Glucose-driven histone lactylation promotes the immunosuppressive activity of monocyte-derived macrophages in glioblastoma.

Immunosuppressive macrophages restrict anti-cancer immunity in glioblastoma (GBM). Here, we studied the contribution of microglia (MGs) and monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) to immunosuppression and mechanisms underlying their regulatory function. MDMs outnumbered MGs at late tumor stages and suppressed T cell activity. Molecular and functional analysis identified a population of glycolytic MDM expressing GLUT1 with potent immunosuppressive activity. GBM-derived factors promoted high glycolysis, lactate, and interleukin-10 (IL-10) production in MDMs. Inhibition of glycolysis or lactate production in MDMs impaired IL-10 expression and T cell suppression. Mechanistically, intracellular lactate-driven histone lactylation promoted IL-10 expression, which was required to suppress T cell activity. GLUT1 expression on MDMs was induced downstream of tumor-derived factors that activated the PERK-ATF4 axis. PERK deletion in MDM abrogated histone lactylation, led to the accumulation of intratumoral T cells and tumor growth delay, and, in combination with immunotherapy, blocked GBM progression. Thus, PERK-driven glucose metabolism promotes MDM immunosuppressive activity via histone lactylation.

A Review of the Molecular Determinants of Therapeutic Response in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases.

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Metastases in the brain are a common hallmark of advanced stages of the disease, contributing to a dismal prognosis. Lung cancer can be broadly classified as either small cell lung cancer (SCLC) or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). NSCLC represents the most predominant histology subtype of lung cancer, accounting for the majority of lung cancer cases. Recent advances in molecular genetics, coupled with innovations in small molecule drug discovery strategies, have facilitated both the molecular classification and precision targeting of NSCLC based on oncogenic driver mutations. Furthermore, these precision-based strategies have demonstrable efficacy across the blood-brain barrier, leading to positive outcomes in patients with brain metastases. This review provides an overview of the clinical features of lung cancer brain metastases, as well as the molecular mechanisms that drive NSCLC oncogenesis. We also explore how precision medicine-based strategies can be leveraged to improve NSCLC brain metastases.

Development of a "Geo-Tagged" tumor sample registry: intra-operative linkage of sample location to imaging.

PURPOSE: There is a growing body of literature documenting glioma heterogeneity in terms of radiographic, histologic, molecular, and genetic characteristics. Incomplete spatial specification of intraoperative tumor samples may contribute to variability in the results of pathological and biological investigations. We have developed a system, termed geo-tagging, for routine intraoperative linkage of each tumor sample to its location via neuronavigation. METHODS: This is a single-institution, IRB approved, prospective database of undergoing clinically indicated surgery. We evaluated relevant factors affecting data collection by this registry, including tumor and surgical factors (e.g. tumor volume, location, grade and surgeon). RESULTS: Over a 2-year period, 487 patients underwent craniotomy for an intra-axial tumor. Of those, 214 underwent surgery for a newly diagnosed or recurrent glioma. There was significant variation in the average number of samples collected per registered case, with a range of samples from 2.53 to 4.75 per tumor type. Histology and grade impacted on sampling with a range of 2.0 samples per tumor in Grade four, IDH-WT gliomas to 4.5 samples in grade four, IDH-mutant gliomas. The range of cases with sampling per surgeon was 6 to 99 with a mean of 47.6 cases and there was a statistically significant differences between surgeons. Tumor grade did not have a statistically significant impact on number of samples per case. No significant correlation was found between the number of samples collected and enhancing tumor volume, EOR, or volume of tumor resected. CONCLUSION: We are using the results of this analysis to develop a prospective sample collection protocol.

Epigenetic Activation of TUSC3 Sensitizes Glioblastoma to Temozolomide Independent of MGMT Promoter Methylation Status.

