review than accepted applicants. The accepted and successfully diagnosed applicants were younger in ages, shorter in review time, more often non-white, of Hispanic ethnicity, and presenting with nervous system features. Half of non-accepted applicants were given suggestions for further local diagnostic evaluation. A few seemed to have two major diagnoses or a provocative environmental exposure history. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive UDN record review generates possibly helpful advice.