Temozolomide (TMZ) is an important first-line treatment for glioblastoma (GBM), but there are limitations to TMZ response in terms of durability and dependence on the promoter methylation status of the DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). MGMT-promoter-hypermethylated (MGMT-M) GBMs are more sensitive to TMZ than MGMT-promoter-hypomethylated (MGMT-UM) GBMs. Moreover, TMZ resistance is inevitable even in TMZ-sensitive MGMT-M GBMs. Hence, epigenetic reprogramming strategies are desperately needed in order to enhance TMZ response in both MGMT-M and MGMT-UM GBMs. In this study, we present novel evidence that the epigenetic reactivation of Tumor Suppressor Candidate 3 (TUSC3) can reprogram sensitivity of GBM stem cells (GSCs) to TMZ irrespective of MGMT promoter methylation status. Interrogation of TCGA patient GBM datasets confirmed TUSC3 promoter regulation of TUSC3 expression and also revealed a strong positive correlation between TUSC3 expression and GBM patient survival. Using a combination of loss-of-function, gain-of-function and rescue studies, we demonstrate that TUSC3 reactivation is associated with enhanced TMZ response in both MGMT-M and MGMT-UM GSCs. Further, we provide novel evidence that the demethylating agent 5-Azacitidine (5-Aza) reactivates TUSC3 expression in MGMT-M GSCs, whereas the combination of 5-Aza and MGMT inhibitor Lomeguatrib is necessary for TUSC3 reactivation in MGMT-UM GSCs. Lastly, we propose a pharmacological epigenetic reactivation strategy involving TUSC3 that leads to significantly prolonged survival in MGMT-M and MGMT-UM orthotopic GSCs models. Collectively, our findings provide a framework and rationale to further explore TUSC3-mediated epigenetic reprogramming strategies that could enhance TMZ sensitivity and outcomes in GBM. Mechanistic and translational evidence gained from such studies could contribute towards optimal design of impactful trials for MGMT-UM GBMs that currently do not have good treatment options.

The presentation of brain metastases in melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and breast cancer and potential implications for screening brain MRIs.

PURPOSE: This study assessed the presentation and institutional outcomes treating brain metastases (BM) of breast cancer (BC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and melanoma origin. METHODS: Patients with brain metastases treated between 2014 and 2019 with primary melanoma, NSCLC, and BC were identified. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from dates of initial BM diagnosis using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 959 patients were identified including melanoma (31%), NSCLC (51%), and BC (18%). Patients with BC were younger at BM diagnosis (median age: 57) than NSCLC (65) and melanoma patients (62, p < 0.0001). Breast cancer patients were more likely to present with at least 5 BM (27%) than NSCLC (14%) and melanoma (13%), leptomeningeal disease (23%, 6%, and 6%, p = 0.0004) and receive whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) (58%, 37%, and 22%, p < 0.0001). There were no differences in surgical resection (24%, 24%, and 29%, p = 0.166). Median OS was shorter for BC patients (9.9, 10.3, and 13.7 months, p = 0.0006). CONCLUSION: Breast cancer patients were more likely to be younger, present with advanced disease, require WBRT, and have poorer OS than NSCLC and melanoma patients. Further investigation is needed to determine which BC patients are at sufficient risk for brain MRI screening.

Capecitabine and stereotactic radiation in the management of breast cancer brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the safety and efficacy of concurrent capecitabine and stereotactic radiotherapy in the setting of breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). METHODS: Twenty-three patients with BCBM underwent 31 stereotactic sessions to 90 lesions from 2005 to 2019 with receipt of capecitabine. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and distant intracranial control (DIC) from the date of stereotactic radiation. Imaging was independently reviewed by a neuro-radiologist. RESULTS: Median follow-up from stereotactic radiation was 9.2 months. Receptor types of patients treated included triple negative (n = 7), hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- (n = 7), HR+/HER2+ (n = 6), and HR-/HER2+ (n = 3). Fourteen patients had stage IV disease prior to BCBM diagnosis. The median number of brain metastases treated per patient was 3 (1 to 12). The median dose of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was 21 Gy (range: 15-24 Gy) treated in a single fraction and for lesions treated with fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) 25 Gy (24-30 Gy) in a median of 5 fractions (range: 3-5). Of the 31 stereotactic sessions, 71% occurred within 1 month of capecitabine. No increased toxicity was noted in our series with no cases of radionecrosis. The 1-year OS, LC, and DIC were 46, 88, and 30%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our single institution experience, we demonstrate stereotactic radiation and capecitabine to be a safe treatment for patients with BCBM with adequate LC. Further study is needed to determine the potential synergy between stereotactic radiation and capecitabine in the management of BCBM.

The Impact of Epigenetic Modifications on Adaptive Resistance Evolution in Glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly lethal cancer that is universally refractory to the standard multimodal therapies of surgical resection, radiation, and chemotherapy treatment. Temozolomide (TMZ) is currently the best chemotherapy agent for GBM, but the durability of response is epigenetically dependent and often short-lived secondary to tumor resistance. Therapies that can provide synergy to chemoradiation are desperately needed in GBM. There is accumulating evidence that adaptive resistance evolution in GBM is facilitated through treatment-induced epigenetic modifications. Epigenetic alterations of DNA methylation, histone modifications, and chromatin remodeling have all been implicated as mechanisms that enhance accessibility for transcriptional activation of genes that play critical roles in GBM resistance and lethality. Hence, understanding and targeting epigenetic modifications associated with GBM resistance is of utmost priority. In this review, we summarize the latest updates on the impact of epigenetic modifications on adaptive resistance evolution in GBM to therapy.

A Novel Role of BIRC3 in Stemness Reprogramming of Glioblastoma.

Stemness reprogramming remains a largely unaddressed principal cause of lethality in glioblastoma (GBM). It is therefore of utmost importance to identify and target mechanisms that are essential for GBM stemness and self-renewal. Previously, we implicated BIRC3 as an essential mediator of therapeutic resistance and survival adaptation in GBM. In this study, we present novel evidence that BIRC3 has an essential noncanonical role in GBM self-renewal and stemness reprogramming. We demonstrate that BIRC3 drives stemness reprogramming of human GBM cell lines, mouse GBM cell lines and patient-derived GBM stem cells (GSCs) through regulation of BMP4 signaling axis. Specifically, BIRC3 induces stemness reprogramming in GBM through downstream inactivation of BMP4 signaling. RNA-Seq interrogation of the stemness reprogramming hypoxic (pseudopalisading necrosis and perinecrosis) niche in GBM patient tissues further validated the high BIRC3/low BMP4 expression correlation. BIRC3 knockout upregulated BMP4 expression and prevented stemness reprogramming of GBM models. Furthermore, siRNA silencing of BMP4 restored stemness reprogramming of BIRC3 knockout in GBM models. In vivo silencing of BIRC3 suppressed tumor initiation and progression in GBM orthotopic intracranial xenografts. The stemness reprograming of both GSCs and non-GSCs populations highlights the impact of BIRC3 on intra-tumoral cellular heterogeneity GBM. Our study has identified a novel function of BIRC3 that can be targeted to reverse stemness programming of GBM.

Management of brain metastases in breast cancer: a review of current practices and emerging treatments.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) are becoming an increasingly common diagnosis due to improved systemic control and more routine surveillance imaging. Treatment continues to require a multidisciplinary approach managing systemic and intracranial disease burden. Although, improvements have been made in the diagnosis and management of BCBM, brain metastasis patients continue to pose a challenge for practitioners. METHODS: In this review, a group of medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, breast surgeons, and neurosurgeons specializing in the treatment of breast cancer reviewed the available published literature and compiled a comprehensive review on the current state of BCBM. RESULTS: We discuss the pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment options (including systemic, surgical, and radiotherapy treatment modalities), and treatment response evaluation for BCBM. Furthermore, we discuss the ongoing prospective trials enrolling BCBM patients and their biologic rationale. CONCLUSIONS: BCBM management is an increasing clinical concern. Multidisciplinary management combining the strengths of surgical, systemic, and radiation treatment modalities with prospective trials incorporating knowledge from the basic and translational sciences will ultimately lead to improved clinical outcomes for BCBM patients.

Breast leptomeningeal disease: a review of current practices and updates on management.

PURPOSE: Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is an advanced metastatic disease presentation portending a poor prognosis with minimal treatment options. The advent and widespread use of new systemic therapies for metastatic breast cancer has improved systemic disease control and extended survival; however, as patients live longer, the rates of breast cancer LMD are increasing. METHODS: In this review, a group of medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, breast surgeons, and neurosurgeons specializing in treatment of breast cancer reviewed the available published literature and compiled a comprehensive review on the current state of breast cancer LMD. RESULTS: We discuss the pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment options (including systemic, intrathecal, surgical, and radiotherapy treatment modalities), and treatment response evaluation specific to breast cancer patients. Furthermore, we discuss the controversies within this unique clinical setting and identify potential clinical opportunities to improve upon the diagnosis, treatment, and treatment response evaluation in the management of breast LMD. CONCLUSIONS: We recognize the shortcomings in our current understanding of the disease and explore the future role of genomic/molecular disease characterization, technological innovations, and ongoing clinical trials attempting to improve the prognosis for this advanced disease state.

Clinical outcomes of breast leptomeningeal disease treated with intrathecal trastuzumab, intrathecal chemotherapy, or whole brain radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: Leptomeningeal disease is a rare presentation of advanced metastatic breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate craniospinal progression between intrathecal (IT) trastuzumab, IT chemotherapy, and whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in leptomeningeal disease. METHODS: A total of 56 patients were identified with breast cancer leptomeningeal disease at our institution treated with IT trastuzumab (n = 18; 32%), single-agent IT chemotherapy (methotrexate n = 14 or thiotepa n = 1; 27%), or WBRT alone (n = 23; 41%). Patients were treated beginning November 2012 and followed until November 2018. RESULTS: Median time from breast cancer diagnosis to development of leptomeningeal disease was 4.3 years. There were no significant differences noted between IT trastuzumab, IT chemotherapy, or WBRT groups in age (p = 0.4), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (p = 0.07), or receipt of systemic therapy at time of leptomeningeal disease treatment (p = 0.47). Median follow-up of patients from leptomeningeal diagnosis was 5 months (range 0.2-81.1 months). Significant differences were noted in Kaplan-Meier (KM) craniospinal progression-free survival (CS-PFS) with 6-month rates of 44%, 18%, and 26% (p = 0.04) between IT trastuzumab, IT chemotherapy, and WBRT, respectively. Craniospinal control > 10 months was achieved in four patients treated with IT trastuzumab. Twelve-month KM OS rates were 54%, 10%, and 19% (p = 0.01) between IT trastuzumab, IT chemotherapy, and WBRT groups, respectively. IT therapy was adequately tolerated with three patients undergoing treatment-related hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: In our institutional series, significant differences were noted in CS-PFS and OS by treatment modality. IT trastuzumab should be considered in the management HER2+ breast leptomeningeal disease.

CDK 4/6 inhibitors and stereotactic radiation in the management of hormone receptor positive breast cancer brain metastases.

PURPOSE: Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors are becoming increasingly utilized in the setting of advanced, hormone receptor (HR+) positive breast cancer. Pre-clinical data suggests a potential synergy between radiation therapy (RT) and CDK4/6 inhibitors. We assessed clinical outcomes of patients treated at our institution with the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors and stereotactic radiation in the management of HR+ breast brain metastases. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who received stereotactic radiotherapy for HR+ brain metastases within 6 months of CDK4/6 inhibitor administration was performed. The primary endpoint was neurotoxicity during or after stereotactic radiation. Secondary endpoints were local brain control, distant brain control, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 42 lesions treated with stereotactic radiation in 15 patients were identified. Patients received either palbociclib (n = 10; 67%) or abemaciclib (n = 5; 33%). RT was delivered concurrently, before, or after CDK4/6 inhibitors in 18 (43%), 9 (21%), and 15 (36%) lesions, respectively. Median follow-up following stereotactic radiation was 9 months. Two lesions (5%) developed radionecrosis, both of which received four prior RT courses to the affected lesion prior to onset of radionecrosis and subsequently managed with steroids and bevacizumab. Six- and 12-month local control of treated lesions was 88% and 88%, while 6- and 12-month distant brain control was 61% and 39%, respectively. Median OS was 36.7 months from the date of brain metastases diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic radiation to breast brain metastases was well tolerated alongside CDK4/6 inhibitors. Compared to historical data, brain metastases control rates are similar whereas survival appears prolonged.

Intrathecal trastuzumab in the management of HER2+ breast leptomeningeal disease: a single institution experience.

PURPOSE: Leptomeningeal disease is a rare and devastating presentation of advanced stage metastatic breast cancer with historically poor overall survival. We assessed the safety and feasibility of intrathecal (IT) trastuzumab in HER2+ leptomeningeal disease. METHODS: A total of 13 patients were treated at our institution with IT trastuzumab beginning November 2012 and followed until November 2017. Outcomes including craniospinal progression as well as overall survival (OS) following initiation of IT trastuzumab were assessed from review of the clinical chart and radiologic examinations. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 48 (range 29-75). Median time from breast cancer diagnosis to development of brain metastases was 87.7 months with a median of 4.6 months from brain metastases diagnosis to the development of leptomeningeal disease. Previous whole brain radiotherapy was received by the majority of patients (92%) and prior surgery for brain metastases was performed in 23%. Median duration of IT trastuzumab treatment was 6.4 months. Median time from IT trastuzumab start to craniospinal progression was 5.7 months with 6- and 12-month Kaplan-Meier rates of 41 and 21%, respectively. Sustained responses > 6 months were achieved in 4 patients. Median survival from the start of IT trastuzumab was 10.6 months with 6- and 12-month OS rates of 68 and 47%, respectively. IT trastuzumab was well tolerated with one patient developing ventriculitis, which resolved with IV antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: IT trastuzumab was well tolerated with prolongation of OS over historical controls. IT trastuzumab should be considered for management of HER2+ leptomeningeal disease patients.

Correction to: First results on survival from a large Phase 3 clinical trial of an autologous dendritic cell vaccine in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in the spelling of one of the author names. In this Correction the incorrect and correct author names are indicated and the author name has been updated in the original publication. The authors also reported an error in the Methods section of the original article. In this Correction the incorrect and correct versions of the affected sentence are indicated. The original article has not been updated with regards to the error in the Methods section.

First results on survival from a large Phase 3 clinical trial of an autologous dendritic cell vaccine in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Standard therapy for glioblastoma includes surgery, radiotherapy, and temozolomide. This Phase 3 trial evaluates the addition of an autologous tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cell vaccine (DCVax®-L) to standard therapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. METHODS: After surgery and chemoradiotherapy, patients were randomized (2:1) to receive temozolomide plus DCVax-L (n = 232) or temozolomide and placebo (n = 99). Following recurrence, all patients were allowed to receive DCVax-L, without unblinding. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS); the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: For the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (n = 331), median OS (mOS) was 23.1 months from surgery. Because of the cross-over trial design, nearly 90% of the ITT population received DCVax-L. For patients with methylated MGMT (n = 131), mOS was 34.7 months from surgery, with a 3-year survival of 46.4%. As of this analysis, 223 patients are ≥ 30 months past their surgery date; 67 of these (30.0%) have lived ≥ 30 months and have a Kaplan-Meier (KM)-derived mOS of 46.5 months. 182 patients are ≥ 36 months past surgery; 44 of these (24.2%) have lived ≥ 36 months and have a KM-derived mOS of 88.2 months. A population of extended survivors (n = 100) with mOS of 40.5 months, not explained by known prognostic factors, will be analyzed further. Only 2.1% of ITT patients (n = 7) had a grade 3 or 4 adverse event that was deemed at least possibly related to the vaccine. Overall adverse events with DCVax were comparable to standard therapy alone. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of DCVax-L to standard therapy is feasible and safe in glioblastoma patients, and may extend survival. Trial registration Funded by Northwest Biotherapeutics; Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT00045968; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00045968?term=NCT00045968&rank=1 ; initially registered 19 September 2002.

Outcomes targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in conjunction with stereotactic radiation for patients with non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases.

Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies have demonstrated activity in patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, little is known about the safety and feasibility of patients receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and stereotactic radiation for the treatment of brain metastases. Data were analyzed retrospectively from NSCLC patients treated with stereotactic radiation either before, during or after anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy with nivolumab (anti-PD-1) or durvalumab (anti-PD-L1). Seventeen patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) to 49 brain metastases over 21 sessions were identified. Radiation was administered prior to, during and after anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in 22 lesions (45%), 13 lesions (27%), and 14 lesions (29%), respectively. The 6 months Kaplan-Meier (KM) distant brain control rate was 48% following stereotactic radiation. Six and 12 month KM rates of OS from the date of stereotactic radiation and the date of cranial metastases diagnosis were 48/41% and 81/51%, respectively. The 6 month rate of distant brain control following stereotactic radiation for patients treated with stereotactic radiation during or prior to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy was 57% compared to 0% among patients who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy before stereotactic radiation (p = 0.05). A Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) of <90 was found to be predictive of worse OS following radiation treatment on both univariate and multivariate analyses (MVA, p = 0.01). In our series, stereotactic radiation to NSCLC brain metastases was well tolerated in patients who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Prospective evaluation to determine how these two modalities can be used synergistically to improve distant brain control and OS is warranted.

LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery to the brain with concurrent vemurafenib for melanoma metastases.

While selective BRAF inhibitors have demonstrated improved outcomes in patients with metastatic BRAF V600E mutant melanoma, management of brain metastases prior to and during therapy presents challenges. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective treatment for melanoma brain metastases, but there is limited safety and efficacy data on the use of SRS during BRAF therapy. An analysis was performed of patients with metastatic melanoma and brain metastases treated with SRS while on vemurafenib. MRI scans were reviewed post-SRS to evaluate local control (LC) as well as distant control. We identified 80 metastatic melanoma brain lesions treated in 24 patients. The median planning target volume was 0.28 cm(3) (range 0.05-4.19 cm(3)), and lesions were treated to a median dose of 24 Gy (range 15-24 Gy). The median follow up was 5.1 months (range 2-25.2 months). Eight (10 %) lesions showed progression at a median of 6.1 months (range 2-20.1 months) following SRS. Kaplan-Meier LC estimates at 6 and 12 months were 92 and 75 %, respectively. Fourteen (58 %) patients were noted to have distant brain failure at a median of 3.4 months (range 1.9-16.1 months) following treatment with SRS. Median overall (OS) from the date of SRS was 7.2 months (range 1.5-26.8 months) with a median of 11.9 months (range 1.5-28.5 months) since the date of brain metastases diagnosis. There was no evidence of increased toxicity with the combination of SRS and vemurafenib. SRS to brain metastases appears to be both safe and effective for patients treated concurrently with BRAF inhibitors.

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy to the post-operative cavity for radioresistant and radiosensitive brain metastases.

Following surgical resection for brain metastases, fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) has been used as an alternative to single dose treatment for large cavities and to reduce risks of late toxicity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients treated with FSRT to the post-operative bed for both radioresistant and radiosensitive brain metastases. Between December 2009 and May 2013 a total of 65 patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases were treated with resection followed by FSRT. Patients were treated to a total dose of 20-30 Gy in five fractions. Median planning target volume (PTV) was 16.88 cm(3) (range 4.87-128.43 cm(3)). The median follow-up for all patients was 8.5 months (range 1.1-28.6 months) with a median of 12.9 months for living patients. One and two year Kaplan-Meier estimates of local control were 87.0 and 70.0 %, respectively. Local control at 1 year was 85.6 and 88.0% for radioresistant and radiosensitive tumors, respectively (p = 0.44). A PTV ≥17 cm(3), was associated with local failure, HR 8.63 ((1.44-164.78); p = 0.02). One and two year distant control rates were 50.9 and 46.2%, respectively with six patients (9.2%) experiencing leptomeningeal disease. OS rates at 1 and 2 years were 65.2 and 47.5%, respectively. Survival was significantly associated with recursive partitioning analysis class (p = 0.001) and graded prognostic assessment score (p = 0.005). One case of radionecrosis was noted on follow-up imaging. FSRT in five fractions offers excellent local control in both radiosensitive and radioresistant tumors with minimal toxicity.

Palliative strategies for the management of primary and metastatic spinal tumors.

BACKGROUND: Technological advances during the last few decades have improved the success rate of surgery for the treatment of malignant spinal tumors. Nonetheless, many patients present with widespread tumor burden and minimal life expectancy, which excludes them from being surgical candidates. For these patients, palliative management is recommended. METHODS: The authors reviewed prospective and retrospective clinical studies as well as case series regarding palliative treatments for primary and metastatic spinal tumors. RESULTS: Analgesics, ranging from nonopioids to strong opioids, may be used depending on the degree of pain. Steroids may also improve pain relief, although they are associated with a number of adverse events. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are conservative treatments with high rates of pain relief and vertebral body stabilization. Radiotherapy is the gold standard for palliative management, with approximately 60% of patients experiencing a decrease in tumor-related spinal pain and up to 35% experiencing complete relief. Stereotactic radiosurgery delivers high doses of radiation to patients to provide pain relief while also sparing delicate anatomical structures. CONCLUSION: Palliative management of spinal tumors is diverse. Analgesics may be used in conjunction with radiotherapy and/or kyphoplasty or vertebroplasty to offer pain relief.

Surgical management of primary and metastatic spinal tumors.

BACKGROUND: The axial skeleton is a common site for primary tumors and metastatic disease, with metastatic disease being much more common. Primary and metastatic spinal tumors have a diverse range of aggressiveness, ranging from benign lesions to highly infiltrative malignant tumors. METHODS: The authors reviewed the results of articles describing the treatment and outcomes of patients with metastatic disease or primary tumors of the spinal column. RESULTS: En bloc resection is the mainstay of treatment for malignant primary tumors of the spinal column. Intralesional resection is generally appropriate for benign primary tumors. Low-quality evidence supports the use of chemotherapy in select primary tumors; however, radiation therapy is often used for incompletely resected or unresectable lesions. Surgical considerations for the treatment of metastatic disease are more nuanced and require that the health care professional consider patient performance status and the pathology of the primary tumor. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of metastatic and primary tumors of the spinal column requires a multidisciplinary approach in order to offer patients the best opportunity for long-term survival